...grounds are inoperative in law on account of vagueness, the entire proceedings emanating from them would fall through. Mr. Mehta next contended that atleast two specific instances are mentioned at the end...inception, the show cause notice containing such vague allegations has to be treated as a still bom one. Mr. Mehta for the respondents invited our attention to the affidavit-in-reply, para 7, wherein...it is stated that the grounds furnished in the show cause notice are clear, just and valid. This is mere ipse dixit on the part of the deponent who filed the affidavit on behalf of the respondents. Mr...

...Mehta. 42. The next contention of Mr. Munshi that even if this sale took place, the consideration for it was a part of the consideration for the whole of the tripartite agreement under...the bank of loans standing to the debit of Kuberdas Raghavji and Issac Mera. 4. Mr. Jamnadas Mehta (defendant No. 3) was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company and also..., a meeting of the executive committee of the bank was held at which Mr. Jamnadas presided. Resolution No. 7 was in these terms :-" Resolved that the offer of Mr. J.M. Mehta for buying the shares...

...Section 304 part II r/w Section 34 I.P.C. It was next contended by Mr. Sandeep Mehta that in this case, accused respondents Lichhman Das, Bhanwara and Bajrang have been held guilty of the...in the incident but it has been stated at the bar by Mr. Sandeep Mehta appearing for the accused-persons that Ramkumar has been murdered and to this effect, an affidavit of one Shri Omprakash has been...incident, the appeal against him abates. 7. It was next contended by Mr. Bhandawat that it was a case of murder and the accused persons have wrongly been held guilty of the offence under...

...to be adopted by the impugned provisions.54. A reference may next be made to the precedents which were cited by Mr. Porus Mehta on this part of the case. In Carmichael v...statute patently discriminatory.39. Before leaving this part of the case we must notice another argument advanced by Mr. Porus Mehta. He argued that it was for the petitioners in the two...Mehta appeared for the Advocate General in all the five matters and also for the State of Maharashtra in the two writ petitions. Besides Mr. Porus Mehta we heard Mr. Sukthankar for the Barsi Municipality...

...may be considered at an early date.4. Mr. Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that if the fresh application for the next Academic Year is made, the...K.M Thaker, J.:— Heard Mr. S.I Nanavati, learned senior counsel with Mr. Saurin Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Shalin Mehta, learned senior counsel with Ms. Dhara Shah...from the Academic Year 2014-2015 to Shrimati Maniba Mahila B.Ed College of Petitioner Trust and to allot the tudents.”3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Nanavati, learned...

...K.M Thaker, J.:— Heard Mr. S.I Nanavati, learned senior counsel with Mr. Saurin Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Shalin Mehta, learned senior counsel with Ms. Dhara Shah...independently without being influenced by the previous, i.e the impugned resolution/decision.5. Mr. Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that if the fresh...and Commerce College;”3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the resolution/decision dated 1.6.20144. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Nanavati, learned senior...

...lakhs. B.V Shah alias Venilal Mehta, Miss Pragna Mehta and the independent witnesses have signed on the documents and on the mahazar. Mr Jayaprakash, Accountant of Dwaraka Hotel had also appended his...Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.— One allegedly Venilal D. Mehta is the father. Miss Pragna Mehta is the daughter and Bharat Mehta is the son. They all have been detained under the....2. Their detentions are challenged in three writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution, filed by Prakash Chandra Mehta, another son of Venilal D. Mehta and brother of Miss Pragna Mehta ...

....8. Mr. Mehta next relied on the decision of a Division Bench of this court in CIT v. National Rayon Corporation, [1985] 155 ITR 413...capital asset by boring the well, there can be little doubt that the expenditure was in the nature of capital expenditure.7. The submission of Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the...of this submission, Mr. Mehta placed reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...

...supported the motion of no-confidence against him. The aforesaid Privy Council judgment cannot be of any avail to Mr. Mehta in the light of the special statutory provisions of the Act viz. S. 54(1), second part as well as t...intimation to be sent to the concerned members. Even apart from this fact, S. 54 of the Act itself affords a clear answer to this contention of Mr. A.H Mehta. Section 54(1), second part provides that...of the Panchayat, respondent 2 herein Kamlashanker Bhuleshwar Dave. Mr. A.H Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner requested me to permit transposition of respondent 2 as petitioner No. 2 in order...

....3. Mr B.K Mehta, learned counsel for the appellants, vehemently contended that the High Court was wrong in its view. When no specific evidence relatable to particular...enhanced the compensation to Rs 100 per square metre and in the next two awards, it confirmed the award of the Land Acquisition Officer. In other words, he made nil award. On appeal under Section 54...in which event the criticism of Shri Mehta would bear relevance and would need closer scrutiny and examination. The burden is always on the claimants to prove by adducing reliable evidence that the...

...made by Sen J. For the aforesaid reasons we reject this contention of Mr. Deb.18. Next Mr. Deb submitted that though it is alleged that these are smuggled goods there is no allegation of smuggling against th...manner in future.”2. It was firstly contended by Mr. R.C Deb, learned advocate appearing in support of the Rule, that there was non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority...looked after the vault affairs.6. Mr. Jayanti Lal Mehta of M/s. Thakorlal Hiralal Co. has also in his statement made on 27th of February, 1975 admitted that they had 5 lockers Nos. 1902...

...Company to develop the land belonging to Ms Jaykirti Mehta who brought the said land as her capital contribution. The land was valued at Rs 65,51,000. A plan for construction of building was submitted in...of Rs 1,25,00,000 as capital contribution. By award dated 11-3-1993, Ms Jaykirti Mehta was directed to stand retired from the partnership firm. It was agreed that after retirement of Ms Mehta, other...partners were to continue with the partnership. It is submitted that the appellant provided a fund of Rs 60,88,000 to the said partnership firm for being paid to Ms Jaykirti Mehta which was paid to her...

...reliefs. However, without waiting for 3 days given by Mr. Mehta to RKC or even without any reply from RKC, he himself paid the salary to the staff the very next day on 12.11.2020. Mr. Mehta has.../106/4004 dated 07.09.2022 issued to Mr. Anil Mehta, Insolvency Professional under section 220 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) read with regulation 13 of the... Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Inspection and Investigation) Regulations, 2017 (Inspection Regulations). Mr. Anil Mehta is a Professional Member of Insolvency Professional...

.... While referring to NHB's call money transaction of Rs 40 crores Mr Margabanthu said that it was not UCO Bank's call money transaction. It was money arranged by Harshad Mehta from NHB. He also said...that the money was required by Harshad Mehta at our Bank at Hamam Street Branch for undertaking certain security operations by him. … He also told that Mr Venkatkrishnan, General Manager that this...amount of Rs 40 crores should be immediately sent to Hamam Street Branch so that security transactions could be completed by Mr Harshad Mehta.”100. PW 13...

...solvency certificate. This part of the prosecution case is not supported by any evidence other than that of the complainant himself. The learned Advocate Mr. Mehta did not contest...wrote down his complaint and then read it over to him and obtained his signature. Mr. Solanki directed the complainant to go to the office next morning with the amount to be bribed. Complainant told...passed the night in the office of the Anti-Corruption Bureau. On the next morning that is 12-1-1979, complainant got up at about 6-30 A.M. and Mr. Solanki reached there at about 7-00 A. M...

..., learned counsel Mr. O.P. Mehta, representing the respondents, submits that:- (a) There is a gross delay on the part of the petitioner in filing the present writ....) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.P. Mehta, through VC Mr...matter was listed for the petitioner's evidence and the date was given as 14.04.2017. However, on the next date, presiding officer was on leave, therefore, the matter was adjourned and was directed to...

...contract. There is evidence to support these findings of the Tribunal and this court would, therefore, be not justified in going behind those findings.10. Mr. Mehta next contends that even...raised by Mr. Mehta. As already stated, it is his contention that even if it is held that the contract of resale was not the result of the failure on the part of the assessee to perform his part of...some other dealers and, therefore, the assessee had paid the difference in price, it being unable to perform its part of the contract. On the other hand, it is the contention of Mr. Joshi that the...

...not examine any witness. The Tribunal made a judgment and award dated 3 December, 2016 allowing part of the claim made by the respondent nos. 1 to 5.6. Mr. Mehta, learned...submission of Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the appellant that the claim itself was not maintainable is concerned, I have perused the certificate of insurance tendered across the bar by the learned...submission made by Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the appellant that the claim filed by the respondent nos. 1 to 5 was not maintainable. Mr. Mehta, does not dispute that the said crane was insured with the...

...different facts and has no application to the case before us.8. Mr. Mehta next relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-I v. Chugandas & Co. I...from business” when the interest was collected by the banks on behalf of the assessee and given or credited to the assessee.6. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondent submitted...regarded as “interest on securities”. In support of this submission, Mr. Mehta relied on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Shree Jagdish Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax...

...construction should be such that no part of the enactment is rendered otiose or surplus. 20. Mr. L. R. Mehta, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 has next drawn our attention...: (AIR 1991 SC 558) have observed that unless there is any ambiguity, the Court should adopt literal construction. 12. Mr. Bhandari next drew my attent...words are sufficiently flexible to admit of some other construction by which that intention will be better effectuated. 13. Mr. Bhandari next referred to certain observations made...