Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court5529
+ Bombay High Court2751
+ Delhi High Court2343
+ Kerala High Court1914
+ Karnataka High Court1526
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1496
+ Allahabad High Court1383
+ Calcutta High Court1213
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1139
+ Patna High Court1092
+ Rajasthan High Court1009
+ Supreme Court Of India989
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court903
+ Gujarat High Court780
+ Central Information Commission708
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal541
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court523
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission495
+ Central Administrative Tribunal412
+ Gauhati High Court410
+ Chhattisgarh High Court373
+ Telangana High Court360
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission356
+ Jharkhand High Court328
+ Orissa High Court268
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission192
+ Uttarakhand High Court190
+ Privy Council186
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court161
+ Tripura High Court94
+ National Green Tribunal91
+ Sikkim High Court83
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal69
+ CESTAT65
+ National Company Law Tribunal45
+ Manipur High Court42
+ Meghalaya High Court40
+ SEBI38
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST36
+ Armed Forces Tribunal32
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property28
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India20
+ Company Law Board20
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal16
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act13
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal9
+ District Court8
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange6
+ Board of Revenue5
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission5
+ Competition Commission Of India5
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST4
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity4
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board4
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal3
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal3
+ RERA3
+ Authority For Advance Rulings2
+ Railway Claims Tribunal2
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal2
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards11652
From 2011 To 20209907
From 2001 To 20102717
From 1991 To 20001231
From 1981 To 1990776
From 1971 To 1980467
From 1961 To 1970444
From 1951 To 1960281
Before 1950847

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...made to Annexure P-1 and P-2 dated 16.09.2016 & 05.11.2012 informing petitioner/appellant that he is disqualified to be appointed as Assistant Seed Certification Officer owing to third child having...affidavit in regard to the date of birth of the third child. 2. Learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition in question on the ground that petitioner/appellant was...third child. As such it is held by the learned Single Judge that the petitioner/appellant is ineligible for government service. 3. Though the controversy lies in a narrow...

.... Heard. Having found to have concealed the fact of having third child born after 26.1.2001 (his third child was born on 8.9.2006), petitioner's appointment to the post of Forest...Guard to which he was appointed after being selected through selection held in August/September 2008, was cancelled. The petitioner represented to the authorities explaining that the third child was born...record, third child was born on 8.9.2006. The petitioner did not disclose this fact while applying for the post of Forest Guard. Later, on revelation of the fact that a third child is...

...the year 2003, 2010 and third child on 23.09.2013 as a result of which now the respondent No.5 has three children and in view of the Rule 6 (6) of M.P. General Conditions of Service...the year 2007 whereas the third child is alleged to be born on 23.09.2013. Therefore, neither on the date of selection nor on the date of appointment the respondent No.5 was having three children and...Baghel Vs. State of M.P. and Ors.) is utterly misplaced for the reason that in the said case the third child was not born by the last date of submission of application form but was born before...

...(hereinafter referred to as " Act"). As per the said Act, if third child is born after 12-09-2001, than that person/ candidate is not eligible to contest the election of Grampanchayat. As per the case of...the complainant , Kum. Laxmi Pinti third child was born on 20-06-2003 after the cut off date i.e. 12-09-2001. However, complainant alleged the petitioner had made false declaration in respect of her...third child, namely, Kum. Laxmi @ Pinty Aute was born on 10-09-2001. Therefore, her nomination paper was treated to be a valid. However, complainant further states that the third...

...she is the elected Sarpanch of Manikeswar Grama Panchayat. The Collector in his notice dated 11.8.2004 under Annexure-1 informed the petitioner that she was blessed with a third child born after the...Village Anganwadi Centre and in Raikia Health Centre, it would be evident that the petitioner has only two children and no such third child was born to her. Despite the aforesaid reply, the Collector...petitioner gave birth to the third child on May, 2003. But it does not appear from the records that the copies of the reports which the Collector had received from the B.D.O and Medical Officer were...

...Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), which was not granted to her.The petitioner had two children from her marriage. On 12.4.2011 a third child was born. Petitioner vide...maternity benefits on the birth of third child. The maternity leave was denied to the petitioner vide letter dated 7.9.2011 (Annexure P-4) by respondent No. 4 relying upon the instructions dated...with pay for the third child. It is this order, which is challenged by the petitioner on the ground that these instructions which are based upon Rule 8.127(1) read with...

...main ground urged on behalf of the 1st respondent was that the petitioner incurred disqualification under Section 19(3) of the Act. It was alleged that the third child of the petitioner was born on 12...-06-1995.The petitioner filed a counter, opposing the allegations of the 1st respondent.She stated that the third child was born on 09-01-1995, that is, before expiry of...counsel for the petitioner submits that the 1st respondent failed to prove that the third child of the petitioner was born after expiry of one year from the date of commencement of the Act. He contends...

... (2 of 2) [SAW-126/2019] If that be so, the case of the appellant needs to be considered on this factual premise that the third child was born...before the cut off date. The respondents should, therefore, be directed to pass appropriate orders in case of the appellant on the admitted factual position that the third child was born before the cut...before us, learned counsel for the respondent-State fairly submitted that an inquiry was conducted and according to the finding of fact contained in the inquiry report, the date of birth of the third...

