CiteTEXT
...) in his evidence, it is stated, did not clear the position as to whether the memo of partition dated 12.5.1989 and rapat roznamcha which was got entered with the Halqa Patwari on 29.7.1994 bears his...signatures. The case set up by the plaintiffs-respondents is that the suit property was partitioned between the parties by way of a memo of partition dated 12.5.1989 Rapat roznamcha in this regard was...got entered with the Halqa Patwari. The defendant-1 in his written statement did not deny his signatures on the memo of partition dated 12.5.1989 and rapat roznamcha that was entered with the Halqa...
...Rameshwar Singh Malik, J. (Oral):— Feeling aggrieved against the Rapat Roznamcha dated 21.05.2015 (Annexure P-8), whereby possession of Shamlat land of the Gram Panchayat, Sudan, was taken...Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the Rapat Roznamcha dated 21.05.2015 (Annexure P-8) entered by the Patwari Halqa....2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.3. A bare reading of the impugned Rapat Roznamcha dated 21.05.2015 (Annexure P-8) would show that Patwari has recorded only the proceedings...
...whereby suit for permanent injunction has been dismissed and RSA No. 5586 of 2014 has been filed by the appellant-defendant for setting aside of the decree whereby Rapat roznamcha dated 1.9.2008 has been...with consequential relief of declaration setting aside of the rapat roznamcha dated 1.9.2008 had been filed. However, both the courts below have erroneously declined the relief of permanent injunction...rapat roznamcha by giving liberty to the parties to seek partition.7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants-defendants submits in RSA No. 5586 of 2014 submits that...
...filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners for exhibiting copy of Rapat Roznamcha No. 303 dated 18.05.1957 was dismissed.2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs/petitioners filed...from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs.3. In the evidence of the plaintiffs, they moved an application to exhibit a copy of Rapat Roznamcha. Prior thereto the...plaintiffs had filed application on 12.02.2013 for summoning of the witness i.e. Halqa Patwari, Sadhuwala with rapat roznamcha in question. The application was allowed and process fee along with diet...
...Inderjit Singh, J.This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying for quashing of Rapat Roznamcha No. 23 dated 3.9.2013 registered...(Annexure-P.2).The Rapat Roznamcha has been registered on the statement of Sahab Singh for the above mentioned offences as the accused-petitioners attacked him with their respective weapons...from any side and he has no objection if the above Rapat Roznamcha in the above FIR is quashed.Learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from the Investigating Officer...
...Dharuhera to join his new place of posting. He reported at the Bank as Guard on the same day at 2:50 p.m. Entry to that effect was made in the Rapat Roznamcha of the Bank. Charge of the previous place of...the same day. On 23.6.1992, at 8:05 a.m., he reached at the Bank. An entry to this effect was made in Rapat Roznamcha of the Bank. After performing his duties at the Bank, the petitioner left for...Dharuhera on 23.6.1992 at 6:15 p.m. and entry to that effect was made in the Rapat Roznamcha of the Bank. After handing over the charge of the investigation pending with the petitioner at Dharuhera, the...
...defendant No.3-Nitta Singh. In order to prove that fact, the plaintiff produced on file an affidavit of Nitta Singh and a copy of the Rapat Roznamcha incorporating the name of Nitta Singh. However, that...Rapat Roznamcha was not signed by any revenue official. Still further, the plaintiff has also produced on record copies of certain Khasra Girdwaries recording him to be in possession. First Appellate...
...counsel for private respondents, dispute has been amicably settled. In terms thereof, parties have entered into compromise. However, rapat roznamcha has not been entered by the concerned authority. In order...to finally bury the hatchet, it will be necessary if entries are made in rapat roznamcha. Learned State counsel prays for some time to seek instructions. He may seek instructions from respondent No...
...the year 2003-04; Khasra Girdawari for the year 2003-04 as Ex.P-4; copy of Rapat Roznamcha No. 384 as Ex.P-5; Jamabandi for the year 2008-09 as Ex.P6 and Khasra Girdawari for the period from 24.10.2008...permanent injunction restraining the other co-sharer from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff over the suit land. The learned Courts below failed to consider the Rapat Roznamcha No. 384...through the case file.8. In this case, the plaintiff-appellant has relied upon the rapat roznamcha No. 384, Ex.P5, to show that the plaintiff is in possession of the suit land to the...
...vide rapat roznamcha No. 398 of this date. Thereafter, on 14.6.1986 these respondents mischievously filed the petition under section 145 of the code. The SDM without applying his mind has passed both...produced copy of rapat roznamcha No. 398 dated 27.5.1986 before the learned SDM that was a conclusive proof that they are in possession of the disputed property. The correctness of that rapat roznamcha was...appeal against the said order, which was dismissed by the Collector on 8.4.1986. Vide repeat roznamcha No. 398 dated 27.5.1986, possession of the disputed land was re- delivered to the petitioners...
