Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal847
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal607
+ Delhi High Court224
+ National Company Law Tribunal215
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission170
+ SEBI155
+ Bombay High Court142
+ CESTAT115
+ Madras High Court115
+ Supreme Court Of India80
+ Kerala High Court54
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court44
+ Company Law Board41
+ Karnataka High Court36
+ Allahabad High Court28
+ Central Information Commission25
+ Competition Commission Of India23
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission23
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST22
+ Calcutta High Court20
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal20
+ Gujarat High Court17
+ Patna High Court17
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court16
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal16
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court16
+ Telangana High Court15
+ Central Administrative Tribunal10
+ Gauhati High Court10
+ Rajasthan High Court10
+ Authority For Advance Rulings7
+ Chhattisgarh High Court7
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST5
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal5
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal5
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission5
+ National Green Tribunal5
+ Orissa High Court4
+ Uttarakhand High Court4
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act3
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal3
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court3
+ Privy Council3
+ Sikkim High Court2
+ Copyright Board1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court1
+ Jharkhand High Court1
+ Settlement Commission1
+ Tripura High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards882
From 2011 To 20201483
From 2001 To 2010297
From 1991 To 200079
From 1981 To 199044
From 1971 To 198029
From 1961 To 197021
From 1951 To 196027
Before 195022

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...said report of the learned Commissioner would assert that its subscriber base is only 980.4. According to it, it having a limited number of subscribers, was not possible for him to pay...In these petitions, the Petitioner, which is a Multi Service Operator, has interalia prayed for issuance of the following directions:—“Allow the present Petition/application...the subscription fee as directed by this Tribunal on a subscriber base of 4500 which was later revised to 2500.It admittedly has not paid unto the Respondent the sum payable on the basis...

...requested the respondent for downgrading its monthly subscription fee on the plea that a rival distributor having slightly higher number of subscribers, is paying subscription fee at the rate of Rs. 75,000...of the previous agreement and for non-payment of dues of subscription fee amounting to Rs. 3,67,701/- as on 31 January 2015. Counsel for the respondent submitted that the petitioner is a chronic...The petitioner is a MSO receiving the signals from the respondent broadcaster. Under the agreement between the two sides, the petitioner was required to pay subscription fee at the rate of...

...regarding transfer or issue of shares to third parties in the company.vi. Under the 1994 agreement, the licencee was liable to pay fixed licence fee for first 3 years. For 4 year and onwards, the licencee wa...) subscribers or part thereof; subject to the minimum shown below:-Minimum Licence Fee for Fourth to Sixth Year Seventh year onwards Service Area (for each year) (for each year).... in crores)Bombay 18 24 Delhi 12 16 Calcutta 9 12 Madras 6 8a) For purpose of charging the lump-sum Licence fee for the first three years, the year shall be reckoned as...

...consider the terms of some of these rules, as for instance, Rule 27, which requires the payment by subscribers of " a fee equal to ten per cent. upon the amount of monthly pension insured,"-and.... The Fund was established many years ago for the purpose of securing a provision for the widows and children of its subscribers. Originally, or at all events prior to 1850, the Rule (then being No. 33...of such circular shall be decisive." If Rule 41 was passed by the votes of a majority of the subscribers in substitution for the old Rule 33, it was of course competent for a majority of...

...minimum guaranteed 2,00,000 subscribers. Period 4: (1st January, 2014 to 31st March, 2014) - Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lacs only) per month based on Rs.12/- per set top box per month for a minimum guaranteed 2,50,000 ... Period 4: (1st January, 2014 to 31st March, 2014) - Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lac only) per month based on Rs. 4/- per set top box per month for a minimum guaranteed 2,50,000 subscribers....for a minimum guaranteed 1,25,000 subscribers. Period 2: (1st July, 2013 to 30th September, 2013) - Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen Lacs only) per month based on Rs.10/- per set top box per month for...

...31st March, 2014) Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lacs only) per month based on Rs.12/- per set top box per month for a minimum guaranteed 2,50,000 subscribers. In the event the average subscribers of Kable First inc...January, 2014 to 31st March, 2014) Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lac only) per month based on Rs. 4/- per set top box per month for a minimum guaranteed 2,50,000 subscribers. In the event the average subscribers of Ka...Period 1: (20th April, 2013 to 30th June, 2013) Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs only) per month based on Rs.8/- per set top box per month for a minimum guaranteed 1,25,000 subscribers. Period 2: (1st July...

...in certain area of Ahemdabad, for collecting subscription fee from subscribers. 4. Respondent No.2 is a competing MSO, engaged in the business of distributing TV...Respondent, MANORAMA CHANNEL, through its proprietor and another with a prayer for an award/ decree for a sum of Rs. 87,667/- (Rupees Eighty Seven thousand Six hundred sixty seven... 2 only) towards subscription charges with an interest @ 21% p.a. with a further prayer for direction to Respondent No. 1 and...

...computing the number of subscribers for determining the licence fee payable from the fourth year onwards contending that the term “subscribers” should be understood to be such as have activated cellular mobile tele...number of subscribers for determining the licence fee shall be the total figure of IMSI in the Home Location Register. The Tribunal found that the representation made on the subject by the appellant-petitioner on 1-4-1999 w...fixed amount towards licence fee for the first three years of the licence period. From the fourth year onwards the licence fee payable was to be on the basis of number of subscribers of the service...

...Bungalows, Thalthej, Ahmedabad, is an LCO, engaged in the retransmission of signal/ service of the Petitioner to the subscribers in certain area of Ahemdabad, for collecting subscription fee from...subscribers. 4. Respondent No.2 is a competing MSO, engaged in the business of distributing TV channel, like Petitioner, having license for it.... 5. Petitioner and Respondent No.1 had entered in an Interconnect agreement, for retransmitting signals of Petitioner to its subscribers and collect subscription fee. According to the agreeme...

...counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that this MoU is for a fixed monthly fee which is based on a benchmark number of subscribers. The fixed fee prescribed is the...subscriber was to be paid per month for subscribers in excess of the benchmark subscribers. We also find that this rate of Rs.35/- was in the nature of a volume discount and a promotional offer whose basis... Kuldip Singh: The dispute in the present case pertains to the rates charged by the respondent as subscription fee for DAS phase II areas. Petitioner No.1 is...

...the Respondent, which was the basis for fixing Rs. 1.10 crores as the monthly subscription fee for year 2008-09 and demand of Rs. 1.60 crores for subsequent year 2009-10.5. The learned counsel ...subscription fee. For a universe of 31.5 lacs of subscribers for the rest of the Kerala the declared subscriber base is admittedly 1.11 lacs and hence the percentage of declaration is only 3.52%. The...contentions of the petitioner are as under:—i. The Respondent fixed subscription fee for the previous year, i.e 2008-09 at Rs. 110 lacs per month (with a further discount of Rs 4 lacs...

...26th May 2006 the respondent had set a figure of 1 million subscribers as minimum figure for payment of fee by the petitioner to the respondent. However, now on 3rd July 2006 the figure has been reduced...subscribers’ as a precondition to supply its signals/bouquet of channels?3.1 Supply of TV signals of one bouquet or all the bouquets together:Learned Counsel for the petitioner..., therefore, that for such a platform where 100 per cent subscribers are paying, the rate of subscription should be less than that on the cable platform. It is also the contention of the petitioner that...

...present M.A No. 120 of 2010 that the petitioner should be directed to pay subscription fee for 6476 subscribers from 1 September, 2009 till April 30, 2010 and thereafter should pay on a connectivity of...carried out by counting the actual subscribers, it is necessary that the parties should negotiate before arriving at a subscriber base for which the agreement is required to be signed for providing signals...2. The main dispute is regarding the subscriber base and, therefore, a joint survey was ordered on 29 May, 2009 for the city of Bhubaneshwar, which was agreed upon by the petitioner to be...

..., to which subscribers the cable operators disseminate the TV Signal for a fee or charge. Thus instead of individual viewers having their own separate dish antenna, the cable operators have common dish antenna and ...satellite, which receives signal from Earth at one point and relays back the said signal covering a major portion of the Earth. Defendant No. 4 is operating a channel known as “Zee TV” for broadcasting...recording, by a broadcasting organisation using its own facilities for its own broadcast by a broadcasting organisation of a work which it has the right to broadcast; and the retention of such recording...

...shares to third parties in the company.vi. Under the 1994 agreement, the licencee was liable to pay fixed licence fee for first 3 years. For 4 year and onwards, the licencee was liable to pay v...postulated a lump-sum payment irrespective of number of subscribers. Minimum fee was also prescribed for later years. It appears that licencees were unable to make payments as per the 1994 agreement..., maintain and operate cellular mobile telephone service, within a given geographical area.ii. The licence was granted for a period of ten years, which was extendable for five ye...

...received from the clients to the latter’s subscribers for which they get a fee from the clients. The clients also promise not to send any data which consider as objectionable. The terms of the...stored on the SMSC.(iv)   Cancel or replace a short message stored on the SMSC.(v)     Send a registered short message (for which a ‘delivery receipt..., the appellants are not responsible for the content of the messages received, carried and delivered by them. Like a courier agency sending parcels, they were only acting as carrier of messages. A...

...) for which it charges a service fee. Through this subscription, the Indian subscribers place there storefront and have their products advertised/listed when visitors go to the website for search of...electronic form. Explaining the brief overview of the subscription arrangement for the services, Mr.Pardiwalla submitted that: a. The subscribers would register..., source is a 'profit-making apparatus', and since the Website constitutes a profit making apparatus for which payments are made to the assessee by the subscribers, therefore, Mohite 11/22...

...) for which it charges a service fee. Through this subscription, the Indian subscribers place there storefront and have their products advertised/listed when visitors go to the website for search of...electronic form. Explaining the brief overview of the subscription arrangement for the services, Mr.Pardiwalla submitted that: a. The subscribers would register..., source is a 'profit-making apparatus', and since the Website constitutes a profit making apparatus for which payments are made to the assessee by the subscribers, therefore, Mohite 11/22...

...the requisite number of subscribers at the agreed coupon rate, the issuer may choose not to launch the issue for subscription. In such a situation, the Managers would not be entitled to any fee...out the consideration to be paid to the Managers. A copy of the proposed Fee Letter was submitted. 9. AGEL submits that the service of arranging for subscribers to the...by the substance of the transaction, then the same is a transaction for purchase and sale of securities, which is outside the scope of GST. Consequently, the amount nomenclated as fee, paid to the...

...the requisite number of subscribers at the agreed coupon rate, the issuer may choose not to launch the issue for subscription. In such a situation, the Managers would not be entitled to any fee...out the consideration to be paid to the Managers. A copy of the proposed Fee Letter was submitted. 9. AGEL submits that the service of arranging for subscribers to the...by the substance of the transaction, then the same is a transaction for purchase and sale of securities, which is outside the scope of GST. Consequently, the amount nomenclated as fee, paid to the...