Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
My Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
Calcutta High Court
168
Madras High Court
31
Allahabad High Court
15
Bombay High Court
15
Patna High Court
10
Delhi High Court
7
Kerala High Court
3
Privy Council
3
Supreme Court Of India
3
Andhra Pradesh High Court
2
Madhya Pradesh High Court
2
Gauhati High Court
1
Gujarat High Court
1
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
1
Telangana High Court
1
AAR-GST
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal
0
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India
0
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST
0
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity
0
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange
0
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property
0
Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act
0
Armed Forces Tribunal
0
Authority For Advance Rulings
0
Authority for Advance Rulings, GST
0
Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction
0
Board of Revenue
0
Board of Revenue, Rajasthan
0
CESTAT
0
Central Administrative Tribunal
0
Central Board of Excise & Customs
0
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
0
Central Information Commission
0
Chhattisgarh High Court
0
Collector Appeals
0
Commissioner (Appeals)
0
Company Law Board
0
Competition Appellate Tribunal
0
Competition Commission Of India
0
Consumer Disputes Redressal
0
Copyright Board
0
Cyber Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
0
Debts Recovery Tribunal
0
Deputy Collector
0
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
District Court
0
First Appellate Authority
0
Food Safety Appellate Tribunal Jaipur
0
Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Himachal Pradesh High Court
0
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
0
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India
0
Intellectual Property Appellate Board
0
Jharkhand High Court
0
Karnataka High Court
0
Manipur High Court
0
Meghalaya High Court
0
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission
0
National Anti-Profiteering Authority
0
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
0
National Company Law Tribunal
0
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
National Green Tribunal
0
Orissa High Court
0
Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board
0
Punjab & Haryana High Court
0
RERA
0
Railway Claims Tribunal
0
Rajasthan High Court
0
Right to Information
0
SEBI
0
Securities Appellate Tribunal
0
Settlement Commission
0
Sikkim High Court
0
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
0
Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal
0
Trade Marks Registry
0
Tripura High Court
0
Uttarakhand High Court
0
Filter by Jurisdiction
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Competition Commission of India
Director General of Foreign Trade
FSSAI
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India
Ministry of Civil Aviation
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
National Company Law Tribunal
National Financial Reporting Authority
PFRDA
RBI
SEBI
SIDBI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Supreme Court Of India
Allahabad High Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Bombay High Court
Calcutta High Court
Chhattisgarh High Court
Delhi High Court
Gauhati High Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Jharkhand High Court
Karnataka High Court
Kerala High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Madras High Court
Manipur High Court
Meghalaya High Court
Orissa High Court
Patna High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Rajasthan High Court
Sikkim High Court
Telangana High Court
Tripura High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Judge Filter
Judge name
Bench
Other Filters
Year Filter
To
2021 Onwards
4
From 2011 To 2020
15
From 2001 To 2010
3
From 1991 To 2000
4
From 1981 To 1990
2
From 1971 To 1980
2
From 1961 To 1970
1
From 1951 To 1960
8
Before 1950
220

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).

× Some judgments containing sensitive subject matter may be excluded from public search results. Please sign in to access the complete set of search results.
1

...section. In this behalf reliance was placed on a number of decisions of various High Courts commencing from the celebrated decision of Sir Richard Couch, C.J in Madhub Chunder v. Raj Coomar Doss 14 BLR 76...in Madhub Chunder case 14 BLR 76 (1874), SC 22 WR 370 (1874) has not been so far considered by this Court and it required to be examined and considered by this Court especially in view of certain...which they appear plainly to bear. This view of the section was expressed by Sir Richard Couch, C.J, in celebrated judgment in Madhub Chunder v. Raj Coomar Doss laying down that whether the restraint...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Mar 21, 1980 Cited By: 168 Coram: 3
2

...for them, procured the delivery from Madhub Chunder Sircar, in a manner which he knew was not authorized by the plaintiffs, without the order of the firm, which it is found was not given, and which...he knew ought to have been given. Having so obtained the goods, he makes a payment to Madhub Chunder Sircar, knowing that he was not the person who ought, according to the usage of the plaintiffs...recover the money. It is only necessary to answer the first question which has been put to us, that the payments made to Madhub Chunder Sircar were not payments to the plaintiffs.The...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Jan 20, 1874 Cited By: 0 Coram: 4
3

...much importance. Our only difficulty arose from the decision of Sir E. Couch in Ankur Chunder Roy Chowdhry v. Madhub Chunder Ghose 21 W.R. 1. When that case, however, is examined, it...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Jan 11, 1878 Cited By: 3 Coram: 1
4

...relies as the basis of his claim : (1) that he was selected as the chela or disciple of Madhub Chunder Giri the deceased mohant; (2) that the ceremony of initiation had been duly performed by which he...succeeded Madhub Chunder Giri as mohant. The presents applicant claims as a chela, not of the original plaintiff, but of his predecessor, and this claim in reality puts him in opposition to the original...circumstances of the case show that it is important that delay should, if possible, be avoided. 2. The applicant is one Keshub Chunder Giri, who asks that his name may be entered in the...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Apr 5, 1894 Cited By: 7 Coram: 1
5

...Chunder Roy v. Madhub Chunder Ghose 21 Calc. W.R. Civ. Rul., 1. My reasons for this opinion are those stated in Sheikh Akbar v...Evidence Act, be given to prove the terms of the contract between the parties, of which the note was intended to be the evidence-Ankur Chunder Roy v. Madhub Chunder Ghose 21 Calc. W.R. Civ..., after the rejection of the promissory note, are the admissions in the written statement only. So that the case is similar to that of Ankur Chunder v. Madhub 21 Calc. W.R. Civ. Rul., 1...


