CiteTEXT
... Chandran v. Union of India5, (4) Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo...) Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S
39. Ruchi Majoo (wife) had come to India with her child consequent to...Majoo). All three that is Ruchi Majoo, Sanjeev Majoo and their child were foreign nationals.
40. Soon after Ruchi Majoo came to India, Sanjeev Majoo approa...
....2. It is an undisputed fact that petitioner No. 1 Mr. Sanjeev Majoo and the complainant i.e wife Ms. Ruchi Majoo, both are citizens of USA and the marriage between them had taken place on...12th December 1996 at Delhi. Even at the time of engagement, Ms. Ruchi Majoo and Mr. Sanjeev Majoo were in America and engagement ceremony had taken place in Detroit, USA at the house of uncle of Ms.... Ruchi Majoo in September 1996. After marriage, the parties left for USA, lived there as US citizens. Ms. Ruchi Majoo gave birth to one son namely master Kush, who became US citizen by birth. However...
...the decision of the Supreme Court reported as Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S(2011) 6 SCC 479.4. The Court has considered...since she was transferred to Bangalore and the son had to necessarily accompany her, and, therefore, the Delhi Court lacked jurisdiction. The reliance placed on Ruchi Majoo (supra) is inapt in these...
...Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S (2011) 6 SCC 479. These judgments were considered by this Court in a recent three-Judge Bench judgment in...
.... (2000) 3 SCC 14 and Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S S....36. This Court specifically took note of the following circumstances: (Ruchi Majoo case (2011) 6 SCC 479..., it is observed as follows: (Ruchi Majoo case (2011) 6 SCC 479)“45. It is difficult to...
...decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ruchi Majoo (supra), petition under Section 17 of the Act read with Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act filed by the respondent titled...be disposed of more justly or conveniently by any other District Court having jurisdiction.”Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ruchi...Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S, AIR 2011 SC 1952, has held that the solitary test for determining the jurisdiction of the Court under...
...Supreme Court in Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S, 2011 AIR (SCW) 3311, has held that the solitary test for determining the jurisdiction of...of Section 9 of the Act and keeping in view the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ruchi Majoo (supra), petition under Sections 7 and 25 of the Act filed by the respondent titled “Balwinder...
...Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S, AIR 2011 SC 1952, has held that the solitary...in view of Section 9 of the Act and keeping in view the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ruchi Majoo (supra), petition under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 read with...
...Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S decided on 13 May 2011 in Civil Appeal No. 4435 of 2011. He also invited my attention to the order passed by this Court on 5 Ma...case of Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S (supra) relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondents are concerned, both the Courts...
...Ruchi Majoo Vs. Sanjeev Majoo, (2011)
6 SCC 479, it has been held by the Supreme Court that the words ordinarily resides would imply something more than a flying visit or...
...must yield to the welfare of the child. After referring to various judgments, in Ruchi Majoo (2011) 6 SCC 479, it was held as under...
...Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S, AIR 2011 SC 1952, has held that the solitary test for determin...the fact that the respondents being grandparents of the minor children have only visiting rights and in view of Section 9 of the Act and keeping in view the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ruchi...Majoo (supra), petition under the provisions of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act filed by the respondents titled...
...of Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S reported in (2011) 6 SCC 479 wherein it is held the word ‘reside’ though means dwell, stay but the...the place where the minor ordinarily resides.”10. Both the parties have relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in case of Ruchi Majoo (Supra) and placed their own...not be relatable only to duration but also to purpose.11. In Ruchi Majoo (Supra) the Apex Court noticed the earlier judgment rendered in case of Kuldeep Nayar v. Union of...
...Ruchi Majoo Vs. Sanjee Majoo , (2011) 6 SCC
479.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent while opposing the s..., (2003) 1 SCC
557. In the case of Ruchi Majoo, supra, the Supreme Court while consideri...
...Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S [(2011) 6 SCC 479...
...titled Ruchi Majoo vs. Sanjeev Majoo: (2011) 6 SCC 479.
1...
.... Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S, (2011) 6 SCC 4795. On the other hand, Mr. Masal supported the impugned order. He submitted that respondent no. ...minor Sanvi is taking education in Sangli.8. In the case of Ruchi Majoo (supra), in paragraph 45 the Apex Court observed that “the fact remains that Kush was ordinarily residing with the...
...Supreme Court in the matter of Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S reported in (2011) 6 SCC 479 wherein it has been laid down that the solitary...Ruchi Majoo (Supra) is distinguishable and does not help the non-applicants in any manner.
11. As a result, it is held that the trial Court has not committed any error...
...at the time of application are not synonymous though stipulates different situations which are not interchangeable. The Apex Court in Ruchi...Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S, has also observed that the solitary test for determin ing jurisdiction of the Court under section 9 is ordinarily residence of minor. The use of the word “resides...
...Sharma, (2000) 3 SCC 14, Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S, (2011) 6 SCC 479...: AIR 2011 SC 1952 Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo S have not been kept in mind by the...