Practice Areas
Indirect Tax Cases
Direct Tax Cases
Intellectual Property
All Practice Areas
All Courts
Filter by Jurisdiction
All Courts
SC & All High Courts
All Tribunals
+ Bombay High Court82
+ Delhi High Court22
+ Madras High Court15
+ Calcutta High Court12
+ Supreme Court Of India9
+ Gujarat High Court8
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court8
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court5
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court5
+ Rajasthan High Court5
+ Securities Appellate Tribunal5
+ Chhattisgarh High Court4
+ Kerala High Court3
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court3
+ Orissa High Court2
+ Debts Recovery Tribunal1
+ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Gauhati High Court1
+ Karnataka High Court1
+ National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1
+ Patna High Court1
+ SEBI1
+ Sikkim High Court1
+ State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1
+ Telangana High Court1
+ AAR-GST0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Appellate Tribunal0
+ Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India0
+ Allahabad High Court0
+ Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, GST0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Electricity0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange0
+ Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property0
+ Appellate Tribunal- Prevention Of Money Laundering Act0
+ Armed Forces Tribunal0
+ Authority For Advance Rulings0
+ Authority for Advance Rulings, GST0
+ Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction0
+ Board of Revenue0
+ Board of Revenue, Rajasthan0
+ CESTAT0
+ Central Administrative Tribunal0
+ Central Board of Excise & Customs0
+ Central Electricity Regulatory Commission0
+ Central Information Commission0
+ Collector Appeals0
+ Commissioner (Appeals)0
+ Company Law Board0
+ Competition Appellate Tribunal0
+ Competition Commission Of India0
+ Consumer Disputes Redressal0
+ Copyright Board0
+ Cyber Appellate Tribunal0
+ Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal0
+ Deputy Collector0
+ District Court0
+ First Appellate Authority0
+ Income Tax Appellate Tribunal0
+ Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India0
+ Intellectual Property Appellate Board0
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court0
+ Jharkhand High Court0
+ Manipur High Court0
+ Meghalaya High Court0
+ Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission0
+ National Anti-Profiteering Authority0
+ National Company Law Tribunal0
+ National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission0
+ National Green Tribunal0
+ Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board0
+ Privy Council0
+ RERA0
+ Railway Claims Tribunal0
+ Right to Information0
+ Settlement Commission0
+ Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal0
+ Trade Marks Registry0
+ Tripura High Court0
+ Uttarakhand High Court0
Apply Filter
Court Filter
+ RBI
+ SEBI
+ Andhra Pradesh
+ Arunachal Pradesh
+ Assam
+ Bihar
+ Chandigarh
+ Chhattisgarh
+ Delhi
+ Goa
+ Gujarat
+ Haryana
+ Himachal Pradesh
+ Jharkhand
+ Karnataka
+ Kerala
+ Madhya Pradesh
+ Maharashtra
+ Manipur
+ Meghalaya
+ Mizoram
+ Nagaland
+ Odisha
+ Punjab
+ Rajasthan
+ Sikkim
+ Tamil Nadu
+ Telangana
+ Tripura
+ Uttarakhand
+ Uttar Pradesh
+ West Bengal
+ Supreme Court Of India
+ Allahabad High Court
+ Andhra Pradesh High Court
+ Bombay High Court
+ Calcutta High Court
+ Chhattisgarh High Court
+ Delhi High Court
+ Gauhati High Court
+ Himachal Pradesh High Court
+ Jammu and Kashmir High Court
+ Jharkhand High Court
+ Karnataka High Court
+ Kerala High Court
+ Madhya Pradesh High Court
+ Madras High Court
+ Manipur High Court
+ Meghalaya High Court
+ Orissa High Court
+ Patna High Court
+ Punjab & Haryana High Court
+ Rajasthan High Court
+ Sikkim High Court
+ Telangana High Court
+ Tripura High Court
+ Uttarakhand High Court
Apply Filter
Apply Filter
Judge Filter
Filter by Judge (Beta)
Judge Name
Bench
Other Filters
To
2021 Onwards68
From 2011 To 202058
From 2001 To 201011
From 1991 To 200011
From 1981 To 199014
From 1971 To 19806
From 1961 To 197010
From 1951 To 19606
Before 19502

Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.

