Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
E.D. Cal.
6524
Cal. Ct. App.
6230
S.D.N.Y.
5103
D.N.J.
3203
E.D. Pa.
3174
9th Cir.
2999
D.D.C.
2719
Ill. App. Ct.
2690
Conn. Super. Ct.
2486
M.D. Pa.
2428
Tex. App.
2249
N.D. Ill.
2050
5th Cir.
1931
E.D.N.Y.
1893
2d Cir.
1832
D. Md.
1817
Ohio Ct. App.
1814
3d Cir.
1798
W.D. Pa.
1722
N.J. Super. App. Div.
1656
N.Y. App. Div.
1557
D.C. Cir.
1514
D. Mass.
1445
Wash. Ct. App.
1412
N.D. Cal.
1373
6th Cir.
1369
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
1313
Mo. Ct. App.
1313
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1302
N.Y. Misc.
1290
U.S.
1243
7th Cir.
1227
Md.
1223
Mich. Ct. App.
1213
Pa. Super. Ct.
1208
E.D. Mich.
1126
Mass.
1099
10th Cir.
1095
Ariz. Ct. App.
1091
Ala.
1061
D.N.M.
1040
D. Conn.
1026
Conn.
989
S.D. Ohio
982
8th Cir.
981
Cal.
979
D. Ariz.
977
4th Cir.
964
N.D. Ohio
952
Iowa
947
1st Cir.
942
Pa.
907
E.E.O.C.
899
D. Kan.
870
Miss.
846
Pa. Cmmw. Ct.
818
Fed. Cir.
802
E.D. Va.
796
D. Colo.
787
Mo.
783
S.D. Tex.
770
N.J.
757
Ga. Ct. App.
751
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
738
Wash.
737
Wis.
731
11th Cir.
727
S.C. Ct. App.
724
D. Del.
720
Or.
719
N.D.N.Y.
704
D. Nev.
695
Conn. App. Ct.
694
M.D. Fla.
692
D. Minn.
681
N.D. Tex.
662
D. Or.
661
Minn.
658
Tex. Civ. App.
654
Mont.
647
C.D. Cal.
646
N.C. Ct. App.
646
Tenn. Ct. App.
645
Alaska
641
D.S.C.
633
Del. Ch.
632
La. Ct. App.
605
S.D. Cal.
604
D.C.
600
Or. Ct. App.
600
E.D. Mo.
599
Mass. App. Ct.
588
Ind. Ct. App.
586
W.D.N.Y.
584
Ky. Ct. App.
574
S.D. Fla.
574
Wis. Ct. App.
574
E.D. Ky.
567
W. Va.
562
N.Y.
560
Tex.
559
W.D. Wash.
558
E.D. La.
554
Minn. Ct. App.
543
Mich.
532
S.C.
532
N.D.
524
Okla.
517
Wyo.
517
Kan.
510
Idaho
508
W.D. Ky.
503
D. Me.
494
N.D. Ind.
493
Neb.
493
D. Haw.
482
M.D. Tenn.
458
N.C.
449
E.D. Tenn.
434
Vt.
427
N.D. Ala.
425
N.J. Super.
423
D. Utah
422
Va. Ct. App.
422
D.P.R.
413
W.D. Va.
412
Fed. Cl.
411
W.D. Tex.
403
Ill.
398
N.D. Iowa
396
S.D.W. Va.
395
Del. Super. Ct.
386
Colo. App.
384
S.D. Ind.
381
Ark.
380
N.D. Ga.
379
Kan. Ct. App.
377
Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
367
U.S.T.C.
364
Utah
364
Ariz.
362
S.D. Ill.
360
E.D. Wis.
355
D.V.I.
354
N.H.
338
M.D. Ala.
335
Ind. App.
329
Me.
328
Iowa Ct. App.
327
D. Idaho
321
W.D. Mich.
321
W.D. Mo.
316
Colo.
310
M.D.N.C.
308
D. Neb.
307
Va.
307
Haw.
306
Ohio
302
S.D.
301
D.R.I.
295
N.M.
294
Ind.
293
S.D. Miss.
287
