...as held in (2006) 4 SCC 1 (State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi) for purposes of regularisation. If it does, shall it...common order. The respondents were directed to reconsider after ascertainment of necessary facts, regularisation of the eligible under the directions contained in paragraph 53 of (Uma Devi) (supra). The authorities after reconsideration on 31.12.2008 declined regularisation holding...decision has gone against them, they cannot be permitted to rescile from their earlier stand and challenge the reference to the Committee itself.There was no conflict between (Uma Devi) (supra) and (M.L Kesari) (supra). The ratio decidendi in the former with regard to the distinction between an illegal and irregular appointment for purposes of regularisation had...

...selection process.8. The law on regularisation underwent a substantive change with the pronouncement in Secretary, State of Karrcataka v. Uma Devi...of the same in subsequent judgments also. In Uma Devi (supra) it has been specifically held that all other judgments and directions contrary to this stands denuded. The present direction for regularisation could...not have been given on 21.11.2008 after pronouncement in Uma Devi (supra).10. The order under appeal dated 26.7.2012 is set aside. The appeal stands allowed....

...appointed as per the constitutional scheme." The directions issued in Uma Devi have been considered by subsequent benches of this Court. In State of Karnataka v. M L Kesari9, a two-judge bench of this Court held that the "one-time measure" prescribed in Uma Devi must be considered as concluded only when all employees who were entitled for regularisation under...Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi (3)6 was delivered on 10 April, 2006. The submission which has been urged on...behalf of the respondents by Ms. Preetika Dwivedi is that the applicability of Uma Devi has been considered in two decisions of this Court in Malathi Das v. Suresh7and...

...this Court has consistently held that such an employee is not entitled to get temporary status or regularisation. Uma Devi quote supra also stands against such a proposition...natural justice. She also seeks a declaration that she is entitled to be conferred with temporary status regularisation of service, recognition 32 years of service and that too for long time as full time..., as scavenger and all types of odd works were done by her for over 32 years. All her representations for granting temporary status and regularisation were not considered seriously and her abrupt...

...learned State counsels have submitted that as settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Uma Devi, (Supra) the theory of "legitimate expectation" for regularisation cannot be...frame a scheme for regularisation. Uma Devi does not denude the State or its instrumentalities from framing a scheme for regularisation. In paragraph 53 of the decision, this Court held as follows...to the contractual CDPO's in violation of the ratio laid down by the Constitutional Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka -vs- Uma Devi (3...

...permanent, those not duly appointed as per the constitutional scheme." 19. The directions issued in Uma Devi have been considered by subsequent benches of this Court. In State of Karnataka v. M L Kesari, a two-Judge Bench of this Court held that the "one-time measure" prescribed in Uma Devi must be considered as concluded only when all employees who were entitled for regularisation under...regularisation in terms of the above directions in Umadevi as a one-time measure. "20. The judgment of this Court in Uma Devi does not preclude the claims of employees who seek regularization after the exercise...has been undertaken with respect to some employees, provided that the said employees have completed the years of service as mandated by Uma Devi. The ruling casts an obligation on the State and its...

.... Uma Devi, 2006 (4) SCC page 1, Hon'ble Supreme Court, while considering its earlier decision, held that the public posts can be...HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral).The petitioner has claimed regularisation of his services on completion of 240 days of service. It is asserted that petitioner was initially...Singh, AIR 1992 Supreme Court 2130. The State Government was directed to frame a policy for regularisation.Subsequently, in Secretary, State of Karnataka v...

...constitutional scheme." 19. The directions issued in Uma Devi have been considered by subsequent benches of this Court. In State of Karnataka v. M L Kesari, a two-Judge Bench of this Court held that the "one-time measure" prescribed in Uma Devi must be considered as concluded only when all employees who were entitled for regularisation under...Uma Devi, had been...one-time measure. "20. The judgment of this Court in Uma Devi does not preclude the claims of employees who seek regularization after the exercise has been undertaken with respect to some employees...

...para 53 of the judgment in the case of Uma Devi (supra). 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the paper book with their able assistance. Their Lordships' of Hon'ble the Supreme Court In the case of Uma Devi (supra) has deprecated regularisation of...petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to frame a scheme of regularisation in accordance with the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Uma Devi (supra) and if...the Constitution Bench of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v. Uma Devi and others, others...

...(Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi (3)) for regularisation of daily wage employees who may have completed ten years of service, the State Government issued circular dated 5.3.2008...: "We therefore sum up our conclusions and answer the reference as follows:- A) Uma Devi (supra) prohibits regularisation of...daily wage in light of Uma Devi (supra) referred to a Full Bench in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.267 of 2010 and 472 of 2010, dated 1.2.2013 for answering a reference if (2010) 9 SCC 247...

