Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court26
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Bombay High Court0
+ CESTAT0
+ Calcutta High Court0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Delhi High Court0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Gujarat High Court0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Karnataka High Court0
+ Kerala High Court0
+ Madras High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Supreme Court Of India0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards6
From 2011 To 202010
From 2001 To 20109
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Amir and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2004 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 204 = 2005 (1) MPHT 411, in which it has been held that when there is no evidence on record that victim was...

...., 2001). Similar view has also been taken by this Court in the case of Ramchandra and Ors. v. State of M.P. 2002 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar 44. This view is based on a judgment passed by the apex...

...of M. P. [2004 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 234]. (5.) HAVING heard the learned Counsel for the parties, in my view, the contention raised by the petitioner have no force. The petitioner was...

...\. S.C. Pandey, reported in 2006 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 786 = (2006) 2 SCC 716 and...

...about transactions made by the executar of power of attorney holder. He relied on 1997 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar 280, 2003 (4) MPLJ...138 : 2004 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar 115, 1994 (1) MPJR 144, 1995 11 MPWN 43, 1995 (2) MPLJ 410...138 : 2004 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar 115, again learned single judge has held as under:—The Plaintiff has assailed the order also on a ground that the Rent Controlling Authority...

.... Mularia Bai, 2000 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 19. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1/plaintiff supported the impugned order and submits that trial Court has rightly...

..., 2000 (2) MPLJ 176 and S.K Shrivastava v. Collector (Mining), Bhind, 2001 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 103 laying down the law that appeal or revision...does not lie against a resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat and the other in Hem Lata v. State of M.P, 1997 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 113 and Om Prakash Verma v. State of...M.P, 2001 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 30 enunciating the principle that against the resolution of the Panchayat the remedy available is revision, the learned Single Judge thought it appropriate to refer the...

...Mishrilal and others v. State ofM.R and others, 2005 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 147 = 2005 SCC (Cri) 1712 in which...

...M.P, 2003 (3) MPLJ 539 : 2004 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 234.5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, in my view, the contention raised by the petitioner have no force. The petitioner...

...judgment passed in the case of "Ranjeet narayan Haskar vs. Laxmanbai Jethabai, [2005 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 38]. Therefore, the order impugned in which it has been opined by the...

...) Vidhi Bhaswar 152 wherein it was observed: "4. The consequence of non-compliance of Rules 3 and 7 has been provided under Rule 8. It does .not leave any alternative with...

...State Of M.P v. S.S Akolkar. 1996(2) Vidhi Bhaswar 1 = AIR 1996 SC 1984 and Special Tahsildar, land acquisition, Kerala v. K. V. Ayiseemma...

...case of Mishrilal and others v. State of M.P. and others, [2005 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 147 = (2005) 10 SCC 701], wherein the...

...appearing for the respondents, I am of the view that this petition deserves to be dismissed. 5. In the case of I.K. Mishra v. Union of India 1998 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar 68...

...) Vidhi Bhaswar 114 [Sheetalchandra (Smt.) v. Steel Authority of India].3) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length.4) In reply to the...

...) Vidhi Bhaswar 67 = (2003) 1 SCC 557. In the case of Ruchi Majoo, supra, the Supreme Court while considering section 9(1) of...

...decision in the matter of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Premlata Shukla, 2007 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 139 = 2007 ACJ 1928...

...[1996 (2) Vidhi Bhaswar 296]. There is no dispute that Shri Rao Khetsingh approached the Election Tribunal before the issuance of notification under Rule 22 of...] and Antram Vs. Badri and others [1996 (2) Vidhi Bhasvar 296]. While dealing with the submissions advanced by the parties, Brother Dipak Misra, J., after exhaustive examination and...

...Madhya Pradesh v. Kedar Yadav., 2007 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar 265 (Supreme Court) observed as under:“14. It is to be noted that the alleged offence was of very serious nature. Section 307.... Saleem @ Chamaru, reported in 2006 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar 14 (Supreme Court), observed as under:“6. Undue sympathy to impose inadequate sentence would do more harm to the justice system to...

...the decision rendered in Usha Bai v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Ganj Basoda, 1997 (1) Vidhi Bhaswar, 44. (9.) Mr. Kaurav...