N.D. Okla.
282
R.I. Super.
282
N.M. Ct. App.
280
D. Mont.
279
D.S.D.
277
Nev.
276
Fla.
274
E.D. Tex.
267
Tenn.
260
W.D. Tenn.
258
E.D.N.C.
247
D.N.H.
244
W.D. Wis.
230
Del.
229
D. Vt.
228
Ala. Crim. App.
218
E.D. Wash.
217
R.I.
216
Ga.
212
Ct. Int'l Trade
207
T.C.
207
Mass. Cmmw.
203
S.D. Ala.
201
W.D. La.
200
W.D. Okla.
191
E.D. Ark.
189
La.
189
S.D. Iowa
186
W.D.N.C.
182
W.D. Ark.
176
Haw. Ct. App.
175
Ky.
171
Ala. Civ. App.
169
N.D.W. Va.
165
Utah Ct. App.
165
N.D. Miss.
160
Me. Super.
150
Bankr. D. Del.
149
Bankr. E.D. Pa.
146
S.D. Ga.
146
B.A.P. 9th Cir.
145
C.D. Ill.
145
D. Alaska
144
M.D. La.
143
Miss. Ct. App.
140
Ark. Ct. App.
127
Bankr. D. Mass.
125
P.T.A.B.
120
N.D. Fla.
115
M.D. Ga.
112
Bankr. N.D. Ill.
111
Ops.Ark.Atty.Gen.
97
Bankr. E.D. Va.
91
E.D. Okla.
90
Tex. Crim. App.
88
Bankr. N.D. Tex.
87
Tenn. Crim. App.
84
Idaho Ct. App.
83
Bankr. D.N.J.
82
N.L.R.B-ALJ
81
Bankr. S.D. Tex.
80
Ops. Tex. Atty. Gen.
80
Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
76
Okla. Civ. App.
75
Bankr. E.D. Mich.
74
D.N.D.
71
Bankr. S.D. Ohio
68
Bankr. E.D. Tenn.
66
Bankr. D.N.M.
64
Bankr. N.D. Ohio
63
D. Wyo.
61
Neb. Ct. App.
61
Mass. Dist. Ct. App.
60
Alaska Ct. App.
58
Okla. Crim. App.
58
Bankr. C.D. Cal.
57
N. Mar. I.
55
N.Y. Ct. Cl.
55
Ops. Fla. Atty. Gen.
55
Bankr. D. Conn.
51
Bankr. D. Md.
50
Bankr. N.D. Ga.
50
N.L.R.B-BD
50
Bankr. N.D. Cal.
48
Bankr. D. Kan.
46
Bankr. M.D. Fla.
46
Bankr. W.D. Pa.
46
Bankr. D. Colo.
45
Bankr. E.D. Wis.
41
Bankr. S.D. Fla.
41
Bankr. D. Mont.
39
Vt. Super. Ct. Civ. Div.
39
Bankr. N.D. Ala.
38
Nev. App.
38
Ohio Misc.
38
Or. T.C.
38
Ops. La. Atty. Gen.
37
Guam
36
Bankr. D. Idaho
35
Bankr. W.D. Mich.
35
N.L.R.B.
35
N.Y. Civ. Ct.
35
Bankr. N.D.N.Y.
33
B.I.A.
32
Bankr. W.D. Tex.
32
Ohio Com. Pleas
32
Bankr. D.P.R.
31
N.J. Tax
31
N.Y. Surr. Ct.
31
Bankr. D.D.C.
30
Ohio Ct. Cl.
30
Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen.
30
Va. Cir. Ct.
30
T.T.A.B.
29
Bankr. D. Ariz.
28
Bankr. D.S.C.
28
Bankr. E.D. Tex.
28
Ind. T.C.
28
Bankr. D. Utah
27
Bankr. W.D. Tenn.
27
N.J. Ch.
27
Bankr. E.D. Cal.
26
Bankr. M.D.N.C.
26
Ops.Okla.Atty.Gen.
26
Bankr. S.D. Miss.
25
B.A.P. 8th Cir.
24
Bankr. D. Minn.
24
Mass. DIA
24
Bankr. D. Haw.
23
Bankr. W.D. Mo.
23
Bankr. D. Or.
22
Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
22
Bankr. W.D. Wis.
22
Ops.Neb.Atty.Gen.
22
Bankr. D. Nev.
21
Bankr. N.D. Ind.
21
B.A.P. 10th Cir.
20
B.A.P. 1st Cir.
