Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother

Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Revisional Restraint under BNSS, 2023 in Section 125 Maintenance: Madras High Court Affirms Award and Reiterates Familial Duty to Maintain Wife/Mother Introduction This commentary examines the...
Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications

Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Jurisdiction First, Amendments Cannot Cure: Bombay High Court (Goa) Directs Simultaneous Consideration of O.7 R.10/11 CPC and Amendment Applications Introduction In Akshay Quenim v. Royce Savio...
As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared

As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared

Date: Sep 26, 2025
As-is-where-is auction sales under IBC do not extinguish KMC’s statutory first charge: mutation can be refused until transferor’s arrears are cleared Decision: Cotton Casuals India Private Limited &...
Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings

Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Threshold for PILs Seeking New Legislation: Allahabad High Court declines to compel enactment of a ‘Men’s Protection Act’ on cursory, media-based pleadings Introduction In Chandrama Vishvakarma v....
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims

Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims Introduction In X Corp v. Union of...

        Duplicate PAN Allotment, Credit Reputation, and Taxpayer Protection:
        Commentary on S. Senthil v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Madras High Court, 23.09.2025)

Duplicate PAN Allotment, Credit Reputation, and Taxpayer Protection: Commentary on S. Senthil v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Madras High Court, 23.09.2025)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Duplicate PAN Allotment and Protection of Credit Reputation: Madras High Court’s Direction to Issue Fresh PAN to First Allottee 1. Introduction The decision of the Madras High Court in S. Senthil v....
RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor Infraction, Delay, and Post-Retirement Futility

RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor Infraction, Delay, and Post-Retirement Futility

Date: Sep 24, 2025
RPF Personnel Are Governed Exclusively by the RPF Act, 1957 and RPF Rules, 1987; Railway Servants (D&A) Rules, 1968 Inapplicable — Appellate Court Quashes Major-Penalty Proceedings for Minor...
Absence of THC Percentage Is Not Fatal; Joint Section 50 Intimation to Multiple Accused Vitiates Personal Search under the NDPS Act — A Commentary on State of HP v. Soni, 2025 HHC 33178

Absence of THC Percentage Is Not Fatal; Joint Section 50 Intimation to Multiple Accused Vitiates Personal Search under the NDPS Act — A Commentary on State of HP v. Soni, 2025 HHC 33178

Date: Sep 24, 2025
State of HP v. Soni (2025 HHC 33178), clarifying that THC percentage in FSL reports is not mandatory to prove 'charas', while holding that joint Section 50 consent for multiple accused vitiates...
Appointing High Court Is the “Court” under Section 29A: Calcutta High Court Affirms Residual Jurisdiction to Extend or Substitute Arbitrator

Appointing High Court Is the “Court” under Section 29A: Calcutta High Court Affirms Residual Jurisdiction to Extend or Substitute Arbitrator

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Appointing High Court Is the “Court” under Section 29A: Calcutta High Court Affirms Residual Jurisdiction to Extend or Substitute Arbitrator Introduction In Best Eastern Business House Pvt Ltd v....
Award‑Specific Limitation and Liberal Construction of Section 28‑A Reaffirmed: Commentary on Ved Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, 23 Sept 2025)

Award‑Specific Limitation and Liberal Construction of Section 28‑A Reaffirmed: Commentary on Ved Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court, 23 Sept 2025)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Award‑Specific Limitation and Liberal Construction of Section 28‑A Reaffirmed: Allahabad High Court in Ved Prakash Saini & Ors. v. State of U.P. and connected matters Introduction This consolidated...
Mandamus to Enforce Section 77 RFCTLARR: Collector must deposit compensation within 30 days of award; quantum disputes no ground to withhold payment

Mandamus to Enforce Section 77 RFCTLARR: Collector must deposit compensation within 30 days of award; quantum disputes no ground to withhold payment

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Mandamus to Enforce Section 77 RFCTLARR: Collector must deposit compensation within 30 days of award; quantum disputes no ground to withhold payment Case: Shri Lokanna S/o. Ramappa Biradarpatil and...
Mere Framing of Issues Is Not Commencement of Trial; Subsequent Facts and Additional Divorce Grounds Can Be Introduced by Amendment

Mere Framing of Issues Is Not Commencement of Trial; Subsequent Facts and Additional Divorce Grounds Can Be Introduced by Amendment

