Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Cal. Ct. App.2024
+ Tex. App.1476
+ S.D.N.Y.1255
+ Ill. App. Ct.1065
+ E.D. Cal.850
+ Mo.808
+ N.Y. App. Div.746
+ Ala.741
+ 9th Cir.738
+ Ohio Ct. App.726
+ E.D.N.Y.712
+ D.D.C.692
+ Miss.668
+ Wash. Ct. App.652
+ N.D. Ill.610
+ U.S.609
+ Tex. Civ. App.604
+ 5th Cir.602
+ Ariz. Ct. App.581
+ Cal.576
+ D.N.J.535
+ N.C. Ct. App.526
+ N.C.511
+ Ga. Ct. App.510
+ E.D. Pa.506
+ D. Md.469
+ Ala. Civ. App.462
+ N.D. Cal.453
+ S.D. Ohio449
+ Mo. Ct. App.442
+ Ala. Crim. App.415
+ 2d Cir.411
+ Iowa410
+ S.D. Tex.406
+ 6th Cir.400
+ Okla.392
+ 10th Cir.390
+ E.D. Mich.371
+ 3d Cir.365
+ 4th Cir.351
+ N.D. Tex.348
+ M.D. Pa.347
+ M.D. Fla.342
+ N.J. Super. App. Div.341
+ W.D. Pa.340
+ N.D. Ohio333
+ Md. Ct. Spec. App.331
+ 7th Cir.327
+ D.C. Cir.324
+ 1st Cir.313
+ Wash.311
+ D. Conn.307
+ N.D.N.Y.306
+ D.N.M.305
+ Tex.305
+ D.S.C.302
+ La. Ct. App.302
+ Ga.301
+ D. Ariz.294
+ 8th Cir.292
+ Pa. Super. Ct.281
+ Fla. Dist. Ct. App.277
+ Idaho274
+ E.D. La.269
+ N.Y. Misc.269
+ N.Y. Sup. Ct.262
+ N.D.259
+ W.D.N.Y.258
+ Md.257
+ D. Mass.254
+ Mont.254
+ D.C.253
+ Ky. Ct. App.247
+ Ind. Ct. App.244
+ Tenn. Ct. App.239
+ W. Va.239
+ 11th Cir.238
+ E.D. Va.236
+ S.D. Cal.236
+ S.C.232
+ N.J. Super.224
+ Conn.217
+ Fla.216
+ D. Colo.213
+ D. Kan.213
+ Pa.213
+ D. Del.208
+ N.D. Iowa208
+ Tenn. Crim. App.207
+ Ill.206
+ M.D. Ala.205
+ Tex. Crim. App.205
+ Or.203
+ Mass.202
+ W.D. Mich.199
+ E.D. Mo.197
+ D. Minn.189
+ Mich. Ct. App.188
+ Kan.186
+ Minn.186
+ Wyo.186
+ Vt.182
+ M.D. Tenn.172
+ La.171
+ Conn. Super. Ct.168
+ Ohio168
+ W.D. Tex.166
+ C.D. Cal.165
+ Nev.159
+ D. Nev.154
+ Or. Ct. App.151
+ E.D.N.C.150
+ Tenn.150
+ Wis.149
+ Va.142
+ Ark.141
+ W.D. La.141
+ N.J.140
+ Conn. App. Ct.137
+ E.D. Tex.136
+ Mich.134
+ D. Or.129
+ Kan. Ct. App.129
+ Neb.129
+ Ind.127
+ M.D.N.C.127
+ Me.126
+ W.D. Va.126
+ W.D.N.C.126
+ S.D. Fla.123
+ N.D. Ga.122
+ N.D. Okla.121
+ W.D. Wash.120
+ S.C. Ct. App.118
+ N.Y.116
+ N.D. Fla.115
+ N.H.111
+ Ariz.110
+ E.D. Ky.110
+ S.D. Miss.107
+ U.S.T.C.106
+ Wis. Ct. App.105
+ E.D. Tenn.101
+ N.D. Ala.101
+ W.D. Tenn.95
+ D. Me.93
+ Utah93
+ D.S.D.92
+ Fed. Cir.90
+ D. Utah88
+ W.D. Ky.88
+ D.V.I.87
+ S.D.W. Va.87
+ E.D. Wis.86
+ S.D. Ind.86
+ D. Haw.85
+ S.D. Ala.85
+ Colo.83
+ N.D. Ind.83
+ N.M.82
+ S.D. Ga.79
+ W.D. Okla.79
+ Ind. App.77
+ Del. Ch.76
