...done by them. Thus, considering the legal position as quoted hereinabove and also keeping in view the order passed by CAT Bombay Bench on 8.5.1991, the Court is of the opinion that relief claimed ...with the respondents. Applicant has also not approached before the Tribunal for execution of the judgment and order dated 8.5.1991 passed by the Bombay Bench of this Tribunal in O.A. No. 68/89 nor...applicant is liable to be allowed. The applicant's claim cannot be defeated on this ground that applicant did not file contempt petition if the order passed in the aforesaid O.A. by the Bombay Bench...

...Petition No. 6785 of 2014. The Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 22.11.2014 (Ann. A/24) declined to interfere with the order passed by CAT, Bombay Bench and confirmed the... case as also by referring to the order passed by CAT Bombay Bench in OA 741/2013 disposed of said OA vide order dated 15.12.2015 directing the respondents to consi...reply filed by them in OA 249/2020 be treated as their reply in connected OAs including the present OA. Considering the said undisputed facts, the present OA is also decided in terms of order passed...

...interfere with the order passed by CAT, Bombay Bench and confirmed the view that provisions of prospective effect contained in DoP&T OM dated 04.03.2014 is not... case as also by referring to the order passed by CAT Bombay Bench in OA 741/2013 disposed of said OA vide order dated 15.12.2015 directing the respondents to consi...challenged by Union of India before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 6785 of 2014. The Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 22.11.2014 (Ann. A/24) declined to...

...Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 6785 of 2014. The Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 22.11.2014 (Ann. A/24) declined to interfere with the order passed by ...passed by CAT Bombay Bench in OA 741/2013 disposed of said OA vide order dated 15.12.2015 directing the respondents to consider the case of the applicants seniority from 2003..., Gujarat such as applicants aggrieved by order passed in OA 405/2014 in the case of Vijay Makode and the decision of respondent no.5 herein granting benefit of seniority to the direct...

...the CAT, Mumbai Bench's order whereby the transfer order of Scientist of CSIR was cancelled. The learned counsel for the applicant also relied upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of ...for the applicant placed reliance on the order passed by Hon'ble Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in the case of the Director, CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute.... His duty cannot be equated with the Scientists. The learned counsel for the applicant vehemently argued and relied upon the order passed by the Bombay High Court as mentioned above. We have perused...

...by Shri V. Narayanan on behalf of the respondents, it is apparent that the said order has not been passed inOA NO. 406/2013compliance with the order passed by the ...Chameli Majumdar, Member (J):— The applicant in this Original ApplicationOA NO. 406/2013challenged the order passed by Respondent No. 2 in compliance with the...order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench dated 21.10.2011 in OA No. 463 of 2008 filed by him.2. Heard Shri V. Narayanan, learned counsel for the...

...Court vide order dated 22.11.2014 (Ann. A/24) declined to interfere with the order passed by CAT, Bombay Bench and confirmed the view that provisions of prospective effect... case as also by referring to the order passed by CAT Bombay Bench in OA 741/2013 disposed of said OA vide order dated 15.12.2015 directing the respondents to consi...&T OM dated 04.03.2014. The said order came to be challenged by Union of India before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 6785 of 2014. The Hon'ble High...

...order passed by CAT, Bombay Bench and confirmed the view that provisions of prospective effect contained in DoP&T OM dated 04.03.2014 is not maintainable... Tribunal after considering the ratio laid down in N R Parmar case as also by referring to the order passed by CAT Bombay Bench in OA 741/2013 disposed of said OA vide .... 10.9 Other direct recruit inspectors working in Vadodara Zone, Gujarat such as applicants aggrieved by order passed in OA 405/2014 in the case of Vijay...

.... 2120/2005, 2138/2005 and 2139/2005 passed by the CAT, Bombay Bench; order dated 17.08.2008in OA.402/2006 passed by the CAT,Principal Bench, as upheld by the High Court...respondents have denied the same benefit on the ground that he was not one of the applicants in the cases decided by the CAT, Honble High Court and also the Honble Supreme Court. According to the learned....5751/2009and the judgment dated 25.07.2013 in SLP No.3380/2009 (Union of India &Ors., vsDhananjay Singh) (converted into Civil Appeal No.1119/2013) passed by the Supreme Court and the various decisions...

