Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Allahabad High Court13391
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court6478
+ Gujarat High Court4744
+ Karnataka High Court2231
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court2030
+ Rajasthan High Court1793
+ Delhi High Court1207
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1178
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1178
+ Madras High Court1046
+ Bombay High Court925
+ Kerala High Court799
+ Patna High Court591
+ Uttarakhand High Court495
+ Gauhati High Court275
+ Meghalaya High Court222
+ Calcutta High Court198
+ Jharkhand High Court188
+ Sikkim High Court180
+ Tripura High Court172
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court87
+ Supreme Court Of India85
+ Telangana High Court81
+ Orissa High Court67
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court60
+ Manipur High Court28
+ Central Administrative Tribunal26
+ Central Information Commission20
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act6
+ District Court3
+ Armed Forces Tribunal1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards31445
From 2011 To 20206291
From 2001 To 20100
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...prosecutrix has very categorically made allegation against the present applicant saying that he has forcefully developed physical relation with her. Under such a circumstance, in my opinion, the delay in lodging the ... Per contra, learned counsel for the State has opposed the application, read over the FIR and also the statement of the prosecutrix. In her statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., the... IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE...

...delay in lodging FIR and the investigation as reflected in the chargesheet, particularly the medical evidence does not support the case of the prosecution.9. That being so, a case for...Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in categorical terms satisfies the ingredients of Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act. Further submissions are, the appreciation of medical evidence can...Nitin W. Sambre, J.:— The Applicant is seeking regular bail in Crime No. 111 of 2018 for an offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(I) of Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3...

...Station Hatuniya, District Pratapgarh for the offences under Sections 363, 366 and 109 IPC and Section 7/8 of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged after significant delay of almost two and...under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.23/2017, registered at Police...half months. The victim Sushri P, in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., did not level any allegation of physical misbehaviour or sexual harassment against the...

.... 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that there is a delay in lodging the FIR. It is mentioned in FIR that the offence was committed two years prior to the filing o.... F.I.R. No.126/2017, was registered at Police Station Renwal (Jaipur Rural), for offence under Sections 376, 384 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, 2012.... 4. It is also contended that there is a dispute between the complainant and the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been filed in this case and petitioner has no criminal antecedents...

...contended by the counsel for the petitioner that there is delay of one month in lodging the FIR. The prosecutrix as per the record was 17 years 11 months on the date of incident. Charge- sheet has been.../2017 was registered at Police Station Sangod, Kota for offence under Sections 354-D (I) 2, 376 I.P.C. and Section 3/4, 11/12 of POCSO Act. 3. It is...filed in this case. Trial will consume time. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for...

...counsel for the petitioner that there is delay of four days in lodging the FIR. Charge-sheet has been filed. Trial would consume time. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail...Police Station Pilani, Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 363, 342, 354 and 509 of I.P.C. and Section 7, 8 and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 3. It is contended by...personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial...

.... 3. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner that there is delay of two days in lodging of FIR. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial would consume time. Co-accused has been given....160/2017 was registered at Police Station Dadia, District Sikar for offence under Sections 354 (A) (I) (II) (IV), 363 I.P.C. and Section 9G/10 of the POCSO Act...released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) and two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each to the satisfaction...

...of IPC and Sec. 3, 4 of POCSO Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is delay in lodging the FIR and inconsistencies in the statement of the... 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RDDAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 BEFORE... ... Respondent (By Sri K. Nageshwarappa, HCGP) This Criminal Petition is filed u/s 438 of Cr.P.C., by the petitioner praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his...

...committed upon her. He has submitted that under the existing circumstances, delay in lodging the FIR is immaterial because in the cases of POCSO, it is not expected from the prosecutrix/victim to... IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE...Penal Code and Sections 3 read with Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The applicant is in jail since 26.08.2024. 2. Learned counsel...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...provisions of the POCSO Act and that delay in lodging the FIR cannot be a ground to quash it, especially under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023...TO QUASH THE FIR DTD 30.01.2025 REGISTERED BY 1st RESPONDENT-JEEVANBIMA NAGAR P.S., IN CR.NO.21/2025 PURSUANT TO COMPLAINT DTD 30.01.2025, PENDING ON THE..., 8, 11, and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). 2. The 2nd respondent lodged the FIR on 30.01.2025 stating that following the...

...Sections 376 (2) (g), 506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there was unexplained delay of 14 days in...from the allegations in the FIR that there was delay in lodging of the FIR because of embarrassment and also the fact that it was not brought to the notice of other family members by the prosecutrix...The present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 13 dated 18.1.2013 registered under...

.... Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is delay of 17 days in lodging the FIR and the maximum punishment as could be awarded under Section 8 is not more than five years. A false case has been... 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Rewant Ram S/o Moti Ram under Section 439 Cr.P.C against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No...Rewant Ram S/o Moti Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ghevda, Ps Osian Dist. Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur). ----Petitioner Versus...

...(2) of IPC and Sections 5(K), 6 of POCSO Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR in this case has been lodged after a considerable delay and according to the statement...Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.275/2023 Police Station Kotwali, District Chittorgarh for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 376...@ Gaurav S/o Ramesh Chand Khangar, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.275/2023 of Police Station Kotwali, District Chittorgarh provided he executes a personal bond in a...

...years and therefore prosecutrix being a child, provisions of POCSO Act will be applicable and there being sufficient evidence to indict the appellant, merely some delay in FIR will not cause any harm to... there is delay in FIR, therefore, all these facts cumulatively indicate towards his innocence. 3. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, learne... IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...further submit that there is delay in lodging the FIR. He would further submit that no offence under Section 18 of the POCSO Act has been made out. He would lastly submit that charge sheet has been...consideration the nature and gravity of offence; extent of delay in lodging FIR; role of the applicant; charge sheet has already been filed and applicant is in jail since 08/01/2016, this Court is of the opinion...applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 06/2016, registered at Police Station Palari, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G), for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 of the...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

.... 4. Delay of four days in lodgement of the FIR in the facts of this case is fatal to the prosecution case. 5. The victim was in fact...application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 23 of 2024 at Police Station Bilari, District Moradabad under Sections 376, 506 I.P.C. and Section 16/17 POCSO Act. The.... 3. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case only to wreak vengeance on her family while causing her indefinite imprisonment under the stringent provisions of the POCSO Act...