Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3724
+ Madras High Court3200
+ Delhi High Court3066
+ Bombay High Court2437
+ Kerala High Court2150
+ National Company Law Tribunal1944
+ Competition Commission Of India1760
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1363
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1348
+ Supreme Court Of India1287
+ Allahabad High Court1136
+ Karnataka High Court1110
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court1092
+ Calcutta High Court1025
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court988
+ Rajasthan High Court938
+ Gujarat High Court889
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court748
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission618
+ Gauhati High Court602
+ Patna High Court600
+ CESTAT581
+ Central Information Commission568
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission558
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal535
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity454
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal450
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission431
+ Telangana High Court421
+ Jharkhand High Court415
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court349
+ Orissa High Court321
+ Uttarakhand High Court296
+ Chhattisgarh High Court198
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal197
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India196
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission166
+ National Green Tribunal152
+ SEBI151
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal104
+ Privy Council98
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission84
+ Meghalaya High Court82
+ Company Law Board79
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board78
+ Manipur High Court61
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal55
+ Armed Forces Tribunal54
+ Tripura High Court54
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority51
+ RERA45
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act38
+ Sikkim High Court36
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board35
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST28
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property19
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction16
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal16
+ Settlement Commission8
+ Authority For Advance Rulings7
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST6
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India6
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange3
+ Board of Revenue3
+ District Court3
+ Commissioner (Appeals)2
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal1
+ Copyright Board1
+ Trade Marks Registry1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards12319
From 2011 To 202016960
From 2001 To 20103355
From 1991 To 20001518
From 1981 To 1990777
From 1971 To 1980530
From 1961 To 1970437
From 1951 To 1960304
Before 1950567

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Commission holds that banks/HFCs have not violated sections 3 and 4 and thereby closed the matter.Member, Mr P.N Parashar and Mr. R Prasad gave separate dissenting orders. As per the diss...), 3(2), 3(3) and 3(4) of the Competition Act and has Issued orders under section 27...the loans after 20 May, 2009.Member, Mr Parashar in his dissenting order found that opposite parties have contravened section 3(1). 3(3)(a) and 3(3)(b) of the ...

...opposite party nos. 1 and 2 are in contravention of section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. (iii) Direct that the informant should be co...abuse of dominance. The informant has also not been able to place any credible or cogent evidence/material to show or establish the infringement of section 3 or 4 of the Act in this case and hence the alle...under section 19 of the Competition Act alleging that the informant had to purchase the insurance policies through the...

...registered on 15thOctober, 2002. Police took up investigation, submitted charge sheet against all the four accused persons under Section 3/4/11 of West Bengal Gambling and Prize Competition .... 4. The charge was framed against all the accused persons under Section 3/4/11 of West Bengal Gambling and Prize Competition Act, 1957 pleading their innoc...persons. Accused Uttam Harijan was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for six months for committing offence under Section 3 of the West Bengal Gambling and Prize Competition Act and to pay fine of R...

...provision of Section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act 2002. It is submitted that aforesaid 4 banks were larger banks and have dominant position ...effect on competition, while in the present matter there is no such agreement. As such, the facts on record do not disclose any violation of Section 3, or any of the sub-sections thereof, of the Competition ...security of the supply, cannot be termed as abusive. Every enterprise has a right to select a reliable and experienced supplier. Therefore, it is clear that no case is made out under Section 4 of the Competition ...

...24.08.2018 The appellant M/s. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited filed the information under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the .... The matter having closed without any investigation by the Director General in terms of Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, the present appeal was filed. During the pendency...the Competition Act...

...the FBA contained several clauses which were contrary to the Competition Act & Policy and violated Section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act. The...of the Competition Act, 2002 in the present case. The conditions under which Section 3(3) of the Act is attracted have been clearly delineated therein. It is observed that these, inter alia, a...competition, while in the present matter there is no such agreement. As such, the facts on record do not disclose any violation of Section 3, or any of the sub-sections thereof, of the Competition Act, 200...

...a tie-in arrangement which is in contravention of Section 3(4) of the Competition Act. The O.P in this case i.e Schott Glass put conditions that no converter would do the job wor...Section 3(4) of the Competition Act. A system of ‘loyalty’ rebates and discounts was introduced. Under this scheme the converter had to sign an agreement that it would b...sell the tubing at prices below that charged by the joint venture. This amounts to resale price maintenance and this is in contravention of Section 3(4) of the Competition Act....

... The appellant 'M/s. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited' filed the information under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Competition Act') against 'NTPC Lt...in terms of Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, the present appeal was filed. During the pendency of the appeal, it was informed that the parties are negotiating for...the Competition Act. The matter having closed without any investigation by the Director General...

