Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Telangana High Court
242
Karnataka High Court
135
Madras High Court
117
Delhi High Court
57
Kerala High Court
51
Bombay High Court
50
National Green Tribunal
50
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
30
Supreme Court Of India
30
Gujarat High Court
29
Allahabad High Court
25
CESTAT
23
Calcutta High Court
20
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
19
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
17
Patna High Court
16
Central Information Commission
15
Punjab & Haryana High Court
15
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
14
National Company Law Tribunal
14
Madhya Pradesh High Court
13
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
13
Andhra Pradesh High Court
12
Rajasthan High Court
10
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
6
Central Administrative Tribunal
5
Gauhati High Court
4
Himachal Pradesh High Court
4
Chhattisgarh High Court
3
Competition Commission Of India
3
Orissa High Court
3
Uttarakhand High Court
3
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
2
Jharkhand High Court
2
Meghalaya High Court
2
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
2
Authority For Advance Rulings
1
Company Law Board
1
SEBI
1
Sikkim High Court
1
Tripura High Court
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
0
Armed Forces Tribunal
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Competition Appellate Tribunal
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
District Court
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Jaipur
0
Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
0
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
0
Manipur High Court
0
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
Privy Council
0
RERA
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
560
From 2011 To 2020
255
From 2001 To 2010
73
From 1991 To 2000
37
From 1981 To 1990
30
From 1971 To 1980
13
From 1961 To 1970
18
From 1951 To 1960
9
Before 1950
12

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...the action taken on two representations he had sent to the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court concerning smoking in the court premises. The CPIO had informed him that his representations had...2012 Name of the Appellant : Shri D K Bhaumik, C9, Vidyasagar Sarani, Kolkata 700 063. Name of the Public Authority : CPIO, Calcutta High Court, Appellate Side, Kolkata. The Appellant was not present...in spite of notice. On behalf of the Respondent, Shri Abhas Narayan Biswas, D.R, was present. Chief Information Commissioner : Shri Satyananda Mishra 2. The Complainant did not turn...


Court: Central Information Commission
Date: Nov 19, 2012 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
2

...the action taken on two representations he had sent to the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court concerning smoking in the court premises. The CPIO had informed him that his representations had...2012 Name of the Appellant : Shri D K Bhaumik, C9, Vidyasagar Sarani, Kolkata 700 063. Name of the Public Authority : CPIO, Calcutta High Court, Appellate Side, Kolkata. The Appellant was not present...in spite of notice. On behalf of the Respondent, Shri Abhas Narayan Biswas, D.R, was present. Chief Information Commissioner : Shri Satyananda Mishra 2. The Complainant did not turn...


Court: Central Information Commission
Date: Nov 19, 2012 Cited By: 0
3

... ITS CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN THE PETITIONERS SHOP PREMISES. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY... interference in the business of the petitioner including the service of Hookha to its customer in the smoking area in the petitioner's shop premises...petitioner to obtain licence for the use of Hooka in the smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only for smoking Tobacco...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Feb 14, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
4

...the service of hookah to its customers in the smoking area, within the shop premises. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that along with the memorandum of the writ petition, three judgments of... - 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:33290 WP No. 18500 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA... RESPONDENTS TO NOT TO INTERFERENCE IN THE BUSINESS OF THE PETITIONER INCLUDING THE SERVICE OF HOOKA TO ITS CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN THE...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Sep 14, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
5

... ITS CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN THE PETITIONERS SHOP PREMISES. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE...the respondents to not to interference in the business of the petitioner including the service of Hooka to its customer in the smoking area in the petitioner's shop premises...of Hooka in the smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only for smoking Tobacco through Hooka. However, if any credible...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Nov 6, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
6

... ITS CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN THE PETITIONERS SHOP PREMISES. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT... premises. To pass any such order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and Equity... obtain licence for the use of Hooka in the smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only for smoking Tobacco through Hooka. However...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Jan 8, 2024 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
7

...Court seeking a writ of mandamus to respondents not to interfere with the business of the petitioner including service of Hooka to its customers in the smoking area in the petitioner's shop premises...AREA IN THE PETITIONERS SHOP PREMISES. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING... smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only for smoking Tobacco through Hooka. However, if any credible information is received...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Jun 20, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
8

...HOOKA TO ITS CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN THE PETITIONERS SHOP PREMISES. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE... 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29THDAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022.../restrictions; and the petitioner agrees to the same. 3 3. The Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.932-933/1974 between...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Sep 29, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
9

...the Act and Rules, particularly related to smoking and smokeless tobacco use within the court premises. 3. Please provide the total number of complaints received by the concerned authorities within the Supreme Court of India and each High Court regarding violations of the Act and Rules in the last five years (2019-2023), specifically related to smoking and...any designated smoking areas within the Supreme Court and High Court premises, if any, and the measures taken to ensure these areas comply with the rules specified in the Act. Etc...and each High Court in India in the last five years (2019-2023), segregated for smoking and smokeless forms of tobacco use. 2. Please provide the...


