..., 464 of I.P Code. As the case was warrant triable and, therefore, evidence of the complainant was taken and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate found prima facie case against the accused, he framed the charge ag...ORAL JUDGMENT1. The present appeal, filed by the original complainant, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed...witnesses and also produced documentary evidence.4. At the end of trial, after recording the statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C, and after hearing...

...Section 438 Cr. P.C in connection with CR No. I - 77 of 2009, registered with Vadi Police Station, Vadodara City for the offences under Section 416, 418, 463, 464, 465, 468, 409..., 114 of I.P Code.3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the papers produced before me.4. Learned Counsel Mr. Oza has contended that the applicant and the...ORAL ORDER1. Rule. Learned APP Mr. Jani waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State.2. This Application is filed by the applicant under...

...Section 416, 418, 463, 464, 465, 468, 409, 114 of I.P Code.3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the papers produced before me.4. Learned Counsel Mr. Oza...is filed by the applicants under Section 438 Cr. P.C in connection with CR No. I 77 of 2009, registered with Vadi Police Station, Dist. Gandhinagar, for the offences under...ORAL ORDERDraft Amendment is allowed.1. Rule. Learned APP Mr. Jani waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.2. This Application...

...section 379, 411 and 114 of I.P Code, has moved this Court under section 439 of Cr.P.C for seeking regular bail, pending trial.3. The ac....7. Accordingly the application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with Crime Register No. I-463/2008 of Vejalpur Police Station, Ahmedabad, on his...ORAL ORDER1. Rule. Shri. Kodekar, learned APP waives service of notice of rule for respondent State. Rule is fixed forthwith with the consent of learned counsel for the...

...against his conviction under Section 463, 366 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the I.P Code). Criminal Appeal Nos. 1250 of 2005 is filed by the State against the acquittal...of the appellant-original accused for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the I.P Code. Criminal Appeal No. 1253 of 2005 is also filed by the State for enhancement...temple and therefore, the learned Trial Judge has committed an error in conviction the appellant under Section 363 and 366 of the I.P Code.8.1 In support of...

...section 191, 193, 196, 199, 201, 463, 464, 465 and 477 of the I.P Code with the concerned police station.3. The applicants, are aggrieved by this direction to respondent No..., 463, 464, 465 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code before concerned Police Station, in this revision application under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code...committed in, or in relation to, any proceeding in any Court, or(ii) of any offence described in section 463, or punishable under section 471, section 475 or ...

...offence of murder, under Section 302, I.P C, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/- and in default of payment of fine .... There he died on 10-10-2001 at 4.45 p.m After the death of Kartar Chand, the case, which was initially registered under Section 324, I.P C, was converted into one under...inference that the accused intended to cause such bodily injury as was sufficient to cause death. The matter was held not to fall within clause thirdly of Section 300. I.P C...

...read with section 34 of the I.P. Code. 2. "The Chalisgaon Peoples Cooperative Bank Limited" (for short, "CPCO Bank") is a Cooperative Bank. A large number of...punishable under section 465 and 471 of the I.P. Code. The Apex Court held that section 146 (P) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 and sections...463 and 464 of the I.P. Code are two distinct offences which are capable of being committed with different intentions by different sets of persons and it could not be contemplated that the...

...representation that he is an agent of a non-existent body he does not in law commit the offence of forgery, cannot be accepted. S.463 defines "forgery". In so far as it is relevant, the section provides...convicted the appellant of the offences under S.406 and 467 I.P. Code and acquitted him of the offence of S.420 I.P. Code. He sentenced the appellant on each of the two charges t...judge the appellant had committed offences punishable under S.420 and S.467 I.P. Code. The learned judge accordingly converted the conviction of the appellant for the offence under S.406 into one for the...

...Criminal Procedure, but in his opinion it was expedient in the interest of justice that a complaint be filed against Babu Lal for offences "under ss. 463 and 471 I.P. Code..., and the revision to the High Court, too, was dismissed. In appeal by special leave,- HELD: (i) Section 479A of the Code of Criminal Procedure excludes the jurisdiction of the Court to proceed under s...punishable under ss. 193, 209, 463 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The Munsiff did not dispose of the application by his judgment deciding the suit. After the disposal of the suit the plaintiffs moved the...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...

...of 2023 And AO Nos. 452/2023, 453/2023, 454/2023, 455/2023, 456/2023, 457/2023, 458/2023, 459/2023, 461/2023, 462/2023 and 463/2023 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, and Mr.... Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the Union of India. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel, along with Mr. P.S. Bisht, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Karthik Jayashankar, Advocate, for the respondents. These...are the bunch of 12 Appeals from Orders, which have been preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996. Precisely, the question requiring consideration was as to whether...