Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Calcutta High Court
23
Delhi High Court
12
Madras High Court
8
Bombay High Court
6
Allahabad High Court
2
Andhra Pradesh High Court
2
Gujarat High Court
2
Patna High Court
2
Supreme Court Of India
2
Orissa High Court
1
Privy Council
1
Telangana High Court
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
0
Armed Forces Tribunal
0
Authority For Advance Rulings
0
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
CESTAT
0
Central Administrative Tribunal
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
0
Central Information Commission
0
Chhattisgarh High Court
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Company Law Board
0
Competition Appellate Tribunal
0
Competition Commission Of India
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
District Court
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Jaipur
0
Gauhati High Court
0
Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Himachal Pradesh High Court
0
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
0
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
0
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
0
Jharkhand High Court
0
Karnataka High Court
0
Kerala High Court
0
Madhya Pradesh High Court
0
Manipur High Court
0
Meghalaya High Court
0
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
0
National Company Law Tribunal
0
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
National Green Tribunal
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
Punjab & Haryana High Court
0
RERA
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Rajasthan High Court
0
Right to Information
0
SEBI
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Sikkim High Court
0
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Tripura High Court
0
Uttarakhand High Court
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
6
From 2011 To 2020
12
From 2001 To 2010
6
From 1991 To 2000
3
From 1981 To 1990
1
From 1971 To 1980
0
From 1961 To 1970
0
From 1951 To 1960
0
Before 1950
32

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss reported in [Vol. XIV] Bengal Law Reports page 76. That ancient Division Bench judgement for the first time drew a distinction between the...above decisions of Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss reported in [Vol. XIV] Bengal Law Reports page 76 and...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Mar 27, 2012 Cited By: 6 Coram: 1
2

...legal meaning of the expression. 10. The case of Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss 14 B.L.R. 76 lays down that in...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Mar 4, 1892 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
3

...the judgment of Sir Richard Couch in Madhub Chunder Rajcoomar Doss, [(1874) 14 Beng LR 76] (supra), we find that that eminent Judge held that...widened and developed, on entirely new lines. They held that the wider construction put upon Section 27 by Sir Richard Couch in Madhub Chunder v. Raj Coomer Doss, (supra), is plainly...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Feb 2, 1995 Cited By: 10 Coram: 2
4

...the celebrated judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, (1874) 14 Beng LR 76 at pp. 85-86, laying down that whether the restraint was general or partial...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Apr 1, 1998 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
5

...Act and put upon the meaning which they appear plainly to bear. This view of the section was expressed by Sir Richard Couch C.J in celebrated judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss [1874...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: Aug 29, 2016 Cited By: 6 Coram: 1
6

...Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, 1874 (14) Beng. L.R 76. In the said case, Sir Richard Couch held that all Agreements in restraint of trade, whether partial or general...Contract Act, and put upon them the meaning, which they appear plainly to bear.”26. The view in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, 1874 (14) Beng. L.R 76...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Feb 1, 2013 Cited By: 6 Coram: 2
7

...SC 1717, where the Apex Court relying on the celebrated Judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomer Doss, (1874) 14 Beng LR 76 held as under (paras 28 and 29 of...Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss (1874) 14 Beng LR 76 at pp. 85-86, laying down that whether the restraint was general or partial, unqualified or qualified, if it was...words of the Contract Act and put upon them the meaning which they appear plainly to bear. This view of the section was expressed by Sir Richard Couch C.J in the celebrated judgment in Madhub...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: May 31, 2002 Cited By: 12 Coram: 1
8

...310, (v) Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, (1974) Beng. L.R 76, among others, and considered the english law on this point in contrast with section...and developed, on entirely new lines. They held that the wider construction put upon S. 27 by Sir Richard Couch in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, (supra), is plainly justified by...Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss (supra) which have become the locus class classicus were these:“The words ‘restraint from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business do...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Jul 28, 2011 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
9

....This distinction was noticed by this Court in Embee Software (supra). In Percept D' Mark (supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the interpretation given by Couch, C.J in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss reported...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Jun 17, 2015 Cited By: 9 Coram: 1
10

...exercising a lawful profession or trade or business is also void. Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss(1), Brahmoputra Tea Co., Ld. v. E. Scarth(2...termination of his agreement, although the restriction only extended to a distance of forty miles from any of the company's gardens. Couch, C.J and Pontifex, J. held in the case of Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss that...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Aug 23, 1950 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
11

...18 of 21 aforesaid, makes all contracts / agreements in restraint of profession, trade or business void and does not permit of restraint of any degree. As far back as in Madhub Chunder Poramanick Vs. Rajcoomar Doss MANU...