Court: Central Information Commission
Date: May 21, 2025 Cited By: 0
10

... CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN THE PETITIONER'S SHOP PREMISES, ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE...in the premises. The respondents are alleged to have interfered with the business of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 4. Under similar...petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only for smoking Tobacco through Hooka. However, if any credible information is received and in the process of monitoring, if any illegal...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Mar 31, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
11

... insist upon the petitioner to obtain licence for the use of Hooka in the smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only... 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2022... THE RESPONDENTS TO NOT TO INTERFERE IN THE BUSINESS OF THE PETITIONER INCLUDING THE SERVICES OF HOOKA TO ITS CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: May 25, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
12

...SERVICE OF HOOKA TO ITS CUSTOMER IN THE SMOKING AREA IN THE PETITIONERS SHOP PREMISES AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY...smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only for smoking Tobacco through Hooka. However, if any credible information is received and... - 1 - WP No. 17872 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Oct 10, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
13

...SERVICE OF SMOKING TOBACCO THROUGH HOOKAH WITHIN THE SPECIALLY PROVIDED/EARMARKED SMOKING AREA IN THE BUSINESS PREMISES OF PETITIONER AND ETC... tobacco through hookah within the specially provided/earmarked smoking area in the business premises of Petitioner." 2) Directing the...premises, the petitioner claims that they have provided a separate smoking zone wherein apart from smoking tobacco in other forms, they are also providing the facility of such...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Nov 15, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
14

...licence for serving hookah in the smoking area of the premises. Learned counsel further contended that this Court and the Honble Supreme Court have time and again held that there is no need to obtain...trade licence to carry on the business of Bar and Restaurant and there is no need to obtain separate licence to provide hookah to its customs in the smoking area of the business premises. The notice...petitioner has obtained separate licence for serving hookah to its customers in the smoking area. This Court, in its order dated 31st January 2017 made in W.P.Nos.2720-2722/2017, at paragraph 4 has...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Jul 23, 2018 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
15

...complaints regarding violations of the Act and Rules, particularly related to smoking and smokeless tobacco use within the court premises. 3. Please provide the total number of complaints received by the concerned authorities within the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad and each district court of Uttar Pradesh regarding violations of the Act and Rules in the last six years (from 2019 to 2024), specifically related to smoking and...Rules in the last six years (from 2019 to 2024), specifically related to smoking and smokeless tobacco use within the Court premises. Reply to...and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 and Rules, particularly related to smoking and smokeless tobacco use within the Court premises...


Court: Central Information Commission
Date: May 21, 2025 Cited By: 0
16

...-ordinate bench of this Court in W.P. No.14226/2015 dated 03.09.2015 wherein, this Court directed the respondents herein not to insist to obtain license for the use of hookah in the smoking zone provided by the petitioners therein in their premises, if.... 4. Hence, this writ petition also requires to be disposed of in the light of the order passed by the co- ordinate Bench of this Court in WP. No.14226/2015. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain license for the use of hookah in the smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if...such facility is provided only for smoking tobacco through hookah. However, if any credible information is received and in the process of monitoring, if...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Jan 21, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
17

...The petitioner is before this Court seeking direction to the respondents not to interfere in the business of the petitioner including serving of Hooka to its customers in the smoking...instant petition to the respondents is not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain licence for the use of Hooka in the smoking zone provided by the petitioner in their premises, if such facility is...directed not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain separate licence for the use of Hooka in the smoking zone provided by the petitioner in the premises. However, the respondents on credible...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Aug 16, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

...selling shop. It is alleged that the location of the said shop in the High Court premises has led to litigants, advocates, court staff and other people visiting the court to passive smoking and it has also been resulting in people...smoking in the small area of glass canteen itself covering the whole area with smoke.3. It is contended that permitting and allowing the said shop to run inside the court premises is...G. Rohini, C.J:— The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed this petition as a Public Interest Litigation seeking a direction to remove a shop situated in the premises of High Court of...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Apr 11, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
19

...revision in their cases but their application was rejected. They have now come to this Court in revision. The facts appear to be briefly as follows: The police raided the house in question, and found several persons present, one of whom was smoking chandu. On the premises were...found three pipes, two iron needles, one pair of tongs, one lamp and one smoking pillow. The amount of the drug found in the...house was within the limit allowed by law. There is no evidence whatsoever of the sale of opium by the applicants. The Magistrate relied upon the decision of this Court in King-Emperor v. Bakir...


Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: Sep 9, 1909 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
20

... HOOKA IN SMOKING AREA IN THE RESTAURANT AS HELD BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN VARIOUS W.P. POST THIS W.P. FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING BEFORE SINGLE JUDGE. v DTD... petitioner in their premises, if such facility is provided only for smoking Tobacco through Hooka. However, if any credible information is received and in the process of...prohibited in public places, exclusive area for smoking hooka is to be earmarked by the petitioner in the business premises, where the hotel being run and as such, he prays for additional condition...


Court: Karnataka High Court
Date: Nov 22, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).