Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madras High Court4795
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal4406
+ Karnataka High Court2779
+ Bombay High Court2776
+ Kerala High Court1675
+ Allahabad High Court1296
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1173
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1168
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court1122
+ Patna High Court1103
+ Delhi High Court1082
+ Gujarat High Court1070
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court956
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission952
+ Calcutta High Court807
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal585
+ Supreme Court Of India544
+ Rajasthan High Court414
+ Telangana High Court411
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court361
+ Orissa High Court358
+ Gauhati High Court329
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission259
+ Jharkhand High Court247
+ Chhattisgarh High Court174
+ Uttarakhand High Court161
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity146
+ National Green Tribunal144
+ Tripura High Court134
+ RERA127
+ National Company Law Tribunal99
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal84
+ SEBI84
+ Privy Council81
+ CESTAT78
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court75
+ Company Law Board63
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal59
+ Central Information Commission53
+ Board of Revenue38
+ Meghalaya High Court31
+ Manipur High Court27
+ Sikkim High Court27
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal26
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act23
+ Central Administrative Tribunal19
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission16
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board16
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal12
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India8
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange6
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property5
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST4
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal4
+ Authority For Advance Rulings3
+ Competition Commission Of India3
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority3
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal2
+ District Court2
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India2
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards11362
From 2011 To 202012957
From 2001 To 20102433
From 1991 To 20001000
From 1981 To 1990610
From 1971 To 1980398
From 1961 To 1970399
From 1951 To 1960320
Before 1950942

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...and western side of the suit schedule property. The sale deed under which the plaintiff purchased the property was mentioned as AGEF and BCDEG in the plain sketch map mentioned as two parts and by mistake in the said ...the absolute owner in possession of the suit schedule property under the registered sale deed dated 07.09.2001. He further submits that in the sale deed there is a mistake crept in regard to the ...attorney, Ex.P2 is the registered sale deed which discloses that the plaintiff has purchased the property under the registered sale deed and measurement of the property shown in the said sale ...

...paiki 4 Acres and 34 gunthas. Against that, the plaintiff got 3 Acres and 10 gunthas of land known as “Kakravalu”, out of aforesaid survey No. 16 of his brother. A registered sale deed dated 8 August, 1975 was executed in that regar..., brother of the plaintiff sold only 4 acres of land of survey no. 16 to Dahya Megha by sale deed at exh.84 and in his turn Dahya Megha could sell the said land of 4 acres to the defendant and...relevant documents on record having bearing on the controversy, and carefully considered the judgments of both the courts below.5. The sale deed dated 8 April, 1968 executed by Ganesh...

...the plaintiff, he was very much aware of the mistake in the Sale Deed. In stead of seeking a declaration and also a rectification of the measurement in the Sale Deed immediately, he approached the...Appellate Court in R.A No. 114/1986 and then in R.S.A No. 559/1987 and kept quite all along till 1998. It is only after 18 years after registration of the Sale Deed, the suit came to be instituted for rectification of .... 1 to 6 under a registered Sale Deed dated 17.12.1979, which was registered on 22.03.1980 He claims that though the property purchased was measuring 16 × 43½ yards, by mistake it was mentioned as 10...

...accept the contentions of the plaintiff that they were in possession of the disputed ‘Wada’ land”. The reliance on the sale deed Exh.46 was placed by the trial Court. The lower Appellate Court while accepting that there was an averm...possession of the land for the last more than 20 years and there was only a mistake of the boundary in the sale deed. It was also contended that the Commissioner had measured the defendants' property in which...the sale deed Exh.46, the lower Appellate Court has held that there was a mistake in the sale deed. She has further submitted that there was no material evidence on record which supports the finding...

...unregistered sale deed dated 12.07.1960, but by mistake the unit of measurement was mentioned as pole of 6 ½ cubits in the sale deed, although it should have been pole of 4 ½ cubits. It is also cl...Prasad Sinha by unregistered written sale deed but it was never produced.(c) Plaintiff claimed that he got his name mutated in 1976, but order of mutation has not been produced...connected and hence they are taken up together. The claim of the plaintiff was based upon an unregistered sale deed dated 12.07.1960 said to have been executed by the alleged owner Narbada Prasad Sinha...

... Gunthas. 3.5. Thereafter, Samubhai Kanjibhai executed a sale-deed No.1965 dated 31.03.1980 with respect to the land bearing Survey No.497 admeasuring 4 Acres and 24 Gunt...Acres and 33 Gunthas of Survey No.497 since the year 1955-56. (ii) On 26.05.1956, Dolatsinh Prabhatsinh executed a registered sale- deed No.1101 in favour of Gambhirsinh Gomansinh and...into revenue record in favour of Gambhirsinh Gomansinh and Bai Gulabben-widow of Jesingbava Khusalbava on the basis of the registered sale-deed dated 26.05.1956...

...Kalpana to the effect that there has been a typographical mistake in mentioning the measurement of the property subjected to the sale deed dated 09.05.2013 and that the same has been rectified as East to...the same under the registered sale deed dated 02.02.1989 from Smt. Lakshmamma and others. The said Hanumanthappa sold 2 acres 15 guntas and 3 guntas of kharab in favour of M.D. Ramakrishnaiah under...the registered sale deed dated 04.08.2004. The said M.D. Ramakrishnaiah has formed sites in the said land and has sold property bearing No. 81 measuring East to West 40 feet and North to South 38 feet...

...bonafide mistake in recording measurement while making sale deed relating to suit proeperty? 2A. Whether defendants proves that the present suit is barred by res judicata....2 is also given by holding that the suit is barred by principle of res judicata. The trial court has come to the conclusion that in the sale deed, probably some mistake has occurred in mentioning the measurement o... holding that there could be error in writing measurement of the land in the registered sale deed dated 13.06.1986 bearing Index No. 1499, and without there being ...

