...was an application for condonation of delay of 9 years for challenging the mutation entry which was certified in the year 2009. Without deciding the delay condonation application and without condoning the delay in preferring the appeal, the Sub Divisional Officer has straight away allowed the appeal by holding that as mutation entry was illegal, the period of limitation will...

...mutation was sanctioned wrongly in favour of both the plaintiff and the defendants on 30.8.1988 However, the suit was filed by the plaintiff on 14.8.2001 when he came to know about the wrong entry in the...mutation. The suit is within limitation.Since the Will was duly proved, the plaintiff was held owner of the land measuring 0 Kanal 19 Marla comprised in Khata No. 1222/1302 Khasra No...defendant equally. However, due to some clerical mistake, mutation of the suit land comprised in Khasra No. 911 was sanctioned in favour of defendants in equal shares. The Will dated 29.3.1982 (Ex.P2...

...Act. He submitted that mere mutation entry may not be starting point of limitation but in the present case, the rights of the plaintiffs were jeopardised by over acts of the defendants when they...the plaintiff-appellants." 10. Question to be decided is whether mere mutation entry or making of gift deed to the knowledge of the plaintiffs amounted to ouster of the plaintiffs and furnished cau...deciding the issue of limitation so for as the facts of the case in hand are concerned as the main point which requires determination is whether mere entry of a mutation in the name of the defendant...

..., this petition. 3 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the mutation entry was questioned by the respondent-Dariyav Kanwar after lapse of 19 years and therefore, the Appellate Authority could not ha...served and she was extended an opportunity of hearing before altering the mutation entry already made. The Board of Revenue and the Appellate Authorities have concurrently found that there was no..., cancelling the mutation of the disputed land made in favour of the petitioner and sanctioning the mutation thereof in favour of the respondent no. 3 herein, stands dismissed. 2. The...

...case of the appellants-petitioners that as soon as they came to know about the cancellation of mutation entry in 1957, they immediately filed RTS Appeal No. 100/91 before the Deputy Collector challenging the order dated 7th August, ...was of the opinion that there was a gross delay in filing the appeal against the order of cancelling the mutation entry without going into the merits of the case. This was challenged by the appellants-petitioners in revision being R...delay of 34 years remained totally unexplained by the appellants-petitioners in challenging the order of cancelling the mutation entry before the appellate authority, therefore, this court should not interfere with the orders passed...

...1979 PLJ 469 to contend that entry of mutation would not give a right to the party for filing the suit, in essence, limitation would not reckon from the date o...decidendi culled out by this Court in Ibrahim''''s case (supra), the limitation would not reckon from the date of entry of mutation but it has to start from the date of threat of dispossession or cloud on...the limitation would start from 1951, when the possession is of the defendants and therefore, the factum of mutation was in the knowledge of the plaintiffs and they cannot take the benefit of the...

...certification of the aforesaid mutation entry No.508 dated 17.05.2010 before the SDO, Yeola under the provisions of Section 247 of the MLR Code. The limitation for filing statutory appeal as prescribed under...03.02.2014 dismissed the appeal on merits 9 of 25 as.wp.2658.18.doc recording petitioners challenge in the order that application for setting aside mutation entry was beyond limitation. The..., inter alia, raised the issue of limitation in the first instance and submitted that since the original challenge to mutation entry No.508 before the SDO was filed beyond limitation, the same was liable to...

...the documentary evidence like Pedhinama, reply of the parties. The applicants have challenged the mutation entry after a long period of 19 years from the date of certification of the entry. The bar of limitation ac.... The dispute between the parties pertains to mutation of entry bearing survey No. 1486 dated 3rd November 1993. The case of the applicants herein is that they have right, title and interest in the land...revision application of the applicant, written submissions, written submissions of the opponent No. 4, the impugned order of the Collector, it appears that mutation entry no. 1486 has been entered in the...

..., which was mutated in the year 1989 and therefore, the suit is filed after a period of 21 years from the mutation entry and hence, barred by law of limitation.4. I have minutely examined...forged statement of Mr. Mohanlal Mangaldas, Mr. Ramanlal and Mr. Jayantibhai and thereby, caused to enter mutation entry No. 1359. Since the plaintiffs wanted to sell the suit land, they met the...to enter false mutation entry in the revenue records and therefore, the plaintiffs filed the suit.3. By virtue of application filed below Exh.49, the petitioners raised a ground that to...

...remedies on revenue side to get mutation entry set aside and have belatedly filed the civil suit and thus, the same is barred under the Limitation Act, 1963. Article 58 lays down....8045/2009 in November 2009 and the same came to be disposed of on 27.9.2010. Thus, according to the learned counsel for respondents, the period spent in pursuing remedies for quashing mutation entry needs to be excluded keeping in ...of jurisdiction or other cause of like nature. The earlier proceedings were for setting aside mutation entry. The present suit is to declare the sale deed dated 7.10.1984 as not binding on the plaintiff and for injunction that the d...