+ D. Neb.75
+ D.P.R.75
+ Ky.75
+ Minn. Ct. App.74
+ N.D. Miss.71
+ E.D. Ark.70
+ D.N.H.68
+ W.D. Ark.68
+ Idaho Ct. App.65
+ Pa. Cmmw. Ct.65
+ Colo. App.64
+ M.D. La.64
+ S.D. Iowa64
+ R.I.63
+ N.M. Ct. App.62
+ Okla. Crim. App.61
+ Haw.60
+ Bankr. S.D.N.Y.59
+ S.D. Ill.58
+ Del.56
+ S.D.55
+ Va. Ct. App.55
+ W.D. Wis.53
+ M.D. Ga.52
+ D. Idaho49
+ D. Vt.49
+ W.D. Mo.49
+ D.R.I.47
+ Utah Ct. App.45
+ Del. Super. Ct.44
+ Alaska43
+ Iowa Ct. App.43
+ C.D. Ill.42
+ T.C.42
+ Fed. Cl.41
+ Miss. Ct. App.40
+ D. Mont.38
+ E.D. Okla.37
+ Mass. App. Ct.36
+ Bankr. N.D. Ill.35
+ Ark. Ct. App.34
+ B.A.P. 9th Cir.33
+ E.D. Wash.32
+ Bankr. S.D. Tex.28
+ D.N.D.28
+ P.T.A.B.27
+ Haw. Ct. App.24
+ N.D.W. Va.24
+ N.J. Ch.24
+ R.I. Super.24
+ Okla. Civ. App.22
+ Bankr. N.D. Ohio21
+ D. Wyo.21
+ Bankr. E.D. Va.19
+ D. Alaska19
+ Bankr. N.D. Ga.18
+ Bankr. S.D. Ohio17
+ Ct. Int'l Trade17
+ Me. Super.17
+ Bankr. D.N.J.16
+ Bankr. M.D.N.C.16
+ Bankr. N.D. Ala.16
+ Bankr. N.D. Tex.16
+ Bankr. E.D. Tenn.15
+ Alaska Ct. App.14
+ Bankr. E.D. Pa.14
+ Bankr. D. Colo.13
+ Bankr. E.D. Mich.13
+ Ops.Ark.Atty.Gen.13
+ Bankr. D. Mass.12
+ C.C.P.A.12
+ Neb. Ct. App.12
+ Bankr. D. Del.11
+ Bankr. D. Md.10
+ Bankr. M.D. Tenn.10
+ B.A.P. 6th Cir.9
+ Bankr. C.D. Cal.9
+ Bankr. D. Conn.9
+ Bankr. D. Mont.9
+ Bankr. E.D.N.Y.9
+ Bankr. M.D. Fla.9
+ E.D.S.C.9
+ Guam9
+ N.C. Business9
+ N.L.R.B-BD9
+ N.Y. Civ. Ct.9
+ N.Y. Ct. Cl.9
+ Bankr. D.N.M.8
+ Bankr. D. Minn.7
+ Bankr. D.S.C.7
+ Bankr. S.D. Ga.7
+ Bankr. W.D. Pa.7
+ N. Mar. I.7
+ Nev. App.7
+ B.A.P. 10th Cir.6
+ B.A.P. 1st Cir.6
+ Bankr. D.D.C.6
+ Bankr. N.D. Cal.6
+ Bankr. N.D.N.Y.6
+ Bankr. S.D. Fla.6
+ Bankr. W.D. Mich.6
+ Bankr. W.D. Mo.6
+ Bankr. W.D. Va.6
+ N.C. Ind. Comn.6
+ N.Y. Surr. Ct.6
+ Ohio Com. Pleas6
+ Ohio Misc.6
+ Ops. Tex. Atty. Gen.6
+ Va. Cir. Ct.6
+ Bankr. D. Vt.5
+ Bankr. E.D. Cal.5
+ Bankr. N.D. Okla.5
+ Bankr. W.D. Tex.5
+ E.D. Ill.5
+ W.D.S.C.5
+ B.A.P. 8th Cir.4
+ Bankr. D. Idaho4
+ Bankr. D. Kan.4
+ Bankr. D. Me.4
+ Bankr. D.P.R.4
+ Bankr. E.D. Ark.4
+ Bankr. N.D.W. Va.4
+ Bankr. W.D. Ky.4
+ Bankr. W.D. Tenn.4
+ Conn. C.P.4
+ N.Y. Crim. Ct.4
+ Ops.Wis.Atty.Gen.4
+ T.T.A.B.4
+ Bankr. D. Nev.3
+ Bankr. D. Or.3
+ Bankr. D. Utah3
+ Bankr. E.D. Ky.3
+ Bankr. E.D. Tex.3
+ Bankr. N.D. Iowa3
+ Bankr. N.D. Miss.3
+ Bankr. S.D. Ala.3
+ Bankr. S.D. Ind.3
+ Bankr. S.D.W. Va.3
+ Bankr. W.D. Ark.3
