Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Ohio Ct. App.
1410
S.D.N.Y.
1324
Cal. Ct. App.
1051
Del. Ch.
856
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
552
N.Y. App. Div.
538
Wash. Ct. App.
532
Tex. App.
523
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
499
N.D. Ill.
499
Ill. App. Ct.
477
Pa. Super. Ct.
470
N.D. Cal.
469
E.D. Pa.
406
9th Cir.
386
2d Cir.
385
D.N.J.
372
3d Cir.
335
N.Y. Misc.
335
5th Cir.
331
N.J. Super. App. Div.
308
E.D.N.Y.
291
6th Cir.
275
7th Cir.
275
D. Del.
267
S.D. Ohio
262
D. Mass.
259
D.D.C.
258
E.D. Mich.
245
D. Md.
241
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
223
N.D. Ohio
220
Ga. Ct. App.
205
Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
204
Conn. Super. Ct.
197
D.C. Cir.
195
8th Cir.
193
U.S.T.C.
190
11th Cir.
188
U.S.
187
Mich. Ct. App.
181
S.D. Tex.
181
1st Cir.
180
D. Minn.
180
S.D. Fla.
180
Del.
176
Md.
171
E.D. Cal.
170
Ala.
167
10th Cir.
162
Mo. Ct. App.
162
E.D. Va.
161
N.D. Tex.
157
W.D. Pa.
157
D.C.
155
Pa.
153
D. Conn.
151
N.Y.
149
D.N.M.
145
T.C.
143
Pa. Cmmw. Ct.
141
D. Kan.
140
M.D. Fla.
140
C.D. Cal.
138
4th Cir.
133
Minn. Ct. App.
133
N.J.
132
Tenn. Crim. App.
131
Del. Super. Ct.
128
D. Colo.
127
Colo. App.
121
Fed. Cir.
120
Wash.
118
N.J. Super.
117
Iowa
116
Mass. App. Ct.
116
N.C. Ct. App.
116
E.D. La.
115
La. Ct. App.
115
Mass.
115
D. Nev.
113
Iowa Ct. App.
109
N.D. Ga.
108
S.D. Cal.
108
Conn. App. Ct.
106
Tenn. Ct. App.
105
Utah Ct. App.
105
E.D. Mo.
104
Cal.
103
Bankr. D. Del.
100
M.D. Pa.
98
R.I. Super.
96
Or. Ct. App.
95
W.D. Wash.
95
N.C.
94
Ky. Ct. App.
93
Ind. Ct. App.
92
Miss.
92
Ohio
92
D. Utah
91
Kan.
89
Tex. Civ. App.
89
Conn.
87
W.D.N.Y.
84
Wyo.
81
Ariz. Ct. App.
79
N.D. Ala.
79
N.D.N.Y.
79
S.C. Ct. App.
79
D.S.C.
78
Idaho
77
R.I.
77
M.D. Tenn.
75
Mo.
75
Tex.
75
W.D. Mich.
75
W.D. Tex.
75
B.A.P. 9th Cir.
74
Ga.
74
D. Or.
73
S.C.
71
Utah
71
D. Ariz.
70
Bankr. E.D. Pa.
69
E.D. Wis.
69
N.M. Ct. App.
66
D. Haw.
65
S.D. Ind.
65
Ark.
64
Colo.
64
Or.
64
Bankr. N.D. Ill.
63
W.D. Mo.
63
Wis. Ct. App.
63
Ill.
62
Neb.
62
Va.
62
Minn.
61
Fed. Cl.
60
N.D. Ind.
60
Kan. Ct. App.
58
Nev.
58
Me.
57
W.D. Ky.
55
Bankr. N.D. Tex.
54
W. Va.
54
W.D.N.C.
54
Mont.
53
W.D. Wis.
53
Bankr. D.N.J.
52
E.D. Tex.
52
Okla.
52
D.P.R.
51
Ind.
49
Bankr. D. Mass.
48
W.D. Tenn.
48
Fla.
47
Mich.
47
Wis.
47
D.N.H.
46
N.M.
46
Va. Ct. App.
46
D. Me.