...contravention of either section 3 or section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 and the matter deserves to b...Competition Act, 2002 is concerned on scrutinizing the entire relevant material no infringement of the provisions of section 3 or 4 of the Act is seen. This complaint, therefore, is not f...section 11(2) of the MRTPC Act and after forwarding a copy of the complaint, the reply of the opposite party was asked for but it was not furnished. Consequent upon the...

...of the provisions of Sections 3 and 4 read with Section 19 of the Act. In exercise of the powers vested in it under Section 64, the Commission has framed regulations called the ...Indian Railways for supply of rails. SAIL, thus, was alleged to have abused its dominant position in the market and deprived others of fair competition and therefore, acted contrary to Section 3(4...prohibitions contained in Sections 3 and 4 of the Act. Where prohibition under Section 3 relates to anti-competition agreements there Section 4 relates to the abuse of d...

...Constitution or under administrative law.CCI proceeding is confined to enforcing the provisions of the Competition Act, in particular Section 3 which regulates and...regulates and prohibits the abuse of dominance, and Sec. 6 which regulates and prohibits acquisitions, mergers and amalgamations. Under Sections 3 and 6, the CCI is required to determine whether t...Competition Act, 2002. It so appears, as in the petition complaining of breach of ...

...provisions of MRTP Act nor the violation of the provisions of section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act is found. The matter relates to year 2008 and the ...The instant case has been received by the Competition Commission under Section 66 of the Competition Act...withdraw its complaint against P&G. The case thereafter was transferred to the Competition Commission of India (the Commission) under section 66 of the Act.5...

...and Farmers Welfare, Government of India (MOA&FW) under section 19(1)(b) of the Competition Act against the petitioners, inter alia, alleging contravention of provision...Informants claim that the sub-license arrangements between them and MMBL also contravene Section 3(1) and Section 3(4) of the Competition Act. 26. ...to be anti- competitive within the meaning of Section 3(4) of the Competition Act, 2002; (iv) MMBL is exploiting the permissions given by the Government to market Bt. cotton technolog...

...crore each towards the prize pool.4. Respondent No. 4 made a complaint to the CCI on 16.05.2012 under Sections 3 & 4 read with Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition ...lottery business in Mizoram. There was bid rigging and a collusive bidding process which violated Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3) of the Competition Act, and also ca...may be specified by the Commission.(4) The Commission may forward a copy of the report referred to in sub-section (3) to the parties concerned:The Developments:...

...and Farmers Welfare, Government of India (MOA&FW) under section 19(1)(b) of the Competition Act against the petitioners, inter alia, alleging contravention of provision...Informants claim that the sub-license arrangements between them and MMBL also contravene Section 3(1) and Section 3(4) of the Competition Act. 26. ...to be anti- competitive within the meaning of Section 3(4) of the Competition Act, 2002; (iv) MMBL is exploiting the permissions given by the Government to market Bt. cotton technolog...

...produced in any of the languages specified in bye-laws.4. The DG came to the conclusion that the rules and regulations of EIMPA are in violation of section 3(3)(b) of the Act ...Therefore I do not agree with the majority of the Members that an association is not an enterprise under the Competition Act. Further CBFC is an authority whereas EIMPA is a company though called an association. Further the DG has m...the Competition Act. Section 3 deals with anti competitive agreements. One cannot enter into agreement with oneself and therefore Section 3 could not be applicable in this case. ...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...in terms of either section 3 and 4 of the Act. Therefore, the Informant may approach appropriate forum for redressal of her grievances. 10. Further, from the ...perspective also, the Commission is of the view that none of the provisions of either section 3 or section 4 of the Act is attracted in the instant matter as the information neither discloses...provisions of section 4 of the Act. 11. In light of the above, the Commission finds that no case of contravention of the provisions of either section 3 or 4 of the ...

...opinion that neither a violation of relevant provisions of MRTP Act nor a violation of the provisions of section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act is found. Theref...allowed to charge a fee. These charges are allowed only when hot plate is not purchased from the distributor.3. BPC filed its reply vide its letter dated 16.09.2009 and stated that...release of new connection.4. The Commission considered the matter in its meeting held on 25.11.2010, and after thoughtful consideration of all the facts and circumstance of the case...

...Karcham Project is insignificant. 7. Considering the facts on record and the details provided in the notice given under sub- section (2) of Section 6 of the Act and the assessment of the ...from around 8630 MW under implementation and development. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Fair Competition For Greater Good C-2014/12/230 Page 2 of 3 4. SPV is a company which would...(Act) given by: JSW Energy Limited (JSW). Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 1. On 12th December 2014, the Competition Commission of...