Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Karnataka High Court57646
+ Telangana High Court27434
+ Delhi High Court24011
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court21947
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court21073
+ Madras High Court20483
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court14484
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal11829
+ Central Administrative Tribunal11447
+ Rajasthan High Court10538
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal10455
+ Allahabad High Court8944
+ Bombay High Court7497
+ Kerala High Court6266
+ Armed Forces Tribunal6143
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission5890
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court5490
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission5133
+ Calcutta High Court4348
+ Gujarat High Court4233
+ Patna High Court4069
+ Chhattisgarh High Court3484
+ Gauhati High Court3431
+ Supreme Court Of India3336
+ Orissa High Court2039
+ Jharkhand High Court1858
+ Central Information Commission1789
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court1757
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1374
+ Uttarakhand High Court1351
+ Tripura High Court1068
+ National Green Tribunal653
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity615
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal566
+ National Company Law Tribunal493
+ RERA394
+ Meghalaya High Court352
+ CESTAT301
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission295
+ Company Law Board273
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal270
+ Sikkim High Court262
+ Manipur High Court232
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal198
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board108
+ Board of Revenue100
+ SEBI58
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal43
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act35
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange25
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal24
+ District Court17
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property11
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority10
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board10
+ Competition Commission Of India8
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal8
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST7
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction6
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission6
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India5
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST4
+ Railway Claims Tribunal4
+ Trade Marks Registry4
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal3
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court0
+ Privy Council0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards162262
From 2011 To 2020102071
From 2001 To 201015270
From 1991 To 20005313
From 1981 To 19901591
From 1971 To 19802140
From 1961 To 19701815
From 1951 To 19602200
Before 19505729

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

....5. Second appellant Swaraj died on 2-12-2008. CMs Nos. 7034 of 2009 (under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC) and 7035 of 2009 (under Order 22 Rule 3 ...was dismissed qua the second appellant by the order dated 6-8-2009. It is clear from the combined reading of Order 22 Rules 3, 4 and 11 CPC that the doctrine of abatement is applicable equally to a suit as well as ....***RSA No. 100 of 2008 and CMs Nos. 6342 of 2008 (for stay), 11811 of 2009 (for delay), 11812 of 2009 (under Order 22 Rule ...

...the applications, IA No. 1 of 2010 should be treated as an application under Order 22 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) while IA No. 2 of 2010 should be ...come to an end, except when the abatement is set aside and the legal representatives are ordered to be brought on record by the court of competent jurisdiction in terms of Order 22 Rule 9(3) CPC. ...22 Rule 9(3) CPC contemplates that the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply to an application filed under sub-rule (2) of Rule 9 of Order 22 ...

...Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.Page: 992. The plaintiff's legal representatives/applicants submitted an application under Order 22, Rule 3, CPC on ac...application under Order 22, Rule 9, CPC as well as the application under Section 5 of the...which could have been taken in application filed under Order 22, Rule 9, CPC. Therefore, the trial Court considered the said application under Order ...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...plaintiff 4. 2. After arguments at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although applications under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act were filed, but no...the said applications. He submits that he is ready to file fresh application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC for setting aside the abatement, which took place before trial Court due to... (DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE does not reflect that the plaintiffs or the petitioner moved any application under Order 22 Rule ...

...appellant moved applications under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC and under section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay.3. It is further submitted by the counsel that the appellate Co...the proceedings would stand abated. Thereafter the litigant is required to file an application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC within a period of 60 days. If such an application could not be filed, then an...application under section 5 of Limitation Act has to be filed for condonation of delay in filing an application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC. In nutshell, no application for condoantion of delay in filing...

...1. The matter has come up on Misc. Application No. 51716 dt. 26/11/2013 filed by the appellant under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC read with Order 22 Rule 9 ....26/11/2013 has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC read with Order 22 Rule 9 CPC....the appellant approached the counsel and application came to be filed under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC read with Order 22 Rule 9 CPC and under Sectio...