...a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant maternity leave of one year for the delivery of her third child by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 27.06.2022 with full...for a direction to the respondents to grant maternity leave of one year for the delivery of the petitioner's third child based on the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2022 within a time frame to...first time, when she was expecting the third child, she had requested the respondents to grant her maternity leave for a period of one year. The third child was also born subsequently but till date, her...

...of 2002 in the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Baragarh.3. Both the parties being at issue on the election of the Opp. Party having a third child after the cut off date, they adduced..., Exts. 1 to 7, the case of Opp. Party having a third child after the cut off date was proved to disqualify him to contest from the post of Member of the Panchayat Samiti.4. Learned Civil...Judge rejected the contention of the Opp. Party and the evidence produced by him that on the issue of the having third child, the decision of the learned District Judge on 26.9.2000 in Misc. Case No...

...appellant said that while four of the 5 passports were issued, i.e, for himself, his spouse and two children but for the third child the respondent said that the information was not forthcoming. The...appellant stated that he had fulfilled all the conditions and passport should be issued to his third child.4. The respondent stated that in the case of his third child, the police...denying the information under section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act on ground of third party information. The appellant filed an appeal before the first appellate authority(FAA...

...of the 5 passports were issued, i.e., for himself, his spouse and two children but for the third child the respondent said that the information was not forthcoming. The appellant...stated that he had fulfilled all the conditions and passport should be issued to his third child. 4. The respondent stated that in the case of his third child, the police verification...the information under section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act on ground of third party information. The appellant filed an appeal before the first appellate authority (FAA) on 1542013...

...Certificates of all the three children of the petitioners have been issued by the respondent-School. 4. Learned advocate Ms.Bharmal has made grievance that UID number of third child is not...mentioned in the School Leaving Certificate. It is submitted that till the UID number is given, the third child of the petitioners would not get admission in any school. 5. In...such circumstances, the petitioners are directed to make an application before the District Education Officer to direct the School to mention the UID number in the School Leaving Certificate of the third...

...taking charge. It is averred that the petitioner has a third child, born on 23.07.2007. A Show Cause Notice was issued by the District Panchayat Officer to the petitioner to approach the District Collector...this length of time. But, the issue before the Court is whether the petitioner has a third child. Keeping the issue as to whether the petitioner has a third child open, the writ petition is...

...to grant Maternity Leave for one year for the third Child is under challenge in the present writ proceedings. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Xerox Operator on...06.10.2017. The petitioner was blessed with two children and delivered third child on 21.07.2022. The petitioner submitted an application on 20.02.2023, seeking Maternity Leave for one year for the third...child. 3. As per the policy, an employee is eligible to avail the Maternity Leave for the first two children. For the third child, the benefit of Maternity Leave has not...

...the third child is not that of the appellant. He claims that the wife was having relationship with the 2 nd respondent and the third child belongs to him. 2. Before the Family Court...she was pregnant. 3. Before the Family Court a DNA test was conducted and it was found that the petitioner/appellant is the biological father of the third child as well. The Apex...concerned. Therefore, the case set up by the petitioner regarding the paternity of the third child has been disproved by the report of DNA analysis. 4. Under such circumstances, we...

...and circumstances of the case. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that respondent No.6 was appointed in the year 2012 and somewhere in the year 2020 or 2021, a third child has...the respondent No.6 is not alleged to be having third child born, though after 26/01/2001, but before the date of appointment. The third child is shown to be born much after the date of appointment...liberty to enquire into the matter and they may take action under Rule 22(4) of Conduct Rules but the respondent No.6 cannot be held to be disqualified for being appointed in service as the third...

...came to be elected as Deputy Sarpanch. A complaint was filed against the present petitioner by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 that on 12-9-2001 the petitioner No. 1 had given birth to a third child. A show...matter and was pleased to pass the order of 17-9-2008 holding that the present petitioner had acquired disqualification as the petitioner has given birth to a third child after the cut off date. The...own in her married life. The provisions of the panchayat act, therefore to the extent that it provides for disqualification for having a third child needs to be challenged. The substantial grounds...

...Chairman of Chhatrapur Panchayat Samiti and Panchayat Samiti Member of Chikalakhandi Grama Panchayat on the ground that she (Susma Das) had given birth to her third child named Chinmaya Das after the...applications, the issue involved is, whether the third child of Susama Das was born before the cutoff date (21.04.1995) or after the cutoff date. 3. It is the case of opposite party No. 1 in...both the writ applications (as election petitioners) that the third child of the petitioner-Susama Das was born after the cutoff date, i.e., 21.04.1995. It was averred by them in the election...

...) had given birth to her third child named Chinmaya Das after the cutoff date, i.e., 21.04.1995. 3. Learned Election Tribunal, after hearing, dismissed the aforesaid election...Susma Das in W.P.(C) No.18406 of 2013. In both the writ applications, the issue involved is, whether the third child of Susama Das was born before the cutoff date (21.04.1995) or after the cutoff date.... 5. It is the case of opposite party No.1 in both the writ applications (as election petitioners) that the third child of the petitioner-Susama Das was born after the cutoff date, i.e...