45
E.D. Ky.
45
Haw.
45
Bankr. S.D. Tex.
44
Ind. App.
44
N.D. Okla.
44
W.D. La.
44
S.D. Ill.
43
N.H.
42
S.D.
42
S.D. Miss.
42
D.R.I.
41
D.V.I.
41
M.D. Ala.
41
M.D.N.C.
41
S.D. Ala.
41
N.D. Iowa
40
N.J. Ch.
40
E.D. Tenn.
39
Mass. Cmmw.
39
S.D.W. Va.
39
La.
38
N.D.
38
W.D. Va.
38
Tenn.
37
Bankr. M.D. Fla.
36
Alaska
34
E.D.N.C.
34
Ky.
34
M.D. Ga.
34
Vt.
34
Haw. Ct. App.
33
Ariz.
32
Miss. Ct. App.
32
Ala. Civ. App.
30
C.D. Ill.
29
Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
28
D. Neb.
28
E.D. Ark.
28
Bankr. N.D. Cal.
27
Bankr. S.D. Ohio
27
S.D. Ga.
27
Bankr. W.D. Tex.
26
W.D. Okla.
26
W.D. Ark.
25
Bankr. C.D. Cal.
24
Bankr. S.D. Fla.
24
Bankr. W.D. Pa.
24
Me. Super.
24
Tex. Crim. App.
24
Alaska Ct. App.
23
Bankr. E.D. Mich.
23
N.D. Miss.
23
Ark. Ct. App.
22
Bankr. E.D. Va.
22
Bankr. N.D. Ga.
22
D. Vt.
22
D.S.D.
22
Okla. Crim. App.
21
S.D. Iowa
21
D. Idaho
19
Bankr. N.D. Ala.
18
Ct. Int'l Trade
18
Okla. Civ. App.
18
Bankr. E.D. Cal.
16
D. Mont.
16
Bankr. D. Kan.
15
Bankr. N.D. Ohio
15
M.D. La.
15
N.D.W. Va.
15
Bankr. D. Ariz.
14
Bankr. D. Conn.
14
Idaho Ct. App.
14
Bankr. D. Md.
13
E.D. Wash.
13
Neb. Ct. App.
13
Ala. Crim. App.
12
Bankr. D.S.C.
12
Bankr. E.D. Tenn.
12
Bankr. D. Mont.
11
Bankr. D.D.C.
11
Bankr. D.N.H.
11
Bankr. D.N.M.
11
Bankr. M.D. Tenn.
11
Bankr. N.D. Ind.
11
Guam
11
N.C. Business
11
Bankr. D. Colo.
10
Bankr. D. Idaho
10
Bankr. D. Me.
10
Bankr. D. Or.
10
Bankr. E.D.N.C.
10
Bankr. W.D.N.C.
10
D.N.D.
10
B.A.P. 1st Cir.
9
Bankr. D. Haw.
9
Bankr. S.D. Miss.
9
Bankr. W.D. Wis.
9
D. Wyo.
9
E.D. Okla.
9
Mass. Dist. Ct. App.
9
N.D. Fla.
9
Nev. App.
9
B.A.P. 10th Cir.
8
Bankr. E.D. Wis.
8
Bankr. W.D. Mich.
8
D. Alaska
8
N.J. Tax
8
N.L.R.B-BD
8
Or. T.C.
8
Bankr. C.D. Ill.
7
Bankr. D. Nev.
7
Bankr. M.D. Pa.
7
Bankr. M.D.N.C.
7
Bankr. S.D. Cal.
7
Bankr. W.D. La.
7
Bankr. W.D. Mo.
7
Ohio Com. Pleas
7
T.T.A.B.
7
B.A.P. 6th Cir.
6
Bankr. E.D. La.
6
Bankr. E.D. Tex.
6
Bankr. M.D. Ga.
6
Bankr. N.D. Okla.
6
Bankr. N.D.N.Y.
6
Bankr. S.D. Ind.
6
Cal. W.C.A.B.
6
N.Y. Ct. Cl.
6
Bankr. D.P.R.
5
Bankr. D.S.D.
5
Bankr. N.D. Iowa
5
Bankr. S.D. Ala.
5
Va. Cir. Ct.
5
B.T.A.
4
Bankr. D. Minn.
4
Bankr. D. Vt.
4
Bankr. E.D. Ky.
4
Bankr. S.D. Ga.
4
Bankr. W.D. Va.
4
Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
4
N. Mar. I.
4
Ohio Misc.
4
Ops.Ark.Atty.Gen.
4
Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.
4
