CiteTEXT
...clause (1). If law made by the State Legislature is reserved for consideration and receives assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the L...Bench held that:“… on a question under Article 254(1) whether an Act of Parliament prevails against a law of the State, no question of repeal arises; but the principle on...Service Development Act, 1955, 9 of 1955, and the Motor Transport (Amendment) Act, 1956, held that the State law did not, on the passing of the Central Act, become wholly void under Article 254(1) of...
...prevails over any repugnant State law. Consequently, the Central Act fixing the maximum limit at Rs. 1,000 prevails over the State law fixing it at Rs. 2000. In our opin...respect to such a matter; which has been referred for the President's consideration and has received his assent, is that the State law will prevail over a repugnant Central law which is earlier in point...-matter was less than Rs. 2000. This, was the state of law when the suit was filed. During its pendency the Central Legislature passed Act 66 of 1956, which came into force on 1-1-57, amending the...
..., Rent and Eviction) Control Act prevails over chapter V of the Transfer of Property Act. It was held that in view of th...brovided under Section 97 of C.P.C Amendment Act 1976 and in view of such repugnancy, the central Act namely the amended Section 92 C.P.C prevails in...under the pretext of getting it repaired. But the son of the 4th defendant filed an application before the Asst. Commissioner. HR. & C.E department to take over records from the 4th defendant to manage...
...assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails over the Central law and operate...the Central amended law, both Central law and the State Law cannot coexist without colliding with each other. Repugnancy thereby arises and to the extent of the repugnancy the State ...State law. In that light, the Court observed that the mandate of Article 254 requires placing the State law before the President for his/her consideration for permitting the State law to prevail ...
...President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails over the Central law and operates in that ...submitted that after the Presidential assent was received under Article 254(2) of the Constitution of India, the test to be applied to the State Law to be held repugnant to Central Law is that “there...such law is to obtain the assent of the President by reserving it for his consideration. When such assent is obtained, the provisions of the State Law or Act so enacted prevails in the State concerned...
...Clause (2) of Article 254 of the Constitution of India, the State law prevails over the Central law and operated...Act, the provisions of the State Act by which the Deputy Commissioner is authorised to issue notice are not applicable. The Central Act of 1894 will prevail over the State...the State and that made by the Parliament with respect to concurrent list, the law made by the Parliament is to prevail. In other words, where the provisions of the Central Act and...
...law made by the State Legislature is reserved for consideration and receives assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of t...Central Law and operates in that State as valid law. If parliament amends the law, after the amendment made by the State Legislature has received the assent of the President..., the earlier amendment made by the State Legislature, if found inconsistent with the Central amended law, both Central Law and the State Law cannot coexist without colliding with each ot...
...by the State Legislature is reserved for consideration and receives assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State ...that as per the proviso to Article 254 (2) of the Constitution of India, if an existing law conflicts with a subsequently enacted Central Law, the State legislation would become invalid, insofar as...Hon'ble Supreme Court had considered the effect of proviso to Article 254(2) of the Constitution of India particularly, when an existing State legislation conflicts with a subsequently enacted Central Law...
...Legislature is reserved for consideration and receives assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails ...Central Law and operates in that State as valid law. If Parliament amends the law, after the amendment made by the State Legislature has received the assent of the President, the earlier amendment...the State legislature, if found inconsistent with the Central amended Law, both Central law and the State Law cannot co-exist without colliding with each other. Repugnancy thereby arises ...
...Article 254 is an exception to Clause (1). If law made by the State Legislature is reserved for consideration and receives assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act,...President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails over the Central law and operates in that ...commencement of a law in view of the plain language used in Article 254(2), the State Act, namely, Section 29-A shall prevail over Section 6 of the Central Act, 2005, because Section 29-A has not been...
...consideration and receives assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails over the ...remained intact. Though it may look slightly baffling as to how the State Legislature can effect amendments in Central Law or how the Parliament can exercise similar power in relation to the State...found inconsistent with the Central amended law, both Central law and the State law cannot co-exist without colliding with each other. Repugnancy thereby arises and to the extent of the repugnancy...
...President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails over the Central law and operates in that ...be determined by reading the Central Act as well as the State Act conjointly. A State law providing for such standards having regard to Entry 66 of List I would be struck down as unconstitutional only...State Act will prevail over the Central Legislation, in view of Article 254(2) of the Constitution. But even if the first contention of the appellants that both fall under...
...prescribed in Cr. P.C will prevail over limitation prescribed under Sec. 67 of the Rajasthan Excise Act because latter law prevails over earlier law and State ...provision and general provision-Specific provision prevails over general provision-General provision applied only to such cases which are not covered by special provision-Rule applies to resolve conflict...provisions and a general provision, the special provision prevails over the general provisions and the latter applies only to such cases which are not covered by the special provisions...
...received assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails over the Central Law an...substituted by a new Section prescribing therein the period of notice as fifteen days. Therefore, in view of the settled law, the Central Amendment Act would prevail over the U.P. Act No...with the Central amended Law, both Central law and the State Law cannot co-exist without colliding with each other. Repugnancy thereby arises and to the extent of the repugnancy the State...
...(1). If law made by the State Legislature is reserved for consideration and receives assent of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislat...State law is inconsistent with the Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails over the Central law and operates in that State as valid ...obtaining the assent of the President would make the State law to prevail over the Central law in the State. Such a situation will legally continue until the Parliament makes a law adding...
...the private warrant case procedure for not outcome of report to police and their investigation with final report. From above conflict for the Central law prevails over the State law, the procedure...Prosecutor representing the State and the complainant supported the order of the lower Court saying no grounds to discharge.
Heard and perused the material on record...-section (3), he shall be required to state, at the commencement of the next hearing of the case, or, if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, forthwith, whether he wishes...
...of the President though the State law is inconsistent with the
Central Act, the law made by the Legislature of the State prevails
over the Central Law and operates in ...complex. The real problem arises is
the problem of determining whether a particular State law is
repugnant to a Central Act. The Supreme Court on a number of
judicial decisions has laid down the...with
the Central amended Law, both Central law and the State Law cannot
co-exist without colliding with each other. Repugnancy thereby arises
and to the extent of the repugnancy the ...
...clause (1) of Article 254. That “if any law made by the State Legislature is reserved for consideration and receives assent of the President, though the State law is inconsistent with th...Central law and operates in that State as valid law. If Parliament amends the law, after the amendment made by...the State Legislature has received the assent of the President, the earlier amendment made by the State Legislature, if found inconsistent with the Central amended law, both Central law and the ...
...surrender or delegation the Parliament will not be competent to legislate on such a subject. When once it legislates its law alone prevails over an earlier law made by a State legislature on such a subject...Legislature. If so, it must be held to repeal by implication whatever State law prescribed it to the extent of the conflicting provisions. There can, of course be no later State law containing provisions repugnant ...such States’, is peremptory enough to suggest that the Act so passed shall prevail over any other State law. The position is further clarified by the 2nd clause of Art. 252 which bars the amendment or...
...prevails over the law made by the State Legislature, the interest of the evacuees in the Shamlat-deh lands cannot be dealt with effectively by the Custodian under the Central Act, because of the...the State Act, the Custodian appointed under the Central Act of 1950 is divested of his control over the evacuee interest in the Shamlat-deh lands. The most significant impact of this divestment....11. If Article 254(1) stood by itself, there would have been no difficulty in holding that, for whatever it is worth, the Central Act of 1950 prevails over the Punjab Act...