CiteTEXT
...to file his written statement thereafter (see Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557). But once an application for...of Rule 11, even without intervention of the defendant.”6. In Saleem Bhai case (2003) 1 SCC 557, this Court has also held that...
....11. This position was explained by this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, in which, while...Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code, the other defendants need not necessarily be heard at all as it does not affect their rights. As a matter of fact, this Court in Saleem Bhai (2003) 1 SCC 557 held that the...
...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557]. The above view has been once again reiterated in the recent decision of this Court in...
...consistent with the settled legal position expounded in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557..., where this Court, in para 11, observed thus:“11. This position was explained by this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of...
...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it was held with reference to Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code that the relevant facts which need to be looked into for...
...this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, in which, while considering Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code, it was held...in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, Church of Christ Charitable Trust (2012) 8 SCC 706, and observed that : (Church...
...Rule 11 in the legal ambit needs to be noted.10. In Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it...
...GALLI, BELAGAVI..
12. SMT.NAFEESA W/O JAFAR BASHA SHAIKH,
AGE: 61 YEARS,OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O: SALEEM BHAI DAKHU CHAWL...SALEEM BHAI DAKHU,
AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK,
R/O: SALEEM BHAI DAKHU CHAWL,
GAIKWAD MILL ROAD, CHIKALWADI, BILLIMORA...,
R/O: SALEEM BHAI DAKHU CHAWL,
GAIKWAD MILL ROAD, CHIKALWADI, BILLIMORA,
TQ: GANDEVI--396360, DIST: NAVASARI,
GUJARAT STATE...
...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, (2003) 1 SCC 557 and Ram Prakash Gupta v. Rajiv Kumar...not been found and consequently, the review petition was also dismissed.In the case of Saleem Bhai (supra) relied by the learned counsel for the revisionist, the Hon'ble Apex Court held...
...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra; (2003) 1 SCC 557, it has not been held by the Supreme Court that automatically the period to file Written...for the respondent no. 4 has supported the impugned order. It is submitted that as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Saleem Bhai (supra), the defendant cannot be called upon to file the Written...of Saleem Bhai (supra) has held that the defendant can file the Written Statement after rejection of the application under Order VII, Rule 11 of CPC. Shri Rivankar, the learned Counsel for the...
...of Civil Procedure only the averments made in the plaint are required to be seen. [See: Saleem Bhai and others vs. State of Maharashtra & ors...
...alone are to be seen while considering application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C.
Saleem Bhai and others vs. State of Maharashtra & ors...
...C. Natrajan v. Ashim Bai, AIR 2008 SC 363; Saleem Bhai v. State of...
....”14. In Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it was held with reference to...
...Court in the judgment of Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra [Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, (2003) 1 SCC 557] . The...
...of this Court in Arjan Motors vs. Girdhara Singh and others, 1978 PLJ 36, while observing that decisions in Saleem Bhai and...
...) Tahir Bhai S/o Shayar Bhai, (4) Saleem Bhai S/o Sh. Rehman Bhai & (5) Raees Khan S/o Sh. Kayamdeen, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision and they shall be released on...Judge No.1, Abu Road, District Sirohi vide order dated 12.05.2017 in Cr. Appeal No.03/2011, against applicants-petitioners (1) Nasiruddin S/o Sh. Mamruddin, (2) Hameer Bhai S/o Sh. Nazeer Bhai, (3...
...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557. The plea that once issues are framed, the matter must necessarily go to trial was repelled by...
...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, 2003 (1) R.C.R (Civil) 464 and P.K Palanisamy v. N...
...9;’14. In Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it was held with...was explained by this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, in which, while considering Order 7 Rule 11 of the...