...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal, [2000] 241 ITR 124 (MP) as affirmed by the Supreme Court in CIT v. ...Chandra Mittal, [2001] 251 ITR 9. The Revenue carried an appeal to the ITAT (Income-tax Appellate Tribunal) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal by order dated January 2, 2006...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2003) 11 SCC 729 whereupon Mr Datta, learned Additional Solicitor General relied, no reason was assigned and only the order of the...

...) Versus 1. Smt. Meera Bansal W/o Late Sri Devendra Kumar Bansal R/o C/o Suresh Chandra Mittal 160/3 Durga nagar Firozabad ...........Respondent(s...) 1. Smt. Meera Bansal Smt. Meera Bansalw/O late shri Devendra Kumar Bansal R/O C/O Suresh Chandra Mittal 160/3 Durga Nagar Firozabad 283203 ...........Appellant(s...

...) Versus 1. Smt. Meera Bansal W/o Late Sri Devendra Kumar Bansal R/o C/o Suresh Chandra Mittal 160/3 Durga nagar Firozabad ...........Respondent(s...) 1. Smt. Meera Bansal Smt. Meera Bansalw/O late shri Devendra Kumar Bansal R/O C/O Suresh Chandra Mittal 160/3 Durga Nagar Firozabad 283203 ...........Appellant(s...

...Chandra Mittal Respondent :- Manzoor Ahmad And 2 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P. Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Case called out in revised list. No... Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42897 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1004771 of 2003 Petitioner :- Suresh...

...case cited as CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal, (2000) 241 ITR 124 which has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court vide judgment cited as...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal, 251 ITR 9. Operative part of the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in case of...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra) is reproduced for ready perusal:—“The assessee had originally filed returns showing meagre income. When...

..., penalty was not leviable. Reliance was placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9...) CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC)(ii)Commissioner Of Income-Tax ...

...perverse. We also find that in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal, [2001] 251 ITR 9, the hon'ble Supreme Court observed that when an assessee files a revised return showing...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...

...CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9, found that this is not a fit case for levy of penalty. Accordingly, he dropped the penalty proc...Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), took one of the possible views, the same cannot be considered to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue. Referring to the judgment of Apex...penalty proceeding by issuing show cause notice. In the course of penalty proceeding, according to the Ld. D.R., on the basis of the judgment of Apex Court in Suresh Chandra Mittal (supra), the...