Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Patna High Court438
+ Jharkhand High Court229
+ Allahabad High Court41
+ Telangana High Court21
+ Madras High Court15
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court9
+ Karnataka High Court8
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court7
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court6
+ Bombay High Court6
+ Calcutta High Court6
+ Kerala High Court5
+ Delhi High Court4
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court4
+ Rajasthan High Court4
+ Gujarat High Court3
+ Orissa High Court3
+ Board of Revenue1
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal1
+ Gauhati High Court1
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court1
+ Privy Council1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ SEBI0
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Sikkim High Court0
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ Supreme Court Of India0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards664
From 2011 To 202013
From 2001 To 201016
From 1991 To 20007
From 1981 To 19906
From 1971 To 19807
From 1961 To 197017
From 1951 To 196029
Before 195046

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

.... Kamaraddi, AIR 1933 Cal 239; Kali Prasad v. Mt. Bibi Aziz Fatma, AIR 1938 Pat 149 and...547 (PC); ILR 117 Cal 347 (PC); Golam Gaffar Mandal v. Golian Bibi, ILR 25 Cal 109; Umda v. Rupchand, AIR...

...Kali Prasad Sahu v. Mt. Bibi Aziz Fatma, AIR 1938 Pat 149, which also says the same thing that if the decree-holder was misled by the copy of the decree...

...Kali Prasad Sahu v. Mt. Bibi Aziz Fatma, AIR 1938 Pat 149, wherein Agarwala, J. was considering...

...Kali Prasad v. Mt. Bibi Aziz Fatma, A.I.R(25) 1938 Pat. 149 : (174 I.C 397) and..., Bani Madhub v. Matungini Dassi, 13 Cal. 104 F.B and Afzul Hossain v. Mt. Umda Bibi, 1 C.W.N 93. As pointed out in Maxwell's Interpretation of Statutes...the relevant provisions of the Limitation Act. See Golam Gaffar v. Goljan Bibi, 25 Cal. 109...

...(Mt. Roshan Bibi v. Aziz Fatma and Hira Singh v. Sonalo) the application was in each instance required by the Bench to be stamped as for a review. In Civil Review No. 38 of 1923 the...

...the Court below. It might be convenient at the very outset to set forth a small pedigree. Chaudhry Saiyed Ali Azhar=Mt. Ansar Fatma Bibi (defendant 1) --------------------------------------...were Mt. Fatma Sughra Bibi defendant 3 (who might be said to be the principal contesting defendant), Mt. Ansar Fatma Bibi, defendant 1, and Mt. Anwar Patina Bibi, defendant 2. ...is married to Ali Athar. Saiyed Hasan Ali is the father and general attorney of Mt. Fatma Sughra Bibi. Mt. Ansar Fatma is Hasan Ali's father's phuphi's daughter. Jawad is a cousin of Mt...

...A.I.R 1933 Cal. 239. and Kali Prasad v. Mst. Bibi Aziz Fatma...

.... 2. The case for the prosecution was that Mst. Fatama was married to the appellant some ten years back when she was a minor. After the marriage, the accused did not keep her with him. Mst. Fatma..., therefore, continued to live with her parents Kasam and Mst. Suraj. Two years after the marriage the parents of Mst. Fatma entreated the accused to keep Mst. Fatma with him and even sent messengers...to him to persuade him to do so. But the appellant paid no heed to these entreaties. The parents then gave away Mst. Fatma in Natra to one Taju. Mst. Fatma got a child from Taju...

...plaint.4. Abdul Aziz is said to have died leaving behind his widow Zabula, two sons Zabadul Haque (defendant No. 1) and Ziaul Haque (plaintiff No. 1) and six daughters, Bibi Fatma, Bibi...that daughters of Abdul Aziz, namely, Bibi Fatma, Bibi Fulo and Bibi Lakma sold their entire share to plain tiff No. 1 and defendant No. 1. Habibur Rahman vendee of Most. Jabulla died leav ing behind..., sold away her entire share in schedule-A land to Bibi Jabula wife of Abdul Aziz, Bibi Mairum (plaintiff No. 2), Bibi Fulo and Jabdul Haque.6. It was also pleaded that Bibi Habiban and...

...same amount against defendant 1, Mt. Fasihunnisa. 2. Mt. Fasihunnisa, defendant 1, is the daughter of Fatma Bibi. On 29th of October 1919, Mt. Fasihunnisa and some other persons...mortgagees in satisfaction of the mortgage debt so far as the property sold was concerned. On the same day Mt. Fatma Bibi executed security bond in favour of Siddiq Ahmad undertaking to indemnify him in...together with interest. Ho brings the suit not only against Mt. Fasihunnisa personally but against the property which was mortgaged by Mt. Fatma Bibi on the very same day as the execution of the sale...