W. Va. Int. Ct. App.
4
B.A.P. 8th Cir.
3
Bankr. D. Alaska
3
Bankr. D. Neb.
3
Bankr. D.R.I.
3
Bankr. M.D. La.
3
Bankr. N.D. Miss.
3
Bankr. N.D.W. Va.
3
Bankr. W.D. Tenn.
3
Bankr. W.D. Wash.
3
C.C.P.A.
3
Colo. Ind. App.
3
E.E.O.C.
3
J.P.M.L.
3
N.H. Super.
3
N.L.R.B-ALJ
3
N.Y. City Ct.
3
N.Y. Civ. Ct.
3
N.Y. Surr. Ct.
3
Ohio Ct. Cl.
3
P.T.A.B.
3
Bankr. D. Utah
2
Bankr. E.D. Ark.
2
Bankr. E.D. Mo.
2
Bankr. E.D. Okla.
2
Bankr. M.D. Ala.
2
Bankr. N.D. Fla.
2
Bankr. S.D.W. Va.
2
Bankr. W.D. Ky.
2
Bankr. W.D. Okla.
2
D. Guam
2
E.D.S.C.
2
Ind. T.C.
2
Mass. DIA
2
N.L.R.B.
2
N.Y. Dist. Ct.
2
N.Y. Sup. Ct. Com. Div.
2
Ops. Tex. Atty. Gen.
2
Ops.Wis.Atty.Gen.
2
Ark. Work Comp.
1
B.I.A.
1
Bankr. D.V.I.
1
Bankr. E.D. Wash.
1
Bankr. S.D. Iowa
1
Del. Fam.
1
Del. Gen. Sess.
1
E.D. Ill.
1
N.C. Ind. Comn.
1
N.C. Super.
1
N.Y. Just. Ct.
1
Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.
1
Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen.
1
Ops.Okla.Atty.Gen.
1
Vt. Super. Ct. Civ. Div.
1
App. T. 1st Dep't
0
App. T. 2d Dep't
0
Ariz. Tax Ct.
0
Ark. Workers' Comp. Comm'n
0
B.A.P. 2nd Cir.
0
Bankr. D. Guam
0
Bankr. D. Wyo.
0
Bankr. D.N.D.
0
Bankr. S.D. Ill.
0
Bankr. W.D. Ark.
0
Cal. Super.
0
Conn. C.P.
0
Conn. Cir. Ct.
0
Conn. Work Comp.
0
D. Ind.
0
D.C.Z.
0
D.N. Mar. I.
0
D.R.I. (Bankr.)
0
Del. Com. Pleas
0
Del. J.P. Ct.
0
Del. Jud.
0
Del. Orph.
0
Emer. Ct. App.
0
F.T.C.
0
FISA Ct.
0
M.D. Mich.
0
Mass. Super.
0
Mont. T.A.B.
0
N. Mar. I. Commw. Super. Ct.
0
N.C. Cir.
0
N.D. Ct. App.
0
N.J. Cir. Ct.
0
N.L.R.B-UBD
0
N.Y. App. Term
0
N.Y. Cnty. Ct.
0
N.Y. County Ct.
0
N.Y. Crim. Ct.
0
N.Y. Fam. Ct.
0
Okla. Ind. Review
0
Okla. Jud. Eth.
0
Ops. Fla. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. La. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. N.Y. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops. Wash. Atty. Gen.
0
Ops.Colo.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Mo.Atty.Gen.
0
Ops.Neb.Atty.Gen.
0
PTAB
0
Pa. Ct. Jud. Disc.
0
S.D. W. Va.
0
Tenn. Ch.
0
Tenn. Cir.
0
Tex. J.P.M.L.
0
U.S.C.M.C.R.
0
Vet App.
0
Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div.
0
W.D.S.C.
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
4635
From 2011 To 2020
9824
From 2001 To 2010
5287
From 1991 To 2000
2782
From 1981 To 1990
2267
From 1971 To 1980
1395
From 1961 To 1970
647
From 1951 To 1960
311
Before 1950
1252

