Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Jharkhand High Court7141
+ Chhattisgarh High Court2684
+ Patna High Court2536
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court1944
+ Allahabad High Court1649
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1620
+ Central Information Commission1429
+ Rajasthan High Court1293
+ Delhi High Court872
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court835
+ Bombay High Court807
+ Calcutta High Court692
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court682
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal593
+ Gujarat High Court477
+ National Green Tribunal387
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission328
+ Supreme Court Of India305
+ Telangana High Court303
+ Karnataka High Court265
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission264
+ Gauhati High Court233
+ Madras High Court223
+ CESTAT221
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court215
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal209
+ Uttarakhand High Court190
+ Kerala High Court159
+ National Company Law Tribunal159
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission142
+ Orissa High Court131
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court102
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal96
+ SEBI70
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission56
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity40
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act37
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority31
+ RERA31
+ Tripura High Court31
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal16
+ Armed Forces Tribunal15
+ Meghalaya High Court14
+ Manipur High Court12
+ Competition Commission Of India11
+ Sikkim High Court10
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal9
+ Company Law Board8
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal8
+ Railway Claims Tribunal7
+ District Court6
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange5
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board3
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST2
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST2
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction2
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Commissioner (Appeals)1
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal1
+ Copyright Board1
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards18781
From 2011 To 20209081
From 2001 To 2010642
From 1991 To 200019
From 1981 To 19904
From 1971 To 19802
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19501

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...preeti Gupta State of Jharkhand t hclcl that the Courts have to scrutinize the allegations rnacle n,ith great ca_re and crrcumspection, especiallv against husband,s relatives who were living in... [ 3251 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF...Srihari Reddy, -aged about. 36 years. R/o, Ptot ttto. 41, Flat No. 301, Jyoti Manor, Sri Nagar Colony' Hyderabad' 2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public...

...preeti Gupta State of Jharkhand t hclcl that the Courts have to scrutinize the allegations rnacle n,ith great ca_re and crrcumspection, especiallv against husband,s relatives who were living in... [ 3251 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF...Srihari Reddy, -aged about. 36 years. R/o, Ptot ttto. 41, Flat No. 301, Jyoti Manor, Sri Nagar Colony' Hyderabad' 2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public...

...on the authority of the decisions of this Court in Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (2010) 7 SCC 667.... (2010) 9 SCC 368, State Of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi . (2005) 1 SCC...568, Onkar Nath Mishra v. State (NCT of Delhi...

...Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (2010) 7 SCC 667, Ramgopal v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 13 SCC 540.... Referring to Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 281, Preeti...Magistrates, but, if the Magistrates themselves accede to the bare requests of the police without examining the actual state of affairs, it would create negative effects thereby, the very purpose of the...

....”14. Further in Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (2010) 7 SCC 667, it has also been observ...which a preliminary enquiry may be made, as mandated by this Court in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P...within the existing framework.”Contention made by Respondent 1 State of Bihar7. Respondent 1 herein i.e. the State of Bihar...

...Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand, (2010) 7 SCC 667, has observed that tendency of implicating the husband and all his immediate re...Hon'ble U.C Dhyani, J.The petitioner, by means of this petition, seeks to issue writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R registered as Crime No. 180...of 2013, under Sections 498-A and 506 I.P.C and ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun.As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to...

...Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand 2010 (4) Recent Criminal Reports 45 that in the cases arising out of matrimonial case, there is a...Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the...registered at Police Station Nakodar, Jalandhar, under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC (Annexure P1) has been lodged. It is further stated that petitioner No. 1-Ranjit Kaur is wife of elder brother of the...

...offence under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.It was pointed out that in such situation, the Supreme Court in a case of State of Delhi v. Ram Avtar @ Rama...rendered in a case of Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (supra) is concerned, the fact appears to be somewhat different wherein the...Kumar Meen v. State of Punjab [2011 (6) Supreme 131] quashed the F.I.R after finding that complaint made by the wife, respondent no. 2 does not make out a case under Section 498A...

