Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Kerala High Court18
+ Supreme Court Of India1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Bombay High Court0
+ CESTAT0
+ Calcutta High Court0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Chhattisgarh High Court0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Delhi High Court0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Gauhati High Court0
+ Gujarat High Court0
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Karnataka High Court0
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court0
+ Madras High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Orissa High Court0
+ Patna High Court0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Rajasthan High Court0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Telangana High Court0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards10
From 2011 To 20204
From 2001 To 20104
From 1991 To 20000
From 1981 To 19900
From 1971 To 19800
From 1961 To 19700
From 1951 To 19600
Before 19500

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...to the M-Sand plants. This can lead to an ecological disaster as in the case of Plachimada, in the near future itself. The groundwater level will be depleted which will dry out many wells and the...such other appropriate writ, order or direction that may be deemed to be just and equitable in the facts and circumstances of the case.”4. W.P (C) No. 11729 of 2014 has been filed by..., order or direction that may be deemed to be just and equitable in the facts and circumstances of the case.”6. W.P (C) No. 13617 of 2014 has been filed by another quarry owner who claims...

...read with Section 149 IPC and Section 2 of Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971. 2. The case relates to the incident allegedly occurred on...15.08.2005 at 11.15 a.m. in front of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Company at Plachimada. There was an outburst against the said company relating to the misuse of water by the said company, which...absconding and he was not available for trial. The case against the petitioner was split up and refiled as S.C. No.483/2010. Since the petitioner is absconding, the case against him has been...

.../O.KANTHAN, RESIDING AT PLACHIMADA COLONY, KANNIMARI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2 PARVATHY AGED 45 YEARS... W/O.AYYAPPAN, RESIDING AT PLACHIMADA COLONY, KANNIMARI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABY MATHEW...MANI AGED 42 YEARS W/O. PAZHANISWAMI RESIDING AT PLACHIMADA COLONY MANNIMARI PO, PALAKKAD DISTRICT...

.../PETITIONERS 1 TO 3: ------------------------------ 1. NILAVARNEESA, W/O.SHAHUL HAMEED PLACHIMADA COLONY, KANNIMARI.... 3. SYED MOHAMMED, S/O.SARABEEBI PLACHIMADA COLONY, KANNIMARI POST, VANDITHAVALAM CHITTUR, PALAKKAD.... 4. SARABEEBI, W/O.SYED MOHAMMED PLACHIMADA COLONY, KANNIMARI POST, VANDITHAVALAM CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 5...

... 20 SARASWATHY W/O. LATE MARIAPPAN, PLACHIMADA, PERUMATTI VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK..., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678534 21 PRIYA D/O. LATE MARIAPPAN, PLACHIMADA... D/O. LATE MARIAPPAN, PLACHIMADA, PERUMATTI VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678534...

...YEARS WIFE OF MANICKAM, THOTTICHIPALAM HOUSE, PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI P.O., CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678534...petitioner submitted that conduct of the DNA test is absolutely necessary to prove the case of the petitioner and her son is ready to undergo the test and, as such, the court below ought to have granted...petitioner to prove the so-called marriage or domestic relationship. No doubt, in appropriate case, the court can order DNA test. However, it is 4...

...merits of the case, and had suggested that since already an appeal had been filed before the Government, it would have been proper for the company to pursue the appeal. The Writ Petition was closed...establishment of the factory in the country, and especially at Plachimada, is violative of various provisions of law regulating the conduct of business by multi-national companies. As the sale and....24. Notwithstanding the above and although the Panchayat would have been justified in refusing renewal, the company was informed that as a special case, taking notice of the...

...politically motivated. It is further the case of the petitioners that no provisions of the Act of 1954 or the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, hereinafter referred to as ‘Rules of 1955’, have...been violated, in the absence of which the impugned orders are legally unsustainable.3. In the context of the legal issues that are involved in the case, it would be appropriate in the...first instance to take into consideration the bare minimum facts culminating into filing of these petitions. [Facts have been extracted from WP. (C) No. 22141 of 2006]. It is the case of the...

...JUDGMENT1. The point that arises for consideration in this case is whether a Grama Panchayat can cancel the licence of a factory manufacturing non-alcoholic beverages, on...the ground of excessive exploitation of ground water. The brief facts of the case are the following:— The petitioner is Perumatty Grama Panchayat. The 2nd respondent Company is running a factory at...Company in Plachimada is causing acute drinking water scarcity in Perumatty Panchayat and nearby places, it is resolved in public interest not to renew the licence of the said Company. It is also resolved...

.... KITTUNNI, MEMBER NO.2390, PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI P.O., CHITTUR, PALAKKAD-682 027. 2 MAHENDRAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.ARUMUGHAM...

.... KITTUNNI, MEMBER NO.2390, PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI P.O., CHITTUR, PALAKKAD-682 027. 2 MAHENDRAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.ARUMUGHAM...

... HEREIN BY THEIR GUARDIAN MOTHER THE 9TH RESPONDENT) RESPONDENTS 9 TO 11 ARE RESIDING AT PLACHIMADA KANNIMARI POST, MOOLATHARA...

...KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARADIKUNU, MEENAKSHIPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 642103. 5 BALAN, S/O MURUGESHAN, PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI...

...KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARADIKUNU, MEENAKSHIPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 642103. 5 BALAN, S/O MURUGESHAN, PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI...

...KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARADIKUNU, MEENAKSHIPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 642103. 5 BALAN, S/O MURUGESHAN, PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI...

...KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARADIKUNU, MEENAKSHIPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 642103. 5 BALAN, S/O MURUGESHAN, PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI...

....Explanation.—For the purpose of clause (b) the expression ‘value of coal’ shall mean,—(i) in the case of...of such sum to Government or a local body, or any other sum as may be prescribed, or(ii) in the case of dispatches, other than those referred to in Item....Explanation.—For the purpose of clause (b), the expression ‘value of coal’ shall mean—(i) in the case of dispatches of coal as a...

..., PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI POST, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD 678 534. 4 SAKTHIVEL M, MEMBER NO.1996, M.S.HOUSE, NELLIMEDU POST, CHITTUR...appeal, who was the 4th respondent in W.P.(C).No. 25824/2020, is aggrieved by the interference with the process of election to the Bank notified under Ext.P1. It is the case of the appellant...virtually endorsed the action of the Electoral Officer, in the peculiar circumstances of this case. As noticed hereinbefore, the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is that in the...

..., PLACHIMADA, KANNIMARI POST, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD 678 534. 4 SAKTHIVEL M, MEMBER NO.1996, M.S.HOUSE, NELLIMEDU POST, CHITTUR...appeal, who was the 4th respondent in W.P.(C).No. 25824/2020, is aggrieved by the interference with the process of election to the Bank notified under Ext.P1. It is the case of the appellant...virtually endorsed the action of the Electoral Officer, in the peculiar circumstances of this case. As noticed hereinbefore, the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is that in the...