Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Allahabad High Court8696
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court7802
+ Rajasthan High Court4434
+ Patna High Court3796
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court3083
+ Bombay High Court2967
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court2836
+ Delhi High Court2305
+ Chhattisgarh High Court1692
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1295
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1134
+ Central Administrative Tribunal1068
+ Jharkhand High Court1022
+ Central Information Commission1003
+ Gujarat High Court984
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission629
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission616
+ Uttarakhand High Court578
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal537
+ National Company Law Tribunal505
+ CESTAT381
+ RERA309
+ National Green Tribunal266
+ Calcutta High Court260
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal259
+ Karnataka High Court249
+ Armed Forces Tribunal247
+ Gauhati High Court174
+ SEBI165
+ Supreme Court Of India148
+ Madras High Court141
+ Kerala High Court123
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission114
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity104
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court90
+ Telangana High Court77
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court75
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST62
+ Orissa High Court62
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal58
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act56
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal42
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority21
+ Tripura High Court18
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal17
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India13
+ Meghalaya High Court10
+ Competition Commission Of India9
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction8
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange7
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property7
+ Company Law Board6
+ Manipur High Court6
+ Privy Council6
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST4
+ Board of Revenue3
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India2
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal2
+ District Court2
+ Railway Claims Tribunal2
+ Authority For Advance Rulings1
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board1
+ Settlement Commission1
+ Sikkim High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Right to Information0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards37210
From 2011 To 202010447
From 2001 To 2010645
From 1991 To 200087
From 1981 To 199034
From 1971 To 198027
From 1961 To 197019
From 1951 To 196011
Before 195039

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...Rs.2 lacs was allegedly paid to the petitioner and her nephew Mohit Sharma without disclosing mode of payment. Further amount of Rs.3 lacs was deposited in the account of Mohit Sharma through Balbir...counsel, on instructions from SI Sukhbir Singh, but submitted that recovery has to be effected from the petitioner as her nephew Mohit Sharma has deposed that booty in favour of the petitioner was to...the tune of ` 95,000/-. Mohit Sharma was arrested and only ` 10,000/- were recovered from him against ` 3 lacs. In view of proceedings undertaken in respect of co- accused Mohit Sharma, I deem it...

...petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 363/366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that one Mohit Sharma kidnapped the daughter of the informant...with an intention to marry. It further reveals from the statement of victim that she was abducted by accused Mohit Sharma and also subjected to rape. The petitioners, who are parent of Mohit Sharma have...IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2136 of 2015 1. Ashok Sharma. 2. Mamta Sharma. ...Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand...

.... Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohit Sharma,Mukul Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Mohit Sharma, learned counsel for...offence is disclosed, inasmuch as, the accused persons including the applicant abused and assaulted the victims with lathi and danda. Faced with this, Shri Mohit Sharma, learned...

...who has stated that Mohit Sharma has illicit relation with Manisha. Manisha was often taking money from his son Mohit Sharma. On 8.12.2012, at about 1.30 P.M Mohit Sharma went to market to bring t...articles. On that day at about 6.00 P.M in the evening, daughter of complainant namely Anchal came to the house and call from the mobile No. 92162-68120 of his wife Sunita Sharma that Mohit Sharma has...set himself on fire at Bij Complex, near Post Office, Jamalpur where Manisha is working at a Dental Clinic. Mohit Sharma was taken to CMC Hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries emergency ward...

...Mohit Sharma Versus M/s. Satluj Motors and others. Both appeals are consolidated for disposal in order to avoid conflicting orders. 1. Appeal No.344/2016...& Appeal No.347/2016 filed against the same order passed by learned District Forum in consumer complaint No.263/2013 title Mohit Sharma Versus M/s. Satluj Motors and...Versus Mohit Sharma & others (F.A. No.344/2016) Mohit Sharma Versus M/s. Satluj Motors & others (F.A. No.347/2016) Brief facts of Case: 2. Mohit Sharma complai...

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

Can't display summary as content is Scanned, Please open the judgment to see full content.

...Mohit Sharma Versus M/s. Satluj Motors and others. Both appeals are consolidated for disposal in order to avoid conflicting orders. 1. Appeal No.344/2016...& Appeal No.347/2016 filed against the same order passed by learned District Forum in consumer complaint No.263/2013 title Mohit Sharma Versus M/s. Satluj Motors and...Versus Mohit Sharma & others (F.A. No.344/2016) Mohit Sharma Versus M/s. Satluj Motors & others (F.A. No.347/2016) Brief facts of Case: 2. Mohit Sharma complai...

...Commission on 02.12.2022 with the direction to Shri Mohit Sharma, BDO, Thannamandi to explain as to why penalty should not be imposed upon him for wilful default and causing deliberate obstruction in the...being considered by the Commission by way of this Order. Decision: 3. In reply, Shri Mohit Sharma, BDO, Thannamandi vide letter dated 14.12.2022 has stated...Mohit Sharma, BDO, Thannamandi has assured the Commission that he will follow the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 in letter and spirit while discharging the duties as Public Information Officer in...

...Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands...adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and...of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say...

...attention of this Court to judgment passed by Coordinate Bench this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs.... State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra...consider and decide the case of the petitioners in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say...

...No. 1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that...issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and satisfied in...Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in...

...Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors...., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and...representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say...

...Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands...adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and...of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say...

...Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands...adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and...of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say...

...No. 1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised...in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions...consider and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered...

...Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coord...Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide her...the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly...

...attention of this Court to judgment passed by Coordinate Bench this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs.... State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra...consider and decide the case of the petitioners in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority...

...Bench this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024 titled Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors...., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioners would be content and...petitioners in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the...

...Mohit Sharma (supra) and as such, petitioners would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide representation of the...) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing... Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Ms. Tim Saran Sharma and Mr. Pawan K. ...