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

1

...disputed taxes did violate the automatic stay. A. The Merger Doctrine The doctrine of merger is a subset of res judicata and precludes a plaintiff...merged into the money judgment. It therefore rejected Taxel's motion for contempt, concluding that the State's retention of the disputed taxes could not, under the doctrine of merger, be a continuing...violation of the automatic stay. We decline the State's invitation to adopt the reasoning of the bankruptcy court. The bankruptcy court's analysis stretches the doctrine of merger beyond...


Court:
Date: Oct 23, 1996 Cited By: 230 Coram: 1
2

...Deceptive Trade Practices Act involves the issue of whether the doctrine of merger applies in a suit under the Act based on breach of an express warranty. After a jury trial, the district court...reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered a take-nothing judgment against Alvarado predicated on the holding that the doctrine of merger applied.... 714 S.W.2d 119. We hold that the doctrine of merger is not applicable, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this cause to that court. In 1973, Bolton, as...


Court:
Date: May 25, 1988 Cited By: 40 Coram: 2
3

...' breach of contract claim on the grounds that it was barred under the doctrine of merger. The relevant facts follow. On May 3, 1999, plaintiffs entered into a written contract to...oversimplification of the law regarding the doctrine of merger. Under Illinois law, the doctrine of merger is not absolute. See, e.g., Trapp v...doctrine is not the absolute bar to plaintiffs' claim for breach of the express warranty in the contract that defendants assert it to be. Instead, the applicability of the merger doctrine here first requires a determination of whether...


Court:
Date: Sep 22, 2000 Cited By: 90 Coram: 1
4

...adduce clear and convincing proof that defendant Kirchner intended to abandon the easement. We also find no error in the trial court's refusal to consider the doctrine of merger since...plaintiff concededly failed to advance this theory in her complaint. Moreover, even if the trial court had considered the doctrine of merger, it would not have extinguished the easement because...the dominant and servient tenements never came into ownership of the same person. An easement is "not extinguished under the doctrine of merger by the acquisition by the owner of the dominant or...


Court:
Date: Apr 8, 1988 Cited By: 10
5

.... The common law doctrine of merger of estates is recognized in New Mexico case law. Padilla v. Sais, 76 N.M. 247..., 128 P.2d 289 (1942), Annot., 143 A.L.R. 93 (1943), and thus indicating that the doctrine of merger of estates is not to be applied rigidly and mechanically, as it was...at common law. In Mobley v. Harkins, supra, the more recent history of the doctrine of merger of estates is briefly and succinctly stated...


Court:
Date: Oct 25, 1977 Cited By: 3
6

...attempt when shown to be successful was due to the general English doctrine of merger and not to any unusual requirement in the law of attempt. A...clear that the rule is historically and logically one aspect of the wider doctrine of merger of misdemeanor in felony. The English doctrine of merger of offenses..., 205 Md. 470, 109 A.2d 89, 92 (1954), after pointing out that the doctrine of merger is not favored today, the court observed...


