Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court2010
+ CESTAT1951
+ Central Administrative Tribunal854
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission657
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission604
+ Telangana High Court491
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission350
+ Madras High Court284
+ Karnataka High Court259
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal242
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal186
+ Supreme Court Of India129
+ Bombay High Court108
+ Allahabad High Court97
+ Delhi High Court97
+ National Company Law Tribunal94
+ Calcutta High Court69
+ Kerala High Court61
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court58
+ Gujarat High Court52
+ Rajasthan High Court46
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court43
+ Gauhati High Court36
+ Orissa High Court36
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court31
+ Patna High Court29
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal25
+ Chhattisgarh High Court15
+ National Green Tribunal15
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court10
+ Tripura High Court9
+ Central Information Commission8
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal8
+ Jharkhand High Court8
+ Sikkim High Court8
+ SEBI7
+ Uttarakhand High Court7
+ Manipur High Court6
+ Company Law Board4
+ Railway Claims Tribunal3
+ Meghalaya High Court2
+ Privy Council2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Board of Revenue1
+ Competition Commission Of India1
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ RERA0
+ Right to Information0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards4394
From 2011 To 20202819
From 2001 To 2010362
From 1991 To 2000164
From 1981 To 1990111
From 1971 To 1980139
From 1961 To 1970214
From 1951 To 1960207
Before 195084

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...December 7, 1954, the High Court upheld the preliminary objection. The High Court, relying upon the decisions of this Court in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao (1953...construction of the relevant provisions of the Constitution, it is clear that Sastri, C.J's observations relating to “authority” in the case of Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao ...was determined by a Constitution Bench in the case of Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao. In that case a writ was applied for in the Madras High Court for...

....”35. But a Constitution Bench of this Court has held in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao ...Election Commission v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao AIR 1953 SC 210...AIR 1952 Ass 91. It was Subba Rao, J. (as the learned Chief Justice then was) who observed in M.K Ranganathan case...

...Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao ([1953] S.C.R. 1144, 1150). Rex v. Electricity Commissioners ([1924] 1 K.B. 171, 205); Walshall's Overseers v. London and Northern...not exercisable by the other High Courts at all. " In that situation " as this Court observed in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao (1), " the makers of the...

...the High Court had no jurisdiction to issue a writ against the Central Board of Revenue in view of the decision in the case of Saka Venkata Subba Rao (1953) SCR 1144. On the second question, it held...hear the petition in view of the decision of this Court in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Rao . (1953) SCR 1144. As the...modification or mere confirmation. This matter has been considered by this Court on a number of occasions after the decision in Skaka Venkata Subba Rao case (1953) SCR 1144. In A. Thangal Kunju Musaliar...

...(2) was introduced in Article 226 of the Constitution to enlarge the scope of the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. The Supreme Court in Saka Venkata Subba Rao case..., Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Rao . ...

...Venkata Rao . (1953) SCR 1144 would not apply. Reliance in this connection has been placed on the decision of this Court in State Of U.P v. Mohammad Nooh . (...High Court would have jurisdiction to grant a writ under Article 226, and that the principle laid down in Election Commission, India v. Saka...

...normally carry on their activities elsewhere. In view of the observations of their Lordships in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao the writs of this court cannot run...

.... In Madurai Veeran's case, the Division Bench of this Court quoted Paragraph 35 from the decision of the Supreme Court in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao, AIR...its jurisdiction either by residence or location within those territories.10. In Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Rao, MANU/SC/0060/1953, the petitioner applied to the High...Of India & Another MANU/SC/0039/1960. A Bench of Seven Judges was called upon to consider the correctness or otherwise of Saka Venkata Rao. The majority (Sinha, C.J, Kapoor, Gajendragadkar, Wanchoo...

.... 6. In Madan Gopal Rungta (supra), reliance is placed on the earlier decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission, India Vs. Saka Venkata Subba Rao...decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), no longer represent the correct position in law. He points out that by the 15th and 42nd amendment to the...contained in Article 226(2) of the Constitution of India, in support of his submissions. 8. The decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra...

.... 6. In Madan Gopal Rungta (supra), reliance is placed on the earlier decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission, India Vs. Saka Venkata Subba Rao...decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), no longer represent the correct position in law. He points out that by the 15th and 42nd amendment to the...contained in Article 226(2) of the Constitution of India, in support of his submissions. 8. The decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra...

.... 6. In Madan Gopal Rungta (supra), reliance is placed on the earlier decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission, India Vs. Saka Venkata Subba Rao...decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), no longer represent the correct position in law. He points out that by the 15th and 42nd amendment to the...contained in Article 226(2) of the Constitution of India, in support of his submissions. 8. The decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra...

...), reliance is placed on the earlier decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao; AIR 1953 SC 210, in which same...view has been taken.7. Mr. S.G Dessai, the learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner, however, submits that the decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra..., in support of his submissions.8. The decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra) were rendered in the context of the...

.... 6. In Madan Gopal Rungta (supra), reliance is placed on the earlier decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission, India Vs. Saka Venkata Subba Rao...decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), no longer represent the correct position in law. He points out that by the 15th and 42nd amendment to the...contained in Article 226(2) of the Constitution of India, in support of his submissions. 8. The decisions in the case of Madan Gopal Rungta (supra) and Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra...

...Court exercises jurisdiction.”28. Thus, in Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), the Supreme Court had expressed the view, in no uncertain words, that in the absence of a specific...arisen within its jurisdiction.29. In other words, what the Supreme Court, in Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), had held was that in the absence of a specific provision..., under Article 226, on the plea that the whole or part of the cause of action had arisen within its jurisdiction.30. According to what Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra) laid down was that...

...Bench, while interpreting Article 226 (as it stood then) observed, in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao as follows:...The rule that cause of action...the presence of the person or authority within the territories in relation to which the High Court exercises jurisdiction. 12. Thus, in Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), the Supreme...not have exercised jurisdiction on the plea that the whole or part of the cause of action had arisen within its jurisdiction. In other words, what the Supreme Court in Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra...

...Constitution Bench, while interpreting article 226 (as it stood then) observed, in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao, AIR 1953 SC 210, as follows...Supreme Court, in Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra), had held was that in the absence of a specific provision, in article 226, suggesting that the cause of action would attract jurisdiction to enable a High...jurisdiction. According to what Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra) laid down was that a High Court can exercise jurisdiction, under article 226, only if the person or authority to whom the writ is sought to be...

...for consideration in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao, AIR 1953 SC 210. In that case the petitioner applied to the High Court of Madras under...of seven Judges was called upon to consider the correctness or otherwise of the decision in Saka Venkata Subba Rao (supra). The majority reaffirmed and approved the view taken by the Court earlier in...Saka Venkata Subba Rao and held that the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir was right in not entertaining the writ petition filed by the petitioner on the ground that it had no territorial jurisdiction...

...decision of the Supreme Court in Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata, Subba Rao. It was decided in that case that the High, Court of Madras had no authority to issue a writ under...

...Election Commission, India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao, AIR 1953 SC 210, thus—“The power of the High Court to issue writs under Article...; Aswini Kumar Sinha v. Dy. Collector of Central Excise and Land Customs, AIR 1952 Ass. 91. It was Subba Rao, J. (as the learned Chief Justice then was) who...Venkata Rao , AIR 1953 SC 210, and to restore the view held by the High Courts in the decisions cited above. Thus the power conferred on the High Courts under Article 226 could as...

.... Saka Venkata Subba Rao, reported in AIR 1953 SC 210 the jurisdiction was based only on the situs of the person or authority concerned against whom writ or order is to be...