...of action for the suit and, therefore, under Order 33, Rule 5, the application to sue as a pauper should have been rejected. The matter was not raised in this form in the trial Court. In the trial Court the contention was that in view of the provisions of Section 92 of the CPC, the...cause of action and therefore the application to sue as a pauper could not have been rejected under Order 33, Rule 5 of the CPC.7. Another contention raised is...is no specific mention that Mahant Darshan Dass is specially empowered to present this application in the Court under Order 33, Rule 3 of the CPC. Thus this application is...