Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Gardner v. Flagstar: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Failure-to-Read” Defense and Requires Jury Trial When Bank-Fee Contracts Are Ambiguous 1. Introduction In Veronica Gardner v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, No....
Davenport v. Pata – When a Mere “Referral Note” Is Not Enough: The Tenth Circuit Holds that Failure to Follow Internal Referral Procedures Can Constitute Deliberate Indifference to Serious Medical...
United States v. Charley: Re-affirming Appellate Deference to a District Court’s Balancing of § 3553(a) Factors in Substantive-Reasonableness Review Introduction In United States v. Charley,...
Culp v. Caudill: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Local Rule 56.1 Compliance and Affirms Broad Discretion on Costs in Mixed-Outcome Cases Introduction In Carl Culp v. Scott Caudill, Nos. 23-2397 & 23-2398,...
Culp v. Woods: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Discretion in Mixed-Outcome Cost Awards and Clarifies N.D. Indiana Local Rule 56.1 Compliance Introduction On 20 June 2025 the U.S. Court of Appeals...
“Facial-Defense Strikes” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act Commentary on Holmes v. Marion County Sheriff’s Office, No. 22-3032 (7th Cir. June 20 2025) 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
Separating Damages from Fees: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Comparative-Fault Limits on Attorney-Fee Awards in Civil Contempt 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Jacqueline Sterling v....
“Incremental Punishment Re-affirmed”: United States v. Rolando Joel De Leon De Paz and the Seventh Circuit’s Endorsement of Robust Upward Variances for Serial § 1326 Offenders 1. Introduction United...
First Circuit Tightens Evidentiary Bar for Economic-Loss and Consequential-Damages Awards, and Re-affirms the Narrow “Obstinacy” Standard for Fees Introduction In Coco Rico, LLC v. Universal...
Coco Rico, LLC v. Universal Insurance Company (1st Cir. 2025): A Landmark on Evidentiary Rigor for Consequential Damages, Business-Interruption Caps, and “Obstinacy”–Based Fee Awards 1. Introduction...
“Commonsense Redressability” — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA and the Expansion of Article III Standing 1. Introduction Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency, 606...
“No Retribution on Revocation” – The New Supervised-Release Principle in Esteras v. United States (606 U.S.___ 2025) I. Introduction On 20 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Esteras v. United...
“Any Person Adversely Affected” Means What It Says: FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (2025) and the Expansion of Statutory Standing Under the Tobacco Control Act 1. Introduction The United States...
Beyond “Minimum Contacts” – The Fifth Amendment, Foreign Affairs, and the New Constitutional Standard for Federal Personal-Jurisdiction 1. Introduction In Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization,...
“Exclusive” No More? McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. and the Re-Opening of District-Court Review under the Hobbs Act 1. Introduction On 20 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court...
Stanley v. City of Sanford (2025): The Supreme Court Imposes a Temporal Boundary on Who Qualifies as a “Qualified Individual” under ADA Title I 1. Introduction Stanley v. City of Sanford, 606 U.S....
Kilburn v. VCAM Commentary: A New Path for Emotional-Distress Recovery in Negligent-Supervision Actions Introduction Ciara Kilburn & Brona Kilburn v. Bill Simmon & Vermont Community Access Media,...
Shaffer v. Northeast Kingdom Human Services, Inc.: 2025 VT 31 – A New Limit on “Empty-Chair” Comparative Negligence in Vermont Introduction In Shaffer v. Northeast Kingdom Human Services, Inc., the...
“Control” Equals “Legal Right to Obtain” Nebraska Supreme Court Tightens Discovery Obligations for LLC Members in Bajjuri v. Karney Introduction On 20 June 2025 the Nebraska Supreme Court, in Bajjuri...
“Sounds, Silence and Remorse” – State v. Vazquez and the Admissibility of Post-Incident Behaviour & Police-Interview Context Under Nebraska Evidence Law 1. Introduction In State v. Vazquez, 319 Neb....