Court: Bombay High Court
Date: Feb 6, 1888 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1
6

...Appellate Authority which was the final tribunal of fact. “For weighing evidence and drawing inferences from it”, said Birch, J. in R. v. Madhub Chunder (1873) 21 WR Cr 13 “there can be no canon. Each...


Court: Supreme Court Of India
Date: Apr 3, 1974 Cited By: 711 Coram: 2
7

...against Surnomoyi Debya, widow of the late Madhub Chunder Sanyal, who now represents the estate which was formerly under the management of the Court of Wards, and upon the establishment for the management...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Jun 2, 1885 Cited By: 3 Coram: 1
8

...unreported case, Khethermomey Dossee v. Madhub Chunder Ghose (No. 726 of 1878, unreported), beard on the 20th June 1878 by Markby and Prinsep, JJ., where the circumstances were similar to...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Jun 23, 1881 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
9

...the Judge of the lower Court: Ankur Chunder Boy Chowdhry v. Madhub Chunder Ghose (21 W. R., 1), and Prossunno Nath Lahiree v. Tripoora Soonduree Dabee (24 W. R., 88...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: May 31, 1881 Cited By: 49 Coram: 1
10

...Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss reported in [Vol. XIV] Bengal Law Reports page 76. That ancient Division Bench judgement for the first time drew a distinction between the...above decisions of Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss reported in [Vol. XIV] Bengal Law Reports page 76 and...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Mar 27, 2012 Cited By: 6 Coram: 1
11

...distance of forty miles from any of the Company's gardens. Couch, C.J., and Pontifex, J., held in the case of Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Das 14 B.L.R. 76 that the words...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: May 11, 1885 Cited By: 24 Coram: 1
12

.... Jammu (sic) (12 Mad. 451),3 In the matter of Ramasamy Chetty (27 Mad. 510)4 and In the matter of Madhub Chunder Mazumdar (16 Cal. 121).5 Therefore, I.L.R (1942) Mad. 414 and A.I.R 1943 Bom...


Court: Patna High Court
Date: Oct 19, 1944 Cited By: 4 Coram: 2
13

..., and certain rulings have been cited before us, both for and against this contention, namely, the rulings in the cases of Gopal Chunder Shaha v. Madhub Chunder Shaha.... 543 and Taru Patur v. Abinash Chunder Butt (1878) I.L.R. 4 Cal. 79. 5. The only rulings which we think are applicable are Govindrao...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Apr 29, 1897 Cited By: 3 Coram: 1
14

...consequence of the decision in Madhub Chunder Mozumdar v. Novodeep Chunder Pundit I.L.R. 16 Cal. 121. 2. Section 487 of...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Jul 15, 1889 Cited By: 2 Coram: 1
15

...Chunder Shalia v. Madhub Chunder Shaha 21 W.R. 29. In the first of those oases, however, it is not stated what the papers were which the Court held to be inadmissible in evidence, and in the...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: May 28, 1909 Cited By: 1
16

...legal meaning of the expression. 10. The case of Madhub Chunder Poramanick v. Rajcoomar Doss 14 B.L.R. 76 lays down that in...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Mar 4, 1892 Cited By: 1 Coram: 1
17

...as to what the nature of the evidence necessary to prove rent receipts should be. On the other hand, it has been held in the cases of Raj Mahomed v. Banoo Rasmah 12 W. E. 34 and Madhub...Chunder Chowdhry v. Promotho Nath Roy 20 W. R. 264 that where the genuineness of a rent receipt is sworn to by the tenant by whom the rent has been paid, that is legally sufficient to prove the...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: Dec 7, 1896 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
18

...1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff, appellant, who claims to be the nearest reversionary heir to one Madhub Chunder Sanyal, after the death of Madhub Chunder Sanyal's...question are inoperative in affecting the reversionary interest of the plaintiff, as regards the moiety of the estate of the late Madhub Chunder Sanyal that is in possession of the defendant No. 1, with...the time of his succession. This view, which is quite in accordance with reason, is also amply supported by the authority of decided cases. See Shama Soonduree v. Shurut Chunder Butt 8 W.R...


Court: Calcutta High Court
Date: May 23, 1894 Cited By: 10 Coram: 1
19

...; Tiluck Chand v. Soudamini Dasi I.L.R. 4 Cal. 566; Brojendro Coomar Roy v. Madhub Chunder Ghose I.L.R. 8 Cal...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Mar 6, 1894 Cited By: 3
20

...Evidence Act. The possible hardship to the lender was noted by Sir Richard Couch, as early as 1873 in Ankur Chunder Roy Chowdhry v. Madhub Chunder Ghose (1873) 21 W.R...has also referred to the judgment of the Full Bench of the Rangoon High Court. In Calcutta, the stricter rule was laid down in Ankur Chunder Roy Chozvdhry v. Madhub Chunder Ghose...Section 35 of the Stamp Act; see also Ankur Chunder Roy Chowdhry v. Madhub Chunder Gkose (1873) 21 W.R. 1. 24. It...


Court: Madras High Court
Date: Feb 10, 1938 Cited By: 33 Coram: 5

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

There are no alerts added for the related case. Please create new alert(s).