Court:
Date: Jan 10, 1966 Cited By: 35 Coram: 1
7

...the doctrine of merger. We disagree. ¶ 5 Wife cites to the merger doctrine associated with the transfer of real property. That doctrine, as cited, albeit to an incorrect case, by.... ¶ 6 First, we find that the doctrine of merger does not apply in this action where Husband's claim arises from the PSA, and not from a contract related to this sale.... See Juniata Valley Bank v. Martin Oil Co., 736 A.2d 650, 661 (Pa.Super. 1999) (holding doctrine of merger did not prohibit bank's claim...


Court:
Date: Jun 8, 2005 Cited By: 4 Coram: 1
8

...dismissing their petition based on the "Doctrine of Merger". We agree on procedural grounds and reverse and remand. 2] FACTS On...July 25, 1995, basing its dismissal upon the execution and delivery of the deed, which the court found implicated the "Doctrine of Merger". On November 8, 1995, the trial court entered a default...sole point on appeal that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine of merger and dismissing their petition against the respondents for damages, costs and attorney's fees as a result of a breach of...


Court:
Date: Nov 5, 1996 Cited By: 4 Coram: 1
9

...of the notes. The minerals having been reserved in the deed by apt language, the title thereto never passed from Kennedy by the deed, but at all times reposed in him, so that under the doctrine of merger the...respectively. They cannot merge in the former, to the extinguishment of his separate title to the minerals for the reasons following: (a) The doctrine of merger applies only to...in his own right and another as trustee. (P. 261). (c) The existence of an intermediate estate, such as the equitable one of the purchaser in this case, will prevent the merger of the title to the minerals with the fee retained by the vendor. (Pp. 261, 262). (d) The doctrine of...


Court:
Date: Jun 30, 1923 Cited By: 101 Coram: 1
10

...which were concerned with merger of sales provisions in land sales contracts, and none of which involved the question of whether or not the "build" provisions of a build-sell agreement also should merge into the deed. If the doctrine of...merger by deed were to be a complete bar to all building construction related claims, as suggested by the builder-seller, then the doctrine of caveat emptor never...doctrine of merger by deed does not bar the enforcement of such independent or collateral undertakings simply because they are expressed in a writing containing terms of sale which merge into the...


Court:
Date: Feb 4, 1982 Cited By: 48 Coram: 1
11

...invoices. The trial court conducted a hearing on the motions. Upon review of the arguments of counsel, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of appellees based upon the doctrines of merger and election of remedies. The trial court concluded that, pursuant to these doctrines, the February 14, 1995 Bahamian default judgment barred Diamond Fertilizer from proceeding against the appellees in the Florida courts based upon the same underlying debt. This conclusion was incorrect. The doctrine of...merger provides that a cause of action upon which an adjudication is predicated merges into the judgment and that, consequently, the cause of action's independent existence perishes upon entry of the judgment. See Vernon v. Service Trucking, Inc., 565 So.2d 905, 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). The doctrine of...merger is based on the reasoning that the judgment is considered to be superior to the cause of action on which it is founded. 32 Fla. Jur. 2d Judgment and Decree § 113 (1994). By extinguishing the cause of action on which a judgment is based, the doctrine of...


Court:
Date: Jul 30, 1999 Cited By: 11 Coram: 2
12

...: 1) The doctrine of merger is applicable to juvenile delinquency proceedings. 2) Under the doctrine of merger, an adjudication that a child is delinquent...: The finding of "simple possession" of cocaine must be vacated under the doctrine of merger. They conclude their argument...disposition hearings. The objective of the Petitioners founders on the shoals of their erroneous concept of the effect of the application of the doctrine of merger. II...


Court:
Date: Feb 24, 1992 Cited By: 44 Coram: 1
13

...doctrine of merger operates to extinguish a cause of action on which a judgment is based and bars a subsequent action for the same cause. See Brinker...of the checks at issue here. Accordingly, the trial court's adjudication of merger must have been predicated on extrinsic evidence. The doctrine of merger is comparable to res...(Fla. 1956). In identifying the issues previously adjudicated in order to apply the doctrine of either res judicata or estoppel by judgment, the court may consider only the record of that prior action. The same principle logically applies to the doctrine of merger. Therefore...