...been summoned to stand trial. The learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon Preeti Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand...husband of the complainant. It is contended that the investigating agency came to conclusion that no offence has been committed by Jitendra, Gopal Ram brothers of Deepak Dhakad husband of complainant and...Basanti and Kiran @ Bhullan wife of brothers of husband. The learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that without any justifiable reasons, petitioners no. 2 to 5 have...

...the petitioners drew the attention of this Court towards the ruling of Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand, (2010) 7 SCC 667...U.C Dhyani, J. (Oral)1. By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of the...Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the FIR No. 43 of 2013, dated 11.03.2013, at 5:35 p.m, relating to offences punishable under...

....14. In Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand [(2010) 7 SCC 667], this Court noted that the tendency to implic..., as we are not concerned with Nimish. Bhawna went on to state that her husband and mother-in-law had complaints with her and her parents on the issue of dowry and that they started harassing her...of such petition [See Joseph Salvaraj A. v. State of Gujarat ((2011) 7 SCC 59)]. This principle was reiterated in...

...; K. Subba Rao v. State of Telangana, (2018) 14 SCC 452; Rajesh Sharma v. ... THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS O R D E R Heard the learned counsel... 4 See - Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and others v. State of Bihar and others, (2022) 6...

....4. Petitioner no.6 is unmarried sister of husband of the complainant. The learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon Preeti Gupta vs. ...Section 313 Cr.P.C. and at the time of delivery of the judgment. b) That in the undertaking filed the petitioners No. 2 and 3 shall specifically state that..., considering the age and relationship of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, their personal appearance before the trial court is exempted subject to following conditions:- a) That the...

...has relied upon Preeti Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand, 2010 AIR 3363 to contend that the complainant has widened the net and had involved...Cr.P.C. and at the time of delivery of the judgment. b) That in the undertaking filed the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 shall specifically state that any evidence recorded in their...mother-in-law respectively of the complainant/respondent no.2. Hence, the present petition on behalf of the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 is dismissed. However, considering the age and...

...Apex Court in Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand(2010) 7 SCC 667 that it is a matter of common experience that most of the ...Hon'ble U.C Dhyani, J. (Oral)1. The petitioner, by means of present Criminal Writ Petition under...Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks to quash the impugned F.I.R registered as case crime No. 194 of 2013 under Sections 498-A, 3...

.... (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3917/2018] Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon Preeti Gupta & Anr. Vs State of Jharkhand &...under Section 313 Cr.P.C. (b) That in the undertaking filed the petitioners No.2 and 3 shall specifically state that any evidence recorded in their absence, but in presence of their.... However, considering the age and relationship of petitioner Nos.2 and 3, their personal appearance before the trial court is exempted subject to following conditions:- (a) That the...

.... (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3983/2018] Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon Preeti Gupta & Anr. Vs State of Jharkhand &...of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. (b) That in the undertaking filed the petitioner No.2 shall specifically state that any evidence recorded in his absence, but in presence of...been leveled against them. However, considering the age and relationship of petitioner Nos.2 his personal appearance before the trial court is exempted subject to following...

...separately from them (Gazala Parveen and Taufeeq Ahmed). Learned counsel for the petitioner placed the ruling of Preeti Gupta v. State of ...Lal Kamlend Pratap Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh(2009) 4 SCC 437.4. Acceding to the prayer of the learned...U.C Dhyani, J. (Oral)1. The petitioner, by way of present criminal writ petition moved under...

...husband of the complainant (nanad).4. Counsel appearing for the petitioners has relied upon the case of Preeti Gupta v. State ...Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.:— After hearing ld. counsel appearing for the petitioners & ld. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and going through the contents of the impugned F.I.R...further state in the undertaking that the evidence of the witnesses recorded in their absence but in the presence of their Counsel shall be binding upon them.C. That in the undertaking, so...

....4. Learned counsel for the petitioners drew the attention of this Court towards the ruling of Preeti Gupta v. State of ...U.C Dhyani, J. (Oral)1. By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of the...Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the FIR dated 07.02.2013 registered as case crime no. 47 of 2013 relating to offences punishable under Sections 498...