CiteTEXT
...examined.(iii) There is no evidence to prove the ingredients of the offence under Section 294 I.P.C, viz., uttering of obscene words to the annovance of others...prove the offence under Section 294 I.P.C mere utterance of absence words are not sufficient, but there must be a further proof to establish that it was to the annoyance of...1991, in respect of the offence under Section 294 I.P.C2. According to the prosecution, on 11.6.1990 at 7.00 p.m while P.W 1 Jaya Ramanujam was sitting in...
...uttered obscene words. So, Section 294(b) IPC is not attracted. To attract Section 353 IPC, either assault or use of criminal force is necessary. There is no allegation that the...Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 426 of 2018 of Mattancherry Police Station...registered for the offences under Sections 186, 294(b) & 353 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim in this case was working as a bill collector, Zonal Office of Cochin Corporation, Mattancherry. On...
...offence under Section 294(b) is not made out as against A4 as no obscene words were uttered in a public place to the annoyance of others. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.S.Madhanagopal and...Section 294 of IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not sufficient but there must be a further proof of establish that it was to the annoyance of others, which is lacking in the...Another Vs. K.Lalitha reported in 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 844, had held that in order to constitute the offence under Section 294(b), the words uttered...
...) 844, had held that in order to constitute the offence under Section 294(b), the words uttered must be obscene and not merely abusive, humiliating or defamatory. The relevant portion is...words by itself cannot attract an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. To prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not sufficient b...submit that the allegations in the impugned final report would not attract any of the offences charged. For the offence under Section 294 (b) IPC, it is to be established that the words uttered were...
...passersby in filthy language. This Court has repeatedly held that in order to constitute the offence under Section 294 (b) of the IPC, the words or actions of the accused must be obscene and must have....
9.To prove the offence under Section 294 IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not sufficient but there must be a further proof of establish that it was to...sexual thoughts or feelings or words cannot attract the offence under Section 294(b). None of the records disclose the alleged words used by the accused. It may not be the...
...the passers-by in filthy language. This Court has repeatedly held that in order to constitute the offence under Section 294 (b) of the IPC, the words or actions of the accused must be obscene and must....
9.To prove the offence under Section 294 IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not sufficient but there must be a further proof of establish that it was...instant case, the absence of words which will involve some lascivious elements arousing sexual thoughts or feelings or words cannot attract the offence under Section 294(b). None...
...respondent before the police. No obscene words is mentioned in this letter. None of the words mentioned in it are obscene words. So Section 294(b) IPC is not attracted.6...charged with having committed the offences under Section 189, 201, 294(b), 353, 500 and 509 IPC and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The first accused was....3. The offences except one under Section 294(b) and 353 IPC and Section 66(A) of Information Technology Act, 2000 are...
...
reported in 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 844, had held that in order to constitute the offence under Section 294(b), the words uttered must be obscene and...offence under Section 294 of IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not sufficient but there must be a further proof of establish that it was to the annoyance of others, which is...further submit that the other offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) IPC are not made out. The alleged words uttered is neither obscene nor amounts to real threat. With regard to offence under...
...in any event none of the alleged offences are made out. The allegations do not attract the offences under Section 294(b) as no obscene words were uttered in a public place to the annoyance of others...anything on record. Mere abusive, humiliating or defamative words by itself cannot attract an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. To prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC mere...impugned final report finds that the offence under Section 294(b) is not made out in the instant case. In this regard the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2022...
...under Section 294 (b) IPC, obscene words must be uttered in a public place to the annoyance of the others. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Judgement reported in...cannot attract the offence under Section 294(b). None of the records disclose the alleged words used by the accused. It may not be the requirement of law to reproduce in all cases...on record. Mere abusive, humiliating or defamative words by itself cannot attract an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. To prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC mere utterance...
...the words uttered is in the nature of insulting and humiliating the victim, the same would not be termed as obscene to attract the offence under Section 294(b) IPC. 6.In N.S.Madhanagopal...) IPC is not made out; and that even if the words uttered by the petitioner amounts to insulting and humiliating the de- facto complainant, they would not fall within the meaning of Section 294(b) IPC...) IPC is not made out on the allegations made in the impugned final report. The words uttered by the petitioner would not fall within the meaning of Section 294(b) IPC. It is well settled that even if...
..., humiliating or defamative words by itself cannot attract an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. To prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not suffi...to the extent of some abuses are uttered by the present applicants. As observed by the Hon'ble Apex Court that to prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not...is whether the tendency of the matter charged under the obscenity is to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences. Section 294(b) of the IPC talks about the obscene acts...
...filthy words by the appellant, but the fact remains that for commission of offence under Section 294 of IPC, words should be obscene words 8. From the evidence of the prosecution...not established that any obscene words were used by the appellant . The essence of the crime under Section 294 of the IPC consists in creating a public nuisance which because of its gravity being of...public nature may endanger public peace. In order to bring home the guilt of the accused for an offence under Section 294 of the IPC, prosecution has to establish that the words uttered were obscene...
...of words which will involve some lascivious elements arousing sexual thoughts or feelings or words cannot attract the offence under Section 294(b). None of the records disclose...hardly anything on record. Mere abusive, humiliating or defamative words by itself cannot attract an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. To prove the offence under Section 294 of... that the words uttered by the appellants accused annoyed others, it cannot be said that the ingredients of the offence under Section 294(b) of IPC is made out." 7.Further, the...
...Information Report. However, the same does not appear to be obscene in order to make out an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. The words uttered by someone in a fit of anger can be rough or sometimes ...:
" To prove the offence under Section 294 IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not sufficient but there must be a further proof to establish that i...the provision under Section 294(b) IPC is concerned, the essential ingredient is an obscene act must have
4/8...
...:-
"To prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC mere utterance of obscene words are not sufficient but there must be a further proof to
...no ingredients to attract the offence under Section 294(b) of IPC. To attract the offence under Section 294(b) of IPC, there must be uttering of words to affect the person who lodged the complaint. In...this regard it is relevant to extract Section 294(b) of IPC, as follows :-
"294. Obscene acts and songs — Whoever, to the annoyance of others— (a...
...complainant. This Court has time and again held that in order to attract the provisions of 294(b) IPC, the words uttered has to be obscene and it must be made to the annoyance of others. The relevant... elements arousing sexual thoughts or feelings or words cannot attract the offence under Section 294(b). None of the....
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the impugned complaint, there is no averment to invoke the offence under Section 294(b) of IPC. The...
...under section 294(b), this Court finds that the alleged words uttered by the complainant would not attract the said offence. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Judgement reported in...which will involve some lascivious elements arousing sexual thoughts or feelings or words cannot attract the offence under Section 294(b). None of the records disclose the alleged...anything on record. Mere abusive, humiliating or defamative words by itself cannot attract an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. To prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC me...
...Honourable Apex Court held that in order to attract the offence under Section 294 (b) IPC, the words uttered must be obscene and in a public place to the annoyance of others. In the instant case...attract an offence under Section 294(b) IPC. To prove the offence under Section 294 of IPC mere utterance of obscene words is not sufficient but there must be a further proof...had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language; that the final report does not contain the exact words said to have uttered by the petitioners; that in any case, Section 294 (b) IPC is not made...
Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.