Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
N.C.
139
Cal. Ct. App.
132
N.Y. Misc.
126
N.Y. App. Div.
116
Cal.
107
Tex. Civ. App.
100
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
82
Okla.
73
Ala.
71
Miss.
67
Tenn. Ct. App.
57
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
48
S.C.
46
U.S.
42
Tex. App.
37
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
36
N.Y.
36
Wash. Ct. App.
31
Md.
30
N.J.
27
Ky. Ct. App.
26
Ga.
25
Mo.
25
Iowa
24
N.J. Super. App. Div.
24
R.I.
24
Mont.
23
Ohio Ct. App.
23
Vt.
23
Mass.
22
N.C. Ct. App.
21
Tex.
21
Ark.
20
Del. Ch.
20
Ill. App. Ct.
19
Mo. Ct. App.
19
Wash.
19
9th Cir.
18
Minn. Ct. App.
17
N.M.
17
Conn.
16
Haw.
16
Utah
16
Fla.
15
Mich.
15
Pa.
15
Pa. Super. Ct.
15
Alaska
13
Conn. Super. Ct.
13
Ariz. Ct. App.
12
N.D.
12
N.Y. Civ. Ct.
12
Nev.
12
S.D.N.Y.
12
Wyo.
12
Ga. Ct. App.
11
N.H.
11
Or.
11
5th Cir.
10
Del. J.P. Ct.
10
E.D.N.Y.
10
Haw. Ct. App.
10
Idaho
10
Ill.
10
Kan.
10
N.J. Ch.
10
S.C. Ct. App.
10
Tenn.
10
Mass. App. Ct.
9
W. Va.
9
D.C.
8
D.N.J.
8
La. Ct. App.
8
N.M. Ct. App.
8
Va.
8
10th Cir.
7
Ark. Ct. App.
7
Colo.
7
Del. Super. Ct.
7
Iowa Ct. App.
7
Mich. Ct. App.
7
Wis.
7
Ala. Civ. App.
6
Colo. App.
6
Conn. App. Ct.
6
D. Minn.
6
D. Or.
6
Kan. Ct. App.
6
Me.
6
N.D. Ill.
6
Neb.
6
Or. Ct. App.
6
S.D. Fla.
6
Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
5
D. Alaska
5
D. Md.
5
D.C. Cir.
5
Ind. Ct. App.
5
Minn.
5
R.I. Super.
5
S.D. Tex.
5
2d Cir.
4
8th Cir.
4
Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
4
D.N.M.
4
Del. Com. Pleas
4
E.D. Va.
4
Miss. Ct. App.
4
N.D. Cal.
4
N.D.N.Y.
4
Okla. Civ. App.
4
S.D.
4
W.D. Pa.
4
1st Cir.
3
Ariz.
3
Bankr. E.D. Cal.
3
Bankr. E.D. Pa.
3
Bankr. E.D. Va.
3
D. Colo.
3
Fed. Cl.
3
La.
3
Mass. Dist. Ct. App.
3
N.D. Tex.
3
Va. Ct. App.
3
Wis. Ct. App.
3
3d Cir.
2
4th Cir.
2
6th Cir.
2
7th Cir.
2
B.A.P. 9th Cir.
2
Bankr. D.N.J.
2
Bankr. S.D. Ohio
2
Bankr. S.D. Tex.
2
Bankr. W.D. Tenn.
2
D. Ariz.
2
D. Del.
2
D. Kan.
2
D. Mont.
2
D. Vt.
2
Del.
2
E.D. Ky.
2
E.D. Pa.
2
Fed. Cir.
2
Ind. App.
2
N.D. Ala.
2
N.D.W. Va.
2
N.J. Super.
2
N.Y. Surr. Ct.
2
Okla. Crim. App.
2
S.D. Cal.
2
S.D. Ohio
2
Utah Ct. App.
2
Vt. Super. Ct. Civ. Div.
2
W. Va. Int. Ct. App.
2
W.D. Tex.
2
Ala. Crim. App.
1
Bankr. D. Alaska
1
Bankr. D. Minn.
1
Bankr. D. Utah
1
Bankr. D.P.R.
1