...well as the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi, the petitioner is entitled for regularisation. When...

...to not only override the judgement of the Court, but also deliberately flouting the order of the Court. The Committee has relied on the judgement of Supreme Court in Uma Devi v. State of Karnataka-(2006) 4 SCC 1 alleging that petitioner being part time employee could not be considered for regularisation. The...of Uma Devi, supra was cited on behalf of the respondents even during 2 the course of arguments in the writ petition, especially with reference to observations made in para 53 of the judgement that...argument also observed that the observations of Supreme Court in para 53 of the judgement of Uma Devi, supra that while computing period of ten years, the period during which the employee has been...

...Supreme Court 2130. The State Government was directed to frame a policy for regularisation.Subsequently, in Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi...HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral).The petitioner has claimed regularisation of his services on completion of 240 days of service. It is asserted that petitioner was appointed on...regularisation of the services.In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed....

...Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi reported in (2006 )4 SCC 1 directed to consider the case of such employees by framing a policy and to regularise them. Despite submitting representation Annexure P/5, no steps have been taken while other similarly situated persons are serving after their regularisation. In...of the Apex Court in the case of Uma Devi (Supra) and as per the policy framed by the Government. The aforesaid exercise be completed within a period of four months. Needless to say that if the petitioner is found entitled for regularisation, appropriate...regularised during such period but despite rendering more than 23 years of service, his case for regularisation has not been considered. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Secretary State of...

...be granted in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Teja Singh v. B.S.N.L. and Secretary and State of Karnataka & Ors. v. Uma Devi (3) & Ors. - 2006 (4) SCC 1. According to respondents as per the law as exists at present, regularisation of...respondents Nos. 1 to 3 submitted that the law laid down by the Apex Court in Uma Devi (supra) prohibited regularisation and absorption of casual and temporary workers. Mr. Hariraj referred to paragraph 53 of...scheme." 10. This would show that Uma Devi is not laying down any law totally prohibiting the absorption or regularisation of temporary workers who have put in continuous...

...judgment in Uma Devi (supra) regularisations have been, done in a pick and choose manner.3. Counsel for the State supported the impugned order urging that the order dated 18.5.1983 itself states that regularisation was...principles settled by this Court in the cases abovereferred to and in the light of this judgment.”9. The judgment in Uma Devi (supra) at para 43† expressly holds that daily wagers do not hold any post and the question of their regularisation does...instruments to facilitate the bypassing of the constitutional and statutory mandates.”10. The judgment in Uma Devi (supra) was pronounced on 10.4.2006 CWJC No. 10660 of 1996 preferred by the petitioners earlier came to be disposed on 28.9.2010 directing consideration of their claims under Uma Devi (supra) when the petitioners clearly fell in the exceptions observed in the case of Uma Devi (supra) not entitled for regularisation. It...

...law as settled by the Constitution Bench in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi (supra) as to which of such affected employees are fit for regularisation in terms of...us, Shiva Kirti Singh, J. in which reliance was placed upon the aforesaid Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi for directing the State Government to consider the cases of petitioners of that case for regularisation as...the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi, reported in 2006 (2) PLJR (SC) 363 shall govern the cases of the affected employees and...

...not be regularised in any circumstances. The Apex Court is following the said view consistently. It has been further observed in Uma Devi (3) (supra) that regularisation of such type of candidates not...Court being the sentinel and guardian of Constitution should not allow any such regularisation of service. Relying upon Uma Devi (3) (supra) in the case of...2008 (10) SCC 1 the Apex Court held that Uma Devi (3) (supra), a constitution judgment, has full binding effect and contra view as taken in the case of...

...(2006) 4 SCC 1 (Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi). In pursuance thereof, the Executive Engineer considered case of petitioners and approved their regularisation, vide...the petitioner are being taken for temporary period during the rainy reason and after close of work, they are paid their wages accordingly, clearly shows they are seasonal worker, in terms of Uma Devi...seasonal employees and they do not fulfill requisite qualification in terms of Uma Devi case (supra), admittedly the appointments of the petitioners have not been made after due advertisement of...

...Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi [(2005) 4 SCC 1]. The learned Single Judge further permitted the writ petitioner to submit a representation to the respondents therein for regularisation of...judgment in Uma Devi bars regularisation of illegal or backdoor appointments but permits consideration of employees in irregular appointments who have served long against sanctioned posts...to approach this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that the writ petitioner/respondent herein was not entitled to regularisation of her services...