...to interfere 26 with the order passed by CAT, Bombay Bench and confirmed the view that provisions of...benefits of N. R. Parmar's case. This Tribunal after considering the ratio laid down in N R Parmar case as also by referring to the order passed by CAT Bombay Bench in OA 741/2013 disposed of said...order passed by the Principal Bench in the case of Pankaj Nayan and Rajeev Kumar as well as the orders passed by this Bench of the CAT. In this regard, it was further submitted that the Writ Petit...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

.../Trade Union of the employees of the Railways filed on behalf of the Commission Vendors/bearers working in the Western Railway, relying upon the earlier order passed by the CAT in OA No. 538/1996 and the ...applicants were granted the relief of pensionary benefits, allowed the said OA 4079/2016. The judgment and order passed by the CAT dismissing the OA and refusing to grant any pensionary benefits to the...the judgment and order passed by the learned CAT passed in OA No. 4079/2016 granting the relief of pensionary benefits by counting their service rendered as Commission Vendors, prior to their...

...the same cannot be applied in general. According to the Respondents, the order passed by the CAT Bombay Bench is violative of directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v.... In this context, the learned counsel for the applicant took exception to the statement of the 3rd Respondent in her reply affidavit that the order passed by the CAT, Bombay is violative of directions.... I find that the Bombay Bench of CAT at Mumbai has held that the impugned order No. 75/07 has been passed in violation and contravention of Transfer Policy of 2005 and particularly Para-3.1 (b) of the...

...made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent of the parties. 2 The Petitioners-original Respondents have challenged impugned order dated 9 March 2010 passed by the Central Ad...CAT. On 9 March 2010, the CAT quashed and set aside order dated 25 July 2008, by relying on order dated 12 July 2007 passed by the CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in ...of prayer clause (b) was granted by this Court. 7 Meanwhile, order dated 12 July 2007 passed by the CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 379 of 2007, was stayed...

...these decisions to the facts and circumstances of this case.11. In the result, both the appeals are allowed. The impugned order dated 10-4-1992 passed by the CAT, Bombay...S.P Kurdukar, J.— These two appeals by special leave arise out of the judgment and order dated 10-4-1992 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench, Bombay...Executive Engineer. It is this judgment and order of the CAT, Bombay which is the subject-matter of challenge in these two appeals.6. The three questions which arise for our...

...judgment dated 24.07.2018 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court upholding the judgment and order dated 29.09.2004 and 23.02.2005 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal ("...was not complied with. On this basis, prayer has been made for accepting the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgments and the order of dismissal. 6. On the other...hand, the Respondents have supported the judgments impugned as well as the order of dismissal by 3 asserting that the...

...circumstances of this case. 11. In the result, both the appeals are allowed. The impugned order dated 10th April. 1992 passed by CAT Bombay, is quashed and set aside and consequently...passed by Central Administrative Tribunal. Bombay Bench, Bombay in O.A. No. 558 of 1989 filed by H.P. Vora, the first respondent in both the appeals. Civil Appeal No. 256 of 1689 of 19932 is filed ...Executive Engineer. It is this judgment and order of CAT Bombay Which is the subject matter of challenge in these two appeals. 6. The three questions which arise for out determination...

...- Smt. Madhubala Saini vs. Union of India & Ors. - order dated 17.07.2012 passed by CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi. 7 .... - order dated 04.10.2004 passed by CAT, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. (v) Mrs. Jyoti Sharma vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan - order dated 10.12.2002 ... "8.1. quash and set aside the impugned order dated 19/2/2005 (Annexure 8) passed by the Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 3, NAL, Bikaner whereby the a...

...incurred during her treatment. The l/c for applicant relied upon the judgement passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Patna in the case of Rajendra Prasad Yadav Vs The Rajendra Agriculture University reported in ...reported in 2006 (3) 414 ATJ and the order passed by CAT Jabalpur Bench in OA 505/2006 reported in 2006 (3) 50 and contended that the claim of the applicant is squarely covered by the....-Jamalpur, Dist.-Munger (Bihar). .....Applicants By Advocate : Shri A.N. Jha VERSUS 1 . The Union of India represented...

..., Bombay which was passed issuing direction for casting of the seniority on the basis of the judgment of Dewan Chand 2009 SCC OnLine CAT 2851 passed by...CAT on 18-1-2010. Writ Petition No. 5148-CAT of 2010 was filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 25-8-2009 2009 SCC OnLine CAT...of 3 : 1 as per OM dated 3-7-1986 which was sought to be challenged in the present case, where the appeal has arisen out of the order passed by the Chandigarh Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal...