Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal78
+ Bombay High Court19
+ National Green Tribunal14
+ CESTAT13
+ National Company Law Tribunal13
+ Delhi High Court8
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal5
+ Company Law Board4
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court3
+ Gujarat High Court3
+ Orissa High Court3
+ Supreme Court Of India3
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission2
+ Karnataka High Court2
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court2
+ Allahabad High Court1
+ Calcutta High Court1
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1
+ Madras High Court1
+ Telangana High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Kerala High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards48
From 2011 To 2020110
From 2001 To 20108
From 1991 To 20001
From 1981 To 19901
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs. Bharat Kumar Padamsi and others, reported in (2009) 151 Company Cases 251 (Bomb) has...(Passed on 26th November, 2015) 1. This company petition has been filed by petitioner Saurabh Cement Pvt. Ltd. for confirming the reduction of the share capital under.../15 has been filed disclosing that publication in terms of the aforesaid direction has been done. 7. Bombay High court in the matter of Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd. reported in...

...Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi, reported in (2009) 151 Company Cases 251 (Bomb) has held that the company can red...Coal (MoC) vide letter dated 12.04.2006 As per the allocation letter, a 50:50 joint venture company of Essar Power Ltd. and Hindalco Industries Ltd. was formed with the sole object of mining coal from...requirement of Section 101 is complied with by the petitioner. Nobody came forward to file objections etc.13. Bombay High Court in the matter of Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd...

...- Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi [(2009) 92 SLC 272 (BOM.)]. It is submitted that the Respondent-Company was de-li...attention to the judgment of the Apex Court - Miheer M. Mafatlal v. Mafatlal Industries Ltd. [(1997) 1 SCC 579], and more particularly, paragraph 29 of the said judgment...-Company with other companies, such as HOCL, Vinati Organics Ltd., Tata Chemicals Ltd., etc. He submitted that no comparison of the Respondent-Company should be made with other companies.4. On...

...and divide its share capital into shares of larger amount than its existing shares.5. In the case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar ...the name and Style of Digital Equipments (India) Ltd. It was a 51 per cent, subsidiary of Digital Equipments Inc., a United States based multinational company. With the worldwide amalgamation of...Digital Equipment and Compaq and later, on the amalgamation of Compaq and Hewlett-Packard, respondent No. 1 company acquired its present name as M/s. Hewlett-Packard Global Soft Ltd. The registered office...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

... Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi [2009] 91 CLA 247 concerning the reduction of capital of... China Ltd. [1907] AC 229 (HL) that the dissenting shareholders do not demand, and never have demanded, better pecuniary terms, but they...Hon'ble Delhi High Court, Single Bench in the matter of M/s. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd., 2011 SCC...

...Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi [2009 Vol. 111 (4) Bom. LR 1421], concerning the reduc...this Court, had refused confirmation of the proposal for reduction of M/s. Sandvik Asia Ltd. on the ground that the promoters group could virtually bulldoze the minority shareholders and purchase....”The Learned Bench granted sanction to the reduction of capital, overruling the order of the Learned Single Judge in Sandvik Asia Ltd. (supra), and posited as follows:“Once it is...

...Court in Sandvik Asia Limited v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi (2009) 92 SCL 272 (Bom) and Organo...Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi [2009] 91 CLA 247 [2009] 111 (4) Bom. LR 1421, concerning the reduction of capital ...Sandvik Asia Ltd. The learned Single Judge of this court, had refused confirmation of the proposal for reduction of Sandvik Asia Ltd. on the ground that the promoters group could virtually bulldoz...

...Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi, [2009] 92 SCL 272 (Bom.) as well as the decision rendered by Delhi High Court in the case of Reckitt Benckiser (India) Limited, in Co...

...only manner in which share capital may be reduced. In support cited the Judgment of Honble Bombay High Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs. Bharat Ku...only manner in which share capital may be reduced. For the purpose it is useful to refer the Judgment of Honble Bombay High Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. (Supra) In this case the company had.... 55. Honble Bombay High Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. (Supra) dealt a petition in which the petition for reduction of share capital of the company be reduced by paying off...

...19. This Court is, however, bound by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court, reported in Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar ...] 91 CLA 247, [2009] 111 (4) Bom. LR 1421, concerning the reduction of capital of Sandvik Asia Ltd. The learned Single Judge of this court, had refused confirmation of...the proposal for reduction of Sandvik Asia Ltd. on the ground that the promoters group could virtually bulldoze the minority shareholders and purchase their shares at the price dictated by them. The...

...Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi [2009] 91 CLA 247 [2009] 111 (4) Bom. LR 1421, concerning the reduction of capital ...Asia Limited vs. Bharat Kumar Padamsi and Ors. (2009) 92 SCL 272 (Bom) and Organon (India) Ltd., In Re.(2010) 98 CLA 480...Judge of this court, had refused confirmation of the proposal for reduction of Sandvik Asia Ltd. on the ground that the promoters group could virtually bulldoze the minority shareholders and purchase...

...Sandvik Asia Ltd v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi in support of his submission that the jurisdiction of this Court under Sections 391 and 394 of the A...Sandvik Asia Ltd. (supra). The Bench has copiously quoted several passages from the judgment in British and American Trustee & Finance Corpn. v. Couper ((1894) A.C. 399...Court in Miheer H. Mafatlal v. Mafatlal Industries Ltd., a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in...

...Ltd and a judgment of a Division Bench of Bombay High Court in Sandvik Asia Ltd Vs. Bharat Kumar Padamsi in support of his submis...). An identical view was taken by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Sandvik Asia Ltd (supra). The Bench has copiously quoted several passages from the judgment in British...Miheer H.Mafatlal Vs. Mafatlal Industries Ltd , a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Vadlamudi Rama Rao Vs. ...

...Sandvik Asia Ltd Vs. Bharat Kumar Padamsi (2009) 92 SCL 272 (BOM.) in support of his submission that the jurisdiction of this Court under Sect...taken by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Sandvik Asia Ltd (supra). The Bench has copiously quoted several passages from the judgment in British and American...Miheer H.Mafatlal Vs. Mafatlal Industries Ltd (1997) 1 SCC 579), a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in...

...intervention applicants has referred to Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi, 2009 (3) Bom CR 57 (Bombay High Court) and...Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Bharat Kumar Padamsi supra and it was held in para 17 as under:—….The Learned Bench granted sanction to ...Learned Single Judge in Sandvik Asia Ltd. (supra), and posited as follows:“Once it is established that non-promoter shareholders are being paid the fair value of their shares, at no...

.... (ii). Sandvik Asia Limited Vs. Bharat Kumar Padamsi & Ors., 2009 SC Online Bom 541. 19. On the other han...very same issue has been noticed by a single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Organon (India) Ltd., which followed the view of its Division Bench in Sandvik Asia...Shareholders. 24.1 A similar question came up for consideration before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Sandvik Asia. In the said case, the...

... ASIA LIMITED VS. BHARAT KUMAR PADAMSI AND ORS.', 2009 VOL.III (4) BOM. L.R. 1421...ASIA LIMITED VS. BHARAT KUMAR & ORS (2009) 3 BOM CR 57; RECKITT BENCHISER (INDIA) LTD., (2005...) DLT 612, 'M.R.GOYAL VS. USHA INTERNATIONAL LTD.', (1998) 93 COMPCAS634 (DELHI) and SANDVIK...

...unfair and unjust. The judgment of learned Company Judge in Sandvik Asia Ltd., (supra) was assailed in appeal as Sandvik Asia Limited v Bharat Kumar Padamsi 2009...), Ramesh B.Desai (supra) and In re: Sandvik Asia Ltd., (2004) 121 Comp Cas 58 (Bom). Before considering the merits of the..., and in particular the postponement of the date of repayment. There is nothing on the petitioner’s side which in my judgment even begins to meet this evidence. In Sandvik Asia Ltd...

.... [122 (2005) Delhi Law Times 612]; (b) Sandvik Asia Limited vs Bharat Kumar...Padamsi [2009 (3) Bom. C.R 57]; In the Sandvik Asia case, the Honble Bombay High Court has observed in para-16 thereof that - If non-promoter shareholders have no objection, court should not...section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013). In this regard, we have particularly considered two cases: - (a) Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd...