Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court2034
+ Karnataka High Court1459
+ Delhi High Court840
+ Allahabad High Court624
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal617
+ Madras High Court518
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court437
+ Telangana High Court412
+ Calcutta High Court374
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court294
+ Patna High Court283
+ Kerala High Court269
+ Supreme Court Of India258
+ CESTAT241
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal210
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court209
+ Gauhati High Court204
+ Rajasthan High Court195
+ Gujarat High Court186
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court151
+ Orissa High Court123
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission88
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission85
+ National Green Tribunal76
+ Jharkhand High Court74
+ Central Information Commission67
+ Uttarakhand High Court65
+ National Company Law Tribunal60
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal43
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission38
+ Chhattisgarh High Court36
+ Central Administrative Tribunal34
+ SEBI27
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court24
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal22
+ Company Law Board19
+ Competition Commission Of India19
+ Tripura High Court19
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity17
+ Board of Revenue14
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property13
+ Armed Forces Tribunal11
+ Privy Council9
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal8
+ Sikkim High Court8
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission7
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange6
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act6
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal6
+ Meghalaya High Court5
+ Manipur High Court4
+ RERA4
+ District Court3
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board3
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India2
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction2
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST1
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission1
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority1
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards5333
From 2011 To 20203546
From 2001 To 2010650
From 1991 To 2000287
From 1981 To 1990179
From 1971 To 198095
From 1961 To 197074
From 1951 To 196049
Before 195063

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...02.08.2011 and 20.09.2011. The first order dismissed an execution petition (EP 38/1998); the other two orders rejected the application for recall of that order, under Section 151, and the...sufficient cause in filing the application 438/2011 (under Section 151 CPC for recall of order) as explained in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act (E....conclusive and of the kind contemplated in Order 21 Rule 106 (3). The application for recall of order under Section 151 was, therefore maintainable. The learned single judge shal...

...party the right to appeal. Therefore the question of whether there was sufficient cause in filing the application 438/2011 (under Section 151 CPC for recall of order) as explained in the ...Order 21 Rule 106(3). The application for recall of order under Section 151 was, therefore, maintainable. The learned Single Judge shall now decide whether the ...cause for the delay in filing I.A 438/2011 (under Section 151 CPC) - seeking the setting aside of the order dated 31.03.2011 All rights and contentions of the parties on this aspect are expressly...

...recall of that order, under Section 151, and the review of the order rejecting the recall application. 1 ...depriving the aggrieved party the right to appeal. Therefore the question of whether there was sufficient cause in filing the application 438/2011 (under Section 151 CPC for recall of ...discussion, it is held that the order dated 31.03.2011 dismissing the execution cannot be treated as conclusive and of the kind contemplated in Order 21 Rule 106 (3). The application for recall of ...

...recall of that order, under Section 151, and the review of the order rejecting the recall application. 1 ...depriving the aggrieved party the right to appeal. Therefore the question of whether there was sufficient cause in filing the application 438/2011 (under Section 151 CPC for recall of ...discussion, it is held that the order dated 31.03.2011 dismissing the execution cannot be treated as conclusive and of the kind contemplated in Order 21 Rule 106 (3). The application for recall of ...

...NO.12 UNDER ORDER 18 RULE 17 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC TO RECALL DW1 FOR FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION AND ONE MORE APPLICATION NUMBERED AS IA NO.13 ... SECTION 151 OF THE CPC SEEKING RECALL THE ORDER DTD.4.3.2016, ONE MORE APPLICATION IA NO.14 FILED UNDER SECTION ....21.3.2016 AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO CROSS EXAMINE DW2 AND APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 18 RULE 17 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CPC NUMBERED AS ...

...obtaining no objection certificate of his previous counsel. He filed application in I.A No. 2 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to recall the ...the order dated 16.09.20154. The Court below is seized of the matter and I.A No. 2 filed by the present, petition under Section 151 of CPC to recall the order date...order-sheet.2. The order-sheet of the court below discloses that respondent No. 1 and his advocate, at the intervention of the Court, had amicably settled the matter whereby the...

...objection certificate of his previous counsel. He filed application in I.A. No.2 under Section 151 : 3 : of the Code of Civil Procedure to recall the ...order dated 16.09.2015. 4. The Court below is seized of the matter and I.A. No.2 filed by the present petition under Section 151 of CPC to recall the order date.... 2. The order-sheet of the court below discloses that respondent No.1 and his advocate, at the intervention of the Court, had amicably settled the matter whereby the appellant also...

...Order VII Rule 14(3) r/w Section 151 of CPC to receive document filed along with petition. I.A. No. 53 of 2022 was filed under Order XVIII Rule 17 r/w Section 151 ...of marking documents. I.A. No. 52 of 2022 was filed under Order Section 151 of CPC to reopen the suit for the purpose of recalling P.W.1 5. Trial Cou...respectively. 6. This Court dismissed the C.R.P. No. 525 of 2022, which is filed against the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A. No. 54 of 2022, which was filed under Order VII...