19
Bankr. D.N.H.
19
Bankr. E.D. Ark.
19
Bankr. W.D.N.C.
19
Bankr. D. Vt.
18
Bankr. E.D. La.
18
Bankr. M.D. Pa.
18
D.N. Mar. I.
18
B.A.P. 6th Cir.
17
Bankr. C.D. Ill.
17
Bankr. N.D. Okla.
17
D. Guam
17
E.D. Ill.
17
Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.
17
N.Y. Fam. Ct.
16
Bankr. N.D. Iowa
15
Bankr. N.D.W. Va.
15
Bankr. S.D. Iowa
15
N.C. Business
15
Ops.Wis.Atty.Gen.
15
Bankr. D. Me.
14
Bankr. D. Neb.
14
Bankr. M.D. La.
14
Cal. W.C.A.B.
14
N.Y. Crim. Ct.
14
Bankr. E.D. Ky.
13
Bankr. M.D. Ga.
13
Bankr. S.D. Ga.
13
Ops. N.Y. Atty. Gen.
13
Bankr. E.D. Mo.
12
Bankr. W.D. Wash.
12
C.C.P.A.
12
N.H. Super.
12
N.Y. Dist. Ct.
12
Bankr. W.D. La.
11
Bankr. W.D. Va.
11
Pa. Ct. Jud. Disc.
11
Bankr. W.D. Ky.
10
E.D.S.C.
10
Ops.Colo.Atty.Gen.
10
W. Va. Int. Ct. App.
10
W.D.S.C.
10
Bankr. D.V.I.
9
Bankr. E.D.N.C.
9
Bankr. M.D. Ala.
9
Bankr. S.D. Ind.
9
Bankr. N.D. Miss.
8
Bankr. W.D. Ark.
8
Bankr. D.N.D.
7
Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
7
Conn. Work Comp.
7
Vet App.
7
Bankr. W.D. Okla.
6
Ops. Wash. Atty. Gen.
6
Ark. Work Comp.
5
B.T.A.
5
Bankr. D. Alaska
5
Bankr. E.D. Wash.
5
Bankr. S.D.W. Va.
5
J.P.M.L.
5
N. Mar. I. Commw. Super. Ct.
5
N.C. Ind. Comn.
5
Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.
5
Bankr. S.D. Ala.
4
Bankr. S.D. Cal.
4
Conn. C.P.
4
Del. Fam.
4
N.Y. City Ct.
4
Bankr. D.R.I.
3
Bankr. D.S.D.
3
Bankr. S.D. Ill.
3
Colo. Ind. App.
3
Del. Com. Pleas
3
Ops.Mo.Atty.Gen.
3
Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div.
3
B.A.P. 2nd Cir.
2
Bankr. D. Wyo.
2
Bankr. E.D. Okla.
2
Bankr. N.D. Fla.
2
Mass. Super.
2
N.Y. Just. Ct.
2
App. T. 2d Dep't
1
Cal. Super.
1
D.C.Z.
1
Emer. Ct. App.
1
N.D. Ct. App.
1
N.L.R.B-UBD
1
N.Y. Sup. Ct. Com. Div.
1
App. T. 1st Dep't
0
Ariz. Tax Ct.
0
Ark. Workers' Comp. Comm'n
0
Bankr. D. Guam
0
Conn. Cir. Ct.
0
D. Ind.
0
D.R.I. (Bankr.)
0
Del. Gen. Sess.
0
Del. J.P. Ct.
0
Del. Jud.
0
Del. Orph.
0
F.T.C.
0
FISA Ct.
0
M.D. Mich.
0
Mont. T.A.B.
0
N.C. Cir.
0
N.C. Super.
0
N.J. Cir. Ct.
0
N.Y. App. Term
0
N.Y. Cnty. Ct.
0
N.Y. County Ct.
0
Okla. Ind. Review
0
Okla. Jud. Eth.
0
PTAB
0
S.D. W. Va.
0
Tenn. Ch.
0
Tenn. Cir.
0
Tex. J.P.M.L.
0
U.S.C.M.C.R.
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
27173
From 2011 To 2020
46935
From 2001 To 2010
26930
From 1991 To 2000
14888
From 1981 To 1990
11630
From 1971 To 1980
7733
From 1961 To 1970
4996
From 1951 To 1960
4072
Before 1950
7426

