Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Central Administrative Tribunal232
+ Delhi High Court194
+ Bombay High Court180
+ Madras High Court115
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court107
+ Karnataka High Court92
+ Rajasthan High Court86
+ Gujarat High Court68
+ Allahabad High Court51
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court43
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court38
+ Supreme Court Of India37
+ Calcutta High Court34
+ Kerala High Court34
+ Telangana High Court34
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court18
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court16
+ Uttarakhand High Court15
+ Chhattisgarh High Court14
+ Gauhati High Court13
+ Patna High Court12
+ National Green Tribunal10
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission9
+ Orissa High Court9
+ Sikkim High Court8
+ Tripura High Court5
+ RERA4
+ CESTAT3
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal3
+ Manipur High Court3
+ District Court2
+ Jharkhand High Court2
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority2
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2
+ National Company Law Tribunal2
+ SEBI2
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2
+ Competition Commission Of India1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Meghalaya High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards681
From 2011 To 2020668
From 2001 To 201099
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19803
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...to file his written statement thereafter (see Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557). But once an application for...of Rule 11, even without intervention of the defendant.”6. In Saleem Bhai case (2003) 1 SCC 557, this Court has also held that...

....11. This position was explained by this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, in which, while...Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code, the other defendants need not necessarily be heard at all as it does not affect their rights. As a matter of fact, this Court in Saleem Bhai (2003) 1 SCC 557 held that the...

...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557]. The above view has been once again reiterated in the recent decision of this Court in...

...consistent with the settled legal position expounded in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557..., where this Court, in para 11, observed thus:“11. This position was explained by this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of...

...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it was held with reference to Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code that the relevant facts which need to be looked into for...

...this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, in which, while considering Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code, it was held...in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, Church of Christ Charitable Trust (2012) 8 SCC 706, and observed that : (Church...

...Rule 11 in the legal ambit needs to be noted.10. In Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it...

...GALLI, BELAGAVI.. 12. SMT.NAFEESA W/O JAFAR BASHA SHAIKH, AGE: 61 YEARS,OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O: SALEEM BHAI DAKHU CHAWL...SALEEM BHAI DAKHU, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK, R/O: SALEEM BHAI DAKHU CHAWL, GAIKWAD MILL ROAD, CHIKALWADI, BILLIMORA..., R/O: SALEEM BHAI DAKHU CHAWL, GAIKWAD MILL ROAD, CHIKALWADI, BILLIMORA, TQ: GANDEVI--396360, DIST: NAVASARI, GUJARAT STATE...

...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, (2003) 1 SCC 557 and Ram Prakash Gupta v. Rajiv Kumar...not been found and consequently, the review petition was also dismissed.In the case of Saleem Bhai (supra) relied by the learned counsel for the revisionist, the Hon'ble Apex Court held...

...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra; (2003) 1 SCC 557, it has not been held by the Supreme Court that automatically the period to file Written...for the respondent no. 4 has supported the impugned order. It is submitted that as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Saleem Bhai (supra), the defendant cannot be called upon to file the Written...of Saleem Bhai (supra) has held that the defendant can file the Written Statement after rejection of the application under Order VII, Rule 11 of CPC. Shri Rivankar, the learned Counsel for the...

...of Civil Procedure only the averments made in the plaint are required to be seen. [See: Saleem Bhai and others vs. State of Maharashtra & ors...

...alone are to be seen while considering application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. Saleem Bhai and others vs. State of Maharashtra & ors...

...C. Natrajan v. Ashim Bai, AIR 2008 SC 363; Saleem Bhai v. State of...

....”14. In Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it was held with reference to...

...Court in the judgment of Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra [Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, (2003) 1 SCC 557] . The...

...of this Court in Arjan Motors vs. Girdhara Singh and others, 1978 PLJ 36, while observing that decisions in Saleem Bhai and...

...) Tahir Bhai S/o Shayar Bhai, (4) Saleem Bhai S/o Sh. Rehman Bhai & (5) Raees Khan S/o Sh. Kayamdeen, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision and they shall be released on...Judge No.1, Abu Road, District Sirohi vide order dated 12.05.2017 in Cr. Appeal No.03/2011, against applicants-petitioners (1) Nasiruddin S/o Sh. Mamruddin, (2) Hameer Bhai S/o Sh. Nazeer Bhai, (3...

...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557. The plea that once issues are framed, the matter must necessarily go to trial was repelled by...

...Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, 2003 (1) R.C.R (Civil) 464 and P.K Palanisamy v. N...

...9;’14. In Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557 it was held with...was explained by this Court in Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557, in which, while considering Order 7 Rule 11 of the...