...Order VII Rule 14(3) r/w Section 151 of CPC to receive document filed along with petition. I.A. No. 53 of 2022 was filed under Order XVIII Rule 17 r/w Section 151 ...of marking documents. I.A. No. 52 of 2022 was filed under Order Section 151 of CPC to reopen the suit for the purpose of recalling P.W.1 5. Trial Cou...respectively. 6. This Court dismissed the C.R.P. No. 525 of 2022, which is filed against the order dated 22.02.2022 in I.A. No. 54 of 2022, which was filed under Order VII...

...the 4 respondent therein and no notice was served on him, he filed applications under Section 151 of CPC, under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC and application under Section ..., by which the 1 respondent rejected the request of the petitioner to take on record the applications filed to recall the order dated 05.01.2021 in view of the fact that case No. MUN/RP/9/2019 is already..., Bengaluru North Taluk, the 2 respondent approached the 1 respondent under Section 178A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (for short ‘the Act’). It is the case of the petitioner that no...

...for arguments. At that stage, the applications, namely I.A.Nos.9 to 13 were filed by the plaintiffs i.e., I.A No.9 under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908, (CPC) to reopen the ...under Order XVIII Rule 17 r/w Section 151 of CPC to recall PW2 to lead further evidence, I.A No.12 under Order VII Rule 14(3) r/w ...HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; ORDER Petitioners are plaintiffs Nos.1(a) to (c) in O.S No.3020/2005 pending on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District...

..., petitioners filed following three applications; • Application dated 10.11.2016 under Section 151 of CPC to recall the order of proclamation; ... • Application dated 10.11.2016 under Order XXI Rule 26(1) read with Section 151 of CPC for stay of execution proceedings; and ..., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A IN...

...the Constitution of India has been filed by petitioners seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) City, Varanasi for expeditious disposal of recall application filed by petitioner under Order 9 Rule 9 ...in default on 25.9.2023. The recall application has been filed by the plaintiffs-petitioners under Order 9 Rule 9 read with Section 151 C.P.C. for recalling of order dated 25.9.2023 which...recall application. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and without commenting on the merits of the case, learned trial court i.e. Civil Judge (J.D.) City, Varanasi is directed t...

...28.06.2018 passed on I.A.No.5 filed under Section 151 of CPC to recall the order dated 05.03.2014 and to permit him to file written statement. 2. The suit...defendant No.5 filed I.A.No.5 under Section 151 of CPC praying to recall the order dated 05.03.2014 and permit him to file written statement in the suit. In support ...The petitioner, who is defendant No.5 in O.S.No.1267/2013 is before this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questioning the order dated...

...under Order 9 Rule 13 under section 151 C.P.C. for cancellation of expartee order dated 02/07/2014 and Decree passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, South, Unnao in Regular Suit No. 2... Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24004 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2376 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bipin Mishra And 2 Others.... 2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief: "i) Pass an order or direction thereby direct the opposite party no. 1 to consider and decide the application for recall...

...') - 3 - have filed this petition challenging an order dated 02.06.2022, by which an application under Section 151 ...-examine PW.1 were rejected. Defendants have also challenged an order dated 06.06.2022 passed by the Trial Court by which an application filed by them under Section 151 of CPC to reopen the stage ...the plaintiff. At this stage, defendant Nos.1 to 6 filed an application under Section 151 of CPC to reopen the stage of the case and another application under Order XVIII Rule 17 read wit...

...direction in the nature of mandamus directing the court below / Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh to decide the Recall Application under Order 39 Rule 4 read with section 151 ...the recall application under Order 39 Rule 4 read with section 151 of C.P.C. filed by the petitioner in Case No. 514/2021 (Masroor Ahmad and others vs. Zulfiqar Ahmad and others),...prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditous disposal of application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is...

...provisions of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 for payment of deficit stamp duty and the penalty; the Act apparently does not provide for recall of such order...adverse decree as provided under Section 105 read with Order XLIII Rule 1A of the Code. All the observations hereinabove being confined to disposal of the writ petition, do not bar the...Petitioner being the plaintiff in a declaration suit in O.S.No.31/2007 is invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court for assailing the order dated 03.07.2019 made by the learned...

...application dated 26.5.2014 filed on behalf of the petitioner/defendant under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to recall the order dated 29.5...application on 26.5.2014 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the court of Sub Judge-III, Patna, to recall the order dated 29.5.2012 and...ORAL ORDERHeard the parties.This application, under Article 227 of the...

...22.01.2014 to dismiss the suit as not pressed. Taking said memo on record, suit came to be dismissed by order dated 21.02.2014. Seeking recall of this order an application came to be filed under ...21.02.2014 - Annexure-D is not that of the counsel representing plaintiff. Plaintiff also does not state that he had not authorised his Advocate as per Vakalathnama. As such, neither the order of dismissal of...suit passed on 21.02.2014 and refusal to recall the said order by rejecting the application dated 01.04.2014 filed by plaintiff would call for interference by this Court. No grounds made out. Hence...