Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court389
+ National Green Tribunal328
+ Supreme Court Of India172
+ Madras High Court162
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court94
+ Delhi High Court74
+ Karnataka High Court73
+ Gujarat High Court69
+ Allahabad High Court64
+ Calcutta High Court49
+ Kerala High Court46
+ Patna High Court44
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court37
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court25
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal24
+ Rajasthan High Court23
+ Uttarakhand High Court20
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court17
+ Orissa High Court14
+ Telangana High Court13
+ Gauhati High Court11
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal10
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court9
+ Sikkim High Court9
+ National Company Law Tribunal5
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal4
+ SEBI3
+ Armed Forces Tribunal2
+ CESTAT2
+ Central Information Commission2
+ Tripura High Court2
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1
+ Jharkhand High Court1
+ Manipur High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards683
From 2011 To 2020360
From 2001 To 2010123
From 1991 To 200083
From 1981 To 199094
From 1971 To 198081
From 1961 To 197097
From 1951 To 1960132
Before 195029

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...children born of the defendant. In 1951 the plaintiff filed a suit for dissolution of her marriage with the defendant on the ground that the defendant had married again before ...Bombay High Court posed the question whether there can be and has been a condonation of the second marriage of the defendant and answered it in the negative. After discussing in ...Judge summed-up the position as follows:-- "A plain reading of Section 3 and other relevant sections of the Act would suggest that a second ...

...by the present appellant. The respondents further contended that the marriage between Zipa and the appellant is void, as the same was in contravention of the ...within the ambit of section 52 of the T.P Act. He further contended that the said gift by Zipa in favour of respondent No. 2 was not effected fraudulently. Furt..., her husband, which is at Exh. 45 dated 10-8-1965 is not binding upon her as the same is a fraudulent transfer under section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the T....

...circumstances of the present case, I therefore, hold that neither the provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriage ...was the case of the plaintiff that his father-defendant No. 1 got married to the original defendant No. 4 for the second time during the life time of his first wife and hence the...marriage with deceased Kersarbai was dissolved by a Registered Deed of Divorce dated 7.2.1951 and that the said Deed was also got registered in the office of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Haveli No. 1,...

...Ranjit is a son of plaintiff No. 1 and defendant No. 1. The alleged marriage of defendant No. 1 with defendant No. 2 Smt. Hirabai is bad and illegal being hit by the provisions of the ...circumstances, it cannot be denied that Vishwasrao was the father of Dilip, Suryakant and Nilima whose mother is Smt. Hirabai. Though the marriage of Vishwasrao with Smt. Hirabai was prior to 1956, even th...Hindu Succession Act and he can make such gifts either to another coparcener or to a stranger only with the prior consent of all ot...

...Section 41. 18. In a Bombay case reported in State of: Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali , in which the validity of the .... 6. The learned Counsel urged that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was ultra vires the Constitution...before on the subject. In the present case. Section 4 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, made this further...

...State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali, AIR 1952 Bom 84, in which the validity of the Bombay Prevention ...number of lawfully married wives a Hindu could have. We equally well know that this state of things was put an end to in 1955 by the enactment of the hindu marriage act ...part of section 5 of that act runs as follows :-'5. Conditions for a Hindu marriage-A marriage may be solemnised between any two Hindus, if the following conditions are fu...

...translated into a rule of law. Thus the Bombay prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriage Act. 1946, the Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention a.... , read with Sections 11 and 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. In this application under Section 561-A, Criminal P. C. the husband seeks to have the proceedings against him quashed on ...Sections 11 and 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act are ultra virus and unconstitutional as they offend Article 15 (1) of the Constitution. We may at once state that though the ...

...personal law of the parties is hinduism. Therefore respondent no. 1 has his personal law as hinduism. The bombay high court in the state v. Narayandas mangilal dayame a. I. R. 1958 bombay 68 (f. B...claim that the provisions of hindu marriage act are not applicable to him as he (as the husband claims here) is not domicile of india ? this is the main question and other questi...act 1955 the said marriage is in contravention of sec. 5 (1) of the hindu marriage act 1955 and is therefore liable to be declared nu...

...before the coming into operation of the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946. It was urged that there can be no qu....20. A plain reading of S. 3 and other relevant sections of the Act would suggest that a second marriage contracted by the husband before the coming into operation ...regarded as a matrimonial offence, it being a marriage valid under the Hindu Law.21. A marriage is defined in character at the time it is celebrated. The ...

