Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Allahabad High Court78415
+ Central Administrative Tribunal12351
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court11670
+ Bombay High Court10678
+ Delhi High Court9417
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court7545
+ Rajasthan High Court7065
+ Telangana High Court6687
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court4785
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal4600
+ Uttarakhand High Court3501
+ Chhattisgarh High Court3440
+ Gujarat High Court3187
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court3128
+ Central Information Commission3048
+ Madras High Court2982
+ Karnataka High Court2970
+ Supreme Court Of India2912
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court2285
+ Patna High Court2204
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2169
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2153
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal1654
+ Calcutta High Court1518
+ Kerala High Court1461
+ CESTAT1326
+ National Company Law Tribunal1252
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1139
+ Gauhati High Court922
+ National Green Tribunal844
+ Jharkhand High Court745
+ Orissa High Court561
+ RERA266
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission246
+ Board of Revenue174
+ SEBI170
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange161
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal149
+ Tripura High Court149
+ Sikkim High Court146
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act133
+ Armed Forces Tribunal121
+ Manipur High Court118
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal90
+ Meghalaya High Court88
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property77
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity71
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal53
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal50
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal36
+ Company Law Board29
+ District Court20
+ Railway Claims Tribunal19
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board17
+ Competition Commission Of India9
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority8
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST6
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India5
+ Privy Council5
+ Settlement Commission5
+ Authority For Advance Rulings4
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction4
+ Commissioner (Appeals)3
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST2
+ Trade Marks Registry2
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Right to Information0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards104625
From 2011 To 202065028
From 2001 To 20109890
From 1991 To 20004430
From 1981 To 19902381
From 1971 To 19801263
From 1961 To 1970759
From 1951 To 1960482
Before 195094

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...R.S Sarkaria, J.— This appeal is directed against a judgment, dated December 2, 1978, of the High Court of Delhi, maintaining the conviction of Mohd. Ramzani, appellant under...Section 302 of the Penal Code, with a sentence of life imprisonment.2. Appellant's father, Mohd. Shafi, is the eldest of four brothers, others being Chhottey Khan, deceased..., Mohd. Din and Abdul Rashid. Abdul Rashid and Mohd. Din were residing on the ground floor of House No. 2934 in Gali No. 5, Sarai Khalil, Sadar Bazar, Delhi, while the appellant, his father Mohd. Shafi...

...Sessions Case No. 21 of 28.04.2006 who was examined as PW-2 in Sessions Case No. 52 of 01.10.2008 was the brother of the deceased Mohd, Haleem alias Mohd. Haleef, who was working as labourer at Adesh...Institute of Medical Science, Bathinda under PW-4 Mohd. Istakh in Sessions Case No. 21 of 28.04.2006 who was examined as PW-3 in Sessions Case No. 52 of 01.10.2008. Both were living in separate huts in Adesh...Institute of Medical Sciences meant for labourers. (b) On 05.10.2005 at about 1.30 PM Abdul Kalam, Mohq. Istakh and Mohd. Haleem were chatting near the hut of Mohd. Haleem...

... Challan Amount 1. UP503220812090039 12.08.2022 Mohd. Yusuf 34000/- 2. UP502220722091117 22.07.2022... Mohd. Yusuf 88000/- 3. UP945200913094244 13.09.2020 Mohd. Yusuf 33000/- 4. UP502220719091433... 19.07.2022 Mohd. Yusuf 92000/- 5. UP502220806150400 06.08.2022 Mohd. Yusuf 88000/- 6...

...Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 1985. By the impugned judgment the High Court upheld the convictions and sentences recorded against Mohd. Aman (one of the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1749 of 1996...) under Sections 302 and 460 IPC and against Mohd. Yusuf (the other appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 1749 of 1996), Babu Khan (appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 1833 of 1996) and one Mohd. Iqbal (who has...20-4-1983 and pursuant to the statement of Babu Khan a pair of silver anklets belonging to the wife of the deceased were recovered and his bloodstained clothes were seized. Statement made by Mohd...

