Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ CESTAT1829
+ Delhi High Court72
+ Madras High Court67
+ Gujarat High Court23
+ Kerala High Court19
+ Calcutta High Court13
+ Bombay High Court12
+ Settlement Commission12
+ Karnataka High Court7
+ Allahabad High Court5
+ National Company Law Tribunal5
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court5
+ Supreme Court Of India5
+ Central Administrative Tribunal3
+ Telangana High Court3
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court2
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2
+ Meghalaya High Court2
+ Commissioner (Appeals)1
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1
+ Rajasthan High Court1
+ Tripura High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards1344
From 2011 To 2020660
From 2001 To 20108
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...PER: S.S.KANG The appellant Shri Sanjeev Kumar has filed this appeal against the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs. The appellant before us is only challenging imposition of penalty under ...lakh imposed on the appellant under section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962. 3. The contention of th...provisions section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 were enacted under...

...Viju Gopinathan, authorised person of M/s Cappithan Agencies, are before us against order1of Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad imposing penalties of ₹ 30,000 under ...Customs Act, 1962 on M/s Cappithan Agencies and penalties of ₹ 15,000 under section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 and ₹ 8,000/- under section 114AA of...extinguished. 3. We have heard Learned Authorised Representative. 4. Considering that the cause for confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962 had been negated by...

...Viju Gopinathan, authorised person of M/s Cappithan Agencies, are before us against order1of Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad imposing penalties of ₹ 30,000 under ...Customs Act, 1962 on M/s Cappithan Agencies and penalties of ₹ 15,000 under section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 and ₹ 8,000/- under section 114AA of...extinguished. 3. We have heard Learned Authorised Representative. 4. Considering that the cause for confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962 had been negated by...

...they do not dispute about confirmation of differential duty which has already been paid along with interest. Also, 25% of the penalty under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 had been paid by the a...the Customs Act 1962 on the appellant company is too harsh in the circumstances of the case; hence, be dropped. Further, she 2 ...under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962, further penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 is unjustified. Therefore, the penalty imposed on the appellant com...

...they do not dispute about confirmation of differential duty which has already been paid along with interest. Also, 25% of the penalty under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 had been paid by the a...the Customs Act 1962 on the appellant company is too harsh in the circumstances of the case; hence, be dropped. Further, she 2 ...under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962, further penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 is unjustified. Therefore, the penalty imposed on the appellant com...

...Section 114(1) and Section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962.2. Ld. Consultant submits that the penalty is imposed only on the ground that whatev...[Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This Stay Petition is filed for waiver of pre-deposit of an amount of penalty imposed on the appellant under...the appellant is not basmati rice due to the admixture of consignments exported. He would draw our attention to the test report of the Chief Chemist, Regional Agmark Laboratory, Mumbai which...

...authority imposed penalties of ` 50,000/- on the courier under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 of ` 25,000/-...Customs Act, 1962 and of ` 25,000/- under Section 158(2)(ii) of the Customs Act...December, 2015, Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-III, has noted that the goods were mis-declared as ‘door supporting wooden cut pieces for personal use’ and that the consignee was shown as...

...component for recovery of additional duty and confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs 3 Act, 1962 for concealme...₹ 43,00,00,000, was also confiscated under section 115 (2) of Customs Act, 1962 with option to redeem on payment of fine of ₹ 10,00,000 granted to M/s Braveworth Shipping Co Ltd along with penalty...Customs Act, 1962. Likewise penalty of ₹ 5,00,000 was imposed on Shri Mohammed Zakir Hossain, master of the vessel, under section 114AA of...

...component for recovery of additional duty and confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs 3 Act, 1962 for concealme...₹ 43,00,00,000, was also confiscated under section 115 (2) of Customs Act, 1962 with option to redeem on payment of fine of ₹ 10,00,000 granted to M/s Braveworth Shipping Co Ltd along with penalty...Customs Act, 1962. Likewise penalty of ₹ 5,00,000 was imposed on Shri Mohammed Zakir Hossain, master of the vessel, under section 114AA of...

...component for recovery of additional duty and confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs 3 Act, 1962 for concealme...₹ 43,00,00,000, was also confiscated under section 115 (2) of Customs Act, 1962 with option to redeem on payment of fine of ₹ 10,00,000 granted to M/s Braveworth Shipping Co Ltd along with penalty...Customs Act, 1962. Likewise penalty of ₹ 5,00,000 was imposed on Shri Mohammed Zakir Hossain, master of the vessel, under section 114AA of...

...component for recovery of additional duty and confiscation under section 111(m) of Customs 3 Act, 1962 for concealme...₹ 43,00,00,000, was also confiscated under section 115 (2) of Customs Act, 1962 with option to redeem on payment of fine of ₹ 10,00,000 granted to M/s Braveworth Shipping Co Ltd along with penalty...Customs Act, 1962. Likewise penalty of ₹ 5,00,000 was imposed on Shri Mohammed Zakir Hossain, master of the vessel, under section 114AA of...

...of Customs Act and liable to be penalized under Section 114 (i) read with Section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962.5. On perusal of the impugned order,...Section 114(i) read with Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Om Prakash Bhatia v. CC, New Delhi re...Customs Act, 1962; that these penalties are to act as a deterrent measures as otherwise economy of this country is at stake; that in the interest of economy and in the interest of larger ...

...approached the Settlement Commission and, on the implicit admission of goods having been undervalued, proceedings there concluded within the stipulation of chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962; that presumed ...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Ajay Kaushik, ₹ 2,80,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Sanjay Kumar, ₹ 1,00,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...

...approached the Settlement Commission and, on the implicit admission of goods having been undervalued, proceedings there concluded within the stipulation of chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962; that presumed ...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Ajay Kaushik, ₹ 2,80,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Sanjay Kumar, ₹ 1,00,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...

...approached the Settlement Commission and, on the implicit admission of goods having been undervalued, proceedings there concluded within the stipulation of chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962; that presumed ...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Ajay Kaushik, ₹ 2,80,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Sanjay Kumar, ₹ 1,00,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...

...approached the Settlement Commission and, on the implicit admission of goods having been undervalued, proceedings there concluded within the stipulation of chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962; that presumed ...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Ajay Kaushik, ₹ 2,80,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Sanjay Kumar, ₹ 1,00,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...

...approached the Settlement Commission and, on the implicit admission of goods having been undervalued, proceedings there concluded within the stipulation of chapter XIVA of Customs Act, 1962; that presumed ...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Ajay Kaushik, ₹ 2,80,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Sanjay Kumar, ₹ 1,00,000 each under section 112(a) and section 114AA of...

...prove mens rea on his part. As such, the Commissioner has himself dropped the penal proceedings under Section 114AA of Customs ...provisions of Section 112(a) of Customs Act, on the ground that consignment of the Teak Wood of Nigerian.... However, he has imposed penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act.3. Countering...

...imposition of penalty of ₹ 8,00,000/- under section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962, and of like amount under section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962, ...involved in the impugned order had filed appeal before the first appellate authority. 5. It is on record that bill of entry had not been filed under section 46 of Customs Act...- II with the finding that the imported goods had been mis- declared rendering them liable to confiscation under section 111(d) and section 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962 and that from the statements ...

...114AA of Customs Act, 1962. However, he has imposed penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs ...provisions of Section 112(a) of Customs Act, on the ground that consignment of the Teak Wood of Nigerian...a personal penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. However, taking in view the findings of the Commissioner...