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Mere Framing of Issues Is Not Commencement of Trial; Subsequent Facts and Additional Divorce Grounds Can Be Introduced by Amendment Introduction This commentary examines the Allahabad High Court’s...
Non‑joinder of a Later‑Formed Partnership Is Not Fatal to Eviction Under the H.P. Public Premises Act: Burden on Occupants to Prove Firm Tenancy

Non‑joinder of a Later‑Formed Partnership Is Not Fatal to Eviction Under the H.P. Public Premises Act: Burden on Occupants to Prove Firm Tenancy

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Non‑joinder of a Later‑Formed Partnership Is Not Fatal to Eviction Under the H.P. Public Premises Act: Burden on Occupants to Prove Firm Tenancy Introduction In Sudershan Devi and Others v....
Once RTI Information Is Lawfully Disclosed, Its Sharing by an Employee Is Not “Unauthorised Communication” or “Official Document” Misconduct

Once RTI Information Is Lawfully Disclosed, Its Sharing by an Employee Is Not “Unauthorised Communication” or “Official Document” Misconduct

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Once RTI Information Is Lawfully Disclosed, Its Sharing by an Employee Is Not “Unauthorised Communication” or “Official Document” Misconduct Case: The Manager (TP-BPN), Bharat Heavy Electricals...
Fact-Verification as a Threshold in Quo Warranto PILs: Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes Costs for Misuse of Judicial Process

Fact-Verification as a Threshold in Quo Warranto PILs: Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes Costs for Misuse of Judicial Process

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Fact-Verification as a Threshold in Quo Warranto PILs: Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes Costs for Misuse of Judicial Process Introduction In Jagdish Masih and another v. State of Punjab and others...
Litigant Not to Suffer for Counsel’s Lapse; MP High Court Pilots a “Social Audit” Restorative Measure While Restoring a 14-Year-Old Writ

Litigant Not to Suffer for Counsel’s Lapse; MP High Court Pilots a “Social Audit” Restorative Measure While Restoring a 14-Year-Old Writ

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Litigant Not to Suffer for Counsel’s Lapse; MP High Court Pilots a “Social Audit” Restorative Measure While Restoring a 14-Year-Old Writ Introduction Case: Sushil Verma v. Madhya Pradesh Industrial...
Meaningful Progress Over Mere Delay: Delhi High Court reaffirms the twin-test for bail under MCOCA and clarifies that prior acquittals do not defeat MCOCA invocation once cognizance has been taken

Meaningful Progress Over Mere Delay: Delhi High Court reaffirms the twin-test for bail under MCOCA and clarifies that prior acquittals do not defeat MCOCA invocation once cognizance has been taken

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Meaningful Progress Over Mere Delay: Delhi High Court reaffirms the twin-test for bail under MCOCA and clarifies that prior acquittals do not defeat MCOCA invocation once cognizance has been taken...
Liberal Interpretation of “Legal Heir or Representative” under the Consumer Protection Act: Brother of Deceased Consumer Has Locus to Maintain Medical Negligence Complaint; Impleadment of a Class-I Heir Relates Back

Liberal Interpretation of “Legal Heir or Representative” under the Consumer Protection Act: Brother of Deceased Consumer Has Locus to Maintain Medical Negligence Complaint; Impleadment of a Class-I Heir Relates Back

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Liberal Interpretation of “Legal Heir or Representative” under the Consumer Protection Act: Brother of Deceased Consumer Has Locus to Maintain Medical Negligence Complaint; Impleadment of a Class-I...
SEBI Investigations and RTI: Delhi High Court Affirms Section 8(1)(h) Shield; SCORES Status Is Sufficient Disclosure

SEBI Investigations and RTI: Delhi High Court Affirms Section 8(1)(h) Shield; SCORES Status Is Sufficient Disclosure

Date: Sep 22, 2025
SEBI Investigations and RTI: Delhi High Court Affirms Section 8(1)(h) Shield; SCORES Status Is Sufficient Disclosure Case: Srishti Rustagi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) & Ors., LPA...
Mother as Natural Guardian Can Solely Consent to Minor’s Life‑Saving Renal Transplant; Hospitals Cannot Insist on Absent Father’s Consent: Madras High Court

Mother as Natural Guardian Can Solely Consent to Minor’s Life‑Saving Renal Transplant; Hospitals Cannot Insist on Absent Father’s Consent: Madras High Court

Date: Sep 22, 2025
Mother as Natural Guardian Can Solely Consent to Minor’s Life‑Saving Renal Transplant; Hospitals Cannot Insist on Absent Father’s Consent: Madras High Court Case: A. Kasthuri v. State of Tamil Nadu &...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert