...Raj Kamal Sudan, a constable in the Border Security Force, was dismissed from service vide Commandant 51 Bn. BSF's order of August 31, 2001 pursuant to the Verdict of a Summary Security Force Court held...petition questioning the findings and Verdict of the Summary Security Force Court and seeking its quashing on the grounds that the allegations leveled against him in the charge were false, and...proceedings conducted prior to and by the Summary Security Force Court were illegal, in that, he was unaware about the nature of the proceedings and was not afforded any opportunity to make statement or cross...

...the Commandant, who, instead of sending the report to the DIG, constituted a Summary Security Force Court. The Summary Security Force Court, after inquiry, passed the impugned order of dismissal of.... The first question is whether it was proper on the part of the Commandant to constitute a Summary Security Force Court in view of the fact that the DIG had already constituted a Board of Enquiry. The...report of the Board of Enquiry should have been submitted to the DIG, who had constituted that Committee for action thereon, but in defiance of that, constitution of the Summary Security Force Court by...

...and convened Summary Security Force Court for trial of the petitioner. On examination of the evidence recorded at the trial, the Summary Security Force Court found the petitioner guilty of both the...charges under sections 20(a) and 26 of the BSF Act, 1968. Accordingly, the summary Security Force Court convicted the petitioner and awarded him punishment of dismissal from...service w.e.f September 25, 2000. The proceedings of Summary Security Force Court were transmitted to the DIG, BSF, under rule 160 of the bsf rules. The DIG, on consideration of the matter, set aside the...

...Ashoke Kumar Dasadhikari, J.:— The writ petitioner, who is a paramilitary force, was subjected to a disciplinary proceeding under Border Security Force Act, 1968. He was issued charge sheet, he was given opportunity to defend and he was held guilty by the Summary Security Force Court. The...the appellate authority also rejected the appeal thereby confirming the order of dismissal passed by the Summary Security Force Court.Mr. Bhattacharya, learned Counsel appearing the...writ petitioner submits that the order passed by the Summary Security Force Court by one word ‘guilty’ is not sufficient to hold the petitioner guilty of the charges framed against the writ petitioner...

...The argument which has been advanced on behalf of the petitioner is that on the basis of the finding given by the Summary Security Force Court, the order of punishment has been passed...this regard.Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention towards the provision as contained in Section-114 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 which speaks as follows:-“114. Finding and sentence of a Summary Security Force Court.-- (1...only after finding an order of sentence may be passed by the Summary Security Force Court. Thus, it has been submitted that if the impugned order is perused, there is no finding of Summary Security Force Court.Counsel...

...Kashmir, where his trial by Summary Security Force Court was held. The proceedings of Summary Security Force Court, however, were counter signed by the Deputy Inspector General of Border Security...Security Force Court and the sentence of dismissal imposed on him. The allegations against the petitioner were for remaining absent from duty or overstaying leave, on different occasions. The petitioner had...RANJIT SINGH, J (Oral)The petitioner was serving with 16 Bn BSF, which was stationed in Jammu and Kashmir at the relevant time. He has impugned his trial by a Summary...

...BY THE COURT:REPORTABLESeeking an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the Summary Security Force Court's proceedings, those resulted into dismissal...dated 22.2.1996 proposed trial of the accused petitioner by Summary Security Force Court by himself in terms of Section 70 of the Act of 1968. Accordingly, Summary Security Force Court was convened and...the charge sheet dated 22.2.1996 was issued. The petitioner availed service of Shri Chain Singh of 192 Battalion, Border Security Force, Jaisalmer as “friend of the accused”. The proceedings of the Summary Security Force Court were...

...43 of the Rules), it should not be quashed at this stage, since at the stages of recording of evidence and trial by summary security force Court the petitioner did not take any exception to the...the summary security force Court, before giving such direction the commandant did not take, record and publish an appropriate decision regarding the necessity of the petitioner's trial by summary...the summary security force Court would be held on November 16th, 2000. By such order the commandant also named the persons who would attend the trial in the capacities of interpretor, friend of the...

...petition preferred by the appellant, impugning validity of sentence recorded by the Summary Security Force Court vide order dated 3.5.1989In brief, facts of the case are that the.... 85102613 Const. v. PURUSHOTTAM of the same Coy. with an intent to kill.” The act of the appellant was termed as an offence under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and also a civil offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. The Deputy Inspector General (Headquarters) after reaching at the conclusion that the case in question was not falling within the exception provided under Section 46 of the Act of 1968 directed to try the appellant by Summary Security Force Court (SSFC...Summary Security Force Court by its order dated 11.1.1989 sentenced the...

...Constitution.2. The respondent was a constable of 71 battalion of the Border Security Force. At the material time, he was posted at Modhugari Police Camp, P.S Karimpur, District Nadia. He was charged with abetment of the offence of exacting money from one Md. Mohiuddin Mondal without proper authority. He was directed to be tried by the Summary Security Force Court. In...found guilty of the charge and, by an order dt. Sept. 10, 1975 of the Summary Security Force Court, he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment in Civil Jail for a period of three months. He was...also dismissed from service. The conviction and sentence of the Summary Security Force Court was approved by the Inspector-General of Border Security force, West Bengal by his order dt. Sept. 29, 1975. The respondent, being aggrieved by the finding and sentence of the Summary Security Force Court, while...