Court:
Date: Dec 9, 1982 Cited By: 6 Coram: 1
14

...cause of action defendant moved to dismiss alleging that it was barred by the doctrine of merger. Supreme Court granted defendant's motion and...this appeal by plaintiffs ensued. Because the doctrine of merger is inapplicable to causes of action alleging fraud, defendant did...not move for summary judgment until the fraud claim was withdrawn by plaintiffs. Under the well-established doctrine of merger, provisions in a contract for the sale of real...


Court:
Date: Dec 18, 1997 Cited By: 13
15

...lien on the property, under the doctrine of merger, since the mortgagors, Kenneth and Lilly Brandon, executed a warranty deed in lieu of foreclosure to Peoples Bank. The trial court granted summary...for the New Hampshire Supreme Court in Stantons v. Thompson, 49 N.H. 272 (1870), wrote: "In fact, the doctrine of merger springs from the fact that when the entire equitable...the mortgage and deed, had executed a mortgage to a third party, which was duly recorded. The third party sought to have its mortgage elevated to a first lien on the property, through the doctrine of merger. We...


Court:
Date: Feb 20, 1987 Cited By: 12 Coram: 1
16

...ruled that arrearage that accrued under the provisional order was not enforceable, pursuant to the "merger" doctrine. 5. That of the...claims that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to correct error because the trial court erroneously determined that the doctrine of merger prohibited the State from bringing an...original claim, because the doctrine of merger operates to extinguish a cause of action on which a judgment is based and bars a subsequent action for the same cause...


Court:
Date: Apr 30, 2003 Cited By: 22 Coram: 1
17

...doctrine of merger as applied in this court's ruling in the case of Dunn v. Ponceler, 230 Ala. 375.... Ponceler decision which holds the doctrine of merger operates to invalidate a trust where two or more trustees are also the named beneficiaries of the trust. The Bank makes two points...in its argument: (1) the doctrine of merger, as applied in the Dunn case, invalidated the Webb Trust ab initio because the trust beneficiaries and trustees are identical and (2) the Webb...


Court:
Date: Jul 27, 1979 Cited By: 6 Coram: 1
18

.... The doctrine of merger, relied upon by defendant, usually is more appropriate as a matter of defense on the part of a vendor. See, Annot., 38 A.L.R.2d 1310...agreement. Those latter aspects are generally referred to in the cases as "collateral matters" which are not affected by the doctrine of merger. The line of demarcation between what is...and is not covered by the doctrine of merger was discussed and a New York opinion quoted with approval in Frisbie v. Scott, 199 Mo.App. 131, 201 S.W. 561 (1918...


Court:
Date: Nov 10, 1981 Cited By: 13 Coram: 1
19

...doctrine of merger, and for dismissal of the rape and sodomy counts for lack of geographical jurisdiction, defendant pleaded guilty to the kidnapping and rape counts in full satisfaction of the...dismiss the kidnapping charge on the ground that the doctrine of merger barred prosecution for that crime. The People correctly argue that defendant's plea of guilty waived any right to challenge this...53 N.Y.2d 338 ). We, therefore, need not reach the issue concerning the doctrine of merger in this case. Defendant's next...


Court:
Date: Dec 15, 1983 Cited By: 5
20

.... In resolving the valuation problem, the trial court mechanically applied the doctrine of merger without considering the intent of the..., 1245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Lassiter cites Contos to support his contention that equity prevents the application of the doctrine of merger in this case because merger...as unencumbered by the lease. Thus, the court found it unnecessary to apply the doctrine of merger to reach the result for which the parties had bargained...


Court:
Date: May 30, 1991 Cited By: 11 Coram: 2

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).