Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court116
+ Supreme Court Of India70
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court25
+ Chhattisgarh High Court23
+ Delhi High Court22
+ National Green Tribunal18
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal6
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal6
+ Allahabad High Court4
+ Bombay High Court4
+ Rajasthan High Court4
+ Central Administrative Tribunal3
+ Competition Commission Of India3
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity2
+ Calcutta High Court2
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2
+ Jharkhand High Court2
+ Karnataka High Court2
+ Madras High Court2
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1
+ Armed Forces Tribunal1
+ District Court1
+ Gauhati High Court1
+ Gujarat High Court1
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court1
+ Kerala High Court1
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority1
+ Sikkim High Court1
+ Telangana High Court1
+ Uttarakhand High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards130
From 2011 To 2020124
From 2001 To 201049
From 1991 To 20006
From 1981 To 19901
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Order1. We have heard Mr Vivek Tankha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant, Ms Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India, Mr...applications are dismissed. However, it would be open to the applicant consortium to take students from State list or All India list, as the case may be.3. At this juncture, Mr Vivek...Tankha submitted that liberty may be granted to the applicant if there will be some difficulty in getting students from State list or All India list, the consortium may approach this Court. Limited...

...without trial. Per contra, Mr Vivek Tankha, learned Senior Counsel contended that now evidence is closed so there is no question of the accused tampering with the prosecution witnesses or fleeing from...

....(Before Uday U. Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.)For Appellant(s) Mr. Vivek Tankha, Sr. Adv.Mr. Manish Desai, Adv.Ms. Sudeshna Guha Roy, Adv...

...Election Commission of India. The same is disputed by Mr. Kapil Sibal and Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. We leave it to the discretion of the Election Commission...

...this view, the High Court has quashed all the proceedings.6. We have heard Mr Subramonium Prasad, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and Mr Vivek Tankha, learned...the criminal culpability without the trial taking place.8. Resisting the aforesaid submissions it is canvassed by Mr Tankha, learned Senior Counsel for the first...any fruitful purpose. That apart, submits Mr Tankha, continuation of the proceeding would unnecessarily load the criminal justice dispensation system as there is likelihood of an order of acquittal at...

....26. Replying to the submissions made on behalf of the appellant, Mr Vivek Tankha, learned Senior Counsel, firstly, took us to the charge framed against the respondents under Section 13(1)(d) read...with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 409, 418, 420 and 120-B of the Penal Code.27. Mr Tankha pointed out that the charge was framed..., 1988 and the Penal Code. Similar charges were framed against the other respondents.28. Mr Tankha submitted that from the inquiry report of the District Vigilance...

...Election Commission of India. The same is disputed by Mr. Kapil Sibal and Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. We leave it to the discretion of the Election Commission...

...of supersession and, in any view, if any of the parties were aggrieved, they ought to have availed of the alternate remedy available under the Act.8. Shri Vivek Tankha, learned....30. Learned Senior Counsel Shri Vivek Tankha submitted that since the Board of Directors was superseded illegally, they, be put back in office and allow to continue, for the period they...

...the appellants and other learned counsel appearing for other appellants in these appeals and also Shri Vivek Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General for the State of Madhya Pradesh and other...

...of 2007), the petitioner in the present case has already been impleaded as a party by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the order dated 11 July 2011. A statement was made by Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned ASG...

...application seeking amendment in W.P No. 7344/2012 filed by the petitioner itself.The prayer is opposed by Shri Vivek Tankha, learned Senior Advocate appearing for respondent No. 3, who...

...the day in terms of our order dated 24.12.2011, may be inspected by the learned counsel for the DoT.Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned ASG appearing on behalf of BSNL submits that an application...

...Order1. No order need be passed on the application for impleadment.2. Heard counsel for the petitioner; Mr Vivek...Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for CBI; Mr Tushar Mehta, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Gujarat and Mr Pallav Shishodia, learned Senior Advocate appearing on...

....12. Questioning the aforesaid decision of the High Court, Mr Vivek Krishna Tankha, learned Senior Advocate, submitted that the High Court had erred in accepting the stand taken...the co-sharers. Both Mr Vivek Tankha and Mr Anoop G. Chaudhari, learned Senior Advocates, brought this point to our notice to indicate that all the co-sharers had not consented to the deed of family...title to his share in the suit property and were, therefore, competent to dispose of the same in favour of Defendant 10. Mr Tankha urged that a partition of joint family property could be effected...

...under Article 32 of the Constitution.2. We have heard Mr. Dushyant Dave, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. Vivek Tankha and Mr. Harin Raval, learned senior counsel...

...learned counsel appearing for the appellants.10. Mr Vivek Tankha, the learned Additional Solicitor General of India, strenuously urged that the High Court committed...

...Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, C.J.:— Heard Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner on IA No. 06 of 2021, which is an application for amendment of the writ...

....33. On the other hand Mr Vivek Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent pressed for the acceptance of the approach of the Division Bench...change of law. It cannot be compared with indemnity for loss due to conduct of the promisor or of a third party.34. Mr Tankha submitted that the clauses in the contract....46. As against that, Mr Tankha submitted that in para 23 of Tarapore & Co. v. Cochin Shipyard Ltd...

...relief.16. Shri Vivek Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for NHAI, referred to the scheme of Sections 3-A to 3-I of the 1956 Act and the order dated 11-10...objections filed by some of the landowners had not been communicated to them before issue of notification under Section 3-D. Shri Tankha emphasised that the objections filed by the landowners were duly...

...Verma v. HMT Ltd. (2006) 2 SCC 26915. Shri Vivek Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for the respondents referred to the first proviso to sub-section (2...

x