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

1

...superior liability are set out in § 220(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Agency. Lee v. Pulitzer Pub. Co., 81 S.W.3d 625, 631 (Mo.Ct.App...details of the work," Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2)(a), and the Missouri Supreme Court has frequently emphasized the importance of the "right to control the conduct of another in the...and skill in accomplishing results." Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220, comment (e); see also Skidmore v. Haggard, 341 Mo. 837, 845...


Court:
Date: Jan 19, 2010 Cited By: 201 Coram: 1
2

...decision, the Commission considered factors set forth in Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 (1958). Next, Landmark appealed the Commission's order to the Franklin Circuit Court...whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor are contained in Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2), which are virtually identical to the factors listed in the first Restatement...of Agency. Id. at 364. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) provides: In determining whether one acting for another is a servant or an independent contractor, the following...


Court:
Date: Dec 19, 2002 Cited By: 102 Coram: 1
3

...contractor is a legal issue frequently litigated in a variety of contexts. The Restatement (Second) of Agency § 2(2) defines a "servant" as an agent "whose physical conduct in the performance of the service is controlled or is subject to the right to control by the master." In determining whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor, § 220 repeats...ten non-inclusive "matters of fact" to be considered. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2). The Missouri appellate courts apply these standards...standard, the Supreme Court has likewise adopted a multifactor common law test derived primarily from § 220(2) of the Restatement. See Ernster v...


Court:
Date: Sep 20, 2010 Cited By: 315 Coram: 1
4

...be determined by reference to common-law principles. The Court in Baker referred to sections of the Restatement (Second) of Agency dealing with the borrowed-servant doctrine and the general master-servant relationship as a guideline for analysis and proper jury instructions. Section 220(1...exposition elsewhere, e. g., Restatement (Second) of Agency §§ 5(2), 220, 226, and 227 renders much of the Court's extended discussion unnecessary. But my chief problem with the Court's opinion...Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220. Many Courts of Appeals have been confronted with problems similar to those in Baker and Ward, and they too have taken a nontechnical...


Court:
Date: Dec 23, 1974 Cited By: 170 Coram: 5
5

...) (applying a non-exhaustive list of ten factors as set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(1) cmt. c (1958)). A number of cases suggest that if a majority of the seven Hale factors is...belief of the parties may be an important factor but only to the extent that it indicates an assumption of control by one party and submission to control by the other party. See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2...more indicative it is of an employer/employee relationship. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) cmt. j. The length of employment here was so abbreviated that it sheds little light one way or the...


Court:
Date: Mar 13, 2001 Cited By: 247
6

...accordingly. In Mortgage Consultants, Inc., we applied a ten-factor analysis described in the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 (1958...relation of master and servant; and whether the principal is or is not in business. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (1958). We.... Applying the Factors A. Extent of Control over Details of the Work. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(1) (1958) defines a servant (i.e...


Court:
Date: Nov 15, 2001 Cited By: 64 Coram: 1
7

...(5th Cir. 1997), in addition to control, this court cited the factors listed in § 220 of the Restatement (Second) of Agency to differentiate between an employee and independent contractor under the...principal is or is not in business. RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 220 (1958). See also Rodriguez v. Sarabyn..., 129 F.3d at 765 (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 220). If the government lacks the power to directly control an individual, then the court must...


Court:
Date: Jun 9, 1998 Cited By: 141 Coram: 1
8

.... Structural Services, Inc., 121 N.M. 657, 664, 916 P.2d 1324, 1331 (1996), we adopted the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 (1958...1330-31. To address this inconsistency, we adopted the approach taken in the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220, which incorporates many factors into the calculus of employee versus independent...independent contractor, only one of which is the degree of control the principal exercises over the details of the agent's work. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (a-j). Other considerations...


Court:
Date: Jan 29, 2004 Cited By: 89
9

...); Khoury v. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co., 265 Mass. 236, 238 (1928); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 (1958). Cf...); Rep. A.G., Pub. Doc. No. 12, at 106, 107 (1980); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 comment i (1958). In deciding that a...Sawtelle v. Mystic Valley Gas Co., 1 Mass. App. Ct. 672, 676 (1974); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 227 comment b (1958). We conclude...


Court:
Date: Aug 15, 1985 Cited By: 219
10

...whether a person is an employee or independent contractor under the common law of agency, the totality of the working relationship is examined. The Restatement provides a nonexhaustive list of factors for consideration. See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2..., 109 S.Ct. 2166, 2178-79, 104 L.Ed.2d 811 (1989)) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2...summarized the common-law test as follows: "In determining whether a hired party is an employee under the general common law of agency, we consider the hiring...


Court:
Date: Jan 27, 1994 Cited By: 60 Coram: 1
11

...Reid, we construe the term to incorporate "the general common law of agency, rather than . . . the law of any particular state." Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 740 (1989). Cf. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2..."most probably would not qualify as an employee" under traditional agency law principles, the Court of Appeals reversed, finding the traditional definition inconsistent with ERISA's policy and purposes..."employee," and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Held: 1. The term "employee," as used in ERISA, incorporates traditional agency law criteria for...