...24 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissing Second Appeal No. 135 of 1998 thereby upholding the oral gift by Wali Mohd. in favour of Respondent 1-plaintiff and the will dated...Mohd. filed OS No. 130 of 1978 against the appellant and one Sakina (deceased predecessor-in-interest of Respondents 2 to 11) for declaration that the mortgage deed dated 21-11-1967 and also sale deed...the mortgage, in case, that the mortgage is held to be valid.3. The case of the respondent-plaintiff is that Wali Mohd., father of Respondent 1 had purchased two plots and...

...Code and within my congnizance.”The trial court convicted Mohd. Taki Haji Hussein Momin, Accused 1 under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to imprisonment.... Chinwa alias Ahmed Hussan Momin, Accused 2, is the brother of Kallu, who is the son-in-law of the appellant, Accused 4. Mohd. Taki, Accused 1, is the servant of Kallu. All these persons are the...residents of the same place and the deceased Mohd. Yahya was a close neighbour of the appellant. According to the prosecution there were constant disputes between the appellant and the deceased over the...

...Syed Laek Husain (widow: Karbalai Begum Mohd. Bashir Plaintiff) Mohd. Bashir (Defendant 1) Mohd. Rasheed (widow: Smt Shakira Bano, Defendant...the plaintiff-appellant, Mohd. Bashir and Mohd. Rasheed became bhumidars of the plots in dispute. It is also not disputed that up to 1359 Fasli both the parties had a joint khewat, as would appear...statement before the trial court, she has clearly stated that the defendants, Mohd. Bashir and Mohd. Rasheed used to manage the properties which were joint and used to give her share and assured her that...

...employees, Jai Jai Ram and Mohd. Mia and the question referred for adjudication was whether the said two workmen should be reinstated with full back wages and to what relief they were entitled...past. It appears that in August 1958, charge-sheets were served on the two workmen. Against Jai Jai Ram, four charges were framed. The first charge was that on August 1, 1958, he along with Mohd. Mia...he had run over the film print of picture “Mother India” and thereby damaged the film print.3. Against Mohd. Mia, three charges were framed. The first was in regard to the...

...Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mohd. Nasir (2009) 6 SCC 280 were per incuriam having been rendered without consider...were, thus, fully binding on the Court in Mubasir Ahmed (2007) 2 SCC 349 and Mohd. Nasir (2009) 6 SCC 280, each of which...254 were not brought to the notice of the Court in the two later decisions in Mubasir Ahmed (2007) 2 SCC 349 and Mohd. Nasir (2009...

...of the assessee in respect of the following two questions: 1. Whether, in view of the facts that Mohd. Rashid, proprietor of Mohammad Rashid and Co., Jabalpur, was not summoned in...applicant without affording an opportunity to him to cross-examine the said Mohd. Rashid and drawing an adverse inference? 2. Whether the assessment vitiated in law as the Inspecting...Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) has not given reasonable opportunity of being heard and failed in summoning the witnesses as requested under Section 131 and his failure to consider the affidavit of Mohd...

.... UP500200911002819 10.09.2020 Mohd. Farukh 48000/- 2. UP501200913100756 13.09.2020 Mohd. Farukh 62000.../- 3. UP501200712113851 12.07.2020 Mohd. Farukh 41500/- 4. UP945220429105057 29.04.2022 Mohd. Farukh 120000.../- 5. UP502220718161618 18.07.2022 Mohd. Farukh 96000/- 6. UP501211208134239 08.12.2021 Mohd...

.... CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 139/16 & 189/16 1] CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 139 OF 2016 1] Mohd. Hanif s/o Mohd. Habib, Age 39 years, Occ. Labour..., 2] Mohd. Azam s/o Mohd. Habib, Age 54 years, Occ. Labour, Both R/o Khangarpura, Akola. (At present in Amravati Prison). .... APPELLANTS. // VERSUS..., Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent. Mr. R.J. Mirza, Advocate to assist prosecution. 2] CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 189 OF 2016 1] Mohd. Munaf s/o Mohd...