+ Bankr. W.D. Wash.3
+ Cal. W.C.A.B.3
+ D.N. Mar. I.3
+ Mass. Cmmw.3
+ N.Y. Dist. Ct.3
+ Ohio Ct. Cl.3
+ Ops. Fla. Atty. Gen.3
+ Ops. La. Atty. Gen.3
+ Ops. Wash. Atty. Gen.3
+ Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen.3
+ Or. T.C.3
+ B.I.A.2
+ B.T.A.2
+ Bankr. M.D. Ala.2
+ Bankr. M.D. Pa.2
+ Bankr. N.D. Ind.2
+ Bankr. S.D. Cal.2
+ Bankr. S.D. Ill.2
+ Bankr. S.D. Iowa2
+ Bankr. W.D. Okla.2
+ Bankr. W.D. Wis.2
+ Bankr. W.D.N.C.2
+ Mass. DIA2
+ N.H. Super.2
+ N.J. Cir. Ct.2
+ N.L.R.B-ALJ2
+ Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.2
+ Tenn. Ch.2
+ Ark. Work Comp.1
+ B.A.P. 2nd Cir.1
+ Bankr. C.D. Ill.1
+ Bankr. D. Ariz.1
+ Bankr. D. Haw.1
+ Bankr. D.N.D.1
+ Bankr. D.R.I.1
+ Bankr. D.S.D.1
+ Bankr. E.D. La.1
+ Bankr. E.D. Wis.1
+ Bankr. E.D.N.C.1
+ Bankr. M.D. Ga.1
+ Bankr. S.D. Miss.1
+ Colo. Ind. App.1
+ Conn. Work Comp.1
+ D. Guam1
+ Del. Com. Pleas1
+ Del. Fam.1
+ E.E.O.C.1
+ Mass. Dist. Ct. App.1
+ N.Y. Fam. Ct.1
+ Okla. Ind. Review1
+ Ops. N.Y. Atty. Gen.1
+ Ops.Colo.Atty.Gen.1
+ Ops.Neb.Atty.Gen.1
+ Vet App.1
+ App. T. 1st Dep't0
+ App. T. 2d Dep't0
+ Ariz. Tax Ct.0
+ Ark. Workers' Comp. Comm'n0
+ Bankr. D. Alaska0
+ Bankr. D. Guam0
+ Bankr. D. Neb.0
+ Bankr. D. Wyo.0
+ Bankr. D.N.H.0
+ Bankr. D.V.I.0
+ Bankr. E.D. Mo.0
+ Bankr. E.D. Okla.0
+ Bankr. E.D. Wash.0
+ Bankr. M.D. La.0
+ Bankr. N.D. Fla.0
+ Bankr. W.D. La.0
+ Bankr. W.D.N.Y.0
+ Cal. Super.0
+ Conn. Cir. Ct.0
+ D. Ind.0
+ D.C.Z.0
+ Del. Gen. Sess.0
+ Del. J.P. Ct.0
+ Del. Jud.0
+ Del. Orph.0
+ Emer. Ct. App.0
+ F.T.C.0
+ FISA Ct.0
+ Ind. T.C.0
+ J.P.M.L.0
+ M.D. Mich.0
+ Mass. Super.0
+ Mont. T.A.B.0
+ N.C. Cir.0
+ N.C. Super.0
+ N.D. Ct. App.0
+ N.J. Tax0
+ N.L.R.B-UBD0
+ N.L.R.B.0
+ N.Y. App. Term0
+ N.Y. City Ct.0
+ N.Y. Cnty. Ct.0
+ N.Y. County Ct.0
+ N.Y. Just. Ct.0
+ N.Y. Sup. Ct. Com. Div.0
+ Okla. Jud. Eth.0
+ Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen.0
+ Ops.Mo.Atty.Gen.0
+ Ops.Okla.Atty.Gen.0
+ PTAB0
+ Pa. Ct. Jud. Disc.0
+ Tenn. Cir.0
+ Tex. J.P.M.L.0
+ U.S.C.M.C.R.0
+ Vt. Super. Ct. Civ. Div.0
+ Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div.0
+ W. Va. Int. Ct. App.0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards7044
From 2011 To 202014749
From 2001 To 20107469
From 1991 To 20003547
From 1981 To 19902710
From 1971 To 19802242
From 1961 To 19701707
From 1951 To 19601666
Before 19506850

