Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal9589
+ Madras High Court9447
+ Delhi High Court8883
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission8437
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission8141
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court7441
+ Bombay High Court7147
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal6211
+ Karnataka High Court5191
+ Kerala High Court4698
+ Allahabad High Court4209
+ Calcutta High Court4032
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court3499
+ Gujarat High Court3122
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2960
+ Patna High Court2692
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court2399
+ Telangana High Court2204
+ Supreme Court Of India2164
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1963
+ RERA1697
+ Rajasthan High Court1600
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1396
+ Orissa High Court1391
+ CESTAT1292
+ National Company Law Tribunal1176
+ Central Information Commission1118
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1043
+ Gauhati High Court1021
+ Jharkhand High Court791
+ Uttarakhand High Court673
+ National Green Tribunal629
+ SEBI612
+ Central Administrative Tribunal549
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court510
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal342
+ Tripura High Court317
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act160
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity150
+ Company Law Board135
+ Privy Council111
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission103
+ Sikkim High Court101
+ Manipur High Court95
+ Meghalaya High Court79
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST76
+ Armed Forces Tribunal71
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction61
+ Competition Commission Of India60
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal58
+ Board of Revenue54
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India50
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal47
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal37
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange31
+ Authority For Advance Rulings16
+ District Court14
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India12
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property11
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board9
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST6
+ Commissioner (Appeals)6
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority5
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board5
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal3
+ Railway Claims Tribunal3
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission2
+ Settlement Commission2
+ Collector Appeals1
+ Trade Marks Registry1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards50738
From 2011 To 202047902
From 2001 To 20107081
From 1991 To 20002840
From 1981 To 19901543
From 1971 To 19801160
From 1961 To 1970930
From 1951 To 1960668
Before 19501084

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...physical possession which is denied by the counsel for the bank and submitted that they had only taken symbolic possession. The applicant further argued that there is no concept of symbolic ..., the only word "possession" has been used in the Act. The Law is very clear the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court has categorically stated that symbolic possession...is also a possession in terms of securitization action. The physical possession of the assets has been taken on 26.06.2025 pursuant to the notice under Section 13(2) dated 19.09.2024. Such proceedings...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...no dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession as observed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in re, 3...appellant that interpretation of the word 'symbolic possession' and 'physical possession' has to be understood in its literal sense and Tribunal below has completely lost sight of the provisions o...losing income over it during that period. The dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession as focussed by the advocate for respondents with reference to the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme...

.... 9. Secondly, the applicant has confused it between the symbolic possession and physical possession. On the one hand the applicant is aggrieved by the order under...according to the applicant, defendant no.1 is taking the symbolic possession on 30thJuly, 2019. The applicant is ready and willing to pay 10% of the total profit made in the business against...section 14 of the 2002 Act and on the other hand the applicant pleads with regard to the symbolic possession. The application is filed with the half-baked knowledge. Mrs. Vaidya submitted that the...

...question and that establishes his physical possession. (4 of 4) [SAW-625/2017] The contention of counsel for the appellant is that the respondent took symbolic possession and ...the Act of 2013) and the bone of contention of the appellant before the ld. Single Judge was that physical possession of the subject land in question still has not been...adverse inference can be drawn of the appellant holding physical possession of the subject land in question and this what ld. Single Judge has considered in detail in the order impugned before us dt...

...of the notices were received by her or were never served upon her. She has challenged all the process issued by the defendant bank in respect of issue of notices, symbolic possession and physical ... Present S.A. was filed on 11.09.2018 and amended S.A. was filed on 18.12.2018. Perused the grounds of S.A. and found that para no. 5.01 to 5.11 are same and so grounds of S.A till XVII...are also same. New grounds from para XVIII to XXXI were added. In totality, the applicant has challenged notices u/s 13 (2) and 13 (4) of the Act, on the ground that none...

...through which Appellant is said to have taken symbolic possession of the property. Appellant herein filed reply to the said S.A. on 08.07.2019. When the S.A. was pending for hearing, on 26.09.2019 Appellant took physical ...to clarify whether there are any two steps like symbolic possession and physical possession for taking measures u/s 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act. Advocate Ms. Nalini Lodha took...settled law there is no dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession. Now it may be relevant to examine possession notice dated 26.02.2019 to know what kind of action Bank initia...

...Advocate for Appellant to clarify whether there are any two steps like symbolic possession and physical possession for taking measures u/s 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act. Advocate Ms...conceded that as per settled law there is no dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession. Now it may be relevant to examine possession notice dated 19.01.2019 to know what kind o...contemplated of taking possession but evidently it has not succeeded in taking physical possession contained with symbolic possession. When that is the situation, having availed the measure u/s 13 (4) of t...

...-Borrowers holding that the representation filed under section 13(3-A) of the SARFAESI Act was not disposed off within 15 days and the symbolic possession notice dated 13.02.2019 was not delivered to the borrowers, accordin...on this aspect. 9. It was further submitted that measures taken for symbolic possession and physical possession give rise separate cause of action, therefore, even if..., the physical possession was taken after taking the symbolic possession, yet the irregularity caused at the time of symbolic possession cannot be ignored. The secured creditor can take the benefi...

.... Presiding Officer has also observed that there is no dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession and there could be no embargo in the creditor misleading to take the ...under Rules 8 (1) & (2) have been complied with before taking physical possession of the subject property. It is further submitted that the nine-pointer affidavit accompanying the application u/s...provisions under Rule 8(1) and (2) need to be complied with at all when the possession is being taken under Sec. 14 of the SARFAESI Act through the District Magistrate given the decision of the Hon'ble...

...taken as a ground at present to find that the appellants have a good prima facie case. It is settled law that there is no dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession. Rules will have...out that there are defects in the procedure adopted for taking symbolic possession of the subject property and that it is not in accordance with the rules and it is based on that symbolic ...Rupak Sawangikar and Mr Kushal Sawant, i/b Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellants. Mr Rajesh Nagory, along with Mr Indrajeet Deshmukh, i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners, Advocate for Respondent...

..., (for short the C.P.C) he submitted that if tenants are in occupation of the mortgaged property, auction purchaser is not entitled to recover physical possession from the tenants. The auction purchaser is entitled to ...to the NPA Act over all laws, if they are inconsistent with it.(n) The dichotomy between symbolic and physical possession does not find place in the NPA Act.(o) Rule 8...NPA Act therefore does not disclose any dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession.(p) Since scheme of section 13(4) read with section 17(3...

...measure under Section 13(4), one of the measure under Section 13(4) is taking possession of the property. Possession is of two kinds: symbolic possession & physical possession. Unless and...has not lost either symbolic or physical possession therefore in the light of above mentioned judgment this SA is premature and no cause of action is accrued in favour of borrower to file this SA...possession by serving 13(4) notice and now going to initiate an action for taking physical possession of the property through DM. The borrower gets a cause of action to file SA when bank adopts any...

..., therefore, not possible to hold that taking “measures” under Section 13(4)(a) also means taking only “symbolic possessionand not “physical possession”. We record further reasons to say so in following...sale, which could be possible only if physical (actual) possession has been taken over and not constructive or symbolic possession. The language of Section 13(6) also supports our view. Thus, while...intimation that the secured creditor has taken possession of the property and at that stage, it is quite possible, may be in view of resistance or if the banks choose to take only symbolic possession, to state that...

...be dismissed. (b) That the bank has not taken any physical possession of movable and bank has taken symbolic possession of the building and super structure of mortgage property. (c) That when bank...had taken symbolic possession bank was required to prepare inventory of the movables because the bank had mentioned the details of movables in the possession notice and further in the Transcore case Hon'ble Supreme...not taken any physical possession of movable as such there ~ np need to prepare punchnama and there is no violation of Rule 4. (d) That non mention of amended provisions in the possession notice...

...the SARFAESI Act and rule framed there under. That as per the SAARFAESI Act, there is no distinction between symbolic possession and physical possession. The Bank had already obtained orders for...between symbolic possession and physical possession. The Bank had already obtained orders for physical possession of the property from the Collector and District Magistrate, Cutt...taken symbolic possession of the property under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act and thereafter proceeded under Section 14 of the Act for taking physical possession of the property and it was del...

...has not been followed by the respondent Bank while taking symbolic possession and physical possession of the property in question, therefore, the SA may be allowed and entire SARF AESI actions...29.10.2019, issued the Demand Notice dated 18.1 1.2019 and Symbolic Possession Notice dated 07 .02.2020 to the S. Applicant. The Demand Notice and the Symbolic Possession Notice w...served to the S. Applicant. It is also submitted that the symbolic possession notice dated 07.02.2020 was also published in the newspapers and affixed on the secured assets. The learned...

...a purpose. The words “including the right” appearing in clause (a) of section 13(4) comprehend both symbolic and/or physical possession in stages as is elucidated in Rules 8 and 9. The measure...provided under rules 8 and 9 of the said rules. These Rules envisage different stages/steps to be followed; first symbolic possession [Rules 8(1) and (2)], then physical/actual possession [Rules 8...Court negatived this contention. The Supreme Court held that there is no dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession.43. The following is the gist of what the Supreme...

...petitioner that the respondent-Bank could have taken only the symbolic possession of the disputed premises and not the actual physical possession while taking measures under Section 13(4) of the said Act...Transcore v. Union of India AIR 2007 SC 712 wherein the Apex Court dismissing the plea of symbolic possession, categorically held that the dichotomy between ...absolute concept. The dichotomy between symbolic and physical possession does not find place in the Act. As stated above, there is a conceptual distinction between securities by which the creditor obtains...