Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court8333
+ Allahabad High Court7213
+ Bombay High Court7152
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court5809
+ Gujarat High Court5573
+ Kerala High Court5371
+ Karnataka High Court5148
+ Delhi High Court4651
+ Calcutta High Court4290
+ Central Administrative Tribunal4222
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court4144
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court3417
+ Rajasthan High Court2792
+ Telangana High Court2369
+ Supreme Court Of India1900
+ Patna High Court1777
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1686
+ Gauhati High Court1371
+ Uttarakhand High Court1313
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1283
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court1113
+ Orissa High Court1081
+ National Green Tribunal951
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal888
+ National Company Law Tribunal873
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal840
+ Jharkhand High Court753
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal584
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal544
+ Company Law Board515
+ CESTAT450
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission446
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission419
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission303
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act281
+ Central Information Commission272
+ Meghalaya High Court245
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity225
+ RERA173
+ SEBI148
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission142
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal140
+ Manipur High Court132
+ Tripura High Court97
+ Sikkim High Court72
+ Armed Forces Tribunal65
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal56
+ Board of Revenue52
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction49
+ Competition Commission Of India46
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board45
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange22
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board22
+ Privy Council22
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal20
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India15
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India12
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST6
+ Authority For Advance Rulings4
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal3
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property3
+ District Court3
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission3
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST2
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority2
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property1
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards35080
From 2011 To 202037504
From 2001 To 20107238
From 1991 To 20002979
From 1981 To 19901228
From 1971 To 1980519
From 1961 To 1970322
From 1951 To 1960292
Before 1950284

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...status quo as in the High Court in the presence of learned counsel for Respondent 4, three days after i.e on 22-12-1986 Respondent 4 Ram Nath Singh and his son Vijendra Singh filed a Criminal...Court the fact that this Court had directed maintenance of status quo, and thereby obtained an order from the High Court dated 3-1-1987 in the said proceedings by which Respondent 4 was allowed to.... 370, and had thus wilfully and flagrantly disobeyed and violated the status quo order of this Court.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties at quite some length...

...light of the materials available it was just and proper to direct the parties to maintain the status quo as on date and delay in the grant of an ad interim order may cause complications, passed an ex...parte ad interim order directing both the parties to maintain status quo as on that day till 17-7-1998. Thereafter alleging that he was in possession on 19-6-1998 when the order to maintain status quo was...injunction and allowed the same by upholding the claim of the plaintiff that he was dispossessed after the interim order of status quo was passed by that court. A challenge by the defendants to that order...

...relief or reliefs.”Pending this suit an interlocutory application was filed and an order dated May 20, 1988 was passed directing the maintenance of status quo in respect of...the fixed properties are concerned there would be an order of status quo as of today till the disposal of the application. There would also be an order not to dissolve the committee in the meantime...of the minutes of this order.”4. From the above it is seen that in relation to the properties an order of status quo as of today, (that is, September 15, 1988...

....7. Mr R.S Sachar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, contended that generally during the pendency of litigation courts protect the status quo existing on the date of the...suit and it is only in exceptional circumstances, where irreparable damage is feared, the courts permit change of status quo. His further contention was that in the present case no such case is made...out by the respondent and the trial court was justified in protecting the status quo as on the date of the suit.8. Mr A.V Palli, learned counsel for the respondent...

...dismissed and the order of the learned Single Judge was affirmed. The learned Single Judge by his order dated 5-6-2007 had vacated an interim order of status quo granted earlier on an application filed...assets in India.7. The respondent raised a plea for vacating the interim order of status quo granted by the learned Single Judge on the application for injunction filed...part consignment as noted hereinabove were already released. It was also the case of the respondent in support of its contention for vacating the interim order of status quo that despite discrepancies...

....4. Status quo, as of today, shall be maintained by the parties.Court Masters...

...maintenance of status quo. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, in our opinion, the High Court erred in exercising the discretion in vacating the injunction already granted. The result...would be that third-party interest would be created and the litigation will prolong. Instead it would have been appropriate for the High Court to direct the parties to maintain status quo with regard...to the property in question until decision of the appeals.5. We direct the parties to maintain status quo i.e they shall not alienate or create a third-party interest in...

...too was dismissed. It is in these circumstances that these appeals have been filed in this Court which also granted an order of “status quo” in respect of possession of the surplus land...possession is still with the appellant who was also granted an interim order regarding “status quo”.5. Since there is nothing on record to indicate that the State had taken...

...injunction. On 10-10-1990, itself an application for ad interim order was made. An order to maintain status quo, as on that date, was passed by the Court.4. According to...jurisdiction and an order directing maintenance of status quo had already been passed. The 1st respondent also filed a written statement pursuant to the preliminary order. The 1st respondent claimed that the...:“The civil suit which has been filed regarding this land which is Suit No. 280 of 1990. In respect of the disputed land which is the subject-matter of the suit an order for maintaining status quo ha...

...Court. The Division Bench directed disposal of the suit within six months and further directed maintenance of status quo of the suit property till its disposal on certain conditions. Subsequently, an...-2002. The High Court dismissed the appeal holding prayer for interim injunction.5. It is stated by learned counsel for the appellants that the order of status quo continued..., there was no need to repeat the reasoning.7. We find that the order of status quo continued for considerable length of time. It would, therefore, be appropriate to direct...

...ordering status quo is also annexed to the appeal. The order indicates that the appellant and Respondent 2 have filed documents in the said suit. While granting status quo order, the trial court has observed...that the said documents will have to be proved by the appellant and Respondent 2 and, hence, it is necessary to maintain status quo during the pendency of the suit.10...

...been made in respect of a suit in which an order of status quo had been passed. Despite noticing the order of status quo the High Court was of the view that it was the duty of the court to enforce the...time of hearing of the said application, the order of status quo, which had been passed in the appeal filed by the appellant herein was not mentioned or considered. Inasmuch as, the order of status quo was...already in place, there was no necessity of passing a specific order of injunction in the suit filed subsequently. Once the order of status quo which was subsisting when the subsequent injunction...

...matter of promotion as there is an interim order granted by the Supreme Court in pending SLP No. 13954/2016 (State of Madhya Pradesh v. R.B. Rai) directing status quo be maintained. He...

...bona fide mistake according to the Army authorities). The Calcutta High Court had directed the respondents in the writ-petition to maintain status quo or not to alter status quo. So far as the writ...petitions before the Andhra Pradesh High Court are concerned such was not the case. The High Court directed allowing the status quo and virtually allowed the writ petition for interim purposes. The High...

...of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in ASs Nos. 90 and 91 of 2009, by which the High Court had rejected the interim applications filed by the appellants seeking status quo and stay of...status quo in respect of the functioning of the Mathadhipati relating to the affairs of the Math as well as the articles till the disposal of the suit. It is true that the interim order of status quo granted...appellants, submitted that since an interim order of status quo regarding the functioning of the Mathadhipati of the Math was operative during the pendency of the suit and triable issues have to be gone...

..., made an order on the said application on 18.6.1998 directing the Respondent therein (Anjanamma) to maintain status quo in regard to the properties until further orders.4. Subsequently...Schedule to I.A.I in Probate C.P No. 8/1998, which was the subject matter of the order of status quo.6. The said application for impleading was resisted by S. Nagaraj. The learned...Single Judge, accepting the objections, has dismissed the application for impleading, holding that the Will dated 15.9.1998 was executed by Anjanamma, in breach and defiance of the order of status quo and...

...On 6.11.2012, an order was passed directing the parties to maintain status quo. Complaining willful disobedience of this order by the appellants, the respondents have made an application...of status quo binds both the parties to the appeal, that the appellants wilfully disobeyed the interim order obtained by them by entering into a partition on 27.07.2013 through a registered instrument...on this application. 6. The counsel for applicants argued that the two transactions under Ex.P.1 and Ex.P.2 show deliberate and willful violation of the order of status quo passed by...

...order, filed SA No. 139 of 2019 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-1 (hereafter referred to as “DRT”), Chennai in which a status quo order was passed dated 28-5-2019. The continuation of these proceedings...on status quo order resulted in Canara Bank in approaching the Madras High Court by filing WP No. 23573 of 2019.4. The Bank stated that it had already sold the secured...assets to the auction-purchaser, namely, M/s Realty Associates. The possession could not be transferred because of the status quo order. The auction-purchaser had paid Rs 5.11 crores as against the...

....6. During the pendency of the writ petition in the High Court, the status quo as of today, with regard to possession of the property in question, shall be maintained and the parties will not create any third-party rights....

...The Judgment of the Court was delivered byAravind Kumar, J.:— This appeal is by defendant No. 11 of O.S No. 4743/2012 directed against the order of status-quo passed by...is already completed before filing the suit.Both the parties are directed to maintain status-quo in respect of suit schedule property till next date.”Being aggrieved by...this order, present appeal has been filed by 11th defendant.3. Time and again this Court as well as Hon'ble Apex Court has held that when an order of status-quo is granted by a Court...