...affirmed in appeal by the Additional District Judge, Mewat. The sole submission made by counsel is that as the respondents/plaintiffs did not examine a witness to prove rapat roznamcha No.408 containing...- defendant have not disputed ownership of the respondents/plaintiffs but a plea was raised that defendant was mortgagee over the suit land. On the basis of rapat roznamcha No.408 Ex.P4..., revenue entries were corrected in favour of the respondents/plaintiffs. Indisputably, the appellant till date has neither challenged correctness of the rapat roznamcha nor the subsequent entries made in the...
.... Rapat Roznamcha (entry in the diary of the revenue official) with regard to the aforesaid exchange was duly entered at Sr.No. 235 dated 28.5.1985. Both the parties had signed that Rapat Roznamcha. Pursuant...the Rapat Roznamcha records partition as well as exchange. He submitted that there cannot be joint entry with regard to partition and exchange of the property. 8. This Court has...
...money of Rs. 10,500/-. If at all Rapat Roznamcha Ex.P9 was in favour of the plaintiffs, nothing prevented them to seek specific performance, thus, they cannot take the benefit of...- Rapat Roznamcha is of 1990 reflecting their possession, whereas, suit has been filed on 18.10.2006. In my view, the plaintiffs have failed to prove the execution of the oral agreement to sell, much...am of the view that Ex.P9 - Rapat Roznamcha is the document which shows that the plaintiffs had been put in possession. The document, i.e., khasra girdawari, which is of 2009 itself is a sufficient...
...therein which is reflected in the rapat Roznamcha (Annexure P-5), in my view, the final decree has to be passed in accordance with the same particulars of the khasra number instead of calling upon the...trial Court is directed to pass the final decree in terms of the rapat Roznamcha (Annexure P-5), whereby the petitioners-plaintiffs have been granted symbolic possession in accordance with law.7. With the aforesaid ob...Roznamcha with regard to the symbolic possession of the property. He submits that the impugned order, in view of the aforementioned facts, is not sustainable as it tantamounts to going behind the decree...
...the revisional Court has wrongly observed in a para of the order that rapat roznamcha dated 5.3.2012 indicates that only two persons had inflicted injuries to the complainant and his wife and that no...along with MLR as Annexure P5 and Annexure P4, respectively.I have gone through the rapat roznamcha and the order passed by the revisional Court. The revisional Court has observed that...
...of 2015.2. The petitioners pray for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to restrain the respondents from dispossessing the petitioners by relying upon Rapat Roznamcha (Annexure...Panchayat submits that the petition under Section 11 of the Act, 1961, has also been dismissed on 31.3.2015 The Gram Panchayat has taken possession as is apparent from the Rapat Roznamcha (Annexure P-8...
...unauthorized occupants vide Rapat Roznamcha Waqiati No. 145 dated 1.12.2007 It was much earlier to the passing of the aforementioned order of stay. Along with reply, copy of Rapat Roznamcha Waqiati No. 145...
...the possession of the land acquires was also taken over by the Revenue Department vide Rapat Roznamcha No. 455 dated August 31, 1985 (copy Annexure R-2) and also Rapat Roznamcha No. 376 dated June 15...Section 4 of the Act was done in accordance with law. The original Rapat Roznamcha was produced today in Court. Its copy was already produced along with the return as Annexure R-5. After perusal of...the Rapat Roznamcha in original, it could not be successfully argued on behalf of the petitioners that there was no Munadi of the notification under Section 4 of the Act in the area concerned. As...
...absolute owner of the property and the possession was delivered to him by the competent authorities i.e Tehsildar (Sales), vide rapat roznamcha No. 145 dated 8.2.1985 in respect of 9 kanal 7 marla of...land and vide rapat roznamcha No. 21 dated 20.9.1985 in respect of 16 kanal 19 marla of land. In pursuance of delivery of possession vide the aforesaid rapat roznamcha entries, the plaintiff came into...tenants since the time of their forefathers. Their possession was continuing and as such, the suit itself was not maintainable. The rapat roznamcha entries were claimed to be false and fabricated and...
..., as alleged and the alleged Rapat Roznamcha delivering the possession in his favour is nothing but collusion between the plaintiff-respondent and the revenue authorities. It is the further case of the...is that no possession was delivered to the respondent in pursuance of the alleged partition proceedings and the Rapat Roznamcha is only a paper transaction, whereas there is enough evidence on record...been quashed. Moreover, it could not be disputed that the Rapat Roznamcha delivering possession in favour of the plaintiff-respondent in pursuance of the partition proceedings has been placed on record...