...that the plaintiffs came to know about effecting mutation in favour of Pandharinath, the father of defendant Nos. 2 and 3 in January, 2008 and they pursued remedies on revenue side to get mutation entry set aside and have b...disposed of on 27-9-2010. Thus, according to the learned counsel for respondents, the period spent in pursuing remedies for quashing mutation entry needs to be excluded keeping in view ...annexed herewith for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.”13. It is clear that what was being pursued before the revenue authorities was challenge to the mutation entry and the same was “dismissed on the count of delay...

... 3 of 4 RSA No.507 of 2011 (O&M) -4- in case of entry of mutation or not, the answer was that limitation to be reckoned from the date of cloud on the title, much less, threat to..., another mutation bearing No.470 dated 23.12.1963 was got sanctioned in favour of Baru Ram son of Hari Kishan son of Devat Ram. There is no limitation qua inheritance as the property was joint in...suit to be barred by law of limitation are totally erroneous and perverse. There is no limitation to challenge the mutation, it 2 of 4 RSA No.507 of 2011 (O&M) -3- is only, when...

...and if the period of limitation is reckoned from the date of writing, the application for redemption was not within limitation. 7 A mutation entry is merely a fiscal entry conferring...ago. Mutation on the basis of this document called Tankiat was attested on 24.12.1953 and entry of the mortgagees being in possession was made. The application for redemption of the mortgage and...Commissioner as well as the Financial Commissioner held that the application fat redemption was within time because the time for calculating the limitation was to commence from 24.12.1953 when the mutation...

...same in the appeal before the Assistant Commissioner. His appeal was allowed in the year 1993. The second respondent has again challenged the mutation entry made in favour of the petitioner. The Assistant Commissioner has allowed th....:—A question of law regarding the rights of the parties on the basis of a mutation entry specially in North Karnataka areas like Belgaum, Bijapur, Dharwar etc., arises for consideration...the mutation entry made in favour of Sunil Jeevanna Pashetty - one of his son-in laws. In the year 1986, the mutation entry was cancelled. Aggrieved by the said order, Sunil Jeevanna challenged the...

...whereas mutation was sought to be entered some times in the year 2019-20. Thus, there was a delay of about 45 years in seeking entry of mutation and the same was barred by limitation. In view of the...has been prescribed for making an entry in the register of mutation. Thus, the argument of limitation is liable to be rejected out right. Reliance placed by learned counsel for the petitioner on...foregoing submissions, the Courts below were in error in sanctioning the mutation and dismissing the appeal and revision there against. The question of limitation is being...

...Rule 32 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Record of Rights (Preparation and Maintenance) Rules, 1971. As far as the question regarding the challenge to the said mutation entry being barred by ...earlier, the Watandar himself had jointly signed the subject application. This fact is recorded in the Mutation Entry No. 748 while effecting the proposed change in terms of the application made by...the petitioner and the Watandar. The said Mutation Entry No. 748 came to be confirmed on June 12, 1977, and also certified by the appropriate authority, which was allowed to attain finality. Suffice it...

...the petitioner. That the Deputy Collector, Veraval vide order dated 26/09/2005 dismissed the said Appeal preferred by respondent No. 5 challenging the mutation entry only on the ground of limitation.However...against the mutation entry No. 998 was preferred by respondent No. 5 after a period of 15 years and, therefore, Deputy Collector was justified in dismissing the Appeal on the ground of limitation, which.../06-07 with respect to mutation entry/revenue entry No. 998 which was in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the registered sale deed dated 07/05/1990.4. The facts leading to the...

...given an opportunity looking to principles of natural justice. However, the order nowhere depicts that how such principles were not observed while sanctioning mutation entry. This Court as well as the Supreme Court of India consiste...Divisional Officer, Sangamner in RTS Appeal No.144/2017, thereby condoning the delay in Appeal filed against Mutation Entry No.308, dated 08.10.1987 certified in favour of the petitioners, pertaining to...lands bearing Gut Nos.118, 119, 129, 328 and 472. 3. Mr. Shelke, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the Mutation Entry was certified in favour...

...years in terms of RETURN to be filed by landlord. Entry in Register II after mutation and payment of rent to landlord; which got extinguished under...Section 27 of Limitation Act and consequent thereupon vested in State as Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1956, as decided vide issue no.3 b...

...name of Adiveppa's widow, 7 respondent as the owner of the property in question having succeeded to the same, evident from the mutation entry bearing ME No. 2055 dated 23.12.1991 Annexure A. Thereafter...registered document transferring the right, title and interest in the immovable property in question, a mutation entry made by the revenue authorities cannot substitute a legal transfer of immovable...mutation entry No. 2056 dated 31-05-1991 by which property stood transferred to Basavanthappa and the subsequent mutation entry No. 2225 dated 25-02-1995 Annexure-“C” by which the petitioner claims to...