Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Delhi High Court99
+ Kerala High Court31
+ Supreme Court Of India30
+ Rajasthan High Court28
+ Bombay High Court14
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court14
+ Chhattisgarh High Court11
+ Gujarat High Court11
+ Calcutta High Court10
+ Patna High Court9
+ Karnataka High Court7
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court5
+ Gauhati High Court5
+ Central Administrative Tribunal4
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court4
+ Madras High Court4
+ Allahabad High Court3
+ Jharkhand High Court3
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court2
+ Central Information Commission1
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal1
+ District Court1
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court1
+ Telangana High Court1
+ Uttarakhand High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards85
From 2011 To 2020133
From 2001 To 201026
From 1991 To 200010
From 1981 To 19908
From 1971 To 198010
From 1961 To 197010
From 1951 To 19606
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Sultan Singh, J.:— Smt Ahmedi Begum is the owner of the property known as ‘Dharampur Lodge’ situated near Clock Tower, Subzi Mandi, Delhi. Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar in terms of the.... on 23rd February, 1968. It was held that though the lease deeds in favour of Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar tenant did give power to him to have sub-tenants but such a sub-tenant was not empowered to...held that Manphul Singh Sharma was a sub-tenant under the sub-tenant Surinder Kumar Sharma and not under the tenant Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar. The tenant Sardar Sardul Singh ...

...Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1965 SC 682, (1965) 1 Cri LJ 6...Kashmira Singh v. State Of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1952 SC 159, 1952 Cri LJ 839 The portion of the deci...would not be prepared to accept.”25. We may make it clear that in Kashmira Singh AIR 1952 SC...

...liquidator any money, property or documents in his hands to which the company is prima facie entitled. It is consequently prayed that Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar be ordered to pay a sum of Rs...Delhi. (13) On 31st of December 1953 the Board passed a resolution (Exhibit P.W. 1/B) stating that with a view to avert the threat given by the Controller of Insurance Sardar Sardul Singh .... (14) Exhibit P.W. 1/D is a copy of resolution No. 2, dated 28th of March 1954 regarding the willingness of Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar to pay a further sum of Rs. 75,000/- as free cash...

...evidence against the other. In Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra...existence of conspiracy, but also for proving that the other person was a party to it. It is true that the observations of Subba Rao, J., in Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra...Evidence Act.280. The decision of the Privy Council in Mirza Akbar case AIR 1940 PC 176 has been referred to with approval in Sardul Singh...

...Tropical. In or about the middle of 1948, Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar, who was controlling the People's Insurance Co. Ltd. and other concerns in Lahore, and Kaul, a practising barrister, came to...respect of the funds of the Jupiter and that case was finally disposed of by this Court in Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Bombay (1). Therein it was found that Caveeshar was a party...Delhi. During that year the former was the President of the Forward Bloc and Shankarlal was its Vice-President. Shankerlal, Caveeshar and Kaul conceived the idea of purchasing the controlling block of...

...wider than the words used in English law (vide Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra...the ambit of Section 10 of the Evidence Act.39. In Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Bombay AIR...Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.) (1988) 3 S...

...person was a party to it. It is true that the observations of Subba Rao, J., in Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra...Mr M.N Singh was the Commissioner of Mumbai Police during which period Telgi was allegedly not kept in custody and was staying in his own flat or hotel and only on or about 9-1-2003 when Mr Jaiswal...now well settled having regard to several decisions of this Court in Kehar Singh...

...in another company called the Delhi Swadeshi Cooperative Stores Ltd. The said Delhi Stores held a large number of shares of the Tropical. In or about the middle of 1948, Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar, who...this Court in Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Bombay (1958) SCR 161. Therein it was found that Caveeshar was a party...and Shankarlal was its Vice-President. Shankarlal, Caveeshar and Kaul conceived the idea of purchasing the controlling block of 63,000 shares of the Jupiter Insurance Company Ltd., hereinafter referred...

...the witness box as a witness in defence, he is in the same position as an ordinary witness (See Peoples Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar ...-nation from the Bank of Maharashtra, Bombay Central Branch, that the appellant had drawn a cheque for Rs 600 (Ex. 147) in favour of one Sardar Singh Ahuja of Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, that the said Sardar...information, Patwardhan sent Constable Naik to Delhi to trace the appellant through Sardar Singh. Naik obtained the address of the appellant from Sardar Singh and was able in consequence to arrest both...

...reference to their common intention’ are wider than the words used in English law (vide Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra...

...statements made by one of the accused could be used as evidence against the other. In Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of...also for proving that the other person was a party to it. It is true that the observations of Subba Rao, J., in Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v...Act.280. The decision of the Privy Council in Mirza Akbar case AIR 1940 PC 176 has been referred to with approval in Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Bombay (1958) SCR...

...supplied)31. The aforesaid judgment is referred to and relied upon in Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v...contention, a five-Judge Bench of this Court in State of J&K v. Thakur Ganga Singh...right to go abroad. Satwant Singh Sawhney v. D. Ramarathnam, A.P.O...

...Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1965 SC 682).....”562. In Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra ...succinctly stated in a decision of this Court in Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra...

...Peoples Insurance Company Limited v. Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar . I.L.R 1960 Punj. 341.. For reasons stated above, I do not find any force in...

...Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra (1964) 2 SCR 378, AIR 1965 S...down thus: (Sardar Sardul Singh case (1964) 2 SCR 378, AIR 1965 SC 682, (1965) 1 Cri LJ 608, AIR p...provisions contained in CBI Manual. Thus, no case is made out so as to condone the delay.16. It was contended by Shri Surendra Singh, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of...

...Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1965 SC 682 : 1965 (1...Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra). 17. In the case of ...Court has held as under in paragraph 19 : 19. It is true that the confession made by a co-accused shall not be the sole basis for a conviction. This Court in Kashmira Singh v...

...Bihar v. Bhim*’ AIR (34) 1947 Patna 284; and ‘Peoples Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar’ A...Fateh Deep Singh, J.:— These two revision petitions bearing CRR No. 1030 of 2014 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the first petition’) and CRR No. 2521 of 2014 (hereinafter referred to as..., Advocate who has heavily placed reliance on the interpretation of Section 319 Cr. P.C. by citing ‘Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab’ 2014 (1) RCR (Criminal) 623...

...—“There is another letter, dated 28th of June, 1952, addressed by Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar (whose signatures I identify) on behalf of the People's Insurance Company Limited to the...which have been lost to the company due to the acts of misfeasance committed by them. The first respondent, Sardul Singh Caveeshar, has died and the petitioner-company did not press any claim against...of Sardul Singh Caveeshar, respondent No. 1, and held by the said respondent from 30th September, 1940 to 23rd July, 1946. The said shares were 10 per cent. paid and in 1944 and 1945 two calls of Rs...

...." Their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Maharashtra...signatures on Ihe memo. Sunita (PW.44) who was declared hostile, identified Mahesh and deposed that she knew him because he used to visit J.P. Tourist Village Resort, Mohan Singh Madhur (PW.147) is the.... 26. In respect of identification of'the accused in court the learned counsel placed reliance on Jaspal Singh @ Pali etc. v. State of Punjab, 1996 (4) Crimes 74 (SC...

...(2018) 11 SCC 458 3) Sardar Sardul Singh ...applications.” 18. Further in Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar's case it is held that - “The essence of conspiracy is, therefore, that there...senior counsel heavily relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar's case, cited supra, wherein the Apex Court has considered that the ingredients of Section 10...

x