...Director General of BSF, the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 28.02.2000 has been rejected. Quashment of the said orders and of the Summary Security Force Court proceedings is....4. The commandant of the Bn. decided that the petitioner be tried by Summary Security Force Court on both the charges. The copies of both the ROEs had been handed over to him alongwith charge sheet...Summary Security Force Court. The proceedings of the SSFC record of which is produced by learned CGSC suggest that the petitioner attended the trial, friend of the accused SI M.M Kukriti of 108 BN BSF...

...documents of the Summary Security Force Court proceedings that took place on 28th July 2021. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that vide order dated 06th July 2021, a...Record of Evidence was ordered against the Petitioner on charges under sections 16 (c), 16 (d), 26 and 20 (c) of the BSF Act 1968, and subsequently, a Summary Security Force Court assembled on 28th.... 4. Issue notice. Mr.S.K.Tyagi, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents. He states that Respondent nos.2 & 3 have no objection to supply of documents of the Summary Security Force Court proceedings...

...against him, as well as the proceedings of the Summary Security Force Court. The writ petition, however, was dismissed by the learned Writ Court vide order dated 12.05.2011. The petitioner thereafter...dated 16.08.2018. 3. Ms. Veenu Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the issue regarding the jurisdiction of the Summary Security Force Court to try an...further contended that Rule 47 of the BSF Rules pertains only to the summarily disposal of a case by the Commandant and not by the Summary Security Force Court, as Section 74 of the BSF Act specifically...

.... 9. On 13.02.2004, the petitioner was informed that he would be tried by a Summary Security Force Court on 16.02.2004. He was also placed under close arrest on the same day..., approximately one hour before the commencement of the Summary Security Force Court proceedings, and the petitioner was certified as medically fit to stand 4... trial. 11. The Summary Security Force Court was formally constituted by the Commandant on 14.02.2004. The...

...of evidence as well as additional records of evidence to the appellant herein informing him about the commencement of the trial in Summary Security Force Court on 2nd August, 2005. The appellant and...the aforesaid two other constables were arrested on 2nd August, 2005 and tried by the Summary Security Force Court on 2nd August, 2005. The final order of punishment was thereafter issued by the...learned Single Judge on 12th March, 2008. The appellant, however, already suffered the imprisonment in the meantime pursuant to the said order of punishment passed by the Summary Security Force Court.5...

...offence report was prepared under Rule 43 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 for commission of an offence under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Charge sheet as against the appellant was issued. The appellant was tried by the Summary Security Force Court. An...for serving on the Security Force Court. He refers to Rule 60(iv) thereof. 13. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, although, the record of evidence of the proceedings of the Summary Security...Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and that the same cannot be dealt with summarily. He refers to Section 47 of the Act of 1968 and submits that, Summary Security Force Court is not...

... 82 Miles Nalkata Tripura 799266 Dated the 23rd Dec. 2018 Sr. 010035120 CONST.(GD) KARAN SINGH A COY Sub: SUMMARY SECURITY FORCE COURT I propose to try you by...holding a Summary Security Force Court on 07 Jan 2019 in the office of the COMMANDANT, 3 Bn BSF at Bn HQ 82 Miles, Nalkata, Tripura for following offence under BSF Act 1968 as committed by you... 2. This is to inform you that under provision to BSF Rule 157 during trial at a Summary Security Force Court you may take W.P.(C) 6357/2021 Page 3 of 6 assistance of any person...

...petition for quashing the order of the Summary Security Force Court after his statutory appeal was turned down by the BSF authorities.3. The respondent has challenged the order of his...158 have been violated. In accordance with S. 70 of the Act Summary Security Force Court may be held by the Commandant of the Unit and he alone will constitute the Court but the proceedings are...was rejected by letter, dated 10 June, 1995. This Summary Security Force Court had no jurisdiction to try the offence. Sri Balodi, SI who attended the proceeding was disqualified being himself a...

...Summary Security Force Court under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Act, 1968). 2. The allegations against the...officer. After trial by the Summary Security Force Court, his services were terminated. The Superior (2 of 9) [CW-5992/1999] Authority confirmed the termination order of the petitioner and his mercy...petition was also rejected by the Director General, Border Security Force on 16.09.1999. 3. The petitioner has assailed the entire proceedings relating to the Summary Security Force Court. Admitted...

... benefits w.e.f. 20.03.2008 after setting aside the order of the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) dated 19.03.2008 (Annexu 2. counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of... Security Force Court (SSFC) dated 19.03.2008 (Annexu After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition at... Security Force Court (SSFC) dated 19.03.2008 (Annexure P-12). After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present...