..., and accordingly, I.A. No.4319/2025 was filed on 21.06.2025. 3. No application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC or under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been filed. 4.... Although application filed under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC can be treated as composite application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC and under Section 5 of Limitation Act, provided .... Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as abated. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to file a fresh application under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC, under Order 22 Rule 9 ...

...accordingly, I.A. No.4320/2025 was filed on 21.06.2025. 3. No application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC or under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been filed. 4.... Although application filed under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC can be treated as composite application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC and under Section 5 of Limitation Act, provided ...dismissed as abated. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to file a fresh application under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC, under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC, and under Section 5 o...

...was also filed under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC for setting aside the abatement. However, no application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was filed for condonation of delay in filing an application...under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC. 3. By order dated 27.02.2025, appellants were permitted to withdraw 1...respondent No.2 Kalyan Singh had expired on 16.09.2011. The application under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC (I.A.No.7206/2024) was filed for the first time 26.09.2024. 5. I.A.No.2329/2025 has ...

.../2022, and I.A. No. 4046/2022 have been filed under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC and under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC respectively. According to these applications,.... Sole appellant has expired on 19.05.2017, and applications under Order 22 Rule 3, and under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC, were filed on 05.09.2022, i.e., after more...under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC for setting aside abatement, is dismissed as barred by time. As a consequence thereof, I.A. No.4027/2022, which is an application under Order ...

...the application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC and Order 22 Rule 9 CPC. For the reasons detailed out in the memo of the applica...hereby allowed. Delay, in institution of the application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC and Order 22 Rule 9 CPC, is condoned. I...Order 13/11/2018 IN IA No. 46597/2018:- Matter comes up on an interim application No. 46597/2018, under Section 5 for condonation of delay in institution of...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...applicants. Shri S.S. Kushwaha, Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2/State. ORDER This is an application under Order 22 Rule 9, ...Order 22 Rule 9, CPC has been filed for setting aside abatement. No application under Order 22 Rule 3, CPC was filed. However, it appears that later on I.A. No.2984/2020...is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to applicants to file a properly constituted application under Order 22 Rule 3 and Order 22 Rule 9 CPC along with S.5 of the Limitation ...

...REPORTABLE Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The plaintiff's legal representatives/ applicants submitted an application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC on...petitioners/defendants submitted that the plaintiff's legal representative had knowledge of the suit and they did not move any application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC as well as...to have been taken to be the reasons which could have been taken in application filed under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC. Therefore, the trial court considered the said application...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...has been filed after delay so also without filing an application to set aside abatement under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits...that although no separate application was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC but in the application filed under...perused the order impugned. Admittedly, respondent no. 4 of the suit Smt. Phoola Devi died on 19.02.2007 and an application under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 CPC was fi...

..., Gokulchand died. An application under Order 22 Rule 3, CPC was submitted by the L.Rs., which was dismissed on 24-8-1999 on account of being barred by limitation, since the application ...the ground that once the application under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC is dismissed, another application before the same Court is not maintainable. 3. Shri S.K. Shrivastava, learned Counsel fo.... Despite dismissal of the application under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC, an application under Order 22 Rule 9, CPC for ...

...terms of Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short “CPC”) read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short “the Limitation Act”) was rejected. The appellant's father had...filed an appeal in the Court of District Judge, Guna, Madhya Pradesh. He died on 9-1-1991. Thereafter, the application in terms of Order 22 Rule 9 CPC came to be filed on 2-10-1991. The explanatio...weeks from today. On the amount being paid, the appeal shall be restored by the District Court and the application in terms of Order 22 Rule 9 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act shall be allowed...

...submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that since the information under Order 22 Rule 10(A) of CPC about the death of the defendant No. 4 was given by his counsel on 19.12.2018, the...Order 22 Rule 9 CPC as well as an application under Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act was...necessary. However, it is submitted that the trial Court should have considered the application filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC as a consolidated application under ...