...of the document was Abreo”.This view in fact confirms the view taken by Bhagwati J., as he then was, in Madholal Sindhu v...

...Madholal Sindhu v. The Asian Assurance Co. Ltd.,2 N.H Bhagwati, J., held that it was futile to merely prove the signature or the handwriting of the person who had...cases of Bishwanath Rai, Madholal Sindhu and Mr. D indicate, this is generally done by calling the author of the document.13. It will have been noticed that the production of certified...Mr. S.3 a Division Bench of this Court approved the decision in Madholal Sindhu's case and held that the evidence of the contents of a document was hearsay evidence unless the writer thereof was...

...Madholal Sindhu v. Official Assignee of Bombay AIR 1950 FC 21, AIR 1947 Bom...

...in Sri Raja Kakarklhpudi Venkata Sudarsana Sundara Narasayamma Garu (supra). In Official Assignee Of Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu AIR 1947...are not maintainable.51. The decision in Madholal Sindhu (supra) was carried in appeal to the Federal Court, wherein the court by majority overruled the decision of the...Andhra Pradesh had agreed with the opinion expressed by Chagla J. in Madholal Sindhu (supra), that in cases of unauthorized sale by the pawnee, the pawnor could seek to file a suit for redemption by...

...this inferential process cannot be denied.”11. The other case cited is Madholal Sindhu v...

...Asian Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Madholal Sindhu & Others, AIR 1950 Bom 378, in support of their respective submissions. 5...

...Official Assignee Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu, AIR 1947 Bom 217 at p. 235 (E)).8. Evidently, an unnecessary issue the decision of which...

...goods do not apply to shares in India.”29. Again in Madholal Sindhu of Bombay v. Official Assignee...

...Madholal Sindhu v. Asian Assu. Co. Ltd. . 1945 56 Bom. L.R 147. In that case, Bhagwati J. held that a document could not be admitted in evidence without...of the decision of Bhagwati, J. in the case of Madholal Sindhu v. Asian Assu. Co. Ltd. cited above and held as follows (at pp. 232–233):“…To conclude this part of the...statements contained in the document. The view taken with regard to admissibility of documentary evidence in Madholal Sindhu's case as well as in the case of In the matter of Mr. D. and Mr. S., is...

...) (Punjab and Haryana) 483 as well as the finding of the Bombay High Court in the Asian Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Madholal Sindhu and others...

...Asian Assurance Go. Ltd. v. Madholal Sindhu, (2), and Trinath Parida v. Sobha Jhalaini, (3...

...root of the plaintiff's case and cannot be said to be a mere formal defect, (see AIR 1950 Bom 378. (Asian Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Madholal...Sindhu and AIR 1956 Bom 632, (Tarachand Bapuchand v. G.A Bag wan). In the circumstances, the application filed under...

...record by the parties.19. In Madholal Sindhu v. Official Assignee of Bombay AIR...

...Madholal Sindhu of Bombay v. Official Assignee of Bombay AIR 1950 FC 21, 1949 FCR 441 it was held thus:‘A sale according to...

...Official Assignee Of Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu, ILR 1948 (2) Bom 1. The learned Chief Justice after setting out the...

...not have allowed the said application. The learned counsel relies on the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of The Asian Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Madholal Sindhu and others...

...AIR 1950 Bom. 378 in the case of Asian Assurance Co. Ltd. V/s. Madholal Sindhu. Considering...

...Commissioner for Greater Bombay, AIR 1982 BOMBAY 387 which also made reference to the decision of this Court in Madholal Sindhu v. Asian...

...Official Assignee, Bombay v. Madholal Sindhu, AIR 1947 Bom 217, in which this court held that...whether the view taken by the judgment holds the field since the judgment has been reversed by the Federal Court in Madholal Sindhu v...

...Madholal Sindhu (supra), which has been followed in other cases, including the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Nabha Investment (supra). If this principle is applied to...do hold that the dictum in Madholal Sindhu (supra) and Nabha Investment (supra), that the pawnor has a right to redemption against third parties when the...