Court:
Date: Mar 24, 1992 Cited By: 1925 Coram: 1
12

...(Second) of Agency § 220(2), p. 489 (1957); § 227, pp. 500, 501; 99 C.J.S. Workmen's Compensation § 47, p. 243. The evidence does not indicate that there was acceptance of.... United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 23, 1969.... AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: In this maritime personal injury suit, the principal question at issue is whether or not an injured employee was a borrowed servant at the time of his...


Court:
Date: Jun 23, 1969 Cited By: 229 Coram: 1
13

...." We have employed the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (1958) factors defining a servant to determine the nature of the relationship between a worker and an employer...of comment c to the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 to describe the degree of control required under Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2)(a) to impose vicarious liability.... See Sterud, 640 P.2d at 826 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(1...


Court:
Date: Nov 22, 2002 Cited By: 17
14

...exists, it is of no consequence that the employee is designated as a[n] . . . independent contractor"); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 comment m (1958) ("[i]t is not determinative that the...(1978) (degree of control or supervision is principal element differentiating employees and independent contractors at common law); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(1) (1958) (defining employee..., appellant worked as an employee during the first year of her service to IAM. Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (1958) lists...


Court:
Date: Feb 13, 1987 Cited By: 71 Coram: 1
15

...forth in RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 220 (1958). Noting that the control factor has been overemphasized in judicial reasoning, we concluded that our concern will usually be "whether on all the...order on the motion for summary judgment in which consideration was given to each of the criteria set forth in the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 220. Particularly, the judge found that although the...the activity giving rise to the claim is performed with hope or expectation of reward. The plaintiffs rely upon RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 225, which states: "One who...


Court:
Date: May 19, 1994 Cited By: 12 Coram: 1
16

...Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 751-752 (1989), and citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2...the relevant factors defining the master-servant relationship focus on the master's control over the servant. The general definition of the term "servant" in the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 2(2) (1957), for example, refers to a person whose work is "controlled or is subject to the right to control by the master." See also id., § 220(1...control by the master." Restatement (Second) of Agency § 2(2) (1957) (hereinafter Restatement). When acting as clinic doctors, the physician-shareholders appear to fit the Restatement definition. The...


Court:
Date: Apr 22, 2003 Cited By: 414 Coram: 3
17

.... See DeWitt v. Harris County, 904 S.W.2d 650, 654 (Tex. 1995); RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 219 (1958). The most frequently proffered justification for imposing such liability is that the principal or employer has the right to control the means and methods of the agent or employee's work. See Newspapers, Inc. v. Love, 380 S.W.2d 582, 585-86 (Tex. 1964); RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 220, cmt...reliance and resulting harm. See Ames v. Great S. Bank, 672 S.W.2d 447, 450 (Tex. 1984); RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 267; KEETON ET...: agency by estoppel (referred to in this opinion as ostensible agency), based on the Restatement (Second) of Agency section 267, and apparent agency, based on the Restatement (Second) of Torts section...


Court:
Date: May 21, 1998 Cited By: 286 Coram: 1
18

...) (unpublished decision) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 cmt. d). In the context of patent infringement, a defendant cannot thus avoid liability for direct infringement by having someone else...District of Texas, Barbara M.G. Lynn, J. Christopher R. Benson, Fulbright Jaworski...L.L.P., of Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Jeffrey D. Mills; J. Jeffery Richardson, of Dallas, TX. Of counsel was Michael R. Krawzsenek, of Austin, TX...


Court:
Date: Sep 20, 2007 Cited By: 310 Coram: 1
19

...nonexhaustive list of factors from the Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (1958): In determining whether a hired party is an employee under the general..., 104 L.Ed.2d 811 (1989) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) (1958))). "In weighing these factors, `all...Wilde v. County of Kandiyohi, 15 F.3d 103, 106 (8th Cir. 1994)). Restatement (Second) Agency § 220, comment h provides: The relation of master...


Court:
Date: Jun 9, 2006 Cited By: 115 Coram: 1
20

...agency that Reid seeks to synthesize. See generally RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 220 cmt. h (1958) (describing factors, some of which are not enumerated in Reid...of the manner in which his work is to be done"); see also RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF AGENCY § 220(1) cmt. d (1958) (stating that "control or right to control the physical conduct of the person...Restatement (Second) "are merely evidentiary indicia of the right to control"). Although Frankel was an Americans with...


Court:
Date: Dec 26, 2000 Cited By: 150 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).