...circumstances of the case. It is the reason that this witness gave an absurd replies to all the relevant questions in his cross examination. This witness gave evasive replies and simply d...independent witnesses PW/7 Shri Harish Chandra Gupta and PW/8 Shri Amir Ahmed. The complainant gave five currency notes each of the denomination of 20 rupees to the Dy.S.P who initialed them and got...complainant turned hostile but the independent witness PW/7 Harish Chandra Gupta also did not support the prosecution case and a permission was obtained by the prosecutor from the court to declare him hostile...

...therein and accused offered to pay balance amount of Rs. 2,000/- and requested receipt of full and final payment in writing on 10.11.1997 but the complainant and witness Garje gave evasive replies and hence, accuse.... He also stated that he saw signature of the accused for the first time.12. Accused put up his case and suggested to said witness that he gave amount of Rs. 20,000/- to the accused and...Jondhale Bank Officer CW 2 and C.W.3 Dilip Garje where as accused neither examined himself nor examined any defence witness, but put forth his defence through the cross examination of the complainant...

..., he gave evasive replies and indicated that he did not know as to who was driving the Tractor and denied that Patram lodged the FIR at his instance. It would be interesting to note that the licence of...was claimed that Dharampal himself was driving the Tractor and accident occurred on account of rash and negligent driving by him, which resulted in his death; the police gave F.R, which was accepted on...Singh and he was made to put his thumb impression on the said FIR, which he did not read. The witness went on to recount the incident, which resulted in the death of Dharampal. The witness was cross...

...husband Babu Lal gave evasive replies in regard to most of the questions asked in cross-examination. It was also submitted that Satya Narayan is not truthful witness which is evident from the...replies were evasive. At one occasion he stated that Pushpa Devi is having only this house and she is residing in it after its purchase but on the question that Smt. Pushpa Devi is residing with her family...defendant-vendor Gopi Chand did not file any written statement nor he came in the witness box and the statements of defendant-vendee Smt. Pushpa Agrawal (DW 1) and her husband Babu Lal (DW 2) are not...

...advocate Mr. Mishra further submits that the petitioner's witness, when cross- examined by the respondent-workman, gave evasive replies to all the questions, merely stating that he was unaware of the...

...circumstance of the last seen together had not been established beyond a reasonable doubt. He submitted that even the allegation that the appellant gave evasive replies about the whereabouts of the deceased to...whereabouts of their son but the appellant gave evasive replies to misguide them. c. The proximity of time of the death of the deceased with the time of the deceased... appellant's residence at 9 am on 13thJuly 1995 is an omission, her version that the appellant gave evasive replies must be treated...

...their respective names. He was also questioned about a telephone and he gave evasive replies and said that he did not know whether this telephone belonged to the other concern or not. On these facts..., when entered the witness box, was specifically questioned whether he knew who are the other partners in the business concern which according to him, had been floated by his wife, but he failed to give...

...cases etc. but he gave evasive replies. P.W 2 Pahelwan Singh knowingly avoided to give replies to the questions which proved his favouritism with P.W 1 and his opposition and enmity with some of the accused persons...Singh P.W 2 and Raj Narain appellant. Ext. Kha. 4 is the copy of judgment in a case under Section 209 Z.A Act in between Ramu and Mangoo. In this case Pahelwan Singh P.W 2 had appeared as a witness...in the witness box although he was named as a witness in the F.I.R Ext. Kha. 10 is also a copy of F.I.R but this is not legible. So there was enmity in between the parties as well as in between the...

...called by the accused party to their home and was murdered and his dead body buried under sand. The accused persons gave evasive replies regarding his absence for a long duration. No sooner the matter (FIR - Ex. P/40) was r...significant delay of twelve days. The appellants had no motive to kill the deceased Hanjaram. The statement of star prosecution eye-witness Kana Ram (PW.10) was recorded after a delay of 13 days; that the...Hanjaram might have been killed, FIR No. 187/2015 (Ex. P/40) was lodged. Immediately thereafter, the witness Kanaram was examined by the Investigating Officer during investigation and in...

...appellant/accused-Mohd. Tahir and failed to appreciate that the prosecution witnesses PW-22, PW-26 to PW-30, who were official witnesses, gave evasive replies and their testimonies do not inspire confidence. There is no rel...evasive in his replies, so his statement cannot be relied upon. No doubt recovery of weapon of offence is an important piece of evidence, but the impugned judgment is silent on the aspect whether.... Adit S. Pujari, learned counsel appearing for appellant- Mohd. Tahir, submitted that the testimony of star witness Sonu Sharma (PW-1), who had identified the accused persons, is false and motivated...

...does not know whether appellant Ram Khilawan and Sheo Ram had given evidence against his son. He denied that he was also accused in said case. This witness has given lot of evasive replies which...Basdeo. Ram Lal further admitted that sometime prior to the incident of dacoity, one Surendra had been murdered in which his son Basdeo was accused, but again he gave an evasive reply and stated that he.... Thus, the evidence of P.W. 1 Munna Lal on this point is highly unnatural and unbelievable. (6.) P.W. 2 Ram Lal is the only other witness who has supported the prosecution case, but...

...if the said letter was written by the workman in Urdu, the management could have gotten it translated from somewhere. Even in the cross-examination, the IO gave evasive replies. This led the Labour...workman's evidence was then closed. The first management witness was examined on 19 July 1973 and cross-examined on 7 September 1973. The other four management witnesses were examined up to 28 September...and copy of documents, was not rebutted. In the cross-examination, the management's witness admitted to receiving this letter but did not give any reason as to why the letter was not replied to. Even...

...-1976 and 12-5-1980 the defendant set up a plea of oral lease as well as adverse possession and gave evasive replies by going to the extent of denying receipt of notices. He contended that the defendant did not examine hims...himself and the witness and relied on the documentary as well as oral evidence. As against this, the defendant did not examine himself nor he has examined any witness on his behalf. The trial Court on...gunthas of land. He contended that two notices dated 2-4-1976 and 26-11-1980 were served on the defendant calling upon him to deliver the possession of the 2 gunthas of land but by his replies dated 8-5...

....20. These witnesses have given evasive replies. Darshan Singh complainant gave evasive reply and pleaded ignorance when suggested that Gurbachan Singh, brother of P.W Dhara Singh was prosecution ...a large number of evasive replies. He stated that he did not know whether in the case under Section 25 of the Arms...manner in which the occurrence took place. The learned Sessions Judge has dealt with the subject and observed that the replies of the autopsy surgeon Dr. S.P Singh (P.W 5) were evasive on this most...

...bua and had a son Ram Naresh. Even he pleaded ignorance where she lived. He gave evasive replies during the cross examination to circumvent justness of the claim of Mahedei to the property of her deceased brother. This ...prosecution case may be summarized as under:-That on 8 November, 1983, at 10.30 p.m Rajaram gave an oral information at the police station that he was resident of village Sisandi. His uncle...had implicated them falsely.6. The learned trial Judge after hearing the arguments, found the prosecution case truthful, eye-witness account trustworthy and convicted the appellants and...

...questioning by P.W. Nos.2, 6 and 8 and others the appellant gave evasive replies. He did not inform the incident at Dilbagh Dhaba, where he used to regularly visit. He was caught within a very short time span, when the burn...Conductor of the said truck. As the conductor was giving evasive replies, they thought that the conductor must have killed that person. At that time Baburao 7...his driver saw a body was burnt on tyre. P.W. No.8 and his driver immediately rushed to the Police Station and gave oral report. Thereafter they went to chase the truck. They caught the truck along...

...took them to the appellant at the railway police post where he was posted as an Assistant Sub-Inspector. The appellant gave a beating to Ramesh and demanded an explanation as to why they had come to...same to the appellant, on demand. The panch witnesses were instructed to keep close to Dal Chand to witness the passing of the tainted notes. The raiding party headed by Inspector Paras Nath...charge-sheet against him in the Court of the Special Judge, Delhi.4. Examined under Section 342, CrPC the appellant denied the prosecution case, and gave this version of the...

...for the same purpose but he gave them evasive replies. In the second week of March 1995, when the detenu and his associates were standing at Gautam Nagar Naka witness C asked the detenu-about light and...his hut. While leaving he gave threats to his life. Consequently, he did not report the matter to the police.Witness C is a resident of Apna Nagar, Kandivali (East), Bombay. In his...were around ran away. The detenu also gave threats that if any one raised voice he would be cut into pieces. The witness was scared and did not report the matter to police.Witness D is a...

..., 1991 after about 14 months. The appellant in his examination under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure denied the allegations and gave evasive replies to some of the questions, while some...Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, wherein he denied the allegations but at the same time admitted some of the facts and gave evasive replies to some of the questions. The relevant...appellant while answering the same had no courage to squarely deny it but gave an evasive reply that “I do not know”. Similarly, in reply to Question No. 6 with reference to the evidence of his mother that...

...appellant had used any unparliamentary words or not never answered in the negative but gave evasive replies that so long as they were at the spot the appellant had not used any unparliamentary words or that they had not hea...humiliation to Sri. Ramit Sengupta further it has also tarnished the image of the bank.”18. Shri Sengupta was management witness no. 1. In his examination in chief, he stated that “I stand by...”.19. Shri Kumar was management witness no. 3. He had conducted an enquiry into the complaint lodged by Shri Sengupta against the appellant and had submitted a report. On being asked to say, what is...