...Sampat Khandade and another, reported in 2008 (4) Mh.L.J. 215 to substantiate his submission that unregistered relinquishment deed is not ...by the plaintiff. The trial Court was not justified in holding that the question whether the relinquishment deed was admissible in evidence or not and the question whether the ...relinquishment deed dated 30.12.1987 was not admissible in evidence. If that was so, the trial Court could not have marked the relinquishment deed as exhibit only because the witness to t...

..., 2005 (5) Ald 274 : AIR 2005 (NOC) 648 (AP). 14. The issue whether an unregistered relinquishment document can be admitted ...opinion that the document in question is an unregistered relinquishment deed, the same is not admissible in evidence for want or registration under...a relinquishment deed and since the same is not properly stamped and unregistered, it is inadmissible in evidence. The trial Court has misread the contents of the document and thereby, erred in...

...in evidence, the contention of applicants that they are not entitled for any compensation amount on the basis of said document is unsustainable. As such, relinquishment deed which is unregistered document ...for non-applicant Nos.4 and 5 submitted that the relinquished deed is not a registered document and, therefore, it is not admissible evidence. Moreover, he filed on record certified copy of Hamipatra...evidence and original relinquishment deed itself is not produced and, therefore, the revision is devoid of merits as learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division at Pusad...

...document is unregistered relinquishment deed and the same is not admissible in evidence on the ground of non-registration and also on the ground that the same is insufficiently stamped. Since the ...introduce the said document in evidence." 29. The recitals of the document in controversy already had been referred to supra. Since, this Court is of the opinion that the document in question is a...= 2006 (5) ALD 1, it was held that unregistered relinquishment deed, inadmissible in evidence, can be relied upon, for collateral purpose. 22. In Sanjeeva Reddi v. Johan ...

...case with trust. However, only on the basis of such statement, particularly in light of relinquishment deed dated 08.12.2004 and consequential mutation entry no.1305 certified on 10.04.2005, plaintiffs cannot assert right o...his legal heirs. Accordingly, each of plaintiffs and defendants have 1/8th share in suit property. According to plaintiffs, defendant no.1 got executed false, bogus and forged relinquishment deed dated...relinquishment deed relied upon by defendants is an unregistered document and contents of same are specifically denied by plaintiffs. The mutation entry no.1305 dated 10.04.2005, which is certified...

...v. Palampalli Subba Reddy, 2005 (5) Aid 274 : AIR 2005 (NOC) 648 (AP).14. The issue whether an unregistered relinquishment document can be admitted in ...question is an unregistered relinquishment deed, the same is not admissible in evidence for want or registration under...immovable property under an unregistered lease deed which requires to be registered under law, certainly, it would be admissible in evidence to show the character of his possession, viz., that his...

...partnership firm who relinquished his interest in one of the immovable properties belonging to the firm and the question before the Court was whether an unregistered deed of relinquishment was admissible ...property to be treated as the property of the firm, there should have been a registered deed from him in favour of the firm. No such question arises here as there is no evidence to show that Bhai Sunder...property was to be taken out of the firm or if a partner of the firm wanted of relinquish his share in the property there would have been a registered deed of relinquishment. No such question arises in the...

...the trial Court and seeks to produce the relinquishment deed dated 03.12.2004 which is a unregistered document and therefore, following the declaration of law made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the... (2015) 16 SCC 787, it is held that, the unregistered and - 3 - unstamped relinquishment deed in...respect of the immoveable property is not admissible in evidence for the primary purpose for the division of the joint properties by metes and bounds, however, the same can be relied upon for the...

...? 3. Whether the unregistered relinquishment deed was admissible in evidence ? 4. Whether the appellate Court was justified ...Pasham Narsi Reddy & Ors.3. The Court held that non-registration of the relinquishment deed which requires mandatory registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 is not.... 59. The third question is as follows : 28 Whether the unregistered relinquishment deed was ...

...) The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the agreement of sale and relinquishment deed are not duly stamped and unregistered, both the documents are not admissible in ...be admitted in evidence even for collateral purpose. Therefore, it can be held that the trial Court was right in holding that the unregistered and deficiently stamped relinquishment deed cannot be...relinquishment deed dated 25.07.1996 as observed by the trial Court is not admissible in evidence. However, the agreement to sell dated 25.07.1996 can be admitted in evidence if the respo...

...counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submitted that Ex. P-5 was a document in the nature of relinquishment deed in respect of immovable property and such a document being unregistered was not ...), being in the nature of a relinquishment deed, was not admissible in evidence for want of registration. The Courts below, therefore, did not err in holding that Ex. P-5 was not ...law in holding that Ex. P-5 being unregistered was inadmissible in evidence and that for want of cross-examination of the attesting witness Sher Singh (P.W-2) family settlement deed (Ex. P-1) was also...

...the trial Court has refused to grant permission in favour of the petitioners to produce the aforesaid relinquishment deed dated 25.03.2006 on the sole ground that the same was an unregistered document and was not .... During the course of their evidence, the petitioners/plaintiffs filed an instant application seeking permission to produce the aforesaid unregistered relinquishment deed as an additional document in...of CPC, for permission to produce original relinquishment deed dated 25.03.2006 was rejected by the trial Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and...

...contentions in respect of the aforementioned two applications filed on behalf of the defendants-appellants and came to the conclusion that the purported unregistered deed of relinquishment was not ...plaintiffs filed objection with regard to taking of the alleged deed of relinquishment in the evidence, inter alia, on the ground that the said document has been filed after the closure of the case of the...application was filed that the defendants intended to prove an alleged unregistered relinquishment deed. On that date D.W 5 was examined. On 20th February, 1980 an application was filed purported to be under...

...favour of the defendant No.1 by executing an unregistered relinquishment deed, but the plaintiffs and defendants No.2 to 6 have denied the execution of the unregistered relinquishment deed. An ...defendants No.2 to 6 have relinquished their rights in favour of defendant No.1 by receiving a part consideration amount of Rs.2,00,000/- and executed an unregistered relinquishment deed. Based on the...relinquished their rights in favour of defendant No.1 by receiving a part consideration amount of Rs.2,00,000/- and executed an unregistered relinquishment deed. Defendant No.1 produced the...

...memorandum dated 5-6-1975 have to be construed as relinquishment deeds. A relinquishment deed which is compulsorily registrable document under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908 and he..., 1908. As Exts. B-21 and B-22 are unregistered and unstamped documents, they are not admissible in evidence. The trial court gave a specific finding that even both the exhibits are not admissible...the learned Senior Counsel that even assuming that Exts. B-21 and B-22 require registration, still the unregistered documents are admissible in evidence for collateral purpose.10. The...

..., 1986, SLJ 139, learned appellate court held that unstamped and unregistered deed of relinquishment of tenancy rights was not admissible in evidence so as to prove title of the p...of plaintiff mentioned therein that the suit land was purchased by defendant No. 3 from its previous owner Lachhman Singh by way of sale deed executed in the year 1970 and Mutation in this regard was...continuous and long and coupled with the evidence of PW 1, Nasib Singh and DW2, Ramji Dass, proved that plaintiff was in possession of suit land and said evidence was sufficient to prove that he was in...

...-80 and 81 i.e. relinquishment deed is not admissible in the evidence. For that purpose, he is relying upon the authority of Yellapu Uma Maheshwar... unstamped partition-deed is not admissible in the evidence and requires compulsory registration as per Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908. Last...though not admissible as evidence as per Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, it is admissible in the evidence for collateral purpose to decide as to whether the family arrangement has taken...

...this nature shall not be admitted for any purpose whatsoever. If all purposes for which the document is sought to be brought in evidence are excluded, we fail to see any reason as to how the document would be admissible for...Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Vide impugned order the trial Court declined to admit the Unregistered Relinquishment ...been paid however, since the claim in the suit for declaration in title and permanent injunction is based on said document which being unregistered cannot be taken in evidence. The...

...unstamped partition deed Deed of relinquishment of right in respect of immovable property Not admissible in evidence for primary purpose of division of joint properties by metes and bound...and Ex.D.15 are partition deeds or they are relinquishment deeds. The Courts did not go in detail into the contents of these documents, but wrongly decided that, they are partition deed or...not admissible in evidence. Therefore, of course did not go into the details of the contents of the said documents in order ascertain the possession of the said property by the defendants...

...partition deed and a deed of relinquishment of rights in respect of the immoveable property is not admissible in evidence". In the case on ha...'Palupatti' contended by the defendants produced at Ex.D6 dated 02-06-1975 is an unregistered document and therefore, it is inadmissible in evidence. It is submitted that the said document could not...examined. He also submits that the trial Court has not considered the contentions of the appellant/plaintiff No.1 that Ex.D6, the unregistered partition memo could not have been admitted in evidence...