Court: Delhi High Court
Date: May 21, 2021 Cited By: 1 Coram: 2
12

...upon them the meaning which they appear plainly to bear.The test laid down by Sir Richard Couch, C.J. in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, supra, has stood the test of...Couch in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, supra, we find that that eminent Judge held that Section 27 of...Madkub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss [1874] Beng L.R. 76 at pp. 85-86 laying down that whether the restraint was general or partial, unqualified or qualified, if it was in the...


Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Date: Dec 27, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
13

...Couch, C.J. in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, supra, has stood the test of time and has invariably been followed by all the High Courts in India.The agreement in....Reverting to the judgment of Sir Richard Couch in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, supra, we find that that eminent Judge held that...bear. This view of the Section was expressed by Sir Richard Couch C.J. in celebrated judgment in Madkub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, [1874] Beng L.R. 76 at pp. 85-86...


Court: Telangana High Court
Date: Dec 27, 2017 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
14

...upon them the meaning ‘which they appear plainly to bear. This view of the Section was expressed by Sir Richard Couch, C.J. in the celebrated Judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss, 1874...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Sep 3, 2014 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
15

...Sir Richard Couch C.J. in the celebrated judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomar Doss (1874) 14 Beng LR 76 at pp. 85-86, laying down that...., AIR 1980 SC 1717, where the Apex Court relying on the celebrated Judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Rajcoomer Doss, (1874) 14...


Court: Gujarat High Court
Date: Apr 8, 2024 Cited By: 0 Coram: 2
16

...section. In this behalf reliance was placed on a number of decisions of various High Courts commencing from the celebrated decision of Sir Richard Couch, C.J in Madhub Chunder v. Raj Coomar Doss 14 BLR 76...which they appear plainly to bear. This view of the section was expressed by Sir Richard Couch, C.J, in celebrated judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Raj Coomar Doss laying down that whether the restraint...Couch, C.J in Madhub Chunder v. Raj Coomar Doss has stood the test of time and has invariably been followed by all the High Courts in India.32. The agreement in question is...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Mar 21, 1980 Cited By: 168 Coram: 3
17

...distance of forty miles from any of the Company's gardens. Couch, C.J., and Pontifex, J., held in the case of Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Das 14 B.L.R. 76 that the words...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: May 11, 1885 Cited By: 24 Coram: 1
18

....The facts may be stated as follows: On the 20th of June 1868, Grish Chunder Bundopadhya mortgaged the property in dispute to Muddun Mohun Pal. On the 28th of February 1873, Grish Chunder borrowed Rs..., Grish Chunder borrowed another Rs. 3,000, and by a bond hypothecated the property in dispute to secure the payment of the whole Rs. 6,000. This bond cited the previous hypothecation to Muddun Mohun. The...property in dispute was situate partly in the district of Nuddea, and partly in Moorshedabad. On the 5th of March 1874, Muddun Mohun, having previously obtained a mortgage decree against Grish Chunder...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Dec 6, 1877 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
19

...Chunder Shalia v. Madhub Chunder Shaha 21 W.R. 29. In the first of those oases, however, it is not stated what the papers were which the Court held to be inadmissible in evidence, and in the...Judge erred in admitting in evidence certain butwara papers. The learned pleader for the appellant relies on the cases of Drobo Moyee Gosmanee. v. Dhurmo Doss Koondoo 10 W.R. 197 and Gopal...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: May 28, 1909 Cited By: 1
20

...and in receipt of rent from the tenants. The petition further suggested that the servants of Chunder Madhub Ghose had ill-treated the ryots, and that, in the event of their being opposed, there was a...order of the Deputy Magistrate aside, on the ground that the evidence did not prove the likelihood of a breach of the peace.An application was then made on behalf of Chunder Madhub..., J.:— The petitioner, Chunder Madhub Ghose, asks this Court to set aside a proceeding of the Deputy Magistrate of Baghat, dated March 17th, 1879, which he has recorded under the...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Jun 27, 1879 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).