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

.... 652 (1906) and Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, 154 S.E. 579 (1930) to support his...right the city may, under its police power, regulate in the interest of the public safety and welfare. . . ." Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. at 583. The city driver's license...grants to individuals the absolute freedom from state regulation that Gordon insists upon. Nor does Thompson v. Smith, supra, support Gordon's position. Although the Thompson court...

...government may not divest itself of this function, or delegate it to executive or administrative officers. Thompson v. Smith, Va., 154 S.E. 579, 71 A.L.R. 604. Whether...oppressive or inefficient. There would be confusion in the laws, and, in an effort to detail and particularize, the law would miss sufficiency both in provision and detail. Thompson v. Smith, ...administrators) distinguishes the questioned statute from those considered in the examined cases. In Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, ...

...Supreme Court of Virginia, id. at 3 (citing Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579 (Va. 1930)), California state courts, id. (citing... CV420-199 09-21-2021 DETRICK MURRAY-BEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORT WENTWORTH and DEREK WHITE, Defendants...before the district court proceedings commenced and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments.'” Behr v. Campbell, 8 F.4th 1206, 1209-1210 (11th Cir. 2021) (emphasis...

...Thompson v Smith 154 SE 579, 580 as that only way States can control the issue of drivers license, registration etc. It is the equity law that denies rights... James Oliver, Plaintiff, v. Mr. Chris Long, Ms. Sandra Wagner, Defendants. No. CV-06-2429-PCT-LOA. United States... A motion to reconsider must provide a valid ground for reconsideration by showing two elements. All Hawaii Tours Corp. v. Polunesian Cultural Ctr., 116 F.R.D. 645, 648-49 (D...

.... 223; 14 R.C.L. 434 § 136; Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. Rep. (Va.) 579; Chaires v. Atlantic, 164 Ga. 755; Clarke v. Harford Agricultu...-Chancellor Church in Brex v. Smith, 104 N.J. Eq. 386; 146 Atl. Rep. 34, in discussing the right of a court of equity to enjoin a... IRVING MORESH, complainant, v. DANIEL T. O'REGAN, prosecutor, c., etal., defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided October...

...likely that the plaintiff is citing to Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579 (Va. 1930), a 1930 decision from the Virginia Supreme Court (which...harassment and misconduct of law. Thompson v. Smith US Supreme Court Says I have the right to travel. Dkt. No. 1 at 2-3...] the right to travel” and appears to cite to a case called “Thompson v. Smith” for that proposition. Id. at 3. While the court could not find any United States Supreme Court decision called...

..., 697 P.2d at 1193; accord Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583 (1930) (holding state regulatory schemes are a valid exercise of police power in the... 50238 08-01-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACK CHRISTOPHER CARSWELL, Defendant-Appellant.... Jack Christopher Carswell, Nampa, pro se appellant. Hon. Raul R. Labrador, Attorney General; Andrew V. Wake, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent...

...v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583 (Va. 1930) (recognizing that a city may, under its police power, regulate a person's right to drive on public streets by requiring a person to have a driving... 4:24-CR-26 (CDL) 02-06-2025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCOTT L. BUNKER, Defendant.... STANDARD OF REVIEW This is a petty offense case. See United States v. Brown, No. 4:25-CR-1 (CDL...

