Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court3868
+ Bombay High Court3132
+ Calcutta High Court2566
+ Delhi High Court2340
+ Allahabad High Court1943
+ Karnataka High Court1355
+ Kerala High Court1207
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1186
+ Patna High Court1129
+ Supreme Court Of India1042
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission906
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court895
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court869
+ Gujarat High Court855
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal752
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court629
+ Rajasthan High Court560
+ Gauhati High Court385
+ Orissa High Court356
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission350
+ Telangana High Court335
+ National Company Law Tribunal277
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal271
+ Privy Council244
+ SEBI223
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court200
+ Jharkhand High Court192
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity176
+ CESTAT170
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal168
+ RERA166
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission155
+ Chhattisgarh High Court114
+ Central Administrative Tribunal111
+ Uttarakhand High Court74
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal71
+ Company Law Board57
+ National Green Tribunal53
+ Tripura High Court49
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal47
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission45
+ Board of Revenue41
+ Manipur High Court25
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST23
+ Sikkim High Court22
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange18
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal18
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India13
+ Authority For Advance Rulings12
+ Central Information Commission12
+ Meghalaya High Court12
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST11
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal7
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board6
+ District Court2
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission2
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority2
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board2
+ Competition Commission Of India1
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards6857
From 2011 To 20207217
From 2001 To 20102704
From 1991 To 20001557
From 1981 To 19901228
From 1971 To 19801178
From 1961 To 19701299
From 1951 To 19601300
Before 19504273

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...being a stranger to the contract of insurance could not sue the insurance company. It is not disputed that the general law is that a stranger to a contract .... 879:The person who has suffered the injury or damage for which the assured is liable is not a party or privy to the contract of insurance, and had not, either at Common law or in...the legal rights of the insured against a third party and were entitled to do so in the name of the insured. He deduced from this that the third party equally had a right to sue the company. In my...

...English Common Law that a stranger to a contract cannot sue, is applicable to India, and what are the limitations within which a stranger may sue in In...Indian cases. I may refer to 53 Mad. 2708 which has reviewed the entire law on the subject and has formulated the rule in these terms:“Where on a contract between A and B, B agrees to pay ...not necessary for the purpose of the decision of the present case to formulate with precision the exceptions recognised in India as regards the principle that a stranger to a contract ...

...contends that at any rate on the principle of equity the plaintiffs were entitled to relief by now it is well set tied that ordinarily a stranger to a consideration cannot take advantage of .... A stranger to a, contract which reserves a benefit for him Cannot sue upon it either in English or in Indian Law even though in India the consideration need not move from the p...respondents cited Subbu Chetti v. Arunachalam, in support of his Contention that a stranger to a contract cannot sue upon it. In the Madras Full Bench case large number of authorities inc...

...the rule that a stranger to a contract cannot sue upon it even if it be clear that it was intented to benefit him. 2. By ext. Bi dated 311949, The defendant and ...hire co. Ltd. V. Stratt (1953) 2 all e. R. 1475 at page 1482) that the rule deduced from "the unfortunate case" of tweddle v. Atkinson (121 e. R. 762) a case decided in 181, Namely, That a stranger to a ...: "it was further argued that the widow, Being a stranger to the contract embodied in the award, Cannot sue to enforce it, But it is too la...

...in the name of a firm is really a suit by or in the name of all its partners, that a suit to enforce a right under a contract can be brought only by a party to that ...principle that a stranger to a contract cannot sue on the contract is not applicable in the case of a partner of a firm. The definition of a firm in...deals with the question as to when a firm can sue, or be sued by, a third party in respect of a right arising from a contract, and provides certain requirements as conditions precedent fo...

...consideration was B's premise to discharge a debt of A to C.C sued B and it was held that C who was a stranger to the contract cannot sue B for the payment of h.... The learned Judges deal exhaustively with the cases and lay down the general rule of law to be that a party who is a stranger to a contract cannot sue on the .... The liability of the post office did not at all arise for consideration in that case. The principles according to which a stranger, not a party to a contract, may sue on the ba...

...authority is in favour of the view that a stranger to a contract cannot without more sue to enforce it. 19. In Jamnadas v. Ram Autar Pande...discharge a debt of A to C. C sued B and it was held that C who was a stranger to the contract cannot sue B for the payment of his debt without joining A as ...with the cases and lay down the general rule of law to be that a party who is a stranger to a contract cannot sue on the contract. The exceptions which the lear...

...and, therefore, the plaintiff's case came under one of the exceptions to the general rule that a stranger to a contract cannot sue although all the parties to the ...AIR 1930 Mad 382 (FB) (B), it was, therefore, held, upon a review of the authorities, that “a person not a party to a contract ...person may sue upon a contract if he takes a benefit under it, although a stranger to such contract. I think that such rule must be introduced by the Legislature, and not by the ...

...:“In the law of England certain principles are fundamental. One is that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it. Our law knows nothing of a jus quaesitum t...defeat the claims of the parties. This was the era to carve out the exceptions to the principle of privity of contract which is that a stranger to a contract cannot ...settled. A stranger to a contract which reserves a benefit for him cannot sue upon it either in English or in Indian law even though in India the consideration need not move from...

...stranger to consideration or contract cannot bring a legal action, Indian law is quite different. Section 2(a) of the...precedent is required to be referred to in support thereof. On the proposition that a stranger to a contract cannot sue, Indian Law is also same as English Law but there...., it was held that where a contract is made for the benefit of a third person, there may be equity for the third person to sue upon the contract.5. In order to app...

...use in the consideration of this case.”11. It was argued before us, mainly on the authority of the ruling to which I have just referred, that the doctrine that a stranger to a ...between his debtor and the defendant.3. The defence is first, that the plaintiff being a stranger to the contract could not sue on it; and secondly, that though the consideration for the...promisee, can sue on the contract.17. Finally it has been contended that the rule against a stranger to a contract being allowed to sue is one merely of ...

...favour of the view that a stranger to a contract cannot without more sue to enforce it. 19. In ...M. 753 at p. 763 : 26 M.L.J. 127 That was a case where A mortgaged his laudato B and part of the consideration was B's promise; to discharge a debt of A to C.C. sued B an...rule of law to be that a party who is a stranger to a contract cannot sue on the contract. The exceptions which the learned Judges enunciate are (a) th...

...in I.L.R (1943) Nag. 6436 at p. 647 and have held that a stranger to a contract cannot sue on it unless there is something over and above the contract, such as ..., which would entitle him to sue. In the present case I am clear the plaintiff cannot sue. In the first place, the agreement with the municipal committee cannot be looked upon as a ...committee was a party the questions which we have here did not arise 61 Cal. 8415 deals with a case in which a beneficiary to a contract can sue. But it is clear from the...

...Rose Fernandes v. Joseph Gonsalves is wrong.The technical rule established in Tweddle v. Atkinson, that a stranger to a ...nineteen. It is important to note that the defendant was of age at the time of the contract, because it is well settled that a guardian cannot enter into a personal contract imposing liability on ...Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose,(5) and that if the contract was to be regarded as a contract between the parents, the bride not being a party...

...rule of common law in England that a stranger to a contract cannot sue on it though he is entitled to some benefit under it. With reference to this case, their Lordships...Full Bench case of Subbu Chetti v. Arunchalan Chattiar their Lordships reviewed all the leading authorities on the point and laid down: “Where on a contract between A and B, B agrees to pay ...under a marriage settlement, partition or other family arrangement.” It is thus clear that though the general rule, as laid down in Tweddle v. Atkinson, is that a stranger to a ...

...stranger to a contract cannot sue to enforce it. It was held that although the plaintiff was not party to the contract which she sought to enforce yet she "was ...person not a party to a contract cannot sue on the contract unless the case comes within one of the recognised exceptions. One such exception is where the contract creates ...tertio arising by way of contract. Such a right may be conferred by way of property as, for example, under a trust, but it cannot be conferred on a stranger to a ...

.... This was the era to carve out the exceptions to the principle of privity of contract which is that a stranger to a contract cannot sue. From time to ...seems to be fairly well settled. A stranger to a contract which reserves a benefit for him cannot sue upon it either in English or in Indian law even though in India the.... Similarly, a person who is a trustee of the third party can also sue likewise, even if he is a stranger to a contract. These are not exhaustive exceptions and as seen above fro...

...consideration has to move from the promisee, and it is well-established there that a stranger to the consideration cannot sue on the contract, unless it is made on his behalf by an agent ...fundamental. One is that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it. Our law knows nothing of a jus quaesitum tertio arising by way of contract. Such a rig.... Poole has gone by the board, and it is settled law that a stranger to a contract cannot sue. But, as I have just pointed out, there are two exceptions made to this general rule...

...contractual obligation with the Corporate Debtor. The High Sea Trade Contract dated 31.05.2017 reveals that the Contract is between the Corporate Debtor and M/s. Thankam Cashew Factory. Therefore, a stranger ...Corporate Debtor. there is no privity of contract between the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor. A stranger to a contract cannot come before a court of Law as held in...]. The Contract dated 31.05.2019, took place between M/s. Thankam Cashew Factory and the Corporate Debtor. The Applicant herein is a stranger to that Contract. 6. Further the...

...for the repair of the complainants vehicle and also there is a privity of contract between the opposite party No.2 and complainant and the stranger to a contract cannot sue only ...can file a case against the party. But there is no contract or cause of action between the complainant and opposite party No.2. The complainant failed to show the cause of action against the opposite...had sanctioned loan of Rs.10,50,000/- to purchase the car and the said car is hypothecated with Canara Bank with estimated monthly installments @Rs.25,600/- for a period of (5) years. On 10-05-2017...