...Bombay AIR 1960 SC 1329, 1960 Cri LJ 1974. This decision, in our opinion, is of little assistance to the appellant. The Court in that case was concerned with the Bombay ...a case of bigamous marriage is equally unhelpful. Construing a section of the Criminal Law Amendment Act of New South Wales, it was observed there that the words used in that sec...to be punished under Section 5 of the Bombay Act. He and his second wife were both charged with having committed an offence under Section 6 of that Act and were tried by the Judicial Magi...

...married person at the time of his marriage with defendant No. 1 and therefore the marriage of Narayanrao with DW-1 will be a bigamous marriage which was prohibited under ...Shahapur with Bombay State Narayanrao can be held as domicile in Bombay State itself from 8th March 1948; and his second marriage will come into the teeth of the provisions of ...Act will be referred as ‘Bigamous Marriages Act’ for short). The Trial Court has held that the marriage of Narayanrao with defendant No. 1 was void under the said...

...has been made. The Central Act, however, came into operation on 18-5-1955, that is prior to the filing of the petition.4. Section 30 of the Central Act provides as ...(Bombay Act XXV of 1946) the Bombay Hindu Divorce Act, 1947 (Bombay Act XXII of 1947), the Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention a...been filed, against the respondent for divorce and dissolution of the said marriage on the ground of desertion under the provisions of the ...

...limits of the province. As a proposition of law, it is generally correct and that is what was laid in (FB). In that case, a resident of Bombay married a woman in Bikaner at that place. The ...Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act 1949, what exactly is her status? For the appellant the contention is that when the marriage is invalid, whatever might be ...Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act 1949 is explicit that notwithstanding any rule of law, custom or usage to the contrary, any marriage solemnised after the commencement ...

...occasion, dealing with the provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriage Act (25 of 1946) a factua...was a domicile of Rajasthan. After the marriage the couple came back to Bombay State. Narayandas was prosecuted under the provisions of the above Act on the gro...express terms said that the Act seems to operate in an extra-territorial manner, and this is beyond the jurisdiction of the Maharashtra State. He is unable to agree with the decision at ...

...Nambudri only in some contingencies. The second marriage by a woman was not also unknown which depended upon desertion or putting away of the wife by her husband. In the State of Bombay, ...Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1950 had a similar effect in that State. A similar legislation in Madhya Pradesh made marriages between Hindus in that State monogamous. In the...Madras as it existed then, the Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act (VI of 1949) rendered any marriage solemnized after the commencement ...

...and defendants Nos. 2 and 3 are their legitimate sons.12. Let it be first noted here that it is an admitted position that the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous M...the high class community of Marathas. The learned trial Judge was labouring under a basic mistake that Pat marriage was not a recognised form of marriage by Hindu Law. All this is very cl.... According to them, she was the legally wedded wife of defendant No. 1 inasmuch as there was a Pat marriage between defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 4 in the year 1948. Thus, defendants Nos. 2 and 3...

...which reliance was placed by the Bombay High Court in Shankarrao's case (supra) dealt with the provisions of Sections 4(b) and 5 of the Bombay Prevention ...I on holding agricultural land and to provide for the acquisition and disposal of surplus agricultural lands. The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 imposed...the impugned provisions and this amounts to extra-territorial operation of the said Act. Relying further on the decision of the Bombay High Court, it was contended that a person ...

...was a permanent resident of the erstwhile State of Hyderabad and that when he married the plaintiff at Nilgond in the then State of Bombay, his first wife was living. After ...Goa amongst all Hindu Goans, where members of the two spousal families and their friends and relatives participate. This did not imply that their marriage was to be governed by the HM Act...to as theBombay Act’) forbidding bigamous marriages amongst Hindus. It was for this reason that the Munsiffhad held the marriage to be void. The District Judge...

...dispute that Siddalingiah was a permanent resident of the erstwhile State of Hyderabad and that when he married the plaintiff at Nilgond in the then State of Bombay, his first wife was li.... Thereafter, the respondent is said to have instituted a matrimonial case before the Family Court, Belgaum in M. C. No. 75/ 2006 under section 13(1)(ia) of the hindu marriage ...Hindu Goans, where members of the two spousal families and their friends and relatives participate. This did not imply that their marriage was to be governed by the HM Act.8. ...

...Shah, J.:—The complainant Nirmalabai filed a complaint being case No. 12/6/53 in the court of the Presidency Magistrate 17th Court, Mazgaon, Bombay, against her husband Rewadas Bhik...therefore in the special law. There is no express provision made in the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, XXV of 1946,.... The Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, XXV of 1946, does not lay down any procedure for the ‘manner’ of in...