...(sic) that they violated his fifth admendant (sic) in light of the retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision Thompson v. Smith , 154 S.E... J-S22035-18 No. 1952 EDA 2017 07-05-2018 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. CHARLES OWEN DANDRIDGE JR... Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Commonwealth v. Santiago , 978 A.2d 349 (Pa. 2009). We...

...argument. In this hearing, Underwood quoted from a 1930 Virginia appellate case that mentioned a right to travel, Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E...appointed. (ECF No. 45.) United States v. Smith, 640 F.3d 580 (4th....'" Smith, 640 F.3d at 588 (quoting United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 151 (2006...

.... Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583 (Va. 1930). The one saving grace of this ruling is ...interrogated by the police is 'in custody.'" Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99, 102 (1995). "[W]hether a defendant is in custody is a mixed... 2020-SC-0534-MR 09-22-2022 TERESA HANEY APPELLANT v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY APPELLEE...

...restrict it, nor may it permit one to exercise it and refuse to permit another of like qualifications, under like conditions and circumstances, to exercise it. Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579..., and Harry A. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General all of Cheyenne, Wyoming and oral argument by Mr. Smyser. POINTS OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT. The operation of a motor vehicle on...without due process. Hulter v. State Road Commission of West Virginia, 193 S.E. 549; Prichard v. Battle, 17 S.E.2d 393, (Va...

...can be taken away. Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, 154 S.E. 579... THORNHILL v. KIRKMAN, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ET AL. Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A..., 71 A.L.R. 604; Fiehe v. R.E. Householder Co., 98 Fla. 627, 125 So. 2...

..., p. 636.) Citing: Thompson's-Shannon's Code, section 6444; Holder v. State, 152 Tenn. (Thompson), 390; Copeland v. State, 154 Tenn. (1 Smith), 7. 3...; Bostwick v. State, 154 Tenn. (1 Smith), 1. 5. SAME. Same. Same. The driving of an automobile on the public highways by one "under.... Contributory negligence does not apply in criminal cases. (Post, p. 637.) Citing: Lauterbach v. State, 132 Tenn. (Thompson); 603. [*] Headnotes...

..., 66 N.Y. 518; Gruman v. Smith, 81 N.Y. 25; Capron v. Thompson, 86 N.Y. 418;...; Taussig v. Hart, 58 N.Y. 425; Gruman v. Smith, 81 N.Y. 25; .... 541; Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 365, 378; Liverpool Steam Co. v. Phenix Insurance Co., 129 U.S. 443...

.... Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, 154 S.E. 579... Robert Lee SHELTON v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. 6 Div. 9. Court of Appeals of Alabama. August 18, 1964...street and not in the crosswalk when the officer told him to get out of the street. In People v. Galpern, 259 N.Y. 279...

...recognizes that the right to travel on public highways may be regulated by the state. See Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, ... FARMINGTON CITY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Wade LAKE, Defendant and Appellant. Wade Lake, Appellant Pro Se. Troy S. Rawlings and J. Craig Bott, Attorneys...a district court's judgment.” State v. Hinson, 966 P.2d 273, 276 (Utah Ct.App.1998). Accordingly, “absent an issue regarding the...

.... 233; Foley v. Ham, 102 Kan. 66 [169 P. 183, L.R.A. 1918C 204]; Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367...construction that statutes in derogation of the common law will be strictly construed. ( Thompson v. Thompson, 218 U.S. 611.... Reliance is placed upon Woolcott v. Shubert, 90 Misc. 474 [154...

...a law, exist in the performance of their duties, and especially when the performance of their duties is necessary for the safety and welfare of the public. Taylor v. Smith, 140 Va. 217, 231, 124 S.E. ...Thompson v. Smith, supra, 155 Va. at page 381: "Mere matters of detail within the policy, and the legal principles and standards...; Thompson v. Smith, supra. The next question is whether or not the ordinance prescribed sufficient standards to guide the building inspector...

...discretion of subordinate officers or boards. Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367, 379, 381, 154 S.E...Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 70 L.Ed. 322, 46 S.Ct. 126; Thompson v. Smith... MARSHALL ANDREWS, ET AL. v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUDOUN COUNTY, ET AL. 40055 Record No. 4883. Supreme Court of...