Bankr. M.D. Fla.
1
Bankr. N.D. Iowa
1
Bankr. N.D.N.Y.
1
Bankr. S.D. Cal.
1
Bankr. S.D. Fla.
1
Bankr. S.D.W. Va.
1
Bankr. W.D. Mich.
1
Bankr. W.D. Wash.
1
Conn. C.P.
1
D. Conn.
1
D. Guam
1
D. Idaho
1
D. Me.
1
D. Neb.
1
D. Utah
1
D.P.R.
1
D.S.D.
1
E.D. Mich.
1
E.D. Mo.
1
E.D. Tenn.
1
E.D. Wis.
1
Idaho Ct. App.
1
Ind.
1
Ky.
1
M.D. Ga.
1
M.D. La.
1
M.D. Pa.
1
Mass. Cmmw.
1
Me. Super.
1
N. Mar. I.
1
N.C. Super.
1
N.D. Ga.
1
N.D. Iowa
1
N.D. Miss.
1
N.D. Ohio
1
N.D. Okla.
1
N.Y. City Ct.
1
N.Y. Ct. Cl.
1
N.Y. Dist. Ct.
1
Nev. App.
1
Ohio
1
Ohio Com. Pleas
1
Ops.Okla.Atty.Gen.
1
Or. T.C.
1
Pa. Cmmw. Ct.
1
S.D. Iowa
1
S.D. Miss.
1
S.D.W. Va.
1
W.D. Ark.
1
W.D. Ky.
1
W.D. Tenn.
1
W.D.N.C.
1
11th Cir.
0
Alaska Ct. App.
0
App. T. 1st Dep't
0
App. T. 2d Dep't
0
Ariz. Tax Ct.
0
Ark. Work Comp.
0
Ark. Workers' Comp. Comm'n
0
B.A.P. 10th Cir.
0
B.A.P. 1st Cir.
0
B.A.P. 2nd Cir.
0
B.A.P. 6th Cir.
0
B.A.P. 8th Cir.
0
B.I.A.
0
B.T.A.
0
Bankr. C.D. Cal.
0
Bankr. C.D. Ill.
0
Bankr. D. Ariz.
0
Bankr. D. Colo.
0
Bankr. D. Conn.
0
Bankr. D. Del.
0
Bankr. D. Guam
0
Bankr. D. Haw.
0
Bankr. D. Idaho
0
Bankr. D. Kan.
0
Bankr. D. Mass.
0
Bankr. D. Md.
0
Bankr. D. Me.
0
Bankr. D. Mont.
0
Bankr. D. Neb.
0
Bankr. D. Nev.
0
Bankr. D. Or.
0
Bankr. D. Vt.
0
Bankr. D. Wyo.
0
Bankr. D.D.C.
0
Bankr. D.N.D.
0
Bankr. D.N.H.
0
Bankr. D.N.M.
0
Bankr. D.R.I.
0
Bankr. D.S.C.
0
Bankr. D.S.D.
0
Bankr. D.V.I.
0
Bankr. E.D. Ark.
0
Bankr. E.D. Ky.
0
Bankr. E.D. La.
0
Bankr. E.D. Mich.
0
Bankr. E.D. Mo.
0
Bankr. E.D. Okla.
0
Bankr. E.D. Tenn.
0
Bankr. E.D. Tex.
0
Bankr. E.D. Wash.
0
Bankr. E.D. Wis.
0
Bankr. E.D.N.C.
0
Bankr. M.D. Ala.
0
Bankr. M.D. Ga.
0
Bankr. M.D. La.
0
Bankr. M.D. Pa.
0
Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
0
Bankr. M.D.N.C.
0
Bankr. N.D. Ala.
0
Bankr. N.D. Cal.
0
Bankr. N.D. Fla.
0
Bankr. N.D. Ga.
0
Bankr. N.D. Ill.
0
Bankr. N.D. Ind.
0
Bankr. N.D. Miss.
0
Bankr. N.D. Ohio
0
Bankr. N.D. Okla.
0
Bankr. N.D. Tex.
0
Bankr. N.D.W. Va.
0
Bankr. S.D. Ala.
0
Bankr. S.D. Ga.
0
Bankr. S.D. Ill.
0
Bankr. S.D. Ind.
0
Bankr. S.D. Iowa
0
Bankr. S.D. Miss.
0
Bankr. W.D. Ark.
0
Bankr. W.D. Ky.
0
Bankr. W.D. La.
0
Bankr. W.D. Mo.
0
Bankr. W.D. Okla.
0
Bankr. W.D. Pa.
0
Bankr. W.D. Tex.
0
Bankr. W.D. Va.
0
Bankr. W.D. Wis.
0
Bankr. W.D.N.C.
0
Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
