Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Allahabad High Court4063
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court3116
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court2546
+ Madras High Court2206
+ Karnataka High Court2085
+ Kerala High Court1539
+ Rajasthan High Court1162
+ Delhi High Court812
+ Bombay High Court695
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court510
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court478
+ Chhattisgarh High Court425
+ Uttarakhand High Court355
+ Patna High Court354
+ Telangana High Court343
+ Supreme Court Of India321
+ Gujarat High Court278
+ Jharkhand High Court226
+ Gauhati High Court194
+ Calcutta High Court136
+ Central Administrative Tribunal133
+ Tripura High Court70
+ Orissa High Court68
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court58
+ National Green Tribunal58
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission47
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act39
+ Meghalaya High Court32
+ Central Information Commission22
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission22
+ Manipur High Court18
+ Sikkim High Court16
+ CESTAT13
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal12
+ National Company Law Tribunal10
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal9
+ District Court7
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal5
+ Armed Forces Tribunal4
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board3
+ SEBI3
+ Company Law Board2
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority2
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity1
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange1
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Railway Claims Tribunal1
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards11222
From 2011 To 20208630
From 2001 To 2010655
From 1991 To 2000158
From 1981 To 199072
From 1971 To 198022
From 1961 To 197012
From 1951 To 19605
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai, passed in C.C No. 537 of 2002 on 24.02.20032. Revision petitioner faced prosecution for offences u/s.353 IPC and 3(1) of Tamil...examined on behalf of defence nor were any exhibits marked. On appreciation of materials before it, trial Court, under judgment dated 24.02.2003, convicted petitioner for offences u/s.353 IPC and...3(1) of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 and sentenced to 6 months R.I and fine of Rs. 500/- i/d 2 months S.I for offence u/s.353 IPC and 1 year...

...K.S Lodha, J.:— The State has filed this appeal against the acquittal of respondents Ghisu Lal and Shankar from offences u/s. 353 IPC and 54(A) of the Rajasthan Excise...leave being granted.3. I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor and Mr. K.S Rathore, for the respondents and have gone through the records. So far as the charge u/s. 353 IPC is concerned...was put up against Babu Lal and present respondents for offence under section 353 IPC and 54 Rajasthan Excise Act along with 332 IPC. The accused pleaded not guilty and tried...

...Public Prosecutor. 5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that even if the entire allegations in the First Information Statement is accepted, no offence u/s.353 IPC is...made out. Only non bailable offence is u/s.353 IPC. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is ready to abide any conditions, if this Court grant him bail. 6...alone is not entitled the discretionary power u/s. 438 Cr.P.C. The counsel for the petitioner produced the decision of this Court in Durga Prasad v. State Of Kerala (201...

...petition no. 918 of 2012, therein the prayer has been advanced to quash the FIR dated 22.9.2012 lodged by S.I Sukhpal Singh at 23.35 PM at P.S Ranipur, pertaining to crime no. 378 of 2012 u/s 353 IPC....also snatched that yellow metal which was found to be the earring. Thus, this action of the petitioner was reported under the crime no. 378/2012 at P.S Ranipur giving rise to the offence u/s 353 IPC....information report dated 22.9.2012 pertaining to crime no. 378 of 2012 u/s 353 IPC lodged at P.S Ranipur, District Haridwar.Now so far as third petition bearing no. 1040 of 2012 is concerned...

.../accused 1 to 3 for offences u/s.353, 333 and 506(ii) IPC and sentencing each of them to 2 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 200/- i/d 3 weeks R.I. for offence u/s.353 IPC, 5 years R.I....offences u/s.342, 353, 332 and 506(ii) IPC. Printed First Information Report is Ex.P10. PW-12, Inspector of Police, took up investigation on 09.07.2011. PW-12 visited the place of occurrence...06.12.2012, while acquitting accused of offence u/s.342 IPC, convicted them for offences u/s.353, 333 and 506(ii) IPC and sentenced each of them to 2 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 200/- i/d ...

...of 2012) by the Special Judge SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, East Sikkim at Gangtok. By the impugned Judgment, the Appellant has been convicted u/S. 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the S...convict the Appellant for the charge framed u/S. 3(1)(x) of the Special Act.10. As far as offence u/S. 353 IPC is concerned, it is found that there is sufficient material on record...Section 353 IPC is concerned. The cross-examination would show that the entire focus of the Appellant was on the offence u/S. 3(1)(x) of the Special Act and the evidence relating to assault or using...

.... Katare, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.S. Gurjar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. The inherent powers of the Court u/S 482 Cr.P.C. are invoked to assail the FIR bearing Crime No.50/2017 registered at Police Station Chi...] Before entering into the field of mala fide, it would be appropriate to decipher as to whether prima facie offence as alleged u/S.353 of IPC is made out or not...that the offence punishable u/S.353 of IPC essentially requires assault on the part of the accused against a government servant to deter him/her from discharge of official duties. It is submitted by...

...: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Harbhaj...Singh U/s 332/34 IPC To undergo RI for 1 year and to pay fine of Rs.500/- or in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for three months. U/s 353 IPC...for the petitioners. 6. In the present case, FIR No. 26 dated 30.1.2002 under Sections 333/353/332/186/34 IPC was registered at Police Station, Dhuri...