...share, and her daughter Mst. Kaniz Fatma Bibi, who was entitled to the remainder.13. On her death mutation of names was effected in respect of the landed property in favour of Mst. Kaniz.... Her allegation was that Sh. Abdur Rashid had got the name of his daughter, Mst. Kaniz Fatma Bibi, entered in respect of the zamindari property left by Mst. Ashraf-un-nissa in the revenue papers on...Fatma Bibi to the exclusion of the plaintiff. Mst. Kaniz Fatma Bibi was then a minor and was represented in that suit by her paternal uncle, Khalil Ahmad, who was her guardian ad litem. Sh. Abdur Rashid...

...Mt. Aziz Fatma v. Mukund Lal (1932) 2 A.I.R. All. 480 on more or lass similar facts-as involved in the present case, a Bench of this Court decl...appellants is reported in Amina Bibi v. Yusuf (1922) 9 A.I.R. All. 449 In this case it was held: Ali these...allegations of the defendant are cor. rect, in that case the suit has to be dismissed. I may refer to a Full Bench ruling reported in Mt. Ananti v...

...to prove if the execution of the document by the person executing it has been specifically denied. Here there is no denial at all by Shammi Begum, Munni Bibi and Kaniz Fatma. Moreover, both the...the plaintiff and the defendant respectively from the Judgment and the decree of the appellate Court below. It appears that the plaintiff filed a suit against Ghosia Bibi and S. Abdul Sakhi on the...allegation that he was the owner and in possession of the property in dispute having purchased it from Mst. Hulas Kanwar w/o. Ghisulal Sogani on 16-8-1941 and that two days later Ghosia Bibi and her...

.... A.I.R 1933 Cal. 239. and Kali Prasad Sahu v. Mst. ...Fatma . A.I.R 1938 Pat. 149.. The court below were, therefore, right in holding that the execution did not stand...

...the wrong action of the Court. Following the view of Jack J. in the said case, Agarwala J. in Kali Prasad v. Mst. Bibi Aziz...Fatma, AIR 1938 Pat 149 excluded the period that was lost on account of a wrong action of the Court under similar circumstances. A Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court consisting of Raghubar...

...defendants respondents, Zahurul Hasan and Fatma Bibi, were his step-brother and step-sister. Mt. Azizunnisa, wife of Dr. Sirajul Hasan, died in December 1932. She had executed a waqf alal-aulad on 1-6...the plaintiff admitted that Mt. Fatma Bibi defendant 2, was the step-sister of Dr. Sirajul Hasan, the paternity of Zahurul Hasan was denied and it was suggested that he was an illegitimate son of...daughter Fatma and a son, Zahurul Hasan. Mt. Azizunnisa was a daughter of Ghulam Ali and her mother was one Zainab Bibi. Her sister was known as Nasiban Bibi and Rahmanul Hasan, plaintiff, is the son of...

..., respondent, has married Habib, respondent. Mt. Naro sought to justify her action on the ground that, according to the terms of the Niqahnama, her previous marriage with the plaintiff, Aziz, was...view of the learned District Judge that the mere fact that Aziz married a second wife would automatically dissolve his previous marriage with. Mt. Naro. According to the terms of the Niqahnama, which...have been reproduced, in extenso, by the Senior Subordinate Judge, Aziz took upon himself the following two liabilities: (a) To pay fts. 300/- to Mt. Naro as dower money on demand, (b) To pay her a...

...devolved upon his widow Bibi Hamidan, his daughter Bibi Zohra and his two nephews Faiyaz Ahmad and Neyaz Ahmad, both sons of Abdul Aziz as per the provision of Mohammedan Law applicable to them. The...Bibi Hamidan in favour of Sk. Wali Mohammad; Ext. E/1 Rehan deed dated 06.07.1965 executed by Bibi Hamidan in favour of Bibi Fatma; Ext. E/2 22...Lal Agarwal All residents of Aurangabad, P.S. Aurangabad, District Aurangabad. ……Plaintiff-Appellants versus 1. Bibi Zohra, daughter of...

..., his said land devolved upon his widow Bibi Hamidan, his daughter Bibi Zohra and his two nephews Faiyaz Ahmad and Neyaz Ahmad, both sons of Abdul Aziz as per the provision of Mohammedan Law...06.07.1965 executed by Bibi Hamidan in favour of Bibi Fatma; Ext. E/2 Rehan deed dated 14.01.1960 executed by Bibi Hamidan in favour of Badri Narayan Gupta; Ext. F registered deed of Bai mokassa dated...Agrawal against Bibi Zohra and Smt. Anchhi Devi (defendant-respondents no. 1 and 2, respectively) for the following reliefs with respect to the suit property, namely, a house with Sahan on four decimals...

...maintenance allowance at the same rate as the sons and daughters by his first wife. Soon after this will Haji Saiyed Mahmudul Hasan married Bibi Siddiq Fatma, defendant 2. On 25th February 1936, Haji.... 200 to Rs. 75. No allowance was fixed for Saiyed Mohammad Hasan, the mutwalli nominated by him. His wife, Bibi Siddiq Fatma, defendant 2, was to get an allowance of Rs. 375 per month. Abrar Fatma, his...daughter by Bibi Siddiq Fatma, defendant 3, was to get an allowance of Rs. 100 per month. The other five daughters, defendants 6 to 10 were to get allowances, at the rate of Rs. 25 each as provided in...