...to the plaintiff, but due to clerical mistake, it was mentioned as sale deed and also measurement was also wrongly shown. Defendants have not examined before the Court, that cannot be a ground to...30 feet and North South 65 feet was gifted to the plaintiff through registered document dated 29.03.1973. While drafting the gift deed, it was drafted as sale deed by mistakenly, which mistake...accepting the Ex.P.2 as not a sale deed, he could have filed a suit for cancellation of the Ex.P.2 sale deed and the measurement also incorrect. On the other hand, the Exs.P.1 and 2 clearly reveals that th...

..., but of lesser extent and only after rectification of the same by the defendant, by producing correct patta, the plaintiff will be in a position to get a sale deed executed in her favour; (c) The defe...execute a sale deed in her favour. The plaintiff also claims that on actual measurement, it was found that the extent of the suit schedule property is only 35 kulies and not 42 kulies (14 cents) as...on the part of the plaintiff to obtain a sale deed in her favour. Since the delay in rectifying the mistake was only on the part of the defendant, the plaintiff is entitled for specific performance...

...written inadvertently due to typographical mistake by the Deed Writer. Deed Writer of both the sale deeds and the attesting witnesses were not cross-examined with regard to the description or...was an error in the measurement given in the sale deeds and description of the property was incorrect. By virtue of the sale deed dated 07.06.2002, plaintiff-respondent acquired the ownership of the...purchased the property towards eastern side of defendants and the measurement given in the sale deed were wrong as she had no concern with the room situated eastern side of the shop in question. She further...

...land sold to Ramu by Bukkaiah measures 34 guntas. In the sale deed due to bonafide mistake and without knowing correct survey number and measurement, it was wrongly written. The said Ramu was in.... 3 property, have encroached the property which belongs to the appellant. The plaintiff's father had purchased the land measuring 20 guntas from his vendor by name Chikkaiah as per Ex.P1 - sale deed...RTC extract also reveals total extent of land as 25 guntas. Ex.P8 - Index of land also reflects the fact that the plaintiff was in possession of 25 guntas of land. From the date of sale deed marked...

...REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 17.05.1958 AND NONE CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF THE PETITIONERS FOR RECTIFICATION OF MISTAKE CREPT IN THE COLUMN NO.9 OF THE RTC BY AND REVEALIN.../1A1 of Byrasandra Village as per registered Sale Deed dated 17.05.1958 and none consideration of claim of the petitioners for rectification of mistake crept in the Column No.9 of the RTC by ..., SUBMITTED BY THESE PETITIONERS FOR RECTIFICATION OF MISTAKE CREPT IN THE COLUMN NO.9 OF THE RTC WHEREIN WRONGLY MENTIONED THE MEASUREMENT OF THE...

...Section 152 CPC. An alleged misdescription with reference to a sale deed and a mismatch between what is contained in the plaint and what was stated in the sale deed cannot be reopened, for, they would amount to mod...the objection that the sale deed on the basis the plaintiff claiming was itself not true, the defendant cannot seek for alteration of the description as regards the measurement. The point is well taken...purchased through a sale deed Dated 22.05.1987 The defendant denied the plaintiff's claim to title but lost in the defence that resulted in decree in favour of the plaintiff as sought for. The defendant...

...possession certificate issued and the sale deed executed in favour of the allottee to S.T.Nagaraj. The clear observation made after conducting spot inspection is as follows: Therefore it is very clear that a mistake has bee...sale deed was executed in favour of S.T.Nagaraj. Actually it was the duty of S.T.Nagaraj to get it corrected. He played fraud on BDA finding the error in measurement being favourable to him. The first...sale deed was in favour of Narasamma and when in the said sale deed the measurement was clearly mentioned as 48 x 30, the plaintiffs have all the right to claim the possession of site to that extent...

...RECTIFYING THE MISTAKE OF MEASUREMENT WHICH IS SHOWN AS EAST TO WEST 25 PLUS 24 1/2 FEET INSTEAD OF EAST TO WEST 25, AND TOTAL MEASUREMENT AS 450... SQUARE FEET INSTEAD OF 500 SQ. FEET IN THE REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 31/12/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY...site in question is as to non-consideration of his representation dated 31.05.2022 (Annexure-G) wherein he has sought for rectification of measurements mentioned in the Sale Deed. 2...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

... ORDER The petitioner with a grievance that there is a mistake in the patta in respect of the ...purchased the property by way of a registered sale deed dated 31.03.1984 to an extent of 3888 Sq.Ft and she has executed a settlement deed in his favour. However, the revenue officials issued patta...filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondents to rectify the mistake. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's wife has...

...petitioner as well as any other necessary party, whom the respondents deem fit to enquire. 5.The petitioner has filed a copy of the sale deed dated 05.03.2003 standing in his name, which discloses that he purchased the aforementione...time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.It is the case of the petitioner that he purchased the aforementioned property under a sale deed dated 05.03.2003. According to him, he noticed only recently a...This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus, seeking for a direction to the second respondent to rectify the mistake in the patta with regard to the property owned by the...

...stated in the sale deed that there is a mistake in the measurement of survey no. 497 and process is going on for correcting the same. Therefore, the seller allotted the full and...Acres and 00 Gunthas to the father of the petitioner. thereafter registered sale deed no. 1965 dated 31.03.1980 was executed by Samubhal Kanjibhal with respect to land bearing survey no. 497...Gandabhal Devabhal executed a registered sale deed dated 05.05.2017 in favour of respondent no.1 Devanbhai Mafatial Patel allegedly with respect to some portion of survey no. 320...