..., Mohd. Zaki, to recover some money that was due to him. When they reached the factory premises they found that DW 1 was not present but several other persons including the appellant, a shopkeeper who...been produced in evidence. He has accordingly pointed out that the defence story projected by DW 1 Mohd. Zaki, the owner of the factory premises, that no amount was due towards PW 2, in fact knocked...semen found was not co-related to the appellant as his blood samples had not been taken.12. In this background the evidence of the defence witness, Mohd. Zaki becomes very...

...of Noor Miya Mohd. Hussain. Appellant-Accused 1 and 2 were convicted by the Sessions Court under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life...prosecution case, on 3-11-2002 at about 12 noon, on receipt of intimation from the Medical Officer of Civil Hospital, PW 1, ASI Maroti proceeded to Burns Ward of hospital where he found that Noor Miya Mohd.... Hussain had suffered burn injuries. PW 1 enquired from Noor Miya Mohd. Hussain (since deceased) about the incident to which he narrated that the appellant-Accused 1 and 2 along with Accused 3 Jaibunisa...

..., in that backdrop, been listed before us to resolve the conflict.3. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that at about 10.00 p.m on 14-12-1992, Mohd. Taheruddin (PW 2) a...resident of Village Changmazi Pathar situate within the limits of Police Station Doboka, District Nagaon in the State of Assam was guarding his paddy crop in his field close to his house. Mohd. Mustafa...Ahmed (PW 3), one of the two sons of Mohd. Taheruddin was sleeping at home in one of the rooms while Mohd. Hanif Ahmed (PW 4) together with one Zakir, said to be a close relative, was sleeping in the...

.... By the common judgment and order, we propose to dispose of both the said appeals.2. The High Court by the said order allowed the writ petition filed by Mohd. Sohrab Khan....3. Mohd. Sohrab Khan filed the said writ petition challenging the aforesaid appointment and also seeking for a direction that he be appointed to the said post on the basis..., as the High Court did not grant a direction as sought for by Mohd. Sohrab Khan, therefore, two appeals came to be filed in this Court on which we have heard the counsel appearing for the parties. We...

...two appellants herein, viz., Shaikh Umar Ahmed Shaikh and Mohd. Naim Mohd. Yasin Qureshi, is directed against the judgment and order dated 14-10-1997 passed by the Designated Court, Greater Bombay...in the hospital who immediately reported the incident to Byculla Police Station. On 4-11-1993, the police arrested the two appellants herein and accused Mohd. Bilal and Liyakat Rasool. On 7-11-1993...-11-1993 again, the police requested Special Executive Magistrate to arrange identification parade and inducted the appellants in the parade. On 15-1-1994, accused Jafar Mohd. Ismail Sayyad was arrested...

.... Counsel for convict appellants submits that appellant no.1 Mohd. Akram S/o Mohd. Umar alias Mamad has been convicted u/S 302 IPC simplicitor and rest of the convict appellants have been convicted with...the aid of Sec.149 IPC and all the convict appellants except appellant no.1 Mohd. Akram S/o Mohd. Umar alias Mamad & no.7 Mohd. Imran S/o Mohd. Anwar alias Annu, were on bail during trial and...further submits that the name of convict appellant no.7 Mohd. Imran S/o Mohd. Anwar alias Annu does not find place in the first Parcha Bayan Ex.P-7 and he has been lateron implicated and in totality of...

...law which calls for decision. Sultan Mohd. Matawali Khan (hereinafter referred to as Sultan Mohd.), Ilaqadar of Kathai was the predecessor-in- interest of the...jagir of Sultan Mohd. amounting to Rs. 5076/9/6 would be collected by Government and the amount credited in the treasury to the credit of the bank tin the sum of Rs. 40,000/- along with interest due...thereon was liquidated. It was in consequence of this arrangement that the bank advanced the sum of Rs. 40,000/- to Sultan Mohd. After the loan had been taken and the pro-note executed the bank opened...

...behalf, would strongly rely upon the decision of this Court in Mohd. Shafi v. Mohd. Rafiq....8. Our attention has further been drawn to the fact that correctness of the decision in Mohd. Shafi...(2009) 16 SCC 46, (2009) 8 Scale 175.)12. In Mohd. Shafi...