0
C.C.P.A.
0
C.D. Cal.
0
C.D. Ill.
0
Cal. Super.
0
Cal. W.C.A.B.
0
Colo. Ind. App.
0
Conn. Cir. Ct.
0
Conn. Work Comp.
0
Ct. Int'l Trade
0
D. Haw.
0
D. Ind.
0
D. Mass.
0
D. Nev.
0
D. Wyo.
0
D.C.Z.
0
D.D.C.
0
D.N. Mar. I.
0
D.N.D.
0
D.N.H.
0
D.R.I.
0
D.R.I. (Bankr.)
0
D.S.C.
0
D.V.I.
0
Del. Fam.
0
Del. Gen. Sess.
0
Del. Jud.
0
Del. Orph.
0
E.D. Ark.
0
E.D. Cal.
0
E.D. Ill.
0
E.D. La.
0
E.D. Okla.
0
E.D. Tex.
0
E.D. Wash.
0
E.D.N.C.
0
E.D.S.C.
0
E.E.O.C.
0
Emer. Ct. App.
0
F.T.C.
0
FISA Ct.
0
Guam
0
Ind. T.C.
0
J.P.M.L.
0
M.D. Ala.
0
M.D. Fla.
0
M.D. Mich.
0
M.D. Tenn.
0
M.D.N.C.
0
Mass. DIA
0
Mass. Super.
0
Mont. T.A.B.
0
N. Mar. I. Commw. Super. Ct.
0
N.C. Business
0
N.C. Cir.
0
N.C. Ind. Comn.
0
N.D. Ct. App.
0
N.D. Fla.
0
N.D. Ind.
0
N.H. Super.
0
N.J. Cir. Ct.
0
N.J. Tax
0
N.L.R.B-ALJ
0
N.L.R.B-BD
0
N.L.R.B-UBD
0
N.L.R.B.
0
N.Y. App. Term
0
N.Y. Cnty. Ct.
0
N.Y. County Ct.
0
N.Y. Crim. Ct.
0
N.Y. Fam. Ct.
0
N.Y. Just. Ct.
0
N.Y. Sup. Ct. Com. Div.
0
Neb. Ct. App.
0
Ohio Ct. Cl.
0
Ohio Misc.
0
Okla. Ind. Review
0
Okla. Jud. Eth.
0
Ops. Fla. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. La. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. N.Y. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. Tex. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. Wash. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops.Ark.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Colo.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Mo.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Neb.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Wis.Atty.Gen.
0
P.T.A.B.
0
PTAB
0
Pa. Ct. Jud. Disc.
0
S.D. Ala.
0
S.D. Ga.
0
S.D. Ill.
0
S.D. Ind.
0
S.D. W. Va.
0
Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.
0
T.C.
0
T.T.A.B.
0
Tenn. Ch.
0
Tenn. Cir.
0
Tenn. Crim. App.
0
Tex. Crim. App.
0
Tex. J.P.M.L.
0
U.S.C.M.C.R.
0
U.S.T.C.
0
Va. Cir. Ct.
0
Vet App.
0
Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div.
0
W.D. La.
0
W.D. Mich.
0
W.D. Mo.
0
W.D. Okla.
0
W.D. Va.
0
W.D. Wash.
0
W.D. Wis.
0
W.D.N.Y.
0
W.D.S.C.
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
224
From 2011 To 2020
321
From 2001 To 2010
204
From 1991 To 2000
114
From 1981 To 1990
167
From 1971 To 1980
125
From 1961 To 1970
115
From 1951 To 1960
163
Before 1950
971

