Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court153
+ Delhi High Court91
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission88
+ Madras High Court68
+ Bombay High Court66
+ Gujarat High Court56
+ Calcutta High Court50
+ Karnataka High Court44
+ Allahabad High Court43
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal41
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court40
+ Rajasthan High Court38
+ Gauhati High Court29
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court28
+ Kerala High Court21
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court14
+ Orissa High Court14
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal13
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal12
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission11
+ Chhattisgarh High Court9
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal9
+ National Company Law Tribunal9
+ Supreme Court Of India9
+ Telangana High Court9
+ CESTAT8
+ Central Administrative Tribunal8
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court8
+ Patna High Court8
+ Uttarakhand High Court5
+ Jharkhand High Court2
+ Meghalaya High Court2
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal2
+ Tripura High Court2
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board1
+ Manipur High Court1
+ National Green Tribunal1
+ Sikkim High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards361
From 2011 To 2020372
From 2001 To 2010114
From 1991 To 200068
From 1981 To 199056
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...the matter to avoid being thrown out unheard. In Rafiq v. Munshilal...

...Rafiq v. Munshilal (1981) 2 SCC 788...attention was not invited to the decision of this Court in Rafiq v. Munshilal...by its judgment and order dated March 3, 1992 allowed the appeal mainly relying upon the decision of this Court in Rafiq (1981) 2 SCC...

...for restoration of appeal and to hear it on merits. Without dilating upon this point, relying on the decision of this Court in Rafiq v.... Munshilal (1981) 2 SCC 788 we think that the appellant's appeal which was admitted by the High Court should have been heard on merits after giving an opportunity to engage another advocate...

...Rafiq v. Munshilal, AIR 1981 SC 1400, and contended that the application be allowed. The application was vehemently opposed by Shri Mukati, learned counsel for the...Rafiq v. Munshilal, AIR 1981 SC 1400, 1401 : "The disturbing feature of the case is that under our present...

.... and Rafiq v. Munshilal . AIR 1981 SC 1400..2. From a...

...Rafiq v. Munshilal [(1981) 2 SCC 788...

...Rafiq v. Munshilal reported in AIR 1981 SC 1400.Both the applications being CAN 9619 of 2011 and CAN 9620 of 2011...

....14. In Rafiq v. Munshilal (1981) 2 SCC 788 this Court has also drawn the same conclusion while...

...arguments advanced, after perusing the petition, so also keeping in view the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the matter of Rafiq...& another Vs. Munshilal & another reported in AIR 1981 SC 1400 holding that the party should not suffer for misdemeanour or inaction of his counsel, I am satisfied that sufficient cause is...

...the matter of Rafiq and Another vs. Munshilal & Another reported in AIR 1981 SC 1400, that the litigant should not...

...prolong litigations on one pretext or the other. Reference in this behalf may be made to Rafiq v. Munshilal, AIR 1981 SC 1400...

..., normally, a party should not suffer on account of default or non-appearance of the advocate.25. In Rafiq v.... Munshilal (1981) 2 SCC 788 the High Court disposed of the appeal preferred by the appellant in the absence of his counsel. When the appellant came to know of the fact that his appeal had been disposed of...aside the order passed by the High Court and remanding the matter for fresh disposal in accordance with law, this Court stated: (Rafiq case (1981) 2 SCC 788)“3...

....8. The Appellate Court apparently did not consider the law as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Rafiq v. Munshilal...

...Rafiq v. Munshilal . What applies to a private litigant will apply with equal, if not more, force to the State Government as a litigant. Its right of...

...evidence produced in support of the same. In case of (1) Rafiq v. Munshilal reported in...desired, it could have called the ‘Pashi’ Register for its own satisfaction.7. In the case of Rafiq v. Munshilal (supra...

...“Rafiq v. Munshilal” AIR 1981 SC 1400 to contend that the interest of the party should not suffer for misdemeanor or inaction of his counsel as the petitioner is...dismissing the application for restoration of the objections in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rafiq (Supra).Accordingly, the impugned order is hereby set...

...advocate for applicant to take appropriate steps in the matter. She sought to draw support from the judgment of the Apex Court in case of Rafiq v.... Munshilal (1981) 2 SCC 788 , A.I.R. 1981 Supreme Court 1400 so as to substantiate her contention that for default on the part of the lawyer, a litigant need not suffer...

...Rafiq v. Munshilal, AIR 1981 SC 1400.4. Having gone through the aforesaid judgment I find that it was a case of appeal. In the present case, it was fixed on 03.09.2004...

...Rafiq v. Munshilal, AIR 1981 SC 1400. This order shall not be construed as a precedent in any other case and is confined only to the facts of the present case...

...MCC for the reasons stated in it so also keeping in view the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Rafiq Vs. Munshilal, AIR 1981 SC...