...the complaint lodged by Muthuraman, Assistant Engineer, Division 63, the respondent police registered a case in Cr. No. 1657 of 2016 on 07.11.2016 for the offences u/s 353 IPC for preventing the...u/s 4A(1a) of Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 against the members of a political party, who installed banner. That apa...offences u/s 4A(1a) of the Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959, against another faction of the...

...:- (i) U/S 186 IPC : to undergo RI for three months. (ii) U/S 353 IPC : to undergo RI for two years. 4. Pursuant to the order dated 2...have been convicted and sentenced as under:- Appellant Rajesh Kumar (i) U/S 186 IPC : to undergo RI for three months. (ii) U/S 353 IPC : to undergo R.... (iii) U/S 25/54/59 Arms Act : to under RI for two years with fine of 5000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for one month. Appellant Somvir (i) ...

...:- (i) U/S 186 IPC : to undergo RI for three months. (ii) U/S 353 IPC : to undergo RI for two years. 4. Pursuant to the order dated 2...have been convicted and sentenced as under:- Appellant Rajesh Kumar (i) U/S 186 IPC : to undergo RI for three months. (ii) U/S 353 IPC : to undergo R.... (iii) U/S 25/54/59 Arms Act : to under RI for two years with fine of 5000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for one month. Appellant Somvir (i) ...

...dated 09.08.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Chandigarh.The trial Court, vide judgment dated 09.08.2011, convicted the petitioner under Sections 332 and 353 IPC and sentenced him as under:-...IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.U/S 353 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of...sentence was reduced from rigorous imprisonment for one year to three months under Section 332 IPC and from six months to three months under Section 353 IPC. Hence, the present petition...

..., out of which 5 cases are u/s 110 Cr.P.C., 3 cases under Excise Act, one case under Arms Act and 3 cases u/s 294 and 323 IPC and one case u/s...Sections 307, 427/34 of the IPC and sec.25 and 27 of the Arms Act. 2. As per prosecution case, complainant along with Mannu, Ghanshyam, Naveen, Shivansh, Lucky...

...Criminal Case No.119/2008, whereby, the learned trial court convicted and sentenced the present petitioners as under : Offence U/s 332 IPC : One year's S.I. and a fine of Rs.200/-, in d...the accused-petitioners gave beating to the complainant. On this report, the police registered the case against accused-petitioner for offences under Sections 332, 353 IPC and started investigation..., 353 IPC may be reduced to the period already undergone by them. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel...

...offence u/s. 353 IPC against the accused." The appellate Court concurred with the finding of the trial court in so far as the conviction U/S. ...No.364 of 2007 registered under Sections 353/294/506 of the IPC. 3. The prosecution case in brief is that on 10.04.1997..., Cuttack. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was submitted against the petitioner under Sections 353/294/506 of IPC and charges were framed against him under those Sections. The petitioner...

...offence committed U/s 353 IPC and for a term of SI for one month for the offence committed U/s 323 IPC.”Being aggrieved by that judgment passed by the appellate court on 23...dated 02.07.2003, the petitioner has been convicted under Sections 353 and 323 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer two years' simple imprisonment under Section 353 of the IPC and one year simple...fairly submitted that it has been asserted erroneously in the said petition filed under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C that the offence punishable under Section 353 of the IPC is compoundable, but according to...

...; Petitioner's Rank Provision under which convicted Sentence A2 U/s.294[b] IPC To pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-...undergo 1 year RI U/s.506[1] IPC To undergo 1 year RI... U/s.3[1] of To undergo 3 years RI and a fine of TNPPDL Act Rs.1,000/-, in default in payment of fine, to ...

...to the criminat proceedings pending against the petitioner in i) FIR No.22712013 on lhe Hasnaparthy police Station ior offence U/s. 34(e) AP Excise Act, Charge Sheet filed Vide C'C No.tggolZO2l on the file Principal Judicial first c...Hasnaparthg Police Stotion for offence U/s. 34(e) AP Excise Act, Charge Sheet ftled uide CC Na.139O/2O21 on the file Principal Judicial First Clqss Magistrate, at Hanmakonda. ii) FIR No.269/2013 onthe Hasnaparthg Police Station for .../13 U/s.34(e) of Telangana Excise Act, on the file of Hasanparthy PS (c.c.No. 1390/2021 on the file of principal Judiciar Magistrate of First class, Hanamkonda), 2) Crime No.269/ 13 U/s....

...C.D Parekh, J.:— This revision arises out of the order dated October 29, 1969 passed by Shri K. Singh, Magistrate 1st Class, Bulandshahr, convicting the applicant u/S. 353 IPC and....6. It was next argued that Shri Allen was not a public servant and conviction could not have been recorded u/S. 353 IPC. In my opinion the applicant cannot claim exoneration on the ground...against whom the criminal force was used had compromised the matter and a compromise application was filed. Had it been a case u/S. 352 IPC it could have been compounded but the courts are not bound to accord sanction to th...

...Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu, whereby the appellant was convicted for offences under Sections 307 and 353 IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. The trial Judge having convicted the appellant for the above said of.../-, in default thereof to undergo additional six months RI. U/s. 353 IPC- to undergo three months RI. U/s. 3/25 of Arms Act- to undergo two years RI and to pay .... 10. So far offence under Section 353 IPC is concerned, it is stated that the appellant had not used any force and there is also no evidence of assault on the police official. Hence...