Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Karnataka High Court
10710
Delhi High Court
7380
Telangana High Court
5211
Madras High Court
3841
Andhra Pradesh High Court
3584
Bombay High Court
3425
Madhya Pradesh High Court
2969
Central Administrative Tribunal
2619
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
2185
Chhattisgarh High Court
1897
Punjab & Haryana High Court
1652
Himachal Pradesh High Court
1472
Kerala High Court
1432
Allahabad High Court
1345
Supreme Court Of India
1248
Gujarat High Court
1119
Calcutta High Court
1117
Rajasthan High Court
1085
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
1015
Debts Recovery Tribunal
913
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
846
Gauhati High Court
829
Patna High Court
732
Jharkhand High Court
606
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
504
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
441
National Green Tribunal
429
Orissa High Court
407
Armed Forces Tribunal
337
Central Information Commission
277
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
255
Uttarakhand High Court
252
National Company Law Tribunal
231
Tripura High Court
226
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
180
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
169
Meghalaya High Court
126
Company Law Board
103
Manipur High Court
95
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
91
RERA
81
Sikkim High Court
77
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
67
CESTAT
66
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
48
SEBI
41
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
26
Competition Appellate Tribunal
19
Securities Appellate Tribunal
13
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
10
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
10
District Court
7
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
6
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
6
Competition Commission Of India
6
Board of Revenue
4
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
4
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
3
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
2
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
2
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
2
Trade Marks Registry
2
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Authority For Advance Rulings
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Privy Council
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Right to Information
0
Settlement Commission
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
38675
From 2011 To 2020
15957
From 2001 To 2010
2867
From 1991 To 2000
837
From 1981 To 1990
278
From 1971 To 1980
423
From 1961 To 1970
416
From 1951 To 1960
727
Before 1950
635

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

.... Though notices were ordered to the respondents, no reply is filed. The petitioner/indigent person is present. Her statement is being recorded for the purposes of Order 33 Rule 4 of CPC. Heard the ld. counsel for the petitioner.ORDERS UNDER ORDER 33 RULE 5 OF...same reads as under:-“Statement of Petitioner (as under Order 33 Rule 4 of CPC) Mrs. Shub Lata W/o Mr. Ashok aged about 55 years, R/o 2202, Gali No. 5/1...Dated 29.04.2011”5. It appears from the order dated 29.04.2011 that the matter has now been put up for evidence of the petitioner on indigency. In the meanwhile, the respondents were...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Mar 1, 2012 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
2

...was examined on oath by the learned Munsif. In that statement he clearly stated in terms of Order 33, Rule 5(c) and (e) of the CPC. A notice was issued on the opposite...did not make out the other ingredients for granting him permission to sue as a pauper as prescribed under Order 33 Rule 5 of the CPC. He remained completely silent about...those ingredients.”2. One is at a loss to appreciate as to what exactly are the other ingredients under Order 33, Rule 5, the learned Munsif wanted the petitioner to satisfy. The Court shall reject an application for permission to sue as a pauper if the petitioner does not satisfy the Court with regard to the requirements laid down in Order 33, Rule 5 of the CPC. Order...


Court: Orissa High Court
Date: Aug 7, 1963 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
3

...….”Thereafter, the High Court proceeded to conclude as under:“In the light of the abovesaid factual findings and in view of the position of law as seen from Order 33 CPC, I do not find any substance in the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners. It is always open to them to raise those objections at the appropriate time. Hence the civil revision petition fails and the same is dismissed….”3. A bare perusal of Order 33 Rule 5 CPC...settled law on the point in the impugned order of the High Court. Order 33 Rule 5 CPC insofar as it is material, is as under:“5. Rejection of application.—The Court shall...of cause of action could not be deferred for consideration after grant of the permission. This alone is sufficient to set aside that order.5. Consequently, the appeal...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Sep 26, 1997 Cited By: 11 Coram: 3
4

.... Venkata Reddi, 1971 Andh LT 12 it has been held by our High Court that Order 33, Rule 5 of CPC the application to sue in forma pauperis can be rejected only when the...that the Court below has got jurisdiction under Order 33, Rule 5 of Code to decide about the maintainability of the suit at the earliest point of time. In that view of the...relating to plaint, schedule and signing and verification, the failure to comply with any one of which would result by the operation of Order 33, Rule 5 in mandatory dismissal of...


Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Date: Aug 13, 2004 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1
5

...Order 33 Rule 5 of CPC. Hence, the first respondent filed civil revision petition before this Court in CRP.No.4089 of 2019 and this Court passed order of interim attachment before judgment in respect of... For R2 & 3 : No appearance COMMON ORDER The criminal original petition in Crl.OP.No.7754 of 2011 has been field...to set aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam dated 2 02.03.2021 made in CMP.No.3997 of...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Oct 10, 2023 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
6

...Order 33, Rule 5, clauses (a) and (d) of the CPC, where it is not framed and presented in the manner prescribed by Rules 2 and 3; and (2) that the allegations do not show a cause of...Order 33, Rule 5 of the CPC, provides that the Court shall reject an application for permission to sue as a pauper where it is not framed and presented in the manner prescribed...Order 33, Rule 5 of the CPC, the lower court was right in rejecting the application for permission to sue as a pauper on the ground that the application did not contain the particulars prescribed...


Court: Gujarat High Court
Date: Aug 27, 1964 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
7

...application to sue as indigent persons would be under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC. Order 33 Rule 1-A CPC provides for inquiry into the means of an indigent person. Order 33 Rule 2 CPC provides contents of application. Order 33 Rule 4 CPC provides for examination of the applicant in case the application is in proper form and duly presented. Order 33 Rule 5 CPC...application for permission to sue as an indigent person can be rejected.12. Order 33 Rule 5 CPC reads as under:“5. Rejection of application.—The Court...instituted on the date on which the application for permission to sue as an indigent person was presented.”16. Thus, from the scheme of Order 33 CPC, it emerges that the application under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC seeking permission to sue as indigent person can be rejected on the grounds mentioned in Order 33 Rule 5 CPC...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Dec 2, 2022 Cited By: 7 Coram: 1
8

...-7 of its impugned order. 4. Learned Advocate Dr. Somaiya would further submit that, as per Order 33, Rule 5(f) of the CPC, such an application could not have been entertained..., whereby no error can be found on the part of the courts while rejecting application of the petitioner filed under Order 33, Rule 5(f) of CPC. Page 2 of 3...payment of court fees and thereby filed an indigent application under Order 33 of the CPC. The said application was rejected by the trial Court and so also confirmed by the Appellate Court...


Court: Gujarat High Court
Date: Jun 20, 2025 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
9

...follow the same, especially when an application has been made by the landowner under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC.22. In view of the aforesaid interpretation given to Order 41 Rule 33 CPC by this Court, we are of the opinion that the High Court denied the relief to the appellants to which they are entitled in view of the Constitution Bench decision in Paripoornan (1994) 5 SCC..., by taking a rather restricted and narrow view of the scope of Order 41 Rule 33 CPC and also on a misconstruction of the ratio in Paripoornan (1994) 5 SCC...against the judgment of the Reference Court, but filed applications under Order 41 Rule 33 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short “CPC”) claiming additional compensation at the rate of 12% p.a...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Sep 15, 2010 Cited By: 122 Coram: 2
10

...the ground that the suit is not maintainable under Clause (f) of Rule 5 of the Order 33, C.P.C4. The only question that arises for consideration is whether the provision of Clause (f) of Rule 5 of Order 33, C.P.C is applicable to the facts of the case.5. Rule 5 of Order 33, CPC lays...that Clause (f) of Rule 5 or Order 33, CPC squarely applies to this case. The order of the Court below therefore cannot be sustained in law. The prayer of the respondent to...Muhammed Kunju v. Sudhamma @ Saraswathi Amma & Others, (1990) 1 Ker LT 464 held on an interpretation of Order 33 Rule 5 that if the suit appears to be barred...


Court: Kerala High Court
Date: Jan 16, 1997 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
11

...the court below has proceeded with the suit without deciding the application under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC. Copy of a notice issued under Order 5 Rule 1...court on the pretext that the enquiry under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC is pending. The court has rightly observed that at the time of deciding the application for suing as an...indigent person, the objections of the defendant cannot be considered. However, as per order 33 Rule 9 CPC, the court on the application of the defendant may withdraw the...


Court: Rajasthan High Court
Date: Jan 17, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
12

...rejection thereof under Rule 5 of Order 33 CPC. Therefore, the impugned orders, Annexures P-2 and P-6 are bad in the eyes of law on this score alone.3. No doubt...trial Judge shall proceed afresh in the matter from the stage of Rule 3 of Order 33 CPC.5. With the above observations the petition stands disposed of, so also...sue himself as an indigent person is under challenge on the grounds inter alia that the procedure prescribed under Rule 6 and 7 of Order 33 CPC has not been followed and...


Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date: Aug 25, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
13

...: "Notice given. Order pronounced in terms of Order 20 rule 1(3) CPC. 4 "In the result, this application stands disposed of with a specific order to the following effect: (a) The application fails at the threshold and is rejected under Order 33 Rule 5(f.... 7. The point for consideration is as to whether the Master was justified in simply passing the aforesaid order extracted supra, mainly based on Order 33 Rule 5(f) of CPC r/w...suit. A Court having no pecuniary jurisdiction cannot allow amendments which are far beyond its jurisdiction. As such on that count also the learned Master was wrong in passing such an order. Order 33 Rule 5(f) of CPC contemplates...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Apr 15, 2010 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
14

...petitioners. The specific contention taken in Ext.P2 is that the mandate of Order 33 Rule 2 of CPC has not been complied with and 2 OP(C) No. 1422 of 2024 : 3 : therefore, the original petition is liable to be dismissed under Order 33 Rule 5(a...counsel for the petitioner would contend that all these things would constitute the fact that the mandate contained in Order 33 Rule 2 of CPC is not complied with. Consequently the original petition is liable to be dismissed under Rule 5(a.... 5. For a proper consideration of the issues involved in this case, it is profitable to extract Order 33 Rule 2 as well as Order 33 Rule 5(a) of the CPC which is extracted as...


Court: Kerala High Court
Date: Jul 19, 2024 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
15

...comply the condition as contemplated under Order Rule 33 (5) ( c) of CPC. In the absence of pleadings, and also absence of any amount of evidence, the petitioner cannot be declared as indigent person...This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the dismissal order in POP.No.285 of 2015 in unnumbered OS.No. Of 2015 dated 27.09.2018 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Salem...petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is directed to pay the court fees within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No order as to costs. 13.07.2021...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Jul 13, 2021 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
16

... ***** ORDER The first respondent / wife has filed an application in P.O.P.No.1 of 2014 under Order 33 Rule 5 CPC seeking exemption from...that the trial Court has allowed the application filed under Order 33 Rule 5 CPC without ascertaining the first respondent's financial condition through the revenue officials. However, he further submitted that pending this revision, the order of the...filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 06.04.2022 passed by the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul, in P.O.P.No.1 of 2014 and set aside...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Oct 17, 2022 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
17

...of action for the suit and, therefore, under Order 33, Rule 5, the application to sue as a pauper should have been rejected. The matter was not raised in this form in the trial Court. In the trial Court the contention was that in view of the provisions of Section 92 of the CPC, the...cause of action and therefore the application to sue as a pauper could not have been rejected under Order 33, Rule 5 of the CPC.7. Another contention raised is...is no specific mention that Mahant Darshan Dass is specially empowered to present this application in the Court under Order 33, Rule 3 of the CPC. Thus this application is...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Feb 26, 1964 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

...the plaintiff to sue as an indigent person without notice to the defendant/petitioner, as required under Order 33 Rule 6 of the CPC. It is further submitted that even otherwise, the application seeking permission to sue as an indigent person filed by the plaintiff was not presented in person, as required under Order 33 Rule 3 of the CPC and is liable to be rejected in view of Order 33 Rule 5(a...deserves to be rejected if it is not filed in accordance with Order 33 Rule 3 of the CPC? VINOD KUMAR 2014.12.18 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CR No.5781 of 2014 (O&M) [5] **** Before..., Order 33 Rule 6 clearly provides that if the Court does not find any reason to reject the application in terms of Order 33 Rule 5 of the CPC, it...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Dec 16, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
19

...Order 33 Rule 6 of the CPC. It is further submitted that even otherwise, the application seeking permission to sue as an indigent person filed by the plaintiff was not presented in person, as required under Order 33 Rule 3 of the CPC and is liable to be rejected in view of Order 33 Rule 5(a.... As regards the question of notice to the defendant is concerned, Order 33 Rule 6 clearly provides that if the Court does not find any reason to reject the application in terms of Order 33 Rule 5 of the CPC, it...Order 33 Rule 3 read with Rules 5 and 6 of the CPC and the observations made by the learned Court below that the question of indigency could only be decided by the executive authority and...


Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date: Dec 16, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
20

...the meaning of clause (d-1) of Rule 5 of Order 33 of the CPC. Where the court finds that one or more of the prayers, which cannot by themselves be said to constitute the suit...Order 33 R. 5 of the CPC, giving the petitioner an opportunity to file a fresh petition, if he thought it necessary, in respect of his claim for partition of the suit properties and a declaration that...rule 5 of Or. 33 of the Civil Procedure Court only directs that the court shall reject the application for permission to sue as a pauper where the suit appears to be barred by any law. In other...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Mar 23, 1961 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).