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

1

...direction. In Holley v. Hawley ( 39 Vt. 532) it was held that the taking of a deed by one tenant in common from a third person, and spreading it on the record, would have no effect as the equivalent of an ouster, unless accompanied and followed by a hostile claim of which the co-tenant...presumed without evidence to have done, or intended to do, an unlawful act. So that, in the present case, to the co-tenant looking on, nothing was apparent, except that the widow conveyed the life estate which she owned, and her grantee took a commensurate possession, and that only. We are thus led to consider the reason and justice of the rule, which should measure the adverse possession necessary to effect the ouster of...appropriate remedy; that it was possible to transform a subsisting tenancy in common into an adverse and hostile possession; and that where there had been an ouster of co-tenants, and an exclusive and hostile...


Court:
Date: Jan 17, 1882 Cited By: 39 Coram: 1
2

...real property which she uses for her own benefit and from which she does not receive rent, is not accountable or liable to her co-tenant out of possession, here Arlene, unless the co-tenant out of possession can show that the co-tenant in exclusive possession holds adversely or as a result of ouster or.... 452 (1915). To demonstrate ouster of a co-tenant, one must show (1) acts of possession inconsistent with and exclusive of the rights of the co-tenant, and (2) knowledge on the part of the...pay Arlene one-half the reasonable rental value of the home from May 15, 1978, forward. The rule of law applicable here is that a co-tenant, as Catherine, in exclusive possession of...


Court:
Date: Apr 2, 1985 Cited By: 4 Coram: 1
3

...mere trespasser. Thus, the analysis here must be informed by the case law such as the Matter of Camp[h]er which recognizes that in adverse possession cases, depriving a co-tenant of his interest is a much more daunting task because proof of ouster of...a co-tenant must be stronger than proof of ouster of a stranger...constructive ouster of a co-tenant as will suffice to commence the running of the Statute of Limitations may be shown by the possessor's hostile intent coupled with notice or knowledge thereof to the...


Court:
Date: Feb 4, 2010 Cited By: 3 Coram: 1
4

...notice of a claim of sole ownership, or by other positive and unequivocal acts put the complainants as co-tenants on notice that he was holding adversely to them. There can be no ouster of a co-tenant except... continued as a tenant in common with her lawful heirs; that the sale of the lands for delinquent taxes, and purchase by Flowers, in no way affected the title. It was furthermore the opinion..., 214 S.W.2d 50, 52, that where a tenant in common who is in possession devises the whole of the property, to wit a "house and lot known as Number 606 Lynch Street in the said City of Knoxville...


Court:
Date: Jun 9, 1950 Cited By: 4 Coram: 1
5

...considered adverse and the property may be acquired by the co-tenant in possession by adverse possession after an additional 10 years, or a total of 20 years of exclusive possession (Myers v. Bartholomew, supra). Nevertheless, both under the common law and RPAPL 541, continuous exclusive possession may be considered adverse to other co-tenants prior to 10 years where there has been an ouster of...other co-tenants. The ouster of a co-tenant only occurs where the "knowledge of its existence is brought home to the co-tenant" (Culver v. Rhodes, 87...assault upon . . . (the co-tenants') title" (Kraker v. Roll, 100 AD2d 424, 434). Here, the respondents contend that the deed from Giro to his wife constituted an ouster of the petitioner. Although the deed was recorded, the respondents do not allege that Giro received any consideration for the conveyance. The respondents rely upon the cases holding that the sale of the entire property by one co-tenant to a stranger...


Court:
Date: Mar 29, 2005 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
6

...: Pending before me is a petition for declaratory judgment and to quiet title by one co-tenant who claims title to two parcels of real property through adverse possession and ouster of the other co-tenants. The remaining co-tenants filed a motion.... Id. The consideration is different, however, when the adverse possessor is a co-tenant seeking to dispossess other co-tenants of the property. Possession by one co-tenant "is considered to be constructive possession by all other tenants in common." So, for a co-tenant to acquire title to the entire property by adverse possession, she must show an ouster of...co-tenants. "For a co-tenant in possession to prevail upon a claim of adverse possession against a co-tenant out of possession it is necessary for a petitioner to establish: (1) intent; (2) adverse possession in fact; and (3) knowledge or notice of the adverse holding." "The proof of an ouster of...


Court:
Date: Jun 18, 2020 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
7

...tract of land. We disagree. The Scotts first contend that they obtained title to this property by ouster of a co-tenant. In Collier v. Welker...regarding what must be shown in order to prove adverse possession as against a co-tenant: Even where a co-owner appropriates rents and profits for his sole benefit, silent occupation and exclusive use of the entire property does not qualify as actual ouster, absent...158 (1940). "In the absence of actual ouster, the ouster of one tenant in common by a cotenant will not be presumed from an exclusive use of the common property and the appropriation of its...


Court:
Date: May 1, 1986 Cited By: 8
8

...Revised Statutes." • 1 In this appeal, defendants argue that the plaintiffs did not notify or oust Mary Jones or her heirs, as is required before a tenant in common may set up a claim of adverse possession against a co-tenant. ( Mercer v. Wayman (1956), 9 Ill.2d 441, 137 N.E.2d 815.) While the defendants state a correct rule of law, that rule does not apply to this case. As the court stated in Mercer, actual notice or ouster is...notification by plaintiffs of their claim of ownership or ouster of such co-tenants. The majority states, however, that ouster of a co-tenant may be in the form of a deed to "a stranger in title" made...if a co-tenant gives a deed of the entire property to a stranger in title. ( 9 Ill.2d 441, 447...


Court:
Date: Dec 30, 1981 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
9

...Robert's argument that there was no evidence of ouster. The chancellor found John ousted his siblings by unequivocal actual notice since 1960. "An ouster of a co-tenant not in possession must be unequivocal.... After a two-day trial, the chancellor found that John adversely possessed the property from his co-tenants; therefore, his estate was the sole owner of the property...estate must also prove ouster. Jordon v. Warren, 602 So.2d 809, 814-15 (Miss. 1992). Ouster is unequivocal notice by one co-tenant that he...


Court:
Date: Jan 30, 2007 Cited By: 4 Coram: 1
10

...of adverse possession sufficient to constitute an ouster of a co-tenant. Therefore, Paul Richard Johnson has an undivided one-fifth interest in the property. The judgment of the trial court is reversed...one tenant in common from a third person will not have any effect towards constituting such an ouster of his cotenant as would lay the foundation for the commencement of an adverse possession against.... * * * So it's the Court's conclusion that Mr. [Pracey] Johnson either, A, was ousted of his interest in the property, or that there was a constructive ouster of him when Susie Perkins sold the property...


Court:
Date: Oct 31, 2005 Cited By: 1
11

...determining the circumstances under which a tenant in common can acquire title by adverse possession against his co-tenant and partly to the quantum of evidence to prove an ouster of a co-tenant...to bring home to the real owner notice of a hostile claim. But when one enters and sets up his claim before he becomes a co-tenant, there is no reason why he cannot be held to continue under that claim...the other. This court has always held that evidence of ouster or the adverse character of a claim must be much clearer as between co-tenants than as between strangers, but it has never gone so far as...


Court:
Date: Sep 27, 1927 Cited By: 7 Coram: 1
12

...plea in that case, says: "We are thus led to consider the reason and justice of rule, which should measure the adverse possession necessary to effect the ouster of a co-tenant. Assuredly it should be one...amounted to an ouster of his cotenants and made his possession no longer theirs, but solely his as a separate and hostile owner. It is undoubtedly true that the possession of one tenant in common is...-sixth of said premises. Abraham Egbert, the husband of Mary Egbert, who, upon her death in 1828, became by curtesy a life tenant in the whole of said premises, died in 1866. Abraham William Egbert, his...


Court:
Date: Nov 1, 1907 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
13

..., the possession of the land of the one by the other is presumptively permissive and amicable." See id. (internal quotations and citations omitted). In addition, presumption against ouster of a co-tenant can...life tenant is still living, the co-remaindermen have a fiduciary relationship to each other that no one of them may impair the rights or interests of his co- remaindermen. Givens v. Givens.... Holder of a life estate in property could not adversely possess against remaindermen, because a life tenant who takes possession admits her right as it was...


Court:
Date: Aug 24, 2001 Cited By: 8 Coram: 1
14

...five elements which must combine to amount to ouster of a co-tenant. Casual reference to the syllabi in Dierks will reflect the failure of the record in this case to support the conclusion of the...subject to partition. The rule in Hassell, supra, evolved from an action brought by one co-tenant, who sought partition of a profitable business property upon the sole ground the...for the reasonable rental value of the farm from January 1, 1963. Defendant also alleged in substance that beginning in 1931 the farm was operated as a family co-tenancy by plaintiff and Fred Mauch...


Court:
Date: Oct 18, 1966 Cited By: 5 Coram: 2
15

...); Scott v. Leonard, 119 Vt. 86, 102-03, 119 A.2d 691, 700 (1956) (presumption against ouster of co-tenant can be overcome only by some overt and notorious act or acts of an unequivocal character, indicating an assertion of ownership of the entire premises to the exclusion of the right of the co-tenant). By virtue of his deed, petitioner's interest in the land was that of a tenant.... II. Our opinions contemplating ouster of a co-tenant have, to date, concerned record titleholders whose interests were conveyed by deed or by...that of a tenant in common with his mother, upon her death petitioner became a co-tenant with his mother's heirs. Where a co-tenant would claim sole right to property...


Court:
Date: Jun 16, 1989 Cited By: 5 Coram: 2
16

...; Fencing the land; The collection of rents; Other acts of absolute and unqualified possession for more than twenty years. It was held that these acts were ample as a predicate for a finding of ouster by the trial court. The decree of the trial court sustaining title by prescription was affirmed. 207 P.2d 313 at ¶23, 319, citing Beaver v. Wilson, 1926 OK 267, 245 P. 34, 117 Okl. 68. In Preston, the co-tenant remained in possession of the land for over twenty years, paid a mortgage...an ouster of her co-tenants, though no one having an interest in the property appeared to counter Hodge's proof. The trial court concluded that Hodge's only remedy was through a partition proceeding...interest and in order to obtain title by adverse possession against co-tenants, she was required to prove an ouster of the co-tenants. The court found that Hodge's remedy was through a partition proceeding...


Court:
Date: Feb 13, 2019 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
17

...the premises were not held in subordination to any title or claim of others, but against all claimants of title." This holding suggests that ouster of a co-tenant may be proved by the same evidence as...absolute and unqualified possession for more than twenty years. It was held that these acts were ample as a predicate for a finding of ouster by the trial court. The decree of the trial court sustaining title by prescription was affirmed. 207 P.2d 313 at ¶ 23, 319, citing Beaver v. Wilson , 1926 OK 267, 245 P. 34, 117 Okl. 68. In Preston , the co-tenant remained in possession of the land for over twenty years, paid a mortgage...against co-tenants, she was required to prove an ouster of the co-tenants. The court found that Hodge's remedy was through a partition...


Court:
Date: Jan 16, 2019 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

...other co-tenant excludes the tenant from use and possession of the common 9 property. Cox v. Cox, 138 Idaho 881, 886, 71 P.3d 1028, 1033 (2003). A co-tenant who leaves the property because they feel unwelcome after being asked to leave is sufficient for an ouster finding.... at 737-38, 184 P.3d at 862-63. The Court held that where one co-tenant had entered a lease without the consent of other co-tenants, partition was not the exclusive remedy. Id. at 739, 184 P.3d at 864. A more relevant case is Cox, where the Court addressed the remedy for ouster of...a co- tenant in a partition of property case. There, the Court adopted the majority rule regarding ouster of...


Court:
Date: Feb 27, 2026 Cited By: 0
19

...plaintiffs' title, and continued to be so until those in possession denied the plaintiffs' title, or committed an actual ouster of the plaintiffs. A mere adverse holding and claim of title by those who are tenants in common with others of a tract of land do not of themselves constitute an ouster of a co-tenant. Entry...possession are referable to the community of title. A tenant in common has a right to assume that the possession of his co-tenant is his possession, until informed to the contrary, either by express...ouster will sever the unity of possession." This they say is inconsistent with the instructions--given at the instance of respondents--that " proof of an actual ouster, that is, a turning out by the...


Court:
Date: Apr 1, 1881 Cited By: 9
20

...an action to try title to land claiming as children of a deceased illegitimate child, held that the evidence did not make a question for the jury and there was no error in court discharging the jury. 9. Limitations. Co-tenant barred by limitations where there is actual ouster. An...without notice to a co-tenant that it was adverse. But the doctrine has been long since held, and the authorities sustain it, that one tenant in common may so enter and hold as to render the entry and possession adverse, and amount to an ouster of a...give effect to the Statute of Limitations in favor of one tenant in common against another but held that the holding of a co-tenant, openly, notoriously, exclusively, and exercising all rights of...


Court